Do you reckon geelong...
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Tue 24 Feb 2009 10:08am
Do you reckon geelong...
If geelong were in our situation, short break, up against Essendon with a longer break.
Do you think they would have kept the score so close?
I still feel the cats would have won by 10+ goals?
What's the point of this thread? Just a feeling of being put back in our place i suppose.
Do you think they would have kept the score so close?
I still feel the cats would have won by 10+ goals?
What's the point of this thread? Just a feeling of being put back in our place i suppose.
Re: Do you reckon geelong...
You may be right. Lets see if the AFL can orgainse when the Cats play the Dons that the breaks are the same as tonight.JEANLUCPICARD wrote:If geelong were in our situation, short break, up against Essendon with a longer break.
Do you think they would have kept the score so close?
I still feel the cats would have won by 10+ goals?
What's the point of this thread? Just a feeling of being put back in our place i suppose.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Wed 07 May 2008 11:31pm
Its funny how much a week can change things. I went into the game tonight thinking that if we played Geelong this week with our current game plan that we could have won (maybe not by much, but we would have given it a fair crack). 6 hours later and I'm not sure. Then again, as has been mentioned, Richmond got within 20 points and Melbourne were competitive with them for a large portion of time. Not surprisingly the only way to judge St Kilda against Geelong is for them to play each other- which we will see eventually in Round 14.
I am not sure the Doggies will be the team to get a sniff thoughplugger66 wrote:Not sure about that. Would love both us and the Cats to be 13 and nil when we play each other and the other thing with a Cats win is we get further ahead of 3rd on the ladder.saint66au wrote:Oh please God let Geelong have an "off" game next Fri night....give the Doggies a sniff
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4655
- Joined: Sun 18 Jun 2006 2:04pm
- Location: Melb
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 23 times
\doggerel wrote:I reckon a 20 pt win bombers is more admirable (especially after differential in days break) than 20pt win against Richmond (Cats Round 2)
It's funny that. We held the bombers at bay for most of the night,they threatened all night,but couldn't get on top of us. They are flying at the moment. Geelong play an inspid football club and trail in the last quarter but do enough to win.
Why are we not allowed to have a night where we don't smash a side? Do we have to beat everyone by 80+ for the entire season to earn the respect of the critics? you watch ,we'll lose to Carlton or someone and be 11 and 1,but as soon as it happens everyone will say "I told you so,they're no good". F### off
Bring back the Lockett era
- widereceiver
- Club Player
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Tue 12 Apr 2005 6:26pm
- Location: near Linton St.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5412
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 10:29am
- Has thanked: 33 times
- Been thanked: 47 times
yep i'm the same. now, i don't think we will beat geelong.sainter2631 wrote:Its funny how much a week can change things. I went into the game tonight thinking that if we played Geelong this week with our current game plan that we could have won (maybe not by much, but we would have given it a fair crack). 6 hours later and I'm not sure. Then again, as has been mentioned, Richmond got within 20 points and Melbourne were competitive with them for a large portion of time.
it probably good for the saintsthis way. the way the papers rwad this morning, you would think the saints lost the game! thats should be a positive from the game!
- SaintWodonga
- Club Player
- Posts: 1868
- Joined: Wed 04 Jul 2007 12:01am
- Location: Wodonga
- Contact:
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1521
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 8:38pm
- Been thanked: 25 times
Don't you think that if we played the tigers the week that the cats played them, that we wouldn't have beaten the tigers by lot more?If geelong were in our situation, short break, up against Essendon with a longer break.
Do you think they would have kept the score so close?
I still feel the cats would have won by 10+ goals?
What's the point of this thread? Just a feeling of being put back in our place i suppose
The cats only won by about 20 points (at their home ground), that week. Yet we make the excuse that they had 'control' of the game, just crusing...
Teams have ups & downs. Having 3 extra days to rest & prep is a BIG factor. And judging us v. the cats after the results of one game doesn't say much either way.......
Lol.
People make me laugh.
We play awesome footy for 7 weeks, footy that would beat anybody.
All of a sudden we come up against the competitions giant killers, a much improved Essendon who have 3 days longer to rest up (and who's main strength is leg speed).
Yet we hold them off for 3 quarters and again restrict them to 10 goals.
The Cats should have lost to Richmond in Round 2, that was a poorer performance then ours was last night.
They also cruised home by about 6 goals against Melbourne.....
Are people suggesting they have been awesome every week lol.
Remember Rossy, the saints need to win by 10 goals every week or their not good enough
Some people have absolutely no effing idea how football works and would find a negative in a 25 goal grand final win.
People make me laugh.
