Official TEAM vs Carlton
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006 8:34am
- Location: Jurassic Park
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10598
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
- Location: North
- Has thanked: 1011 times
- Been thanked: 1055 times
Agree that it would be a big plus for us if Armo could get himself into a position where he's demanding selection. He can't be too far away if he's being named as an emergency.Armoooo wrote:
IMO it all comes down to attitude, Mini is in the team for his work ethic.
He tackles, he chases and he isn't afraid to get hurt.
IMO Armitage is a far more talented player and if he applied himself could be a superior player to Mini, tackling, chasing, harrassing and going hard at the ball are things that everyone is capable of, it just comes down to your state of mind. If Armo could get himself into that state of mind he could easily play Mini's role and be more damaging offensively.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18655
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1994 times
- Been thanked: 873 times
bj's the most likely to kick a bag, true, but plugger has it right about the balance aspect.starsign wrote:i'm thinking that one of gilbert, blake or dawson will play gwilt's usual role this week.
thinking in terms of BJ myself
blake or dawson most likely to play forward, imo. he'll go for a settled back six before he worries about kicking goals if i read him right.
Last edited by bigcarl on Thu 11 Jun 2009 8:32pm, edited 2 times in total.
Thoght Blake was very lucky to retain his spot in front of Gwilt, Still think Raph is best 22 but his form does not warrant selection and he will need to prove himself again to get his spot back. Disagree with some on Mcqualter, dont see him dropping out of the side unless his form changes, regardless of who is pressing for his spot.
Maybe this year?
- Spinner
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8502
- Joined: Sat 02 Dec 2006 3:40pm
- Location: Victoria
- Has thanked: 185 times
- Been thanked: 133 times
With all respect what is Blake going to do up forward?plugger66 wrote:If Milne plays I would think Blake will go forward as the backline is still top heavy and Max and Blake together isnt great for the skills of the backline. Obviously Jimmy comes in if Milney doesnt play so Blake cannot go forward.
If that were the case surely Gwilt would have been a better option, firstly his skill level and secondly he has been playing that structure all year.
Excellent point but maybe RL like the flexibility that Blake gives him. Jimmy has a little flexibilty but not as much as Blake.Spinner wrote:With all respect what is Blake going to do up forward?plugger66 wrote:If Milne plays I would think Blake will go forward as the backline is still top heavy and Max and Blake together isnt great for the skills of the backline. Obviously Jimmy comes in if Milney doesnt play so Blake cannot go forward.
If that were the case surely Gwilt would have been a better option, firstly his skill level and secondly he has been playing that structure all year.
- mad saint guy
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7088
- Joined: Tue 26 Jul 2005 9:44pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 52 times
- Been thanked: 367 times
Get no respect from Carlton, find himself loose in the 50 and kick some easy goals. Not a long-term solution, but it wouldn't surprise me if he bagged a few while the opposition doesn't even know he's there as they're triple-teaming Roo and Kosi.Spinner wrote:With all respect what is Blake going to do up forward?
- Animal Enclosure
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2364
- Joined: Mon 04 Apr 2005 2:37pm
- Location: Saints Footy Central
Very happy with the team.
I wouldn't be surprised to see Blakey run around the ground with Kreuzer & Gardy running forward to really stretch them.
BJ to be all over the place but spend more time forward.
Very surprised to see them drop Brad Fisher. He gets back in, kicks 3 goals, adds to their fwd line mix & then gets the boot. Actually quite happy that he's out.
If Setanta plays CHF look for us to use Chips on him to exploit his lack of footy nous & have a huge game across half back.
Would just love to absolutely thump this mob, prime time on a Friday night & show the AFL/Ch 7 who really deserves the best tv time slots.
I wouldn't be surprised to see Blakey run around the ground with Kreuzer & Gardy running forward to really stretch them.
BJ to be all over the place but spend more time forward.
Very surprised to see them drop Brad Fisher. He gets back in, kicks 3 goals, adds to their fwd line mix & then gets the boot. Actually quite happy that he's out.
If Setanta plays CHF look for us to use Chips on him to exploit his lack of footy nous & have a huge game across half back.
Would just love to absolutely thump this mob, prime time on a Friday night & show the AFL/Ch 7 who really deserves the best tv time slots.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 907
- Joined: Fri 12 Nov 2004 10:06am
- St Fidelius
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10492
- Joined: Sun 01 Aug 2004 10:30am
What a silly comparison ....plugger66 wrote:Why would you even comment on where they are named. Lenny hasnt kicked a lot of goals for a FP this year.St Fidelius wrote:and hard to kick a decent score...saintsRrising wrote:BEST team for the year...
All 3 ins are better than the outs...
This team though is better than any of the previous 11 picked.
Add to this as well that both Roo and Schneider started the year not fully fit and you get our best team this year.
Possibly we have one two many tall slow defenders with so so footskills....but none the less this is a better team than any yet picked.
The Blues are going to find it very hard to win.
O’hAilpin CHF lol..
Fact is that O’hAilpin has played up forward at times this year and managed 3 goals from his 4 matches...
Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
- St Fidelius
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10492
- Joined: Sun 01 Aug 2004 10:30am
- Milton66
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3521
- Joined: Tue 19 May 2009 9:53pm
- Location: None of your goddam business
Interesting point about Blake. Running with Keizer would be the go for him, like he does with Goodes. Could be spot on.Animal Enclosure wrote:Very happy with the team.
I wouldn't be surprised to see Blakey run around the ground with Kreuzer & Gardy running forward to really stretch them.
BJ to be all over the place but spend more time forward.
