Our Rookies
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- ThePunter
- Club Player
- Posts: 742
- Joined: Mon 16 Jun 2008 12:43pm
- Location: Level 2 Half Forward Flank Lockett End
- Contact:
Dawson definitely promoted
Miles and Simpkin probably promoted
Three rookie promotions would mean we would not have to draft a single player in the National Draft (don't worry, I'm sure we'll use pick 32 at least)
Haretuku and Howard are in trouble
McGrath, McGarry, Gaertner & Tungatulum to be retained for a second year
Miles and Simpkin probably promoted
Three rookie promotions would mean we would not have to draft a single player in the National Draft (don't worry, I'm sure we'll use pick 32 at least)
Haretuku and Howard are in trouble
McGrath, McGarry, Gaertner & Tungatulum to be retained for a second year
- borderbarry
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6676
- Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
- Location: Wodonga
Would doubt McGarry after what happened this year. Simpkin will not be promoted and in my opinion Miles should be delisted but it doesnt look that way.ThePunter wrote:Dawson definitely promoted
Miles and Simpkin probably promoted
Three rookie promotions would mean we would not have to draft a single player in the National Draft (don't worry, I'm sure we'll use pick 32 at least)
Haretuku and Howard are in trouble
McGrath, McGarry, Gaertner & Tungatulum to be retained for a second year
Miles is almost 23 and has played 0 games.plugger66 wrote:Would doubt McGarry after what happened this year. Simpkin will not be promoted and in my opinion Miles should be delisted but it doesnt look that way.
Compare him to Clinton Jones. Drafted at 22, played 6 games in the year after he turned 23. When he turned 24 had still only played 6.
Miles might still deserve another year on the list to become a player. (Though I don't remember ever seeing him so I'm not making that call.) With our grab bag of crappy draft picks, I feel certain he'll be promoted.
- ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10800
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 838 times
Beno88 wrote:From AFL.com.au
ADDITIONS:
Exchange period – received: Andrew Lovett (Essendon), Brett Peake (Fremantle)
Rookie elevation: Zac Dawson, Luke Miles
Scholarship elevation: Josh Duncan (Pennant Hills) – rookie list, Ted Widner (Pennant Hills ) - rookie list
NAB AFL Draft: TBA
NAB AFL Rookie Draft: TBA
Check the source of that.
I think you will find that is from another post and how our list looks now with the presumption of permanent promtions for Dawson, Miles, Duncan and Widner but does not become official until List Lodgement No 1 on 30 October.
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
- ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10800
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 838 times
Clubs must make 3 draft picks but a rookie promotion can reduce that to 2, but further rookie promotions don't help.ThePunter wrote:Dawson definitely promoted
Miles and Simpkin probably promoted
Three rookie promotions would mean we would not have to draft a single player in the National Draft (don't worry, I'm sure we'll use pick 32 at least)
Haretuku and Howard are in trouble
McGrath, McGarry, Gaertner & Tungatulum to be retained for a second year
St Kilda still has to use two picks Nos 32 and 60.
However as a result of trading some clubs have accumulated a number of early picks.
If they don't clear space for their later picks, these later picks will be cancelled and St Kilda's pick 60 could end up in the high 50s.
Last edited by ace on Tue 13 Oct 2009 4:27pm, edited 2 times in total.
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
I'm pretty sure only one rookie promotion counts as a draft pick. So we still have to use picks 32 and 60.ThePunter wrote:Dawson definitely promoted
Miles and Simpkin probably promoted
Three rookie promotions would mean we would not have to draft a single player in the National Draft (don't worry, I'm sure we'll use pick 32 at least)
Haretuku and Howard are in trouble
McGrath, McGarry, Gaertner & Tungatulum to be retained for a second year
Note I'm not entirely sure but its what I heard.
Beaten by that much
mick13 wrote:I'm pretty sure only one rookie promotion counts as a draft pick. So we still have to use picks 32 and 60.ThePunter wrote:Dawson definitely promoted
Miles and Simpkin probably promoted
Three rookie promotions would mean we would not have to draft a single player in the National Draft (don't worry, I'm sure we'll use pick 32 at least)
Haretuku and Howard are in trouble
McGrath, McGarry, Gaertner & Tungatulum to be retained for a second year
Note I'm not entirely sure but its what I heard.
Beaten by that much
All picks have to be draft picks but we can use 62 and 78 and 94 and so on as long as we delist enough players to get those picks. At the moment we only have 2 picks because no player has been delisted and 2 have retired.
- ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10800
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 838 times
Same time makes it a draw doesn't it.mick13 wrote:I'm pretty sure only one rookie promotion counts as a draft pick. So we still have to use picks 32 and 60.ThePunter wrote:Dawson definitely promoted
Miles and Simpkin probably promoted
Three rookie promotions would mean we would not have to draft a single player in the National Draft (don't worry, I'm sure we'll use pick 32 at least)
Haretuku and Howard are in trouble
McGrath, McGarry, Gaertner & Tungatulum to be retained for a second year
Note I'm not entirely sure but its what I heard.