We play awesome footy for 7 weeks, footy that would beat anybody.
All of a sudden we come up against the competitions giant killers, a much improved Essendon who have 3 days longer to rest up (and who's main strength is leg speed).
Yet we hold them off for 3 quarters and again restrict them to 10 goals.
The Cats should have lost to Richmond in Round 2, that was a poorer performance then ours was last night.
They also cruised home by about 6 goals against Melbourne.....
Are people suggesting they have been awesome every week lol.
Remember Rossy, the saints need to win by 10 goals every week or their not good enough
Some people have absolutely no effing idea how football works and would find a negative in a 25 goal grand final win.
- InkerSaint
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2132
- Joined: Wed 07 Jan 2009 3:06pm
Exactly, let's see how Geelong handle Essendon.ohwhenthesaints! wrote:Essendon are the inform team of the comp, they have certainly caught me by surprise. They could just be a smoky. Geelong play them Sunday week, so will be interesting.
Even then, I wouldn't jump to any conclusions... unless the Cats gave them a thrashing.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Thu 25 Sep 2008 11:19pm
- evertonfc
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7262
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 9:11pm
- Location: 'Quietly Confident' County
- Has thanked: 115 times
- Been thanked: 267 times
- Contact:
It's good to see this forum finally grow up and realise that mediocrity is for mediocre people.
We didn't play well yesterday, but we did enough against an impressive and attacking team on a short break.
We kept our winning streak intact and now we have a great run of matches leading into our showdown with Geelong. There's a real chance we'll drop no more than one of those matches. Hopefully none.
Either way, whilst yesterday wasn't great, a win is a win, is a win, is a win. And to re-phrase Greg Baum this morning, the Bombers still lost.
We didn't play well yesterday, but we did enough against an impressive and attacking team on a short break.
We kept our winning streak intact and now we have a great run of matches leading into our showdown with Geelong. There's a real chance we'll drop no more than one of those matches. Hopefully none.
Either way, whilst yesterday wasn't great, a win is a win, is a win, is a win. And to re-phrase Greg Baum this morning, the Bombers still lost.
Clueless and mediocre petty tyrant.
- bigred
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11463
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 7:39am
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 609 times
True.HarveysDeciple wrote:Lol.
People make me laugh.
We play awesome footy for 7 weeks, footy that would beat anybody.
All of a sudden we come up against the competitions giant killers, a much improved Essendon who have 3 days longer to rest up (and who's main strength is leg speed).
Yet we hold them off for 3 quarters and again restrict them to 10 goals.
The Cats should have lost to Richmond in Round 2, that was a poorer performance then ours was last night.
They also cruised home by about 6 goals against Melbourne.....
Are people suggesting they have been awesome every week lol.
Remember Rossy, the saints need to win by 10 goals every week or their not good enough
Some people have absolutely no effing idea how football works and would find a negative in a 25 goal grand final win.
Our output was considerably down last night compared to the month prior. Just ran out of legs early in the second in my opinion. I cannot discount the extra three days that Essendon had....at all.
If it was Geelong we were playing under the same circumstances last night, they would have given us an almighty flogging.
"Now the ball is loose, it gives St. Kilda a rough chance. Black. Good handpass. Voss. Schwarze now, the defender, can run and from a long way".....
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4655
- Joined: Sun 18 Jun 2006 2:04pm
- Location: Melb
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 23 times
I'm not sure why people think Geelong are as quick as Essendon!!?? Geelong are no quicker than us. It's horses for courses. If we played Geelong last night it would of been a totally different game! For one they wouldn't have exploited us for pace,as they are no quicker than us. This is Essendons strength, and us coming off a short week,they still couldn't beat us
Bring back the Lockett era
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 763
- Joined: Tue 19 Jun 2007 7:18pm
Geelong had an off night last season and were beaten, by the filth , by 10 goals. We didn't play to our full potential yesterday but still won. Why is it we must win by 10 goals every week. The sign of a good side was shown yesterday, didn't play to a great game but still got over the line by 19 points....not much more a team can do.
Geelong are still the bench mark for obvious reasons but we have truly closed the gap.
May be they have an off day when we play them.
Geelong are still the bench mark for obvious reasons but we have truly closed the gap.
May be they have an off day when we play them.
i reckon richmond and melbourne will be competitive with a lot of sides. not because they're any good, but because it's basically impossible to be fully motivated to take on the worst two sides in the comp.sainter2631 wrote:Then again, as has been mentioned, Richmond got within 20 points and Melbourne were competitive with them for a large portion of time.
- InkerSaint
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2132
- Joined: Wed 07 Jan 2009 3:06pm