Milne reported?

Abxdul · Post: # 786188Post **Abxdul** » Sat 01 Aug 2009 9:27pm

Did I hear right???

fonz_#15 · Post: # 786191Post **fonz_#15** » Sat 01 Aug 2009 9:27pm

yeah no idea what for though i missed it

battye · Post: # 786194Post **battye** » Sat 01 Aug 2009 9:28pm

Reported for throwing his arms back.

saint1974 · Post: # 786197Post **saint1974** » Sat 01 Aug 2009 9:29pm

Should be ok!
Abit of push and shove.
Sydney player went down milking it for a free!

Spinner · Post: # 786199Post **Spinner** » Sat 01 Aug 2009 9:29pm

Curious of others thoughts....But is Crouch viewed as a respected player? Or is he a bit of a dog?

I know Aker has had problems with him.....

saint75 · Post: # 786203Post **saint75** » Sat 01 Aug 2009 9:31pm

Crouch was alll over him right in front of the umpire. Umpire decided he would finally book Milne instead of giving him the free kick after Milne pushed his arms back to get him off his back.

Should have been a free to Milne, not a report. *Should* get thrown out, but with our record at the tribunal, it will mostly likely be 6 weeks!

mullet · Post: # 786211Post **mullet** » Sat 01 Aug 2009 9:37pm

I am not sure if he actually got reported. The commentators said so but we didnt see if he actually got reported cause they were showing a replay of something else. When they showed a replay of the incident Dunstal said nothing in it.

goodie · Post: # 786460Post **goodie** » Sat 01 Aug 2009 11:02pm

Should be tossed out, nothing in it

But then the MRP is a joke, anything could happen

backit · Post: # 786468Post **backit** » Sat 01 Aug 2009 11:04pm

Right in front of umpire, Andrew Maher and Malcolm Blight uncommitted on outcome.

matrix · Post: # 786520Post **matrix** » Sat 01 Aug 2009 11:13pm

well if ya reported for stuff RIGHT IN FRONT of the ump
ya could be in some trouble

degruch · Post: # 786523Post **degruch** » Sat 01 Aug 2009 11:14pm

matrixcutter wrote:well if ya reported for stuff RIGHT IN FRONT of the ump
ya could be in some trouble

By the same token, if the umpire calls play on instead of a report, you should be OK then?

matrix · Post: # 786529Post **matrix** » Sat 01 Aug 2009 11:15pm

degruch wrote:
matrixcutter wrote:well if ya reported for stuff RIGHT IN FRONT of the ump
ya could be in some trouble
By the same token, if the umpire calls play on instead of a report, you should be OK then?

huh?
lost me

Cairnsman · Post: # 786530Post **Cairnsman** » Sat 01 Aug 2009 11:15pm

backit wrote:Right in front of umpire, Andrew Maher and Malcolm Blight uncommitted on outcome.

well if those oxygen thiefs were uncommitted it means Milney is completely safe.

degruch · Post: # 786531Post **degruch** » Sat 01 Aug 2009 11:16pm

matrixcutter wrote:
degruch wrote:
matrixcutter wrote:well if ya reported for stuff RIGHT IN FRONT of the ump
ya could be in some trouble
By the same token, if the umpire calls play on instead of a report, you should be OK then?
huh?
lost me

Zac.

battye · Post: # 786534Post **battye** » Sat 01 Aug 2009 11:16pm

degruch wrote:
matrixcutter wrote:well if ya reported for stuff RIGHT IN FRONT of the ump
ya could be in some trouble
By the same token, if the umpire calls play on instead of a report, you should be OK then?

There was no 50m penalty after the report was there? How can it be report worthy but not bad enough for a 50?

Enrico_Misso · Sat 01 Aug 2009 11:18pm

We should bring in a screen and make those dithering f'wits on the tribunal watch the Hall punch on Maguire 137 times and then rest our case.

matrix · Post: # 786544Post **matrix** » Sat 01 Aug 2009 11:18pm

ohhhhh
lol
dunno
footage is right in the corner of the screen
thank god for fox camera work

hard to tell what will happen
prob 4 weeks

i mean he did throw the arms back

crouch was being a prick all day

desertsaint · Sat 01 Aug 2009 11:20pm

on radio talback - confirmed he was reported

BigMart · Post: # 786583Post **BigMart** » Sat 01 Aug 2009 11:27pm

Lacked disipline most of the night Milne - he was more interested in Crouch than impacting the game....he was sucked in and had his pants pulled down.....kudos to crouch

battye · Post: # 786599Post **battye** » Sat 01 Aug 2009 11:31pm

matrixcutter wrote:ohhhhh
lol
dunno
footage is right in the corner of the screen
thank god for fox camera work

hard to tell what will happen
prob 4 weeks
i mean he did throw the arms back
crouch was being a prick all day

No footage... what is the precedent for that. Didn't Baker get 8 or 10 weeks or something...

Maxstar22 · Post: # 786630Post **Maxstar22** » Sat 01 Aug 2009 11:40pm

Well we all know what inept tools the MRP are. They never seem to make logical or consistant descisions.

Luckily the vision is pretty poor, but on saying that it was right in front of the ump and bad or no vision didn't help Bakes.

Bernard Shakey · Sun 02 Aug 2009 12:24am

Milney swings an arm right in front of an umpire who reports him.

If the umpire says he hit him in the head, I would say he's in trouble video or no video.

battye · Post: # 786766Post **battye** » Sun 02 Aug 2009 12:27am

Bernard Shakey wrote:Milney swings an arm right in front of an umpire who reports him.

If the umpire says he hit him in the head, I would say he's in trouble video or no video.

Don't forget the infamous attempting to strike verdict. Whether he hit him or not could be irrelevant...

st.byron · Post: # 786813Post **st.byron** » Sun 02 Aug 2009 12:52am

Saw the footage on the fifth quarter. Was behind play. Didn't look good. Two weeks I reckon.

saint75 · Post: # 786833Post **saint75** » Sun 02 Aug 2009 1:09am

st.byron wrote:Saw the footage on the fifth quarter. Was behind play. Didn't look good. Two weeks I reckon.

You can't be serious? 2 weeks?

Must have been watching a different game......