Judd

Milton66 · Post: # 834940Post **Milton66** » Sun 27 Sep 2009 8:02pm

Let's be honest. If we had taken him instead of Ball,we would have won yesterday.

xander · Post: # 834943Post **xander** » Sun 27 Sep 2009 8:03pm

we should have traded everyone that played bad yesterday for him in 07 when he came back to vic

Milton66 · Post: # 834945Post **Milton66** » Sun 27 Sep 2009 8:05pm

xander wrote:we should have traded everyone that played bad yesterday for him in 07 when he came back to vic

And that my friend, makes as much sense as all these other threads that keep popping up on here.

I trust you saw the irony in my op.

bethb7 · Post: # 834951Post **bethb7** » Sun 27 Sep 2009 8:10pm

I was pretty impressed with Judd yesterday I was sittting up the top deck in row T and only a couple of rows over was Juddy sitting by himself, he could have had any seat he wanted in the house couldn't he? and he chose to sit up there on his own good effort.

xander · Post: # 834987Post **xander** » Sun 27 Sep 2009 8:34pm

Milton66 wrote:
xander wrote:we should have traded everyone that played bad yesterday for him in 07 when he came back to vic
And that my friend, makes as much sense as all these other threads that keep popping up on here.

I trust you saw the irony in my op.

Yep i sure did.
I'm quite surprised that people want to trade kosi & milne we lost by 6 (12) points ffs

saintspremiers · Sun 27 Sep 2009 8:36pm

bethb7 wrote:I was pretty impressed with Judd yesterday I was sittting up the top deck in row T and only a couple of rows over was Juddy sitting by himself, he could have had any seat he wanted in the house couldn't he? and he chose to sit up there on his own good effort.

current players under the EBA get the opporunity to buy two tickets at face value for the Grand Final.

The seats allocated to players are generally only Standard seats.

Source: a workmate of mine's nephew plays for North Melbourne!

satchmo · Post: # 834996Post **satchmo** » Sun 27 Sep 2009 8:38pm

It might seem crazy, but I'm sure that if we had taken Kosi at no.1 and Roo at no.2 we would have won. Kosi needs more love IMHO.

Milton66 · Post: # 834998Post **Milton66** » Sun 27 Sep 2009 8:39pm

satchmo wrote:It might seem crazy, but I'm sure that if we had taken Kosi at no.1 and Roo at no.2 we would have won. Kosi needs more love IMHO.

jonesy · Post: # 835005Post **jonesy** » Sun 27 Sep 2009 8:43pm

we shouldn't have sacked GT.....

Milton66 · Post: # 835015Post **Milton66** » Sun 27 Sep 2009 8:48pm

jonesy wrote:we shouldn't have sacked GT.....

Ah yes, but it isn't Monday yet.

Just wait until the usuals log on and startcommenting on how RL was outcoached etc.

Sam23 · Post: # 835053Post **Sam23** » Sun 27 Sep 2009 9:18pm

bethb7 wrote:I was pretty impressed with Judd yesterday I was sittting up the top deck in row T and only a couple of rows over was Juddy sitting by himself, he could have had any seat he wanted in the house couldn't he? and he chose to sit up there on his own good effort.

also in row t in Q53.

satchmo · Post: # 835072Post **satchmo** » Sun 27 Sep 2009 9:27pm

Sam23 wrote:
bethb7 wrote:I was pretty impressed with Judd yesterday I was sittting up the top deck in row T and only a couple of rows over was Juddy sitting by himself, he could have had any seat he wanted in the house couldn't he? and he chose to sit up there on his own good effort.
also in row t in Q53.

Judd is omnipresent.

bethb7 · Post: # 835105Post **bethb7** » Sun 27 Sep 2009 9:50pm

Sam23 wrote:
bethb7 wrote:I was pretty impressed with Judd yesterday I was sittting up the top deck in row T and only a couple of rows over was Juddy sitting by himself, he could have had any seat he wanted in the house couldn't he? and he chose to sit up there on his own good effort.
also in row t in Q53.

I was in Q54 good seats.

ace · Post: # 835143Post **ace** » Sun 27 Sep 2009 10:11pm

NO, we would have only half the team that played yesterday just to fit him and his WAG into an honest salary cap.
Our TEAM will win a flag, an individual mercenary takes more than he provides.

ace · Post: # 835147Post **ace** » Sun 27 Sep 2009 10:13pm

bethb7 wrote:I was pretty impressed with Judd yesterday I was sittting up the top deck in row T and only a couple of rows over was Juddy sitting by himself, he could have had any seat he wanted in the house couldn't he? and he chose to sit up there on his own good effort.

No team mates for him, even his co workers refused to let him sit with them.

dcstkfc · Post: # 836564Post **dcstkfc** » Tue 29 Sep 2009 3:59am

Whatever happened to tha Bradman fellow?

barks4eva · Post: # 836840Post **barks4eva** » Tue 29 Sep 2009 2:44pm

Milton66 wrote:Let's be honest. If we had taken him instead of Ball,we would have won yesterday.

Obviously no point in going into this

BUT

Butterss wanted to use the selection on Judd,

Thomas had the choice and chose to ignore Butterss and selected Ball,

What I'm trying to figure out is........

has this decision by Thomas, cost us one premiership, two premierships or three premierships???

IMHO the club should re-employ Thomas and give him a role in the football department whereby we ask him for his opinion on any possible trade or draft selection, then do the exact opposite, fair chance we won't put a foot wrong!

SaintWodonga · Tue 29 Sep 2009 2:52pm

Bartel instead of X would have ben nice too...

3rd generation saint · Tue 29 Sep 2009 3:19pm

Yep and if meteor hadn't hit the earth 65 million years ago we'd all be dinosaurs.
Let's live in the future people!

Judd

Judd

Re: Judd