Lovett lodges notice of grievance with club
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
I cant believe the crap on here sometimes. To suggest racism is one of the reasons we on here believe Al might be guilty is utter crap. maybe we should look at other reasons he might be guilty like how quickly he was suspended, the fact he might be charged, previous form and so. Pretty sure 99% of posters on here arent saying he might be guilty because he is aboriginal. An insult IMO.
Your opinion Plugger and you are welcome to express it.plugger66 wrote:I cant believe the crap on here sometimes. To suggest racism is one of the reasons we on here believe Al might be guilty is utter crap. maybe we should look at other reasons he might be guilty like how quickly he was suspended, the fact he might be charged, previous form and so. Pretty sure 99% of posters on here arent saying he might be guilty because he is aboriginal. An insult IMO.
My point is that you can't discount it as a factor in his treatment, especially when you compare it to the treatment of Milne and Montagna.
So what is your contention about Milne & Montagna? Did they get a red carpet ride?GrumpyOne wrote:Your opinion Plugger and you are welcome to express it.plugger66 wrote:I cant believe the crap on here sometimes. To suggest racism is one of the reasons we on here believe Al might be guilty is utter crap. maybe we should look at other reasons he might be guilty like how quickly he was suspended, the fact he might be charged, previous form and so. Pretty sure 99% of posters on here arent saying he might be guilty because he is aboriginal. An insult IMO.
My point is that you can't discount it as a factor in his treatment, especially when you compare it to the treatment of Milne and Montagna.
Poster formerly known as SENsaintsational. More wisdom. More knowledge. Less name.
Completely different case. 2 saints players through and through. AL wasnt even at the club as long as the Irish. A witness or 2 to the AL case. No witnesses to the other case apart from the girls. Different times. Different committee.GrumpyOne wrote:Your opinion Plugger and you are welcome to express it.plugger66 wrote:I cant believe the crap on here sometimes. To suggest racism is one of the reasons we on here believe Al might be guilty is utter crap. maybe we should look at other reasons he might be guilty like how quickly he was suspended, the fact he might be charged, previous form and so. Pretty sure 99% of posters on here arent saying he might be guilty because he is aboriginal. An insult IMO.
My point is that you can't discount it as a factor in his treatment, especially when you compare it to the treatment of Milne and Montagna.
- degruch
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8948
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
- Location: Croydonia
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
I don't think the club's actions are being questioned here, it's people's attitudes towards the player in question. I'm not saying we should support him because no-one's charged him yet, I am saying that I'm surprised at a lot of the tough talking 'guilty as hell' talk on here. I'm not sure where it's coming from, as it seems this was far from the case with MM. Are we dealing with a change in attitudes? If he's found innocent, what happens?? Red faces and retractions??? Or are people gonna go to the match to vent????GrumpyOne wrote:Your opinion Plugger and you are welcome to express it.plugger66 wrote:I cant believe the crap on here sometimes. To suggest racism is one of the reasons we on here believe Al might be guilty is utter crap. maybe we should look at other reasons he might be guilty like how quickly he was suspended, the fact he might be charged, previous form and so. Pretty sure 99% of posters on here arent saying he might be guilty because he is aboriginal. An insult IMO.
My point is that you can't discount it as a factor in his treatment, especially when you compare it to the treatment of Milne and Montagna.
- borderbarry
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6676
- Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
- Location: Wodonga
Lovett's colour has nothing to do with why he was suspended by the club. Its his stupid, selfish behaviour that is the reason.
What kind of person behaves like he has after being given a second chance by a club. He should have been behaving like an angel, doing whatever he could to keep his nose clean. Instead he gets in trouble with the law twice before he even plays a single game.
This guy has made a fool out the club, the coach, the players. He deserves no loyalty from us at all.
What kind of person behaves like he has after being given a second chance by a club. He should have been behaving like an angel, doing whatever he could to keep his nose clean. Instead he gets in trouble with the law twice before he even plays a single game.
This guy has made a fool out the club, the coach, the players. He deserves no loyalty from us at all.
Were they suspended indefinately? Were they banned from the club?SENsaintsational wrote:So what is your contention about Milne & Montagna? Did they get a red carpet ride?GrumpyOne wrote:Your opinion Plugger and you are welcome to express it.plugger66 wrote:I cant believe the crap on here sometimes. To suggest racism is one of the reasons we on here believe Al might be guilty is utter crap. maybe we should look at other reasons he might be guilty like how quickly he was suspended, the fact he might be charged, previous form and so. Pretty sure 99% of posters on here arent saying he might be guilty because he is aboriginal. An insult IMO.
My point is that you can't discount it as a factor in his treatment, especially when you compare it to the treatment of Milne and Montagna.
I think not.
Lovett's signature is on the line as a Saints player, should be treated the same as any other.
