R7 Match Preview - Collingwood v St.Kilda - By DaVe86

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

DaVe86
Club Player
Posts: 53
Joined: Tue 05 May 2009 1:15pm

Post: # 734998Post DaVe86 »

stinger wrote:this is the sort of crap that our new filth mate is posting on his site.......just a try hard blow hard stirrring up trouble iimhfo.....



"haha my mate is mad st.kilda and showed me his forum..so i made a account and have been snooping for the last few weeks.
the stuff i read on this makes me furious , the resort to us as the "filth"
it was just tonite after all my posts talking up as magpies that they noticed i wasnt no saint haha pretty funny really.
they have a forum on this weeks game claiming players as medda , swan , pendles , leon ect as pretenders but really they carry the names as jones in there team..lol
i have noticed over these weeks that us pies are sane ppl and the knobs over at st.kilda are clueless
just filling the rest of you guys in on the rejects over at saintsational
Smile
http://www.saintsational.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=1

if your bored and feel like stirring things up before the big game get on there and give them something to talk about
carn the pies lets crush this rabble Smile"





....in the end just another f****** troll.....
:roll: :roll: :roll:

OK, I never wrote any of that. Thankfully the smarter people here realised that straight away.

If you look at my posting on Nicks and BigFooty, it is always unbiased and i say the same things there as i do here.



FWIW, i merely came onto this site to share with you my match preview. If you are not interested in an outsiders opinion that is your prerogative, you do not have to read it.


But I spent hours writing this for no other reason than i love the game and i enjoy analysing the finer points of it.

I receive no pay for this, and there is no incentive for me to do it other than the fact that I find the majority of people only know their own side, and know completely nothing about the opposition. I also find collingwood supporters in particular find it hard to give objective opinions, so these analysis are designed to give people a bit of information, a few things to look out for and learn a bit.

The majority of people who read these tell me that they find it extremely useful and they go to the games well informed, and take a different perspective on things as they try to see whether my opinions and predictions pan out.



I have come here in good faith and have done nothing to stir you guys up. I understand over at Nicks there is a bit of a stir going on...but that's all a bit of fun. I don't mind you guys having a crack at Collingwood supporters....its part of footy. But to s*** all over my work and efforts is a low act. And you call us 'filth'.


Thanks again to all those that read and shared opinions....I will continue to come on here and post for the remainder of the week simply because i enjoy the debate.


I have not come on here saying "We will win"....i have said i think we can...which is me been a fan. I have always maintained that I think you guys will win, and have said why this is the case in my preview. And when i claim that i think we can win....i do it with reason and logic, flled with facts and thought out opinions.

I remember Collingwood won the first 5 games a few years back, and lost every game there on. I think we got cocky.

Good on you guys for a fantastic start....but you have to remember every week you have a new opposition who will go in trying to win. If you ignore the relative strengths and weaknesses of your opposition then thats dissapointing because i think the saints are a great side this year.

My preview is so bloody long because i have a lot of respect and i really enjoyed writing it.


Look forward to further discussions with those sensible people out there.


DaVe86
Club Player
Posts: 53
Joined: Tue 05 May 2009 1:15pm

Post: # 735001Post DaVe86 »

InkerSaint wrote:
DaVe86 wrote:My comments are made in the sense that it seems you are very confident that you will win THIS GAME. I too believe the Saints will win...it just suprises me how confident you guys are that you will....
So let's turn that one around... what gives the Pies any right to think that they will nick the game? Your assessment is the Pies will match up well. And even if that is true, do the Pies have the collective fortitude to overcome the Saints? Going on form... going on Mick's ANZAC Day comments about the team commitment to the game plan... no chance.

It may only be round 7 but I think the ladder and percentage are a fair representation of these two teams at the moment.

The Saints were overpowered last year in the PF and QF by harder teams. Who was the last team to catch the Saints napping? ...Collingwood.

What are Collingwood's chances of catching Geelong by surprise a second time? ...Zip.

I think you can see where I am leading.
I have never said we will win....i have said i think we CAN win. And I have done that with a 6000 word analysis of the game which goes into all your strengths.

