Match Ups for Next Week...

Milton66 · Post: # 824952Post **Milton66** » Sat 19 Sep 2009 10:37pm

Against the Cats. Some one had to start the discussion.

Discuss...

LaUrEnCe · Post: # 824954Post **LaUrEnCe** » Sat 19 Sep 2009 10:40pm

Clinton Jones on Ablett
Did the job on him last time didn't he

matrix · Post: # 825002Post **matrix** » Sat 19 Sep 2009 11:05pm

im not discussing match ups in any way shape or form this week

nope
uh uh

woooosaints · Sat 19 Sep 2009 11:07pm

Negating Roles
C.Jones v Ablett
Dawson v Tomahawk
Blake v Mooney
Baker v S.Johnson
Gilbert v Chapman??

arthur08 · Post: # 825007Post **arthur08** » Sat 19 Sep 2009 11:07pm

I know this is going over ground that probably wont eventuate, but i think with geelong we really need hudghton. Dont think drop dawson, but i really think we need the experience of hudghton to help deal with their forward line

matrix · Post: # 825010Post **matrix** » Sat 19 Sep 2009 11:08pm

although its my opinion that if enright and milburn get 60 uncontested possies between them we'll be in trouble
and ill be seriously upfrigginset

plugger66 · Post: # 825014Post **plugger66** » Sat 19 Sep 2009 11:09pm

woooosaints wrote:Negating Roles
C.Jones v Ablett
Dawson v Tomahawk
Blake v Mooney
Baker v S.Johnson
Gilbert v Chapman??

Baker isnt going to play on Johnson. He will get Byrnes. gibert to Johnson

degruch · Post: # 825017Post **degruch** » Sat 19 Sep 2009 11:09pm

woooosaints wrote:Negating Roles
C.Jones v Ablett
Dawson v Tomahawk
Blake v Mooney
Baker v S.Johnson
Gilbert v Chapman??

...and Dempster?

Bernard Shakey · Sat 19 Sep 2009 11:14pm

Milton66 wrote:Against the Cats. Some one had to start the discussion.

Discuss...

Always love an OP that says nothing and then says discuss. An ego thing?

Beej · Post: # 825050Post **Beej** » Sat 19 Sep 2009 11:20pm

Who takes Ottens then?

saints11 · Post: # 825052Post **saints11** » Sat 19 Sep 2009 11:21pm

If CJ beats ablett like he did in r14 we win

3rd generation saint · Sat 19 Sep 2009 11:22pm

Johnson may still be a liability, first game back looked great early, but I'm sure we've seen players come back, be great first game, then struggle the following week, because one match doesn't give match fitness.

degruch · Post: # 825059Post **degruch** » Sat 19 Sep 2009 11:23pm

OLB wrote:Who takes Ottens then?

Max?

matrix · Post: # 825060Post **matrix** » Sat 19 Sep 2009 11:23pm

one Mini tackle and he lands on that hip is all it could take

Milton66 · Post: # 825064Post **Milton66** » Sat 19 Sep 2009 11:25pm

Bernard Shakey wrote:
Milton66 wrote:Against the Cats. Some one had to start the discussion.

Discuss...
Always love an OP that says nothing and then says discuss. An ego thing?

No not really. I'm not that clued up on match ups and am interested in people's views.

Discuss.

dcstkfc · Post: # 825069Post **dcstkfc** » Sat 19 Sep 2009 11:26pm

degruch wrote:
woooosaints wrote:Negating Roles
C.Jones v Ablett
Dawson v Tomahawk
Blake v Mooney
Baker v S.Johnson
Gilbert v Chapman??
...and Dempster?

Dempster must come in. I'd prefer Baker on Chapman, and Dempster on Johnson, with Gilbert left to run free.

jonesy · Post: # 825074Post **jonesy** » Sat 19 Sep 2009 11:27pm

We need to deal with Chapman mid week in the form of a truck Bob Pratt style.

degruch · Post: # 825076Post **degruch** » Sat 19 Sep 2009 11:28pm

Milton66 wrote:
Bernard Shakey wrote:
Milton66 wrote:Against the Cats. Some one had to start the discussion.

Discuss...
Always love an OP that says nothing and then says discuss. An ego thing?
No not really. I'm not that clued up on match ups and am interested in people's views.

Discuss.

Well, we have them covered for small match-ups on their forward line, but Ottens remains an odd one. Will they use him more in the ruck, taking into account that there was only Cameron Wood to counter tonight? Gardiner drops back? They have an oversized backline IMO and will have match-up issues there.

Teflon · Post: # 825078Post **Teflon** » Sat 19 Sep 2009 11:28pm

Chapman IMO is crucial.

Ironically it was he and Bartel in Rd 14 in the 3rd qtr that dragged them back in it.....

That said - Montagna and Goddard HAVE to step. Hayes/Dal out of the square cant do it on their own.

Ling will go to Dal - drag him fwd for mine.....hes slow and vulnerable to pressure.

Kosi HAS to give more and Milne/Schneider cant go missing.

Eddy out Dempster in.....but gee Im tempted on another true defender iin Hudgton.....I reckon Stevie J will struggleto play much in the middle....and when hes fwd Max would flog him.......Johnson looked slow and hes no doubt not 100%...

Milton66 · Post: # 825090Post **Milton66** » Sat 19 Sep 2009 11:31pm

Not sure about Max, but I'd have Dempster in 100%.

Put Ling on Dal... Version 2009 will flog him.

Say you bring in Max, who goes?

degruch · Post: # 825106Post **degruch** » Sat 19 Sep 2009 11:36pm

Milton66 wrote:Not sure about Max, but I'd have Dempster in 100%.

Put Ling on Dal... Version 2009 will flog him.

Say you bring in Max, who goes?

Joking...sorry Max.

plugger66 · Post: # 825111Post **plugger66** » Sat 19 Sep 2009 11:38pm

Max isnt going to play. We have plenty of talls aready to handle the cats forwards.

SainterK · Post: # 825113Post **SainterK** » Sat 19 Sep 2009 11:38pm

Gwilt in

Milton66 · Post: # 825118Post **Milton66** » Sat 19 Sep 2009 11:39pm

plugger66 wrote:Max isnt going to play. We have plenty of talls aready to handle the cats forwards.

I think who umpires wil also be critical.

sendmehomehappy · Sat 19 Sep 2009 11:46pm

Gwilt in

We definately need another strong, mobile good kicking forward to take the heat off Roo. Has done it before in the finals and has a big body to batter them with.

Eddy goes...he has had too many chances...form is dropping right off and he has had enough this year.

Match Ups for Next Week...

Match Ups for Next Week...

Re: Match Ups for Next Week...

Re: Match Ups for Next Week...

Re: Match Ups for Next Week...