Which is why I tend to believe stinger's official's version. This is more serious an issue 'internally'. The code is broken. Allegedly.GrumpyOne wrote:Were they suspended indefinately? Were they banned from the club?SENsaintsational wrote:So what is your contention about Milne & Montagna? Did they get a red carpet ride?GrumpyOne wrote:Your opinion Plugger and you are welcome to express it.plugger66 wrote:I cant believe the crap on here sometimes. To suggest racism is one of the reasons we on here believe Al might be guilty is utter crap. maybe we should look at other reasons he might be guilty like how quickly he was suspended, the fact he might be charged, previous form and so. Pretty sure 99% of posters on here arent saying he might be guilty because he is aboriginal. An insult IMO.
My point is that you can't discount it as a factor in his treatment, especially when you compare it to the treatment of Milne and Montagna.
I think not.
Lovett's signature is on the line as a Saints player, should be treated the same as any other.
Poster formerly known as SENsaintsational. More wisdom. More knowledge. Less name.
- markp
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 15583
- Joined: Mon 26 Mar 2007 4:22pm
- Has thanked: 63 times
- Been thanked: 82 times
Firstly, I think if you are at the centre of so much grief before you even play a practise match, then you are bound to be seriously under the pump....GrumpyOne wrote:Were they suspended indefinately? Were they banned from the club?SENsaintsational wrote:So what is your contention about Milne & Montagna? Did they get a red carpet ride?GrumpyOne wrote:Your opinion Plugger and you are welcome to express it.plugger66 wrote:I cant believe the crap on here sometimes. To suggest racism is one of the reasons we on here believe Al might be guilty is utter crap. maybe we should look at other reasons he might be guilty like how quickly he was suspended, the fact he might be charged, previous form and so. Pretty sure 99% of posters on here arent saying he might be guilty because he is aboriginal. An insult IMO.
My point is that you can't discount it as a factor in his treatment, especially when you compare it to the treatment of Milne and Montagna.
I think not.
Lovett's signature is on the line as a Saints player, should be treated the same as any other.
Secondly, perhaps the difference between the club's response then and this now is based on what they know.
Last edited by markp on Mon 08 Feb 2010 4:11pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Stinger theory does make sense, but gives rise to concernes as to how far the players should be allowed to determine the Club's actions.SENsaintsational wrote:Which is why I tend to believe stinger's official's version. This is more serious an issue 'internally'. The code is broken. Allegedly.GrumpyOne wrote:Were they suspended indefinately? Were they banned from the club?SENsaintsational wrote:So what is your contention about Milne & Montagna? Did they get a red carpet ride?GrumpyOne wrote:Your opinion Plugger and you are welcome to express it.plugger66 wrote:I cant believe the crap on here sometimes. To suggest racism is one of the reasons we on here believe Al might be guilty is utter crap. maybe we should look at other reasons he might be guilty like how quickly he was suspended, the fact he might be charged, previous form and so. Pretty sure 99% of posters on here arent saying he might be guilty because he is aboriginal. An insult IMO.
My point is that you can't discount it as a factor in his treatment, especially when you compare it to the treatment of Milne and Montagna.
I think not.
Lovett's signature is on the line as a Saints player, should be treated the same as any other.
- degruch
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8948
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
- Location: Croydonia
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
It could also be based on the fact that they did seemingly very little previously, which looked tantamount to support two players during a criminal investigation - not a good look for a professional sporting club.markp wrote:Firstly, I think if you are at the centre of so much grief before you even play a practise match, then you are bound to be seriously under the pump....GrumpyOne wrote:Were they suspended indefinately? Were they banned from the club?SENsaintsational wrote:So what is your contention about Milne & Montagna? Did they get a red carpet ride?GrumpyOne wrote:Your opinion Plugger and you are welcome to express it.plugger66 wrote:I cant believe the crap on here sometimes. To suggest racism is one of the reasons we on here believe Al might be guilty is utter crap. maybe we should look at other reasons he might be guilty like how quickly he was suspended, the fact he might be charged, previous form and so. Pretty sure 99% of posters on here arent saying he might be guilty because he is aboriginal. An insult IMO.
My point is that you can't discount it as a factor in his treatment, especially when you compare it to the treatment of Milne and Montagna.
I think not.
Lovett's signature is on the line as a Saints player, should be treated the same as any other.
Secondly, perhaps the difference between the club's response then and this now is based on what they know.
What they did differently with M&M was accept the players' version of what occurred, and abide by the rule of law that says innocent until proven guilty.degruch wrote: It could also be based on the fact that they did seemingly very little previously, which looked tantamount to support two players during a criminal investigation - not a good look for a professional sporting club.
I am not trying to defend Lovett here; if he is found guilty I will take delight in tipping the biggest load of fertilizer I can find on his head; but something in this whole matter is not as it seems, and it is not Andrew Lovett.