I tipped st.kilda ultimately in the preview, and I am not expecting to walk away monday night with teh 4 points. But the point of my preview is not to say we will win....it is to analyse the game. The tip is just for fun at the end...it bears no consequence to what i have written


DaVe86
Club Player
Posts: 53
Joined: Tue 05 May 2009 1:15pm

Post: # 735002Post DaVe86 »

Iceman234 wrote:I assumed that was TEDBUNDY stinger.

Was written in his style, not Dave86 who is quite articulate.
thanks mate....that post was obviously not by me....in fact i don't post in that thread until around page 4. Pretty stupid to attach my name to that.


python
Club Player
Posts: 185
Joined: Tue 26 Aug 2008 5:37pm

Post: # 735007Post python »

i think its silly of us to dismiss collingwood, and dave. He never said collingwood will win, said we will, so i think hes copped a bit for what really was an unbiased preview, probably as unbiased as we could get from either of the teams supporters.

We have to be concerned about collingwood, as even though i thought, and still believe, that we are a much better side last year, and even more so this year, they knocked us off, twice, and they do have one of the better coaches going round.

I really think collingwood would be mad to get rid of malthouse.

It should be a ripping game, and im glad ive got my ticket


User avatar
Eastern
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14357
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
Location: 3132
Been thanked: 1 time

Post: # 735012Post Eastern »

DaVe86 wrote:
I tipped st.kilda ultimately in the preview, and I am not expecting to walk away monday night with teh 4 points. But the point of my preview is not to say we will win....it is to analyse the game.
Yeah, but you got it horribly wrong :evil: :twisted:

You picked us to beat your mob by 30 points when the actual saints winning margin will be 33 points :lol: :wink: !!


vacuous space
SS Life Member
Posts: 3465
Joined: Fri 29 Oct 2004 1:01pm
Has thanked: 91 times
Been thanked: 162 times

Post: # 735016Post vacuous space »

DaVe86 wrote:My comments are made in the sense that it seems you are very confident that you will win THIS GAME.
We are confident. We should be. Our players haven't shown any lack of commitment to taking on any team we've played so far. There's no reason to think they'll suddenly switch off for Collingwood. We're not looking ahead. We're not arrogant. We're taking it one week at a time. There's precious little talk of September here. We know what month it is. We're all excited about Monday. It's going to be a big game on a big stage and a chance to really showcase what we're all about.

We want effort. If we get the effort we'll be happy. If the Pies pull a rabbit out of a hat, that's fine, as long as our effort is there. If you combine our talent with effort, we're confident that more often than not, the results will go our way. Our belief comes from seeing the commitment our team has made to their goal. I don't think it can be argued. We should win this game. That doesn't mean we will. It's odd to expect anything but extreme confidence from us at this point. Look at the ladder.


Yeah nah pleasing positive
User avatar
starsign
Club Player
Posts: 1854
Joined: Sat 12 Apr 2008 8:45am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 24 times

Post: # 735026Post starsign »

sorry they are no way near us at present
last encounter semi final mcg all over by half time
so forget about the bit about they match up well against us
granted they beat us previous game , but go back and look at this forum post match...we should never have lost ....at least 6 dead set sitters from within 30 m we missed and the pies kicked 3-4 absolute blinders out of their fundamental orifices..and we won't even mention the umpiring

good read but most of the final washup is pure wishful thinking
Saints easily this week and I've been a bit too conservative in the margin tipping , but am preparede to stick my neck out
we will kill them and pull the % back to 200!!
GOSAINTS


User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30098
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 711 times
Been thanked: 1235 times

Post: # 735041Post saintsRrising »

I don't think I have ever been this confident about beating the Pies before.

It is not cockieness..

I just think we have all the bases covered and have a group of players more switched on that I can ever recall.


I know if many, many previous years I have wished and pined fora St Kilda team that could apply themselves as they currently are.

Now upsets can always happen.

But I do not think so this Monday.

Saints to win...in an emphatic manner.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
stkfc1
Club Player
Posts: 1351
Joined: Sat 06 Oct 2007 2:42pm
Has thanked: 240 times
Been thanked: 382 times

Post: # 735060Post stkfc1 »

Hey as far as I'm concerned it's a PUBLIC FORUM. There are no membership fees, no secret handshakes and everyone has a right to
express their views.

If we were in China they would have shut us down,called us dissidents and we'd all be sitting in a Shanghai sling right now!

We live in a free country where we are lucky enough to be able to rib each other, freely express our views and (hopefully )RESPECT each other for it.

