Lovett interviewed by Police

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
Richter
SS Life Member
Posts: 3914
Joined: Wed 30 Nov 2005 1:18pm
Location: Elwood

Post: # 870121Post Richter »

gazrat wrote:
At least, he didn't do an abductor....
it'll get funnier mr fox

by the 23rd time its posted , you'll be weeing yourself

i was holding on , but i only made it to the 19th
I'm not really getting it gaz, what was the original context?


Hird... The unflushable one is now... just a turd...
saint66au
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 17003
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:03pm
Contact:

Post: # 870124Post saint66au »

Richter wrote:
gazrat wrote:
At least, he didn't do an abductor....
it'll get funnier mr fox

by the 23rd time its posted , you'll be weeing yourself

i was holding on , but i only made it to the 19th
I'm not really getting it gaz, what was the original context?
Rodg got "adductor" mixed up with "abductor"

Much as Mr Fox's posts do drive me to distraction often, I reckon this lil mistake has been done to death and beyond :roll:

We should all be so literate..in the grand list of great spelling mistakes / typos..this aint one of em

Enough eh?


Image

THE BUBBLE HAS BURST

2011 player sponsor
User avatar
Bernard Shakey
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11242
Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
Has thanked: 126 times
Been thanked: 137 times

Post: # 870172Post Bernard Shakey »

St Fidelius wrote:
Bernard Shakey wrote:
ausfatcat wrote:
santazzi wrote: Mmmm... there are so many hard to understand inconsistencies...Why have they not supprted him indeed.....

Or more likely different coaching styles. And it doesn't mean they aren't supporting him he hasn't been sacked has he?
Why would they support him? They only just met him. Anyone thought of that?
Anyone thought you are just full of it??

Your remarks to my posts were an insult and to me it really shows you know nothing....

NOTHING AT ALL!!!

A Tip...

Get a life, before you start to miss quote people :idea:

I have never had a discussion with anyone else, that really has no idea on matters than yourself, and by going your input in the general forum....

My impression has not changed since your last PM to me, with respect to this same thread @ around page 4.....

How about you live and learn at little before you come on here and miss quote posters and get things wrong :idea:

in other words .....

GET A CLUE!!!! :idea: :idea: :idea: :idea:

What the........


Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
User avatar
St Fidelius
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10492
Joined: Sun 01 Aug 2004 10:30am

Post: # 870176Post St Fidelius »

Bernard Shakey wrote:
What the........
I should have said the same to your last PM...



You really don't have a clue......

AGAIN....

VERY HARD TO PROVE!

and that is all I ever stated....

I never stated that the alleged victim was lying, again it's very hard to prove...

Now, get a grip on reality :idea: :roll:

and stop miss quoting me..... :idea:

and you remark that I don't care about the victims or alleged victims via PM is way off the mark, and yet another insult...

They just keep piling up with you inability to understand life and police and law procedures....

But hey, continue on by all means, only if you stop miss quoting me.

I HAVE NEVER SAID THAT LOVETT IS INNOCENT OR THAT THE ALLEGED VICTIM IS LYING ..........

DOSE THAT SINK IN

:?: :?: :idea: :idea:


Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
GrumpyOne

Post: # 870227Post GrumpyOne »

St Fidelius wrote:
Bernard Shakey wrote:
What the........
I should have said the same to your last PM...



You really don't have a clue......

AGAIN....

VERY HARD TO PROVE!

and that is all I ever stated....

I never stated that the alleged victim was lying, again it's very hard to prove...

Now, get a grip on reality :idea: :roll:

and stop miss quoting me..... :idea:

and you remark that I don't care about the victims or alleged victims via PM is way off the mark, and yet another insult...

They just keep piling up with you inability to understand life and police and law procedures....

But hey, continue on by all means, only if you stop miss quoting me.

I HAVE NEVER SAID THAT LOVETT IS INNOCENT OR THAT THE ALLEGED VICTIM IS LYING ..........

DOSE THAT SINK IN

:?: :?: :idea: :idea:
A harsh but probably justifiable response.

This is St Fids territory.

In 40 - 50 pages of various Lovett threads his message has been consistant.

Very hard to prove.

Our system of justice assumes innocence until proven guilty. I would not want it any other way.

If your own experiences lead you to think that some other system is better, so be it.

Don't shoot the messenger.


Milan Faletic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6090
Joined: Fri 11 Mar 2005 9:18pm

Post: # 870257Post Milan Faletic »

saint66au wrote:
Richter wrote:
gazrat wrote:
At least, he didn't do an abductor....
it'll get funnier mr fox

by the 23rd time its posted , you'll be weeing yourself

i was holding on , but i only made it to the 19th
I'm not really getting it gaz, what was the original context?
Rodg got "adductor" mixed up with "abductor"

Much as Mr Fox's posts do drive me to distraction often, I reckon this lil mistake has been done to death and beyond :roll:

We should all be so literate..in the grand list of great spelling mistakes / typos..this aint one of em

Enough eh?
"Birdie num nums" still makes me laugh 40 years later.

I respectfully disagree with you saint66au because IMHO when someone professes to be an expert and then makes a fundamental mistake of calling an adductor an abductor without re-editing that post or conceding their error, I think it is a blinder of a mistake, especially when that line is used to criticise our coach and fitness staff who got us within 12 points of our 2nd premiership in over 100 years.

