Changes this week

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

User avatar
Hurricane
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4038
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:24pm
Location: The isle of Besaid, Spira

Post: # 780606Post Hurricane »

in: Gardiner, Max, Ball
out: Eddy (omit) , Kosi, Dawson (both susp)

Ball for Eddy and Max are obvious ones. Ball goes back into the middle and Maxy covers the defense. King is full time ruck rotation and Big Ben and Gardy take stints up foward and in the ruck.

Ben has played up front in the VFL and can kick a goal plus we all know Gardy can take a grab and kick a goal. Both may be less mobile than Kosi but both have the size and strength to be a good target

I honestly think Goose's form in the VFL has (unfortunatly) not earned him inclusion

BANG BANG


Mitsuharu Misawa 1962 - 2009.

I am vengeance....I am the night...I....AM.....BATMAN

I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass and im all out of bubblegum
User avatar
St Fidelius
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10492
Joined: Sun 01 Aug 2004 10:30am

Post: # 780611Post St Fidelius »

bigcarl wrote:
St Fidelius wrote:I cannot give an opinion if I don't know how he has played.
fair enough. i thought you might be one of the posters who have already decided his time at st kilda is over. i apologise if i offended you,
No offence taken, I just thought I was clear on the fact that I don't know Goose's form over the last 4 odd matches.

You did mention the fact that....
i'm wondering how many times you've seen him play this season to make the call on his career.
If his form (again if) he is not up to it, IMO playing him FF against one of the in form FB that maybe the Club are making a call on his career.

It will be a tough call to play him at FF and I would suggest that if he is not really in good form this weeks inclusion into the side maybe a career call.

If he has not been in the best 4 players for Sandi over the last four games I hope he does not play for his sake, but if he plays I hope he plays a blinder.

I would like to see Milne play FF to stuff up Lakes overhead marking.

If Milne can mark on the lead Lakes high marking would be rendered useless.

I would structure a smaller FF line, but that's just my opinion.


Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18655
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1994 times
Been thanked: 873 times

Post: # 780612Post bigcarl »

kannus_ wrote:RL has obviously done something right this year considering we are 16-0. I think we are pretty safe to trust whatever decision he makes will be the right one.
correct. he's the guy who has to accept responsibility for the decisions that are made and i'll back whatever team they go with.


claystreet
Club Player
Posts: 1166
Joined: Mon 17 Sep 2007 1:52pm
Location: Outer Wing Moorabbin

Post: # 780621Post claystreet »

Kosi Zac out

Max Gardy in


PJ
SS Life Member
Posts: 2974
Joined: Sun 14 Dec 2008 10:31am
Location: Adelaide

Post: # 780628Post PJ »

MG isnt a forward and neither is Ben.
Someone should tell them to get the hell out of the forward line then :roll:

Ben has played plenty of forward time in his development and Gardy can come in from time to time. There are options and these guys can present and do a job.


I've never seen a bad St.Kilda player - that's just how they are.
bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18655
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1994 times
Been thanked: 873 times

Post: # 780636Post bigcarl »

St Fidelius wrote:It will be a tough call to play him at FF and I would suggest that if he is not really in good form this weeks inclusion into the side maybe a career call.
not giving him the chance might be worse. if he can't break into the side when we're down two key position players (maybe three if max doesn't come up) his future seems bleak.

personally i'd play him, but it's easy for me to say because i don't have to accept responsibility for the decision and ross and the match committee do.


User avatar
St Fidelius
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10492
Joined: Sun 01 Aug 2004 10:30am

Post: # 780640Post St Fidelius »

bigcarl wrote:
St Fidelius wrote:It will be a tough call to play him at FF and I would suggest that if he is not really in good form this weeks inclusion into the side maybe a career call.
not giving him the chance might be worse. if he can't break into the side when we're down two key position players (maybe three if max doesn't come up) his future seems bleak.

personally i'd play him, but it's easy for me to say because i don't have to accept responsibility for the decision and ross and the match committee do.
If he plays, I would like to see him down back and maybe Gilbert up forward on the HF Line.