Dave 86, long may you make your presence known amongst us.....and your mob has snowballs on monday.... 8-)


User avatar
stinger
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 38126
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:06pm
Location: Australia.

Post: # 735068Post stinger »

s***.......even the press are hoping on board


"Anthony's headbutt a free kick to Saints

Michael Gleeson | May 6, 2009

JOHN Anthony's headbutt to the groin of Scott Thompson caused no damage to the North Melbourne player, but he has helped render his own team impotent.

Collingwood this week confronts St Kilda, undefeated and proud owner of the most miserly defence in the competition.

Now it will do so without full-forward Anthony - its leading goalkicker - and possibly without its next-best goalkicker Paul Medhurst, an All-Australian last year.

Medhurst is a chance to play given the 10-day break between last Friday night's game and Monday evening's match, but he left Etihad Stadium last week on crutches and will need every minute available to get himself right.

Alan Didak, another former All-Australian capable of kicking a match-winning score, is still a fortnight away with his hamstring.

Anthony Rocca will likely come back into the side, but he has played two games in a year and not at all for a fortnight.

His first game back this year was a serviceable effort that helped straighten the team and create opportunities at his feet, but he followed up on Anzac Day playing as you might expect a man in his 30s to play a week after being knocked in the back and head. He has now been rested a week and will be fresher, but the query remains of how much there is left of the old Anthony Rocca in the old Anthony Rocca.

Travis Cloke at centre half-forward is yet to find the form of two years ago when he won the Copeland Trophy.

Tarkyn Lockyer will be used on a half-forward flank and probably given the absentees, Dale Thomas will be used more in front of the ball. Brent Macaffer will be in his third game.

A player such as Nick Maxwell might be expected to play a defensive job in attack on Brendon Goddard.

The point and context of this thinness in the forward line is that it happens at the worst possible time given St Kilda is the most defensively effective side this year.

The evidence is irrefutable: it has conceded the fewest points against than any other team.

But this raw number is only partly a result of the quality of those playing behind the ball, and partly the effort of those playing up the field.

St Kilda has allowed the ball to go inside its defensive 50-metre arc fewer times than any other team.

The Saints have conceded an average of 39 inside 50s a game this year. Adelaide is next best with 45 a game, while Brisbane Lions are worst, allowing 58 inside 50s a match. It is easier to keep a side from scoring when it doesn't get the ball in a dangerous position as often.

However, even allowing for the fact they defend fewer inside-50 entries, the Saints are still the most effective at stopping teams scoring. St Kilda's opponents score from 42 per cent of their inside-50 entries, which is the lowest percentage of any team. The Saints allow a goal from just 20 per cent of entries - the lowest of any side.

With that in mind, had Collingwood's leading goalkicker been using his head, he wouldn't have used his head


.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will

"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"

However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
User avatar
stinger
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 38126
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:06pm
Location: Australia.

Post: # 735070Post stinger »

DaVe86 wrote:
stinger wrote:this is the sort of crap that our new filth mate is posting on his site.......just a try hard blow hard stirrring up trouble iimhfo.....



"haha my mate is mad st.kilda and showed me his forum..so i made a account and have been snooping for the last few weeks.
the stuff i read on this makes me furious , the resort to us as the "filth"
it was just tonite after all my posts talking up as magpies that they noticed i wasnt no saint haha pretty funny really.
they have a forum on this weeks game claiming players as medda , swan , pendles , leon ect as pretenders but really they carry the names as jones in there team..lol
i have noticed over these weeks that us pies are sane ppl and the knobs over at st.kilda are clueless
just filling the rest of you guys in on the rejects over at saintsational
Smile
http://www.saintsational.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=1

if your bored and feel like stirring things up before the big game get on there and give them something to talk about
carn the pies lets crush this rabble Smile"





....in the end just another f****** troll.....
:roll: :roll: :roll:

OK, I never wrote any of that. Thankfully the smarter people here realised that straight away.


Look forward to further discussions with those sensible people out there.



offensive little troll aren't you.......??? :roll: :roll: ....


.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will

"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"

However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
CaptainRiewoldt
Club Player
Posts: 180
Joined: Sun 04 Jan 2009 5:41am

Post: # 735078Post CaptainRiewoldt »

HOW THIS GAME WILL GO DOWN

Clearances to collingwoods advantage straight to Fisher or Gram then we go direct to Kosi or Roo with milne and Schnieder crumbing.