Beaten by that much
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
- borderbarry
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6676
- Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
- Location: Wodonga
- saintbrat
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 44575
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:11pm
- Location: saints zone
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 188 times
no announcement necessary till lists due to AFL
which is 30th Oct
just impatient supporters really. who want the next chapter to look forward to.
which is 30th Oct
just impatient supporters really. who want the next chapter to look forward to.
StReNgTh ThRoUgH LoYaLtY
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
At the moment Khan, McGarry and Ross are gone from the rookie list and LJ and Begley are gone from the main list. may still be one or 2 more. Howard and Fisher depending on contracts i would say.borderbarry wrote:According to a thread on Big Footy, McGarry has been let go as well. Does anyone actually know which rookies are being retained and which ones let go?
- borderbarry
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6676
- Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
- Location: Wodonga
Link?plugger66 wrote:At the moment Khan, McGarry and Ross are gone from the rookie list and LJ and Begley are gone from the main list. may still be one or 2 more. Howard and Fisher depending on contracts i would say.borderbarry wrote:According to a thread on Big Footy, McGarry has been let go as well. Does anyone actually know which rookies are being retained and which ones let go?
I think his name was spelt Linke but he doesnt play for us anymore so he cant be delisted.bergholt wrote:Link?plugger66 wrote:At the moment Khan, McGarry and Ross are gone from the rookie list and LJ and Begley are gone from the main list. may still be one or 2 more. Howard and Fisher depending on contracts i would say.borderbarry wrote:According to a thread on Big Footy, McGarry has been let go as well. Does anyone actually know which rookies are being retained and which ones let go?
So it's all speculation, then? Or is there some proof?plugger66 wrote:I think his name was spelt Linke but he doesnt play for us anymore so he cant be delisted.bergholt wrote:Link?plugger66 wrote:At the moment Khan, McGarry and Ross are gone from the rookie list and LJ and Begley are gone from the main list. may still be one or 2 more. Howard and Fisher depending on contracts i would say.borderbarry wrote:According to a thread on Big Footy, McGarry has been let go as well. Does anyone actually know which rookies are being retained and which ones let go?
No speculation. Geoff Linke hasnt played at our club for over 20 years so he will not be delisted.bergholt wrote:So it's all speculation, then? Or is there some proof?plugger66 wrote:I think his name was spelt Linke but he doesnt play for us anymore so he cant be delisted.bergholt wrote:Link?plugger66 wrote:At the moment Khan, McGarry and Ross are gone from the rookie list and LJ and Begley are gone from the main list. may still be one or 2 more. Howard and Fisher depending on contracts i would say.borderbarry wrote:According to a thread on Big Footy, McGarry has been let go as well. Does anyone actually know which rookies are being retained and which ones let go?
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5413
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 10:29am
- Has thanked: 33 times
- Been thanked: 47 times
didn't LJ have some potential?plugger66 wrote:At the moment Khan, McGarry and Ross are gone from the rookie list and LJ and Begley are gone from the main list. may still be one or 2 more. Howard and Fisher depending on contracts i would say.borderbarry wrote:According to a thread on Big Footy, McGarry has been let go as well. Does anyone actually know which rookies are being retained and which ones let go?
and McGarry, i thought he had some potential, he even played some seniors vfl games.????
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 966
- Joined: Tue 03 Feb 2009 4:25pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 9 times
they all had potential. just not enough or they never met it.saintly wrote:didn't LJ have some potential?plugger66 wrote:At the moment Khan, McGarry and Ross are gone from the rookie list and LJ and Begley are gone from the main list. may still be one or 2 more. Howard and Fisher depending on contracts i would say.borderbarry wrote:According to a thread on Big Footy, McGarry has been let go as well. Does anyone actually know which rookies are being retained and which ones let go?
and McGarry, i thought he had some potential, he even played some seniors vfl games.????
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30098
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1235 times
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11242
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 126 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
Who is this LJ character? Is he related to BJ?saintsRrising wrote:Remember that LJ was Pick Number 70....so was always a speculative pick.
I seem to remember Eljay Connors being drafted at pick 70 in 2007.
Interestingly his weight was listed at 70kg and he hasn't put on a gram since.
Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
Is often referred to as LJ as he was named after an uncle's initials.Bernard Shakey wrote: Who is this LJ character?
I seem to remember Eljay Connors being drafted at pick 70 in 2007.
Interestingly his weight was listed at 70kg and he hasn't put on a gram since.
He put on a fair bit last year over the pre-season but again a couple of injuries knocked him down.
http://www.theage.com.au/news/sport/new ... 70809.html
A face only a mother could loveIceman234 wrote: http://www.theage.com.au/news/sport/new ... 70809.html