Sen Radio overnight Nathan Brown Medical with saints
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: Fri 29 Oct 2004 1:01pm
- Has thanked: 91 times
- Been thanked: 162 times
That's not an answer, it's just more questionsTeflon wrote:I can answer that - would Nathan Browne have ensured that Sneider, Milne kick straight?SainterK wrote:Sorry to interrupt, but it's actually a really good question to pose in light of this thread...
Do you reckon Nathan Brown would have been a useful addition to our GF forward last week?
This will probably answer if this is a worthwile pickup not....
Please feel free to continue
AND had Nathan Browne played....would Sneider/Milne played or one gawn....
or...when Bartel shut down Hayes and Ling Dal Santo to 17 touches could we have used an additional midfielder that also kicks goals and frees up a Goddard?
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23247
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 741 times
- Been thanked: 1800 times
spot on.vacuous space wrote:With the benefit of hindsight and a time machine, there are some other things I'd try before bringing in Brown.SainterK wrote:Do you reckon Nathan Brown would have been a useful addition to our GF forward last week?
to be honest if we went that path IMO it smacks of absolute desperation.
NO other AFL club would entertain Browne....besides Im not sure he'd meet all the criteria in Icemans "Good Guide to Moral Values"handbook...
“Yeah….nah””
Iceman234 won't respond until Teflon drops the farking e from Brown - is it that difficult?Teflon wrote:spot on.vacuous space wrote:With the benefit of hindsight and a time machine, there are some other things I'd try before bringing in Brown.SainterK wrote:Do you reckon Nathan Brown would have been a useful addition to our GF forward last week?
to be honest if we went that path IMO it smacks of absolute desperation.
NO other AFL club would entertain Browne....besides Im not sure he'd meet all the criteria in Icemans "Good Guide to Moral Values"handbook...
Would have taken Dempster's place...... who also missed a sitter than NB might have jagged. Also gives a LOT more offensively than Dempster in terms of disposals garnered, goals scored and goal assists...... question mark would clearly be over his ability to give forward pressure..... another Lyon "trademark".Teflon wrote:I can answer that - would Nathan Browne have ensured that Sneider, Milne kick straight?
AND had Nathan Browne played....would Sneider/Milne played or one gawn....
or...when Bartel shut down Hayes and Ling Dal Santo to 17 touches could we have used an additional midfielder that also kicks goals and frees up a Goddard?
Hird... The unflushable one is now... just a turd...
Neither would any other club touch Michael Gardiner..... and look how he's turned out...... no absolutes in this business gentlemen.....Teflon wrote:to be honest if we went that path IMO it smacks of absolute desperation.
NO other AFL club would entertain Browne....besides Im not sure he'd meet all the criteria in Icemans "Good Guide to Moral Values"handbook...
Hird... The unflushable one is now... just a turd...
Disagree. MG was very remorseful and showed a character that was redeeming and one which wanted to prove himself.Richter wrote:Neither would any other club touch Michael Gardiner..... and look how he's turned out...... no absolutes in this business gentlemen.....Teflon wrote:to be honest if we went that path IMO it smacks of absolute desperation.
NO other AFL club would entertain Browne....besides Im not sure he'd meet all the criteria in Icemans "Good Guide to Moral Values"handbook...
MG and BC were worlds - thousands and thousands of miles - apart and were chalk and cheese when it came to commitment to a team environment and making good for past indiscretions.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23247
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 741 times
- Been thanked: 1800 times
No hope in Nathan Browne playing Dempsters role GF day - fanciful.Richter wrote:Would have taken Dempster's place...... who also missed a sitter than NB might have jagged. Also gives a LOT more offensively than Dempster in terms of disposals garnered, goals scored and goal assists...... question mark would clearly be over his ability to give forward pressure..... another Lyon "trademark".Teflon wrote:I can answer that - would Nathan Browne have ensured that Sneider, Milne kick straight?
AND had Nathan Browne played....would Sneider/Milne played or one gawn....
or...when Bartel shut down Hayes and Ling Dal Santo to 17 touches could we have used an additional midfielder that also kicks goals and frees up a Goddard?
Browne HAS NO defensive side to his game whatsoever and can play only 1 position - fwd.
So who goes out....Milne? Sneider? or we play 3 midgets?
Geelong didnt.
Neither would we.