Saints will smash the pies easily. Too strong too hard too tall. The pies are missing antony and didak the 2 small forwards we might have had problems with. If they think Cloke and Rocca are going to cause problems ??? tredrea, hall etc we get numbes back get the ball to a stoppage or to the ground where we dominate it will happen again.

We would have to have an off night to lose this one and thomas and medhurst straight back from injury would have to play blinders and kick 4 each from a half foward!!

Saints our mighty saints are the real deal.... top 2. Collingwood are top 8 but as youll see there is a massive gap this year between geelong/stkilda/hawks to everyomne else. :wink:


Goose is king
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2295
Joined: Sun 27 Jan 2008 9:05am
Has thanked: 768 times
Been thanked: 207 times

Post: # 735117Post Goose is king »

Its funny how reading a report only slightly biased towards Collingwood makes me even more confident the Saints will win. All the requirements listed for Collingwood to win seem unlikely and I think Dawson will smash an over-rated out of form Rocca (if he plays).

This said I bet Geelong didn't think they would get smashed last year.

I did totally agree with one thing however.

Saints by 30 points sounds about right (and good).


User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 17049
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3664 times
Been thanked: 2927 times

Post: # 735125Post skeptic »

Dave86,

thanks for a superb post

I apologise that you have to tolerate a few narrow minded losers who unfortuneltly are like bad smells that the forum can't get rid of.

Please come back again


User avatar
Iceman234
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6533
Joined: Wed 20 Jul 2005 1:29am

Post: # 735134Post Iceman234 »

I thank Dave86 for his contribution.

Interesting how times have changed...media quote fan forums now...old style pub conversations are now dealt with in forums etc etc....

Pretty sure if I ran into Dave86 in a pub before the game or during the week leading up, and he gave the same opinion he did in his OP, I would enjoy speaking with him about it and encourage it.

Guarantee I wouldn't tell him to f*** off because he is a Pie supporter, and if I did I'd expect a comeback befitting of the 80's.

Dave86 - I read the lot, thought it was well thought out and well written, you are clearly not the "stereotypical" Pies man (because of your old man :wink: ) and I'd have a beer with you before the game without a problem.


User avatar
bigred
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11463
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 7:39am
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 609 times

Post: # 735135Post bigred »

I read all of it.

Seemed ok to me.

IMO even if the filth do win the clearances, who the hell is going to finish for you?

Medhurst? If he plays? hmmm.... Anthony is gorn for his attempted hummer......Pebbles is a shadow of his former self..if he plays. Hooly dooly your gonna need 60 inside fifties....

The way I see it, if the saints come to play with the same intensity as they have shown over the past six weeks, your gonna struggle. Plain and simple. If we approach sixty tackles again, I don't think the Filth have the speed or skilled disposal to kick a winning score. Our stats really do tell the tale at the moment....

At the moment the saints are making reasonable teams look absolutely rubbish. Our back line is as stingy as you will ever see, And the filth are going into this game (possibly) without its main forwards.

That said, of course we will lose a few games this year and you never know. I just cant see it happening this week.

Thanks for your post. Saints by 30 is probably about right going on form. But you never know.

I'm confident, not cocky. Our form gives me good reason to be so and I have been around long enough to see the worst happen.


"Now the ball is loose, it gives St. Kilda a rough chance. Black. Good handpass. Voss. Schwarze now, the defender, can run and from a long way".....
BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Post: # 735153Post BigMart »

He knows about as much about St.K as I know about the Auckland Warriors......sweet FA...

Some examples

Cloke is more versatile than Blake.....Blake has played in at least 4 positions with success in his career, a HS article titled Mr.Fix it and a nickname of Selleys outline his versatility.....Cloke 1 (hit up CHF) and Cloke has NEVER beaten Cloke....

Goddard.....possibly the best decision maker in the AFL, and his game is built around composure.....is suspect under pressure.....I would rather the ball in his hands than Dane Swan's - one can kick - one cannot.......and BTW - he played in the midfield for the second half of 07........as for Maxwell being the ideal match-up....yes he has the size to go with BJ, but on sheer talent Goddard is streets ahead......this would be universally accepted.