It's just that I feel he will be more comfortable down back instead of in the forward half


Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
User avatar
St Chris
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2153
Joined: Wed 05 Apr 2006 2:20pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 41 times

Post: # 780644Post St Chris »

We've made minimal changes every week, so i can't see how this week will be any different.

Out: Kosi, Dawson
In: Maguire, Gardiner

Emerg: Ball, Miles, Gwilt

Max still no good.....


lefty
Club Player
Posts: 1307
Joined: Tue 28 Sep 2004 8:11pm
Been thanked: 40 times

Post: # 780654Post lefty »

Out: Eddy, Kosi, Zac, McEvoy

In: Armatige, Meguire, Max, Gardiner



I dont want to be harsh but Eddy is definately not in the top 22. His main problem is his kicking, its not up to standard. Geary is WAY ahead than Eddy for me, although I honestly think Armatige deserves a crack. I rate Armo very high as most do, Im not sure why Ross wont play him, I need to see a lenny/armo combo, common Ross!

Meguire for Kosi, give him a go at Full Forward, surely its time to see him have a carck.

Max for Zac, you want both in your team any day of the week :) (max is faster)

McEvoy for Gardiner, Ben still learning, but Gardiner has been in form and has alot more effect around the ground.

Luke Ball... well I couldn't fit him in, he'd be fighting for the Eddy/Geary/Armo spot.
Last edited by lefty on Wed 22 Jul 2009 11:12pm, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
St Fidelius
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10492
Joined: Sun 01 Aug 2004 10:30am

Post: # 780658Post St Fidelius »

lefty wrote:Out: Eddy, Kosi, Zac, McEvoy

In: Armatige, Meguire, Max, Gardiner



I dont want to be harsh but Eddy is definately not in the top 22. His main problem is his kicking, its not up to standard. Geary is still better than Eddy for me, although I honestly think Armatige deserves a crack.

Meguire for Kosi, give him a go at Full Forward, surely its time to see him have a carck.

Max for Zac, you want both in your team any day of the week :)

McEvoy for Gardiner, Ben still learning, but Gardiner has been in form and has alot more effect around the ground.

Luke Ball... well I couldn't fit him in, he'd be fighting for the Eddy/Geary/Armo spot.
Again, just why do so many posters want Goose to play FF against Lake?

Correct me if I am wrong but has he only played just two games as FF for Sandi and some on here want him to play FF against Lake in his first hit out this year???

I would like to think, if selected, he would be better off playing in the back half


Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
lefty
Club Player
Posts: 1307
Joined: Tue 28 Sep 2004 8:11pm
Been thanked: 40 times

Post: # 780662Post lefty »

St Fidelius wrote:Again, just why do so many posters want Goose to play FF against Lake?

Correct me if I am wrong but has he only played just two games as FF for Sandi and some on here want him to play FF against Lake in his first hit out this year???

I would like to think, if selected, he would be better off playing in the back half
Because Goose is big and solid enough to be at Full Forward. Our backline is very strong, so there's no point putting him there. How do you try get into a backline with Max, Fisher, Gram, Clarke, Blake?, Gilbert, Dawson, Goddard, Dempster, Baker. Im sure goose would be craving at the opportunity, its been quite some time, and Im sure he'd try to prove himself.

I cant see a Gwilt or McEvoy playing a FF role, Gwilt is good but not big enough and McEvoy is still learning. I dont think Lynch is ready to have a crack either. If Gwilt came in, then Roo would have to go FF, but I think Roo is better around the Forward flank, he provides that kicking option/strong mark that no one else seems to do.

I wouldn't want to have 3 rucks playing against a fast Bulldogs teams. McEvoy is quite slow around the ground compared to Gardy/King.

Also Bulldogs lack tall defenders so technically Goose should be alright, the matchups should be in our favour.
Last edited by lefty on Wed 22 Jul 2009 11:27pm, edited 1 time in total.


SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Post: # 780667Post SainterK »

lefty wrote:
St Fidelius wrote:Again, just why do so many posters want Goose to play FF against Lake?