“Yeah….nah””
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23247
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 741 times
- Been thanked: 1800 times
True - but Gardiners a rare commodity - mobile, taslented ruckman who was what........27? when drafted?Richter wrote:Neither would any other club touch Michael Gardiner..... and look how he's turned out...... no absolutes in this business gentlemen.....Teflon wrote:to be honest if we went that path IMO it smacks of absolute desperation.
NO other AFL club would entertain Browne....besides Im not sure he'd meet all the criteria in Icemans "Good Guide to Moral Values"handbook...
Brownes 32, got a stuffed leg and has never been able to get anywhere near what he was prior to his horrific injury.
We aint comparing apples...
“Yeah….nah””
My biggest concern with Brown may actually be the dropping of the E.Iceman234 wrote:Iceman234 won't respond until Teflon drops the farking e from Brown - is it that difficult?Teflon wrote:spot on.vacuous space wrote:With the benefit of hindsight and a time machine, there are some other things I'd try before bringing in Brown.SainterK wrote:Do you reckon Nathan Brown would have been a useful addition to our GF forward last week?
to be honest if we went that path IMO it smacks of absolute desperation.
NO other AFL club would entertain Browne....besides Im not sure he'd meet all the criteria in Icemans "Good Guide to Moral Values"handbook...
Maybe this year?
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23247
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 741 times
- Been thanked: 1800 times
rexy wrote:My biggest concern with Brown may actually be the dropping of the E.Iceman234 wrote:Iceman234 won't respond until Teflon drops the farking e from Brown - is it that difficult?Teflon wrote:spot on.vacuous space wrote:With the benefit of hindsight and a time machine, there are some other things I'd try before bringing in Brown.SainterK wrote:Do you reckon Nathan Brown would have been a useful addition to our GF forward last week?
to be honest if we went that path IMO it smacks of absolute desperation.
NO other AFL club would entertain Browne....besides Im not sure he'd meet all the criteria in Icemans "Good Guide to Moral Values"handbook...
hmmmm.....there goes the code of ethics Iceman...
“Yeah….nah””
I thought dropping an e would be more up Benny's alley...Teflon wrote:rexy wrote:My biggest concern with Brown may actually be the dropping of the E.Iceman234 wrote:Iceman234 won't respond until Teflon drops the farking e from Brown - is it that difficult?Teflon wrote:spot on.vacuous space wrote:With the benefit of hindsight and a time machine, there are some other things I'd try before bringing in Brown.SainterK wrote:Do you reckon Nathan Brown would have been a useful addition to our GF forward last week?
to be honest if we went that path IMO it smacks of absolute desperation.
NO other AFL club would entertain Browne....besides Im not sure he'd meet all the criteria in Icemans "Good Guide to Moral Values"handbook...
hmmmm.....there goes the code of ethics Iceman...
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23247
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 741 times
- Been thanked: 1800 times
Bennys gone....you need to move on Ice........we up for a new E fight?Iceman234 wrote:I thought dropping an e would be more up Benny's alley...Teflon wrote:rexy wrote:My biggest concern with Brown may actually be the dropping of the E.Iceman234 wrote:Iceman234 won't respond until Teflon drops the farking e from Brown - is it that difficult?Teflon wrote:spot on.vacuous space wrote:With the benefit of hindsight and a time machine, there are some other things I'd try before bringing in Brown.SainterK wrote:Do you reckon Nathan Brown would have been a useful addition to our GF forward last week?
to be honest if we went that path IMO it smacks of absolute desperation.
NO other AFL club would entertain Browne....besides Im not sure he'd meet all the criteria in Icemans "Good Guide to Moral Values"handbook...
hmmmm.....there goes the code of ethics Iceman...
“Yeah….nah””
Surely you mean Icman?Teflon wrote:rexy wrote:My biggest concern with Brown may actually be the dropping of the E.Iceman234 wrote:won't respond until Teflon drops the farking e
hmmmm.....there goes the code of ethics Iceman...
Re. Brown, I'd entertain playing 3 smalls. All 3 can rotate (particularly Brown and Schneider) through the midfield. Point is, IMO, we need someone who can actually HURT the opposition in the final available spot in the 22.
Only man from within who could conceivably do it is X Clarke, and he hasn't played consistently at the level required for over 12 months - be nearly 2 years by the time next season comes along.[/quote]
Hird... The unflushable one is now... just a turd...