Very surprised to see them drop Brad Fisher. He gets back in, kicks 3 goals, adds to their fwd line mix & then gets the boot. Actually quite happy that he's out.
If Setanta plays CHF look for us to use Chips on him to exploit his lack of footy nous & have a huge game across half back.
Would just love to absolutely thump this mob, prime time on a Friday night & show the AFL/Ch 7 who really deserves the best tv time slots.
I'd say that Max is part of the 2009 grand plan, and Zac is a revelation. No Zac and Goose would beplaying seniors at CHB.
Gilbert provides run as does Fisher.
So if the current back 6 settles, it will be interesting if either BJ or Gilbert become permanent fwds.
Hotel De Los Muertos: Your room is ready... Care to step inside?
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 684
- Joined: Sat 26 Jul 2008 9:44pm
IMO Gwilt was stiff but it was always gunna be a very tough decision if Milne was fit.Still not convinced that Milne will play but rarely does Ross play "ducks & drakes" so we'll have to wait & see how it pans out.Still a strong team I really hope they can get the "spark" back this week & give those cheating low life carlscum another floggin
- perfectionist
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9054
- Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
- Has thanked: 60 times
- Been thanked: 353 times
I think the team lacks the balance that it has "enjoyed" so far this year. In particular, the omission of Gwilt leaves a real hole.
So many seem to suggest that playing blokes way out of their comfort zones, up forward, is an experiment worth taking. Rubbish. It never works. Whilst the "ins" (if they all play) are more or less automatics, the "outs" are not. The most obvious "out", for balance and on performance, in my book, Max, has been ignored. We'll see tomorrow night who's right and who's not.
So many seem to suggest that playing blokes way out of their comfort zones, up forward, is an experiment worth taking. Rubbish. It never works. Whilst the "ins" (if they all play) are more or less automatics, the "outs" are not. The most obvious "out", for balance and on performance, in my book, Max, has been ignored. We'll see tomorrow night who's right and who's not.
- St Fidelius
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10492
- Joined: Sun 01 Aug 2004 10:30am
Gilbert better than R Clarkeperfectionist wrote:I think the team lacks the balance that it has "enjoyed" so far this year. In particular, the omission of Gwilt leaves a real hole.
So many seem to suggest that playing blokes way out of their comfort zones, up forward, is an experiment worth taking. Rubbish. It never works. Whilst the "ins" (if they all play) are more or less automatics, the "outs" are not. The most obvious "out", for balance and on performance, in my book, Max, has been ignored. We'll see tomorrow night who's right and who's not.
Milne better than Gwilt
I really don't see the problem...
Max is now in so is that your problem?
Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
Indeed we will...and I challenge you to answer this questionThe most obvious "out", for balance and on performance, in my book, Max, has been ignored. We'll see tomorrow night who's right and who's not.
Hypothetical scenario...Max plays the whole game on Fev...how many goals would you expect Fev to kick...given your opinion of Max as an over rated dud who is years past his use-by date??
I say four goals tops..what say you?
THE BUBBLE HAS BURST
2011 player sponsor
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2119
- Joined: Tue 28 Sep 2004 7:43pm
- Location: Gippsland
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
But he doesn't. And until he does regularly, McQ is a better choice.Armoooo wrote:IMO it all comes down to attitude, Mini is in the team for his work ethic.
He tackles, he chases and he isn't afraid to get hurt.
IMO Armitage is a far more talented player and if he applied himself could be a superior player to Mini, tackling, chasing, harrassing and going hard at the ball are things that everyone is capable of, it just comes down to your state of mind. If Armo could get himself into that state of mind he could easily play Mini's role and be more damaging offensively.
- St Fidelius
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10492
- Joined: Sun 01 Aug 2004 10:30am
I'm tipping shots at goal to be 5 to 6, so it's any ones guess...saint66au wrote:Indeed we will...and I challenge you to answer this questionThe most obvious "out", for balance and on performance, in my book, Max, has been ignored. We'll see tomorrow night who's right and who's not.
Hypothetical scenario...Max plays the whole game on Fev...how many goals would you expect Fev to kick...given your opinion of Max as an over rated dud who is years past his use-by date??
I say four goals tops..what say you?
I would say 3 to 4 goals max
Fev will be starved of opportunities and move up the ground to gather possessions..
Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 684
- Joined: Sat 26 Jul 2008 9:44pm
Not sure what you are trying to say? Im definately not disagreeing with you ,I you just dont understand what you meanperfectionist wrote:I think the team lacks the balance that it has "enjoyed" so far this year. In particular, the omission of Gwilt leaves a real hole.
So many seem to suggest that playing blokes way out of their comfort zones, up forward, is an experiment worth taking. Rubbish. It never works. Whilst the "ins" (if they all play) are more or less automatics, the "outs" are not. The most obvious "out", for balance and on performance, in my book, Max, has been ignored. We'll see tomorrow night who's right and who's not.
- perfectionist
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9054
- Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
- Has thanked: 60 times
- Been thanked: 353 times
Four? Gee that's big of you. So far this year, Fev has kicked 39 goals in 11 games - average 3.5 - against almost all of the teams we have beaten. And yet, in a pathetic attempt to play Max at any cost, you are willing to concede 4 goals before you think he might not be that greatest full back of the century.saint66au wrote:...I say four goals tops..what say you?
If he is such a "gun", and given that no-one disagrees that he is a one trick pony in that he can only punch and produce a problem that someone else has to deal with, I should say 2. But I will give you 3 - a figure that no backman has conceded so far this year and may well lead to our defeat, a result supporters of Max seemingly are quite happy to see as long as he plays.