I'm not really getting it gaz, what was the original context?gazrat wrote:it'll get funnier mr foxAt least, he didn't do an abductor....
by the 23rd time its posted , you'll be weeing yourself
i was holding on , but i only made it to the 19th
Lovett interviewed by Police
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Rodg got "adductor" mixed up with "abductor"Richter wrote:I'm not really getting it gaz, what was the original context?gazrat wrote:it'll get funnier mr foxAt least, he didn't do an abductor....
by the 23rd time its posted , you'll be weeing yourself
i was holding on , but i only made it to the 19th
Much as Mr Fox's posts do drive me to distraction often, I reckon this lil mistake has been done to death and beyond
We should all be so literate..in the grand list of great spelling mistakes / typos..this aint one of em
Enough eh?
THE BUBBLE HAS BURST
2011 player sponsor
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11242
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 126 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
St Fidelius wrote:Anyone thought you are just full of it??Bernard Shakey wrote:Why would they support him? They only just met him. Anyone thought of that?ausfatcat wrote:santazzi wrote: Mmmm... there are so many hard to understand inconsistencies...Why have they not supprted him indeed.....
Or more likely different coaching styles. And it doesn't mean they aren't supporting him he hasn't been sacked has he?
Your remarks to my posts were an insult and to me it really shows you know nothing....
NOTHING AT ALL!!!
A Tip...
Get a life, before you start to miss quote people :idea:
I have never had a discussion with anyone else, that really has no idea on matters than yourself, and by going your input in the general forum....
My impression has not changed since your last PM to me, with respect to this same thread @ around page 4.....
How about you live and learn at little before you come on here and miss quote posters and get things wrong :idea:
in other words .....
GET A CLUE!!!! :idea: :idea: :idea: :idea:
What the........
Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
- St Fidelius
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10492
- Joined: Sun 01 Aug 2004 10:30am
I should have said the same to your last PM...Bernard Shakey wrote:
What the........
You really don't have a clue......
AGAIN....
VERY HARD TO PROVE!
and that is all I ever stated....
I never stated that the alleged victim was lying, again it's very hard to prove...
Now, get a grip on reality
and stop miss quoting me.....
and you remark that I don't care about the victims or alleged victims via PM is way off the mark, and yet another insult...
They just keep piling up with you inability to understand life and police and law procedures....
But hey, continue on by all means, only if you stop miss quoting me.
I HAVE NEVER SAID THAT LOVETT IS INNOCENT OR THAT THE ALLEGED VICTIM IS LYING ..........
DOSE THAT SINK IN
Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
A harsh but probably justifiable response.St Fidelius wrote:I should have said the same to your last PM...Bernard Shakey wrote:
What the........
You really don't have a clue......
AGAIN....
VERY HARD TO PROVE!
and that is all I ever stated....
I never stated that the alleged victim was lying, again it's very hard to prove...
Now, get a grip on reality
and stop miss quoting me.....
and you remark that I don't care about the victims or alleged victims via PM is way off the mark, and yet another insult...
They just keep piling up with you inability to understand life and police and law procedures....
But hey, continue on by all means, only if you stop miss quoting me.
I HAVE NEVER SAID THAT LOVETT IS INNOCENT OR THAT THE ALLEGED VICTIM IS LYING ..........
DOSE THAT SINK IN
This is St Fids territory.
In 40 - 50 pages of various Lovett threads his message has been consistant.
Very hard to prove.
Our system of justice assumes innocence until proven guilty. I would not want it any other way.
If your own experiences lead you to think that some other system is better, so be it.
Don't shoot the messenger.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6090
- Joined: Fri 11 Mar 2005 9:18pm
"Birdie num nums" still makes me laugh 40 years later.saint66au wrote:Rodg got "adductor" mixed up with "abductor"Richter wrote:I'm not really getting it gaz, what was the original context?gazrat wrote:it'll get funnier mr foxAt least, he didn't do an abductor....
by the 23rd time its posted , you'll be weeing yourself
i was holding on , but i only made it to the 19th
Much as Mr Fox's posts do drive me to distraction often, I reckon this lil mistake has been done to death and beyond
We should all be so literate..in the grand list of great spelling mistakes / typos..this aint one of em
Enough eh?
I respectfully disagree with you saint66au because IMHO when someone professes to be an expert and then makes a fundamental mistake of calling an adductor an abductor without re-editing that post or conceding their error, I think it is a blinder of a mistake, especially when that line is used to criticise our coach and fitness staff who got us within 12 points of our 2nd premiership in over 100 years.