Ok, despite the lack of a personal apology from him for his unwarranted personal attack on me and no best wishes on the health front, I will show some dignity and try to cut back. Shhheeesh!
Last edited by Milan Faletic on Thu 07 Jan 2010 5:10pm, edited 2 times in total.


User avatar
Milton66
SS Life Member
Posts: 3521
Joined: Tue 19 May 2009 9:53pm
Location: None of your goddam business

Post: # 870275Post Milton66 »

Wad's going on ere? :shock:

Isn't adducter what ya call when ya sick?

BTW, when was Roo kidnapped? That's news to me. :?


Hotel De Los Muertos: Your room is ready... Care to step inside?
User avatar
barks4eva
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10748
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:39pm
Has thanked: 190 times
Been thanked: 92 times

Post: # 870284Post barks4eva »

I reckon a few dingbats on here have been "adducted" by aliens who upon arrival started experimenting on cows before moving on to sheep and in that process, not surprisingly some GT goofballs ended up in the mix!

Word is that the aliens were here looking for signs of intelligent lifeforms, they have since departed.


DO THE MATHS AND THE SQUARES ARE ALL ROOTED.
User avatar
matrix
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21475
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Post: # 870297Post matrix »

actually sheep mutilations are a rare sight...
in the ufology community

its usally just moo moos


User avatar
Milton66
SS Life Member
Posts: 3521
Joined: Tue 19 May 2009 9:53pm
Location: None of your goddam business

Post: # 870358Post Milton66 »

barks4eva wrote:I reckon a few dingbats on here have been "adducted" by aliens who upon arrival started experimenting on cows before moving on to sheep and in that process, not surprisingly some GT goofballs ended up in the mix!

Word is that the aliens were here looking for signs of intelligent lifeforms, they have since departed.
Agree. It explains why you're still here. :lol:


Hotel De Los Muertos: Your room is ready... Care to step inside?
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Post: # 870372Post plugger66 »

GrumpyOne wrote:
St Fidelius wrote:
Bernard Shakey wrote:
What the........
I should have said the same to your last PM...



You really don't have a clue.....

AGAIN....

VERY HARD TO PROVE!

and that is all I ever stated....

I never stated that the alleged victim was lying, again it's very hard to prove...

Now, get a grip on reality :idea: :roll:

and stop miss quoting me..... :idea:

and you remark that I don't care about the victims or alleged victims via PM is way off the mark, and yet another insult...

They just keep piling up with you inability to understand life and police and law procedures....

But hey, continue on by all means, only if you stop miss quoting me.

I HAVE NEVER SAID THAT LOVETT IS INNOCENT OR THAT THE ALLEGED VICTIM IS LYING ..........

DOSE THAT SINK IN

:?: :?: :idea: :idea:
A harsh but probably justifiable response.

This is St Fids territory.

In 40 - 50 pages of various Lovett threads his message has been consistant.

Very hard to prove.

Our system of justice assumes innocence until proven guilty. I would not want it any other way.

If your own experiences lead you to think that some other system is better, so be it.

Don't shoot the messenger.
Whether it is hard to prove or not has little if anything to do with the decision the Saints will make. We arent going to wait for the court case to make a decision. That will be made very quickly. The court case will be months away.


User avatar
St Fidelius
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10492
Joined: Sun 01 Aug 2004 10:30am

Post: # 870386Post St Fidelius »

plugger66 wrote:

Whether it is hard to prove or not has little if anything to do with the decision the Saints will make. We arent going to wait for the court case to make a decision. That will be made very quickly. The court case will be months away.
Agreed that the Saints will make their own decision, even though there might not even be a court case.


Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
User avatar
Eastern
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14357
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
Location: 3132
Been thanked: 1 time

Post: # 870389Post Eastern »

St Fidelius wrote:
plugger66 wrote:

Whether it is hard to prove or not has little if anything to do with the decision the Saints will make. We arent going to wait for the court case to make a decision. That will be made very quickly. The court case will be months away.
Agreed that the Saints will make their own decision, even though there might not even be a court case.
Could it be that the saints HAVE ALREADY made a decision, but haven't made it public just yet? It wouldn't surprise me if the saints made their decision on Christmas Eve. The CEO was using very strong language when he fronted the cameras !!


NEW scarf signature (hopefully with correct spelling) will be here as soon as it arrives !!

Image
User avatar
Spinner
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8502
Joined: Sat 02 Dec 2006 3:40pm
Location: Victoria
Has thanked: 185 times
Been thanked: 133 times

Post: # 870392Post Spinner »

Eastern wrote:
St Fidelius wrote:
plugger66 wrote:

Whether it is hard to prove or not has little if anything to do with the decision the Saints will make. We arent going to wait for the court case to make a decision. That will be made very quickly. The court case will be months away.
Agreed that the Saints will make their own decision, even though there might not even be a court case.
Could it be that the saints HAVE ALREADY made a decision, but haven't made it public just yet? It wouldn't surprise me if the saints made their decision on Christmas Eve. The CEO was using very strong language when he fronted the cameras !!

When in reference to 'making a decision' the only option pre-court process would be a sacking?

Keeping him on in delaying a decision in effect yes?


Post Reply