Ben is a word that cant really be spelt without the eIceman234 wrote:I thought dropping an e would be more up Benny's alley...Teflon wrote:rexy wrote:My biggest concern with Brown may actually be the dropping of the E.Iceman234 wrote:Iceman234 won't respond until Teflon drops the farking e from Brown - is it that difficult?Teflon wrote:spot on.vacuous space wrote:With the benefit of hindsight and a time machine, there are some other things I'd try before bringing in Brown.SainterK wrote:Do you reckon Nathan Brown would have been a useful addition to our GF forward last week?
to be honest if we went that path IMO it smacks of absolute desperation.
NO other AFL club would entertain Browne....besides Im not sure he'd meet all the criteria in Icemans "Good Guide to Moral Values"handbook...
hmmmm.....there goes the code of ethics Iceman...
Bit like Ice
Maybe this year?
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23247
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 741 times
- Been thanked: 1800 times
[/quote]Richter wrote:Surely you mean Icman?Teflon wrote:rexy wrote:My biggest concern with Brown may actually be the dropping of the E.Iceman234 wrote:won't respond until Teflon drops the farking e
hmmmm.....there goes the code of ethics Iceman...
Re. Brown, I'd entertain playing 3 smalls. All 3 can rotate (particularly Brown and Schneider) through the midfield. Point is, IMO, we need someone who can actually HURT the opposition in the final available spot in the 22.
Only man from within who could conceivably do it is X Clarke, and he hasn't played consistently at the level required for over 12 months - be nearly 2 years by the time next season comes along.
Brown at 32 can also play midfield?
Funny havent seen him in there much the past 3 yrs.
Nor Sneider for that matter.
Nup. Dreaming.
Geelong dropped a small...didnt add them...
“Yeah….nah””
You just need to move on Teflon, it will do you good.Teflon wrote:Nah no need for a goal kicking in the GF..... leave it all to Lenny hey?Iceman234 wrote:Still can't believe we didn't pick up BC myself.Teflon wrote:TBH Id rather Russel Robertson(?)..FFS at least he can STILL move and bagged 5 and a few 3's this year.
Brown is absolutely lazy, doesnt tackle, soft, and looks good on the end of everyones hard work......IF that doesnt eventuate hes the kinda player you wonder where hes been hiding on the park.
NO WAY.
Hes finished IMO.
Very on himself and the fool shouldnt have left the Dogs folllowing the Tan Man.
I reckon NB would pull his head in, train his arse off and burn for any club that would pick him up for a one-year deal, ala Stuie Dew.
Brownes a spud.
"Dew dilligence"completed.
BC wasn't ours. And he won't be.
It's okay, you can do it. Take it easy.
Nite pal. Don't be too hard on yourself.
IC
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6090
- Joined: Fri 11 Mar 2005 9:18pm
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18653
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1994 times
- Been thanked: 872 times
agree. we have some promising young players such as stanley, lynch. and steven among others who i'd like to see considered ahead of a veteran outsider such as brown.super dooper wrote:I just hope that we dont fall in the trap carlton fell into after their 99 GF appearence by constantly topping up the list and forgetting about the youth...
Lets not forget that our list is more than adequate, it was our finishing that cost us severely, we must develop from within.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6090
- Joined: Fri 11 Mar 2005 9:18pm
we have good young players. i agree with big carl. any kids big carl? i'm pushing for dimitri faletic to get a game or even svetlanabigcarl wrote:agree. we have some promising young players such as stanley, lynch. and steven among others who i'd like to see considered ahead of a veteran outsider such as brown.super dooper wrote:I just hope that we dont fall in the trap carlton fell into after their 99 GF appearence by constantly topping up the list and forgetting about the youth...
Lets not forget that our list is more than adequate, it was our finishing that cost us severely, we must develop from within.
What I understand it to be at this stage is that Browny has met with the club, and they sent him away for a medical to assess his various ailments before deciding whether to pursue him.
Brown is in LA at the minute with Richo and a couple of the other tigers so not sure what the result of that is.
It's a possibility, but a lot to happen and a lot of unknown factors.
Guy that told me that has had a lot to do with Nathan Brown.
Brown is in LA at the minute with Richo and a couple of the other tigers so not sure what the result of that is.
It's a possibility, but a lot to happen and a lot of unknown factors.
Guy that told me that has had a lot to do with Nathan Brown.