Ok, despite the lack of a personal apology from him for his unwarranted personal attack on me and no best wishes on the health front, I will show some dignity and try to cut back. Shhheeesh!
Last edited by Milan Faletic on Thu 07 Jan 2010 5:10pm, edited 2 times in total.
- barks4eva
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:39pm
- Has thanked: 190 times
- Been thanked: 92 times
I reckon a few dingbats on here have been "adducted" by aliens who upon arrival started experimenting on cows before moving on to sheep and in that process, not surprisingly some GT goofballs ended up in the mix!
Word is that the aliens were here looking for signs of intelligent lifeforms, they have since departed.
Word is that the aliens were here looking for signs of intelligent lifeforms, they have since departed.
DO THE MATHS AND THE SQUARES ARE ALL ROOTED.
- Milton66
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3521
- Joined: Tue 19 May 2009 9:53pm
- Location: None of your goddam business
Agree. It explains why you're still here.barks4eva wrote:I reckon a few dingbats on here have been "adducted" by aliens who upon arrival started experimenting on cows before moving on to sheep and in that process, not surprisingly some GT goofballs ended up in the mix!
Word is that the aliens were here looking for signs of intelligent lifeforms, they have since departed.
Hotel De Los Muertos: Your room is ready... Care to step inside?
Whether it is hard to prove or not has little if anything to do with the decision the Saints will make. We arent going to wait for the court case to make a decision. That will be made very quickly. The court case will be months away.GrumpyOne wrote:A harsh but probably justifiable response.St Fidelius wrote:I should have said the same to your last PM...Bernard Shakey wrote:
What the........
You really don't have a clue.....
AGAIN....
VERY HARD TO PROVE!
and that is all I ever stated....
I never stated that the alleged victim was lying, again it's very hard to prove...
Now, get a grip on reality
and stop miss quoting me.....
and you remark that I don't care about the victims or alleged victims via PM is way off the mark, and yet another insult...
They just keep piling up with you inability to understand life and police and law procedures....
But hey, continue on by all means, only if you stop miss quoting me.
I HAVE NEVER SAID THAT LOVETT IS INNOCENT OR THAT THE ALLEGED VICTIM IS LYING ..........
DOSE THAT SINK IN
This is St Fids territory.
In 40 - 50 pages of various Lovett threads his message has been consistant.
Very hard to prove.
Our system of justice assumes innocence until proven guilty. I would not want it any other way.
If your own experiences lead you to think that some other system is better, so be it.
Don't shoot the messenger.
- St Fidelius
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10492
- Joined: Sun 01 Aug 2004 10:30am
Agreed that the Saints will make their own decision, even though there might not even be a court case.plugger66 wrote:
Whether it is hard to prove or not has little if anything to do with the decision the Saints will make. We arent going to wait for the court case to make a decision. That will be made very quickly. The court case will be months away.
Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
- Eastern
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14357
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
- Location: 3132
- Been thanked: 1 time
Could it be that the saints HAVE ALREADY made a decision, but haven't made it public just yet? It wouldn't surprise me if the saints made their decision on Christmas Eve. The CEO was using very strong language when he fronted the cameras !!St Fidelius wrote:Agreed that the Saints will make their own decision, even though there might not even be a court case.plugger66 wrote:
Whether it is hard to prove or not has little if anything to do with the decision the Saints will make. We arent going to wait for the court case to make a decision. That will be made very quickly. The court case will be months away.
NEW scarf signature (hopefully with correct spelling) will be here as soon as it arrives !!
- Spinner
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8502
- Joined: Sat 02 Dec 2006 3:40pm
- Location: Victoria
- Has thanked: 185 times
- Been thanked: 133 times
Eastern wrote:Could it be that the saints HAVE ALREADY made a decision, but haven't made it public just yet? It wouldn't surprise me if the saints made their decision on Christmas Eve. The CEO was using very strong language when he fronted the cameras !!St Fidelius wrote:Agreed that the Saints will make their own decision, even though there might not even be a court case.plugger66 wrote:
Whether it is hard to prove or not has little if anything to do with the decision the Saints will make. We arent going to wait for the court case to make a decision. That will be made very quickly. The court case will be months away.
When in reference to 'making a decision' the only option pre-court process would be a sacking?
Keeping him on in delaying a decision in effect yes?