Ball

Dark Days · Post: # 799718Post **Dark Days** » Thu 20 Aug 2009 7:21pm

What would we take for Ball

plugger66 · Post: # 799720Post **plugger66** » Thu 20 Aug 2009 7:22pm

Dark Days wrote:What would we take for Ball

A bat.

Dark Days · Post: # 799722Post **Dark Days** » Thu 20 Aug 2009 7:23pm

he needs a bat at the moment

starsign · Post: # 799729Post **starsign** » Thu 20 Aug 2009 7:32pm

normally my dancing shoes plenty of crownies on ice and maybe a bottle of red and something for Cinderella

widereceiver · Thu 20 Aug 2009 7:35pm

I feel for the guy, but I think he's GAWN.

SainterK · Post: # 799748Post **SainterK** » Thu 20 Aug 2009 7:43pm

We are in a position of having depth for the first time in a long time, I don't subscribe to trading it all away myself....

skeptic · Post: # 799758Post **skeptic** » Thu 20 Aug 2009 7:58pm

apparently daniel kerr if we lose a 1st rounder too

Mr Magic · Post: # 799764Post **Mr Magic** » Thu 20 Aug 2009 8:05pm

His manager is going to struggle to get a 'big contract' out of the Saints with Bally not an automatic selection atm.

If you take today's team selection at 'face value' then,
Armitage is currently preferred as an inside mid
Mini is currently preferred as a defensive hff
CJ is currently preferred as a tagging midfielder.

Stillwaiting · Thu 20 Aug 2009 8:05pm

plugger66 wrote:
Dark Days wrote:What would we take for Ball
A bat.

, I love the non intelligent humor

But seriously, he should not be traded, to good a player not to come back.

Sobraz · Post: # 799768Post **Sobraz** » Thu 20 Aug 2009 8:09pm

skeptic wrote:apparently daniel kerr if we lose a 1st rounder too

Must be too good to be true.... Lets hope theres truth to this rumour...

older saint · Thu 20 Aug 2009 8:14pm

Mr Magic wrote:His manager is going to struggle to get a 'big contract' out of the Saints with Bally not an automatic selection atm.

If you take today's team selection at 'face value' then,
Armitage is currently preferred as an inside mid
Mini is currently preferred as a defensive hff
CJ is currently preferred as a tagging midfielder.

Not sure of the 1st one, they know what Ball gives, armitage an unknown quantity at the moment. Worryis Ball could become Daniel Harford mark 2. Hope not and he bounces back. Must be remembered althugh did not miss footy coming off first full season for a while.

SaintHomer · Post: # 799770Post **SaintHomer** » Thu 20 Aug 2009 8:15pm

unbelievable. i'm glad the club doesn't turn its back as quickly as some supporters. ball must remain a required player. he will find form again (maybe not in time this year) and with him in the reserves, that's super depth and super pressure on those in the side.

he's also a victim of his own success. he's been every bit as good as armitage in the past two weeks (arguably better). but i don't think either are in our best 22 at present.

Stillwaiting · Thu 20 Aug 2009 8:18pm

SaintHomer wrote:unbelievable. i'm glad the club doesn't turn its back as quickly as some supporters. ball must remain a required player. he will find form again (maybe not in time this year) and with him in the reserves, that's super depth and super pressure on those in the side.

he's also a victim of his own success. he's been every bit as good as armitage in the past two weeks (arguably better). but i don't think either are in our best 22 at present.

and i think constant injuries have hurt him. but agree with everything you said. We must keep Ball, he deserves the chance

BaysideSaint · Thu 20 Aug 2009 8:24pm

you're all idiots.
here you all are thinking like the media they have turned you into zombies.
luke ball's position is unquestioned.
he is NOT the guy who cant get a start.
he is THE GUY that everything depends on.

Dan Warna · Post: # 799776Post **Dan Warna** » Thu 20 Aug 2009 8:25pm

form changes class does not.

ball is a class player with a few issues atm.

I would hate to see Ball leave or be pushed.

That said he needs to earn his place.

everything that can be done should be done to keep him.

those throwing rocks at him need a good hard look at themselves. I would how many people would put their body on the line as ball has done for the club.

Stillwaiting · Thu 20 Aug 2009 8:25pm

BaysideSaint wrote:you're all idiots.
here you all are thinking like the media they have turned you into zombies.
luke ball's position is unquestioned.
he is NOT the guy who cant get a start.
he is THE GUY that everything depends on.

How to win freinds and influence people 101

BaysideSaint · Thu 20 Aug 2009 8:26pm

are you really that thick STILLWAITING?

Mr Magic · Post: # 799779Post **Mr Magic** » Thu 20 Aug 2009 8:30pm

BaysideSaint wrote:you're all idiots.
here you all are thinking like the media they have turned you into zombies.
luke ball's position is unquestioned.
he is NOT the guy who cant get a start.
he is THE GUY that everything depends on.

Well unless you're a member of either the coaching panel or the match/selection committee at St Kilda, then your post needs an 'IMHO' attached to it. (IMO)

suss · Post: # 799780Post **suss** » Thu 20 Aug 2009 8:33pm

BaysideSaint wrote:you're all idiots.
here you all are thinking like the media they have turned you into zombies.
luke ball's position is unquestioned.
he is NOT the guy who cant get a start.
he is THE GUY that everything depends on.

What are you on about?

BaysideSaint · Thu 20 Aug 2009 8:34pm

suss wrote:
BaysideSaint wrote:you're all idiots.
here you all are thinking like the media they have turned you into zombies.
luke ball's position is unquestioned.
he is NOT the guy who cant get a start.
he is THE GUY that everything depends on.
What are you on about?

luke ball is the ace of spades.

Stillwaiting · Thu 20 Aug 2009 8:35pm

BaysideSaint wrote:are you really that thick STILLWAITING?

chookfeeder

plugger66 · Post: # 799784Post **plugger66** » Thu 20 Aug 2009 8:36pm

Its not whether Luke Ball is good enough or not its to other things, are we prepared to pay a pretty large sum for a depth player and the answer should be no and secondly can we get a good trade for a depth player and if for some strange reason the answer is yes then he could go.

Depth players dont earn 500k a year no matter how much we like and respect him.

suss · Post: # 799786Post **suss** » Thu 20 Aug 2009 8:39pm

BaysideSaint wrote:
suss wrote:
BaysideSaint wrote:you're all idiots.
here you all are thinking like the media they have turned you into zombies.
luke ball's position is unquestioned.
he is NOT the guy who cant get a start.
he is THE GUY that everything depends on.
What are you on about?
luke ball is the ace of spades.

Right-e-o then. I wasn't sure what you were on about but that explains everything.

You are talking about the guy playing for Sandy this weekend aren't you?

Moods · Post: # 799789Post **Moods** » Thu 20 Aug 2009 8:40pm

BaysideSaint wrote:you're all idiots.
here you all are thinking like the media they have turned you into zombies.
luke ball's position is unquestioned.
he is NOT the guy who cant get a start.
he is THE GUY that everything depends on.

Care to elaborate or explain yourself?

His position obviously is in question or he wouldn't be dropped - again!

We are 19-1 without a huge input from him, so hardly everything depends on him.

Maybe I'm not as profound as you, but from where I'm sitting your post makes absolutely no sense.

saintjake · Post: # 799791Post **saintjake** » Thu 20 Aug 2009 8:46pm

would love to get daniel kerr for himXD

Ball

Ball

Re: Ball

Re: Ball