Ins and outs?

rexy · Post: # 804285Post **rexy** » Wed 26 Aug 2009 11:59pm

Could not find a thread for this week, find that unusual?

I think Hayes and Ball in. McEvoy a chance at the expense of King? Eddy or Geary may get another run?

Think Gwilt is out.

Armitage faded again, but good early, and hard.

Dempster seemed to be quiet. Is it just me?

Gramms ball use gets more and more frustrating, question is will others get into position to rceive it as often as he does if he is not there?

Ray had a poor game defensively I thought, looked lost. Over head marking speed and ball use are big pluses though.

Lastly I am still frustrated with our backline match ups, to me Fisher is still playing on a tall and either Dawson or Blake are getting a medium sized lead up. Not sure if I am undervaluing some op. players but on Sun I would have had Dawson on Petrie, Blake on Goldstein and played Fisher on Edwards? Must admit I have not scouted the strengths and form of the NM forwards and I may simply be wrong but many times this year I have felt that Fisher and Blake have played on the wrong guys. Is Fisher injured? Is Blake not good enough to play on the big forwards?

TassieJones · Thu 27 Aug 2009 12:01am

hudghton in

sax · Post: # 804287Post **sax** » Thu 27 Aug 2009 12:01am

In: Ball, Hayes, Hudghton
Out: Dempster, Gwilt, Dawson

That's what I'd like to see! Whether it happens or not......?

Young Georgie · Thu 27 Aug 2009 12:06am

sax wrote:In: Ball, Hayes, Hudghton
Out: Dempster, Gwilt, Dawson

That's what I'd like to see! Whether it happens or not......?

Seems reasonable IMO, I'd also like to see Geary come in for a run around the G at the expense perhaps of Armo. I don't think either of them have done much wrong when given the opportunity but IMO Geary adds a bit more spark and polish that has served the team well.

sainter104 · Thu 27 Aug 2009 12:28am

In Max Ball Mcevoy Hayes

Out Dawson Armo King ( gwilt or bakes )

SainterK · Post: # 804312Post **SainterK** » Thu 27 Aug 2009 12:33am

In: Ball
Out: Armitage

I guess that they will give Hayes and Max another week

jonesy · Post: # 804313Post **jonesy** » Thu 27 Aug 2009 12:33am

Can't see Rewoildt playing. Don't care what the club say,or players say to the media, he didn't look good at training today. Gingerly jogging.
If it was round 4 he'd miss a month

Bernard Shakey · Thu 27 Aug 2009 12:34am

From the body language at training today.

In: Lenny, Ball.

Out: Gwilt, Armitage (only because Lenny and Ball will be in).

Max will not play this week.

degruch · Post: # 804316Post **degruch** » Thu 27 Aug 2009 12:35am

Out: Reiwoldt
In: Ball

Legendary · Post: # 804319Post **Legendary** » Thu 27 Aug 2009 12:37am

Bernard Shakey wrote:From the body language at training today.

In: Lenny, Ball.

Out: Gwilt, Armitage (only because Lenny and Ball will be in).

Max will not play this week.

Concur with that.

TassieJones · Thu 27 Aug 2009 12:48am

Bernard Shakey wrote: Max will not play this week.

you seem pretty adamant mate, any particular reason? is he still injured?

nathan000 · Post: # 804332Post **nathan000** » Thu 27 Aug 2009 12:49am

sax wrote:In: Ball, Hayes, Hudghton
Out: Dempster, Gwilt, Dawson

That's what I'd like to see! Whether it happens or not......?

I agree completely with that.

Gurgman · Post: # 804345Post **Gurgman** » Thu 27 Aug 2009 1:33am

Why do you want Gwilt out , so it was his fault we lost was it ???? They have tried several players in his spot and he is the best by a long way , you smart arses tell me who can play his spot better then , if its not Raph its Gwilt yuo want ti drop ,

plugger66 · Post: # 804364Post **plugger66** » Thu 27 Aug 2009 2:37am

Why will Max play. he hurt himself last week.

In Ball hayes
Out gwilt Armo or dempster.

jonesy · Post: # 804430Post **jonesy** » Thu 27 Aug 2009 12:06pm

Bit worried about Dempster and his role. I know he's used more as a negator, but still,don't think he does enough. We're lacking a bit of run,he doesn't provide any. I think the balance was better when we had Geary in the side.

borderbarry · Thu 27 Aug 2009 12:46pm

Assuming Max is going to be given another week to recover, I would bring in Ball, Hayes, and Geary. Out would go Gwilt, Dempster, and either Baker or Armitage. Dawson to exit when Max returns.

St Plugger · Thu 27 Aug 2009 12:46pm

Re Gwilt,

They have tried several players in his spot and he is the best by a long way

I couln't agree more. He seems to now realise this himself, showing some real intent against the Roos last weekend.

borderbarry · Thu 27 Aug 2009 12:49pm

I dont mind James Gwilt, but he has played the majority of games this year as a half forward, and his results are not good enough. We still need that bigger 3rd forward, a role I expect Lynch to fill next season.

saint75 · Post: # 804442Post **saint75** » Thu 27 Aug 2009 12:57pm

INS: Ball, Hayes, MacGuire (bit left field)
OUTS: Armitage, Gwilt, Riewoldt (resting)

Before I get shouted down for MacGuire, it is just a little something from left field. Nothing to lose but plenty to gain by giving him a shot in a game that has no impact to the rest of the year (he will get his 100th game - father/son). Also, if Roo or Kosi should get cut down, nice to know we may have a replacement to step into the team. Ross likes to keep us on our toes.....

Ball will definitely get a shot after his performance in the 2's last week.

Riewoldt they will err on the side of caution due to his importance to the team for the finals

Hayes has had the week off and will need a run before the finals if his elbow/illness allows.....

reincarnated · Thu 27 Aug 2009 1:04pm

In goose, ball, hayes, max
Out dawson, geary, gwilt, someone else

aussiejones · Thu 27 Aug 2009 1:08pm

Fishers game was good compared to previous weeks .

Also Gwilt was ok too.

Baker is down and slow .

jonesy · Post: # 804452Post **jonesy** » Thu 27 Aug 2009 1:12pm

If Goose has a hamstring,and isn't even training,then why to people continously drag his name up for selection?!!! Staggering!

X Clarke must play this weekend,and J Allen must be given a go as the third forward if not a farewell game

Ice Wolf · Post: # 804455Post **Ice Wolf** » Thu 27 Aug 2009 1:15pm

I'd keep Gwilt in, hes kicks into 50 we just about perfect, not his fault that the other forwards didn't capitalise.

They were long accurate and well aimed, much better than Grams long and out of bounds.

saint75 · Post: # 804456Post **saint75** » Thu 27 Aug 2009 1:16pm

jonesy wrote:If Goose has a hamstring,and isn't even training,then why to people continously drag his name up for selection?!!! Staggering!

X Clarke must play this weekend,and J Allen must be given a go as the third forward if not a farewell game

Notice how you said 'if' in regards to Goose. Even you are not sure.

I don't know where he is at with his injury and if you bothered to read, you would notice that I was using his selection as a 'smoky' for this week. FFS, some people need to take a chill pill! This thread is to guess the ins and out and is just a bit of fun.....

jonesy · Post: # 804462Post **jonesy** » Thu 27 Aug 2009 1:31pm

It wasn't an "if" as in 'not sure'...I was using it as a point. He did a hammy,he's not training,how can he play? The calls for Goose to play now can not be just a "bit of fun". It's everywhere I look...facebook...all the nuffs nuffs on there continously call for him to play....ARGHHHHHHHHHHH....get over Goose!!!!