Ins and outs?

Saint Bev · Post: # 804467Post **Saint Bev** » Thu 27 Aug 2009 1:37pm

Dempster needs all the game time he can get.

In - Hayes, Ball, Max or Geary
Out - Riewoldt (inj), Blake (inj), Gwilt

Saint Bev · Post: # 804470Post **Saint Bev** » Thu 27 Aug 2009 1:39pm

jonesy wrote:If Goose has a hamstring,and isn't even training,then why to people continously drag his name up for selection?!!! Staggering!

X Clarke must play this weekend,and J Allen must be given a go as the third forward if not a farewell game

Your kidding, Allen is on crutches and X only just started training

Sobraz · Post: # 804473Post **Sobraz** » Thu 27 Aug 2009 1:43pm

Would be a big mistake to drop Gwilt imo...

Played a very servicable game on the weekend, and is crucial to our forward setup... He took a step up last week i thought... He is ready to break out...

He is probably the best, or equal to BJ, inside 50 deliverer in our team...

Thinline · Post: # 804478Post **Thinline** » Thu 27 Aug 2009 1:49pm

Saint Bev wrote:
jonesy wrote:If Goose has a hamstring,and isn't even training,then why to people continously drag his name up for selection?!!! Staggering!

X Clarke must play this weekend,and J Allen must be given a go as the third forward if not a farewell game
Your kidding, Allen is on crutches and X only just started training

I think you'll find he was pulling your leg, Bev, and making then point that Goose loyalists appear to have no idea about much...

Out Riewoldt (inj), Dawson, EDIT meant Armo!!! Sorry bakes...
In Hayes, Ball, Max

Gwilt retained as a forward in Riewoldt's absence ( I mean, really, why risk it?).

If Max not 100%, they'll ditch the risk there too and go with Geary and we'll play an extra mid instead of retaining Dawson or subbing a replacement tall.

Agree with Bev that Blake looked very sore at times. If he's out Dawson stays.

SaintHomer · Post: # 804479Post **SaintHomer** » Thu 27 Aug 2009 1:49pm

this side should basically be the side we are going into the finals with. we don't want to be making too many changes come finals time.

in - hayes, ball and hudhton
out - armitage (unlucky), gwilt/raph and dawson

dempster will be important come finals time. great negator, who did a number on hodge when we played the hawks. its funny to hear that he has not done much. i'm more interested on the person he is negating than what he is doing. dempster can also play forward if gwilt goes out.

St Chris · Post: # 804483Post **St Chris** » Thu 27 Aug 2009 2:00pm

Tonight's team will show:

In: Hayes, Geary, McEvoy
Out: Nil

And the final picked teams will be:

In: Hayes
Out: Armitage
Emerg: Armitage, Geary, McEvoy

McEvoy will be emergency as back up for Roo, and will come in if he doesn't pull up in time.

degruch · Post: # 804486Post **degruch** » Thu 27 Aug 2009 2:03pm

Sobraz wrote:Would be a big mistake to drop Gwilt imo...

Played a very servicable game on the weekend, and is crucial to our forward setup... He took a step up last week i thought... He is ready to break out...

He is probably the best, or equal to BJ, inside 50 deliverer in our team...

He'll be in, especially with Roo out.

spert · Post: # 804526Post **spert** » Thu 27 Aug 2009 2:24pm

Geary should replace Armo, as he has a bigger motor. Ball might have picked up a lot of possessions last week against Port Melb, but didn't overly impress me and went pretty quiet when the game was there to win in the last quarter. Max would probably be rested. I think McEvoy should have a run on the MCG and King could be rested.

SaintHomer · Post: # 804531Post **SaintHomer** » Thu 27 Aug 2009 2:28pm

Something that I think is great and shows how hard work pays off, it that McQualter has not been mentioned as a possible out. For so long he was fringe and even demoted to rookie at one stage, I think it's great that he is now a regular. Its ironic (but no surprise) that he is in the side because of the hard work he brings to the team.

JABBER · Post: # 804536Post **JABBER** » Thu 27 Aug 2009 2:37pm

INs McEvoy Hayes Ball Max
Outs Roo Milne Armo Gilbert

saintsRrising · Thu 27 Aug 2009 2:49pm

plugger66 wrote:Why will Max play. he hurt himself last week.

.

Did he?

I thought that he was reading and willing to play the second half...but that the coaches and conditioning staff opted to just be extra cautious on the day and so did not allow him to go back on.

Animal Enclosure · Thu 27 Aug 2009 3:01pm

I can't see Gwilt being dropped. He is very important structure wise as he's the high half forward that allows Roo & Kosi to play deep forward.

I think Lenny replaces Armo.

I hope Bally comes in as well but for who, I don't know.

I rate Dempster but I also think Geary is making huge claims to be back in the side.

Zac has had a few rough weeks and I'm not sure Max is fit enough to come straight back in. I'd probably prefer a fully fit Max but having said that I'm one of the few that thinks Max & Zac can play in the same side.

As much as McEvoy has improved I'd be very surprised if Ross doesn't go with the experienced ruck combo.