Correct me if I am wrong but has he only played just two games as FF for Sandi and some on here want him to play FF against Lake in his first hit out this year???

I would like to think, if selected, he would be better off playing in the back half
Because Goose is big and solid enough to be at Full Forward. Our backline is very strong, so there's no point putting him there. How do you try get into a backline with Max, Fisher, Gram, Clarke, Blake?, Gilbert, Dawson. Im sure goose would be craving at the opportunity, its been quite some time, and Im sure he'd try to prove himself.

I cant see a Gwilt or McEvoy playing a FF role, Gwilt is good but not big enough and McEvoy is still learning. I dont think Lynch is ready to have a crack either. If Gwilt came in, then Roo would have to go FF, but I think Roo is better around the Forward flank, he provides that kicking option/strong mark that no one else seems to do.

I wouldn't want to have 3 rucks playing against a fast Bulldogs teams. McEvoy is quite slow around the ground compared to Gardy/King.

Also Bulldogs lack tall defenders so technically Goose should be alright, the matchups should be in our favour.
Are Gwilt and Goose much different in size?


bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18655
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1994 times
Been thanked: 873 times

Post: # 780669Post bigcarl »

ohwhenthesaints! wrote:Are Gwilt and Goose much different in size?
no, but goose is a strong key position player and gwilt hasn't shown that he is.


User avatar
St Fidelius
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10492
Joined: Sun 01 Aug 2004 10:30am

Post: # 780670Post St Fidelius »

lefty wrote:
St Fidelius wrote:Again, just why do so many posters want Goose to play FF against Lake?

Correct me if I am wrong but has he only played just two games as FF for Sandi and some on here want him to play FF against Lake in his first hit out this year???

I would like to think, if selected, he would be better off playing in the back half
Because Goose is big and solid enough to be at Full Forward. Our backline is very strong, so there's no point putting him there. How do you try get into a backline with Max, Fisher, Gram, Clarke, Blake?, Gilbert, Dawson. Im sure goose would be craving at the opportunity, its been quite some time, and Im sure he'd try to prove himself.

I cant see a Gwilt or McEvoy playing a FF role, Gwilt is good but not big enough and McEvoy is still learning. I dont think Lynch is ready to have a crack either. If Gwilt came in, then Roo would have to go FF, but I think Roo is better around the Forward flank, he provides that kicking option/strong mark that no one else seems to do.

I wouldn't want to have 3 rucks playing against a fast Bulldogs teams. McEvoy is quite slow around the ground compared to Gardy/King.

Also Bulldogs lack tall defenders so technically Goose should be alright, the matchups should be in our favour.
Well I differ on that...

his first game since round 7 last year and you and others want him to line up against one of the in form FB who's assets is his marking against top quality FF.

I hope I am wrong on this but I just feel it's too much to ask of him and maybe Gilbert would be better off in the forward half and Goose down back (if Goose gets a game)


Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
lefty
Club Player
Posts: 1307
Joined: Tue 28 Sep 2004 8:11pm
Been thanked: 40 times

Post: # 780672Post lefty »

ohwhenthesaints! wrote: Are Gwilt and Goose much different in size?
If he is, it wouldn't be by much, but I would think that Goose is stronger/built bigger, but I'd expect Gwilt to be faster/more agile.


lefty
Club Player
Posts: 1307
Joined: Tue 28 Sep 2004 8:11pm
Been thanked: 40 times

Post: # 780677Post lefty »

St Fidelius wrote:Well I differ on that...

his first game since round 7 last year and you and others want him to line up against one of the in form FB who's assets is his marking against top quality FF.