- Eastern
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14357
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
- Location: 3132
- Been thanked: 1 time
IIRC the account given by one of the girls was similar to that of M&M. The other girl (the alleged aggreived one) was the one with a different story !!plugger66 wrote:Completely different case. 2 saints players through and through. AL wasnt even at the club as long as the Irish. A witness or 2 to the AL case. No witnesses to the other case apart from the girls. Different times. Different committee.GrumpyOne wrote:Your opinion Plugger and you are welcome to express it.plugger66 wrote:I cant believe the crap on here sometimes. To suggest racism is one of the reasons we on here believe Al might be guilty is utter crap. maybe we should look at other reasons he might be guilty like how quickly he was suspended, the fact he might be charged, previous form and so. Pretty sure 99% of posters on here arent saying he might be guilty because he is aboriginal. An insult IMO.
My point is that you can't discount it as a factor in his treatment, especially when you compare it to the treatment of Milne and Montagna.
Last edited by Eastern on Mon 08 Feb 2010 4:27pm, edited 1 time in total.
NEW scarf signature (hopefully with correct spelling) will be here as soon as it arrives !!
- degruch
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8948
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
- Location: Croydonia
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
Who's to say AL's version of events hasn't been accepted by the club? They're doing the right thing in placing him on ice regardless, and letting the police to their job, whilst remaining impartial. Which is what everyone should do IMO...but people have their opinions. I have just been intrigued by those who are taking a lynch mob attitude about this case, because the club has handled it differently, as if it proves he is guilty. To me, they're remaining impartial.GrumpyOne wrote:What they did differently with M&M was accept the players' version of what occurred, and abide by the rule of law that says innocent until proven guilty.degruch wrote: It could also be based on the fact that they did seemingly very little previously, which looked tantamount to support two players during a criminal investigation - not a good look for a professional sporting club.
I am not trying to defend Lovett here; if he is found guilty I will take delight in tipping the biggest load of fertilizer I can find on his head; but something in this whole matter is not as it seems, and it is not Andrew Lovett.
But dont racists hate wogs as well? Therefore Joey would have been for the highjump.GrumpyOne wrote: I am not trying to defend Lovett here; if he is found guilty I will take delight in tipping the biggest load of fertilizer I can find on his head; but something in this whole matter is not as it seems, and it is not Andrew Lovett.
Or maybe Ross Lyon is just racist. Mean he did move X on. He got choo choo delisted (Raph is a problem and a whole in the argument, and so is drafting Lovett in the first place, and the fact that Jimmy Gwilt is still at the club, but hey lets not let a chance to play the race card go by).
Yup I am convinced, RL and the Board are racist toward Lovett.
mods can this idiotic thread be locked?
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
Yes the girls are witnesses but my point was that Grammy could have been an impartial witness this time. No one like that in the other case. This I believe played a huge part in what the club have done with AL compared to MM.Eastern wrote:IIRC the account given by one of the girls was similar to that of M&M. The other girl (the alleged aggreived one) was the one with a different story !!plugger66 wrote:Completely different case. 2 saints players through and through. AL wasnt even at the club as long as the Irish. A witness or 2 to the AL case. No witnesses to the other case apart from the girls. Different times. Different committee.GrumpyOne wrote:Your opinion Plugger and you are welcome to express it.plugger66 wrote:I cant believe the crap on here sometimes. To suggest racism is one of the reasons we on here believe Al might be guilty is utter crap. maybe we should look at other reasons he might be guilty like how quickly he was suspended, the fact he might be charged, previous form and so. Pretty sure 99% of posters on here arent saying he might be guilty because he is aboriginal. An insult IMO.
My point is that you can't discount it as a factor in his treatment, especially when you compare it to the treatment of Milne and Montagna.
Awwww cmon Joffa...... Have you not read any of my posts?joffaboy wrote:But dont racists hate wogs as well? Therefore Joey would have been for the highjump.GrumpyOne wrote: I am not trying to defend Lovett here; if he is found guilty I will take delight in tipping the biggest load of fertilizer I can find on his head; but something in this whole matter is not as it seems, and it is not Andrew Lovett.
Or maybe Ross Lyon is just racist. Mean he did move X on. He got choo choo delisted (Raph is a problem and a whole in the argument, and so is drafting Lovett in the first place, and the fact that Jimmy Gwilt is still at the club, but hey lets not let a chance to play the race card go by).
Yup I am convinced, RL and the Board are racist toward Lovett.
mods can this idiotic thread be locked?
Hate to spoil your enjoyment, but you seem to have taken an inch and extended it to a light year.
Somewhat of a hair-trigger reaction there old chap.
- degruch
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8948
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
- Location: Croydonia
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
Probably because everyone from the fence-sitters to the lynch mob wish there was no reason for it to exist.GrumpyOne wrote:One thing in its favour..... over three pages of vigorous debate and no-ones called anyone else a Dhead or a Fwit.bigred wrote:Yup. Please.mods can this idiotic thread be locked
Besides, fwit is a pretty lame insult, f***wit.