If there is any doubt on Roo, then I'd wouldn't be surprised if Tom Lynch gets a very surprise run. I do recall Ross saying something about young players playing important roles in finals (I think he used Dermie's debut in a final as an example).

plugger66 · Post: # 804561Post **plugger66** » Thu 27 Aug 2009 3:18pm

Saint Bev wrote:Dempster needs all the game time he can get.

In - Hayes, Ball, Max or Geary
Out - Riewoldt (inj), Blake (inj), Gwilt

Why is Blake injured. Do people just make things up.

plugger66 · Post: # 804563Post **plugger66** » Thu 27 Aug 2009 3:21pm

JABBER wrote:INs McEvoy Hayes Ball Max
Outs Roo Milne Armo Gilbert

Thanks for the comedy but we are trying to pick the Saints side this week.

terry smith rules · Thu 27 Aug 2009 3:22pm

Ice Wolf wrote:I'd keep Gwilt in, hes kicks into 50 we just about perfect, not his fault that the other forwards didn't capitalise.

They were long accurate and well aimed, much better than Grams long and out of bounds.

Exactly, there were a couple of kicks in the third quarter that were beauties, broke the line and kicked to position with 55m roosts.

As opposed to Gram's floating punts that go anywhere in a 40m arc.

I love the thought of Gwilt on the g, spotting up players.

I want Geary in as well, he has that great "x" factor of getting that goal from the 50.

Taking on board the resting of roo my changes are

In Geary Ball
Out Roo Armitage (think the big ground will find him out)

Max and Lenny , why risk them? If we play doggies week 1 then Max comes in for Brad Johnson. Not sure he gets a match up against the pies.

doggerel · Post: # 804576Post **doggerel** » Thu 27 Aug 2009 3:32pm

reincarnated wrote:In goose, ball, hayes, max
Out dawson, geary, gwilt, someone else

Hard to drop Geary seeing as he played for Sandringham.

He played a blinder actually and it will be hard for the coach not to bring him back on that form.

Thinline · Post: # 804605Post **Thinline** » Thu 27 Aug 2009 4:20pm

terry smith rules wrote:
I want Geary in as well, he has that great "x" factor of getting that goal from the 50.

I put to you that over his career Stephen Milne has won more ruck contests than Geary has bombed 50 metre goals.

Agree re Gwilty though. Hope he stays in.

Max would ruin Anthony if we get Pies.

Saint Bev · Post: # 804614Post **Saint Bev** » Thu 27 Aug 2009 4:29pm

plugger66 wrote:
Saint Bev wrote:Dempster needs all the game time he can get.

In - Hayes, Ball, Max or Geary
Out - Riewoldt (inj), Blake (inj), Gwilt
Why is Blake injured. Do people just make things up.

Not making it up. Was in the players rooms after last weeks game. He was very battered, could hardly walk and was in alot of stress, he needs a rest.

terry smith rules · Thu 27 Aug 2009 4:29pm

Thinline wrote:
terry smith rules wrote:
I want Geary in as well, he has that great "x" factor of getting that goal from the 50.

I put to you that over his career Stephen Milne has won more ruck contests than Geary has bombed 50 metre goals.

Yes he has only kicked 7 goals but I can thick of 2/3 where he has come through on the fifty and kicked the goal. No don't ask me the specific. sure someone can help.

Call it the "x" factor that you need in a final

Thinline · Post: # 804617Post **Thinline** » Thu 27 Aug 2009 4:34pm

Saint Bev wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Saint Bev wrote:Dempster needs all the game time he can get.

In - Hayes, Ball, Max or Geary
Out - Riewoldt (inj), Blake (inj), Gwilt
Why is Blake injured. Do people just make things up.
Not making it up. Was in the players rooms after last weeks game. He was very battered, could hardly walk and was in alot of stress, he needs a rest.

Blakey is a coach's dream. Leaves absolutely nothing on the paddock.

Hope he's alright.

reincarnated · Thu 27 Aug 2009 4:35pm

doggerel wrote:
reincarnated wrote:In goose, ball, hayes, max
Out dawson, geary, gwilt, someone else
Hard to drop Geary seeing as he played for Sandringham.

He played a blinder actually and it will be hard for the coach not to bring him back on that form.

Reincarnated's fault

Reincarnated swore he read that Geary was in our team and hence didn't obviously notice Geary at all during the game...as he wasnt there

borderbarry · Thu 27 Aug 2009 4:44pm

Reincarnated, not a bad trick if you can get away wiith it, dropping a player who is'nt there.

borderbarry · Thu 27 Aug 2009 4:45pm

Whoops, did'nt open page 2.

Gurgman · Post: # 804648Post **Gurgman** » Thu 27 Aug 2009 5:45pm

reincarnated wrote:In goose, ball, hayes, max
Out dawson, geary, gwilt, someone else

Out Geary , seems you take a lot of notice , he played for Sandy last week

saintbob · Post: # 804660Post **saintbob** » Thu 27 Aug 2009 6:00pm

INS : Hayes, Ball, Geary and Steven

OUTS : Armitage, Dempster, McQualter and Gwilt

Ins and outs?

Inns and outs

Re: Inns and outs