I hope I am wrong on this but I just feel it's too much to ask of him and maybe Gilbert would be better off in the forward half and Goose down back (if Goose gets a game)
All good, I dont think having this discussion is bad, its a good problem to have :)

Im not sure if I'd want Gilbert out of our backline, he tries and runs the hardest out of all of them, chase's/runs down players when we're in trouble.


bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18655
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1994 times
Been thanked: 873 times

Post: # 780745Post bigcarl »

St Fidelius wrote:his first game since round 7 last year and you and others want him to line up against one of the in form FB who's assets is his marking against top quality FF.
if he does play there, and i think it's a possibility, i'll be measuring him against kosi's form of the past fortnight.

in other words, the bar is set low (and i love kosi as a player).

all he would need to do is compete, bring the ball to ground for the crumbers, draw a player away from riewoldt and hopefully snag a goal.

structurally the role is important because it gives us the option of going deep to a marking contest.

but it is not the only type of forward line that can be effective and, as others have said, they might decide to go with a smaller set up.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Post: # 780750Post plugger66 »

bigcarl wrote:
St Fidelius wrote:It will be a tough call to play him at FF and I would suggest that if he is not really in good form this weeks inclusion into the side maybe a career call.
not giving him the chance might be worse. if he can't break into the side when we're down two key position players (maybe three if max doesn't come up) his future seems bleak.

personally i'd play him, but it's easy for me to say because i don't have to accept responsibility for the decision and ross and the match committee do.
It is completely different wondering down forward whilst rucking than to play permanately in the foward line against a fast running side. MG hasnt been able to do it for years and Ben isnt developed enough to do it yet.


User avatar
Ghost Like
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6562
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
Has thanked: 5786 times
Been thanked: 1909 times

Post: # 780780Post Ghost Like »

bigcarl wrote:
St Fidelius wrote:his first game since round 7 last year and you and others want him to line up against one of the in form FB who's assets is his marking against top quality FF.
if he does play there, and i think it's a possibility, i'll be measuring him against kosi's form of the past fortnight.

in other words, the bar is set low (and i love kosi as a player).

all he would need to do is compete, bring the ball to ground for the crumbers, draw a player away from riewoldt and hopefully snag a goal.


structurally the role is important because it gives us the option of going deep to a marking contest.

but it is not the only type of forward line that can be effective and, as others have said, they might decide to go with a smaller set up.
Spot on with the first part bc...vreat summation of why and what he'd need to do.

I serously doubt the last line as we have not played to a forward line like that all year, it would go against evrything our players have trained and played to this year. Unless our 'smaller' forward line is Goddard and Gilbert, which really isn't that small. However I'd be loath to lose their run and flexibility from the back half and through the middle.


User avatar
borderbarry
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6676
Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
Location: Wodonga

Post: # 780799Post borderbarry »

If form is to be considered, Tom Lynch should get a shot. Has been playing well for Sandy over the last month or so. Could be an asset to our forward line.
Ball is probably nursing a sore groin. If so, one week out is probably not enough.
If Max is fit he must come in. We will need him to man up on Buddy in Tassy in a few weeks. No way would you give that job to Zac.
Gardiner if fit is a certainty.
Will be very interesting to see this weeks selections.


claystreet
Club Player
Posts: 1166
Joined: Mon 17 Sep 2007 1:52pm
Location: Outer Wing Moorabbin

Post: # 780996Post claystreet »

borderbarry wrote:If form is to be considered, Tom Lynch should get a shot. Has been playing well for Sandy over the last month or so. Could be an asset to our forward line.
Ball is probably nursing a sore groin. If so, one week out is probably not enough.
If Max is fit he must come in. We will need him to man up on Buddy in Tassy in a few weeks. No way would you give that job to Zac.
Gardiner if fit is a certainty.
Will be very interesting to see this weeks selections.
I am thinking Lynch as an outsider for a crack at it as well


SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Post: # 781096Post SainterK »

This is about the time on a Thursday it gets busy around here....

Wonder if we will have a 100th game celebration this weekend


claystreet
Club Player
Posts: 1166
Joined: Mon 17 Sep 2007 1:52pm
Location: Outer Wing Moorabbin

Post: # 781109Post claystreet »

I dont think Ross will be too left field in his picks, but i am sure Goose would be on the table with a few others.

I am starting to think Lynch might get a run but will stick with my original
Max and Gardy


Post Reply