Joffaboy, don't personalise this as usual.joffaboy wrote:Too bad. From a reliable source.rodgerfox wrote: Sorry, but I have to comment on this.
I simply can't accept this.
Who cares what you think.rodgerfox wrote:Are you seriously, with a straight face, saying that the St Kilda Football Club's match committee (or whatever they call themselves) selected a guy to only play half a game?
Are you for real?
Off you go - oh are you are member though?rodgerfox wrote:Honestly, and I do mean this, if this happened, the members of the club should march down to the joint and demand that heads roll.
Is it. I think your reaction to a bloke who only played 50% of most games this year the laughable thing.rodgerfox wrote:If that is what happened, that is the most unbelievable decision ever made.
So unbelievable that it is simply laughable.
Ohhh good for another 5 or so pages hey Rodge???
Really mate, give the feigned outrate a rest. The routine is getting a bit old hat.
Surely you think you have found a gold nugget.rodgerfox wrote:Surely you're taking the piiss?
Ho hum Rodge the feigned outraged member (or is he?) i s going to mount a popular revolt because a player only got 50% of game time
lol - you really crack me up Rodge
We all see right through you RF.
We will have to start calling you O'Briens
Answer this...
As a member, are you honestly Ok with the decision to knowingly take only 21.5 men into a Grand Final?
Especially considering we were overrun in the last 10 minutes?
Honestly, do you think this decision does not require significant accountability for those responsible?
I'm honestly flabbergasted that you're saying this was a consicious decision by the club to select a player for the GF and plan to only play him during the first half.
Unbelievable.