Montagna - lack of defensive pressure......isn't he leading our tackle count....do some research

Ball to tag Swan - I don't think so...he will be a head to head with an opponent who can kick

Mini to tag Pendlebury - No.....too small.......

I hope your two tags eventuate.......Barham and Wellingham have what....20 games between them.......against Joey and Dal - 250+

Rocca is bordering on hopeless ATM and I would expect Zac (who has not had more than 2 kicked on him this year to towel him up and expose him the other way...

Gardiner will struggle with Fraser cheating around the ground.......but 'the big show' will put him to the sword in the contest - if he has hardness issues, they will be tested.

Do some research on the other team.......by watching some games........not from fan forums..

If we do not win by at least 8 I would be disappointed........Collingwood have 6 playes who would not be considered in our 22.....Cox, Clarke, Wellingham, Barham, Toovey, Rocca.......if we lost - it would be a disgrace


User avatar
Loyal
Club Player
Posts: 853
Joined: Thu 12 Mar 2009 10:31am

Re: R7 Match Preview - Collingwood v St.Kilda - By DaVe86

Post: # 735184Post Loyal »

Hi guys, I write weekly match previews for a number of Collingwood boards. I watch all games of footy so have a great all-round knowledge...but i particularly know St.Kilda because my family barrack for the Saints and i go to most of their matches.

This is a very in depth piece...and it takes ages to write and research. So i think you guys will find it interesting. It is as unbiased as possible, but i suppose has a slight Collingwood lean to it...although the majority of it is an analysis of the Saints and how we can beat you guys.

Comments would be appreciated, I love a good discussion. Thanks and enjoy

----------------


Collingwood vs St.Kilda is always a much anticipated game for me. Coming from a family that is 50% St.Kilda and 50% Collingwood means this game is always a big event. I’ve managed to get to 3 St.Kilda games this year and have watched every other on television and have been really impressed. So, this weeks match preview is going to be a really in depth analysis of this weeks game because I’m in a fantastic position to give a totally unbiased and neutral account of what is making St.Kilda the standout team early in 2009. It’s fair to say I’ve been looking forward to preparing this preview for a few weeks now and I’m fired up.


First of all, I truly believe Collingwood can win this game. This reminds me a lot of the Round 9 clash against Geelong last year. Geelong were all but unbeatable last year and Collingwood were in patchy form. Following the Geelong win, Collingwood went on to win the next 3 games and basically cemented a finals spot.

We have all had our say about Malthouse, but he is the master of preparing a game-plan to unravel the good sides. What’s more, Collingwood has won the last 3 home and away encounters against the Saints, all in very close matches. However, it was St.Kilda who humiliated Collingwood in the Semi-Fina last year which was the last time these 2 sides met.

St.Kilda have obviously had a blistering start to the year. They are scoring far easier than they have done in the previous 2 years under Ross Lyon, and are restricting sides to lower scores. They have an unbelievable percentage of nearly 200, and have beaten top 8 sides. Collingwood on the other hand still struggle for consistency. The Pies took an undermanned North Melbourne side to pieces last Friday night, but were underwhelming against a lowly ranked Essendon side on ANZAC day. However, the season could have looked a lot different considering 2 of Collingwood’s 3 losses have been by less than a kick, and the opportunity was perhaps there for Collingwood in the 2nd quarter against Geelong. But good sides make the most of their chances, and Collingwood have failed to capitalise on momentum when they’ve had it this year.

This game will be played on Monday night at Etihad Stadium. This means a 10 day break for Collingwood, and 9 for St.Kilda. It will be interesting to see if the crowd responds to this timeslot. I think ratings will be good, but it may cost attendance at the ground.

It is fair to say the next 2 weeks are critical for Collingwood. They will go in as underdogs against St.Kilda this week, and then face last years bogey side Carlton. Collingwood cannot afford to be 3 wins and 5 losses. I’m sure many fans would gladly accept a loss against St.Kilda if it meant beating Carlton…but I think this is a huge opportunity for Collingwood to really get some respect back in the competition and really get some momentum going.

For St.Kilda, taking down Collingwood, Pt.Adelaide and Western Bulldogs in consecutive weeks pretty much confirms they are the real deal and almost a lock for a top 2 spot considering they’ll take a 3 game head-start against Hawthorn.


So let’s get this preview underway by having an in depth look at the Saints and why they have started 2009 so good…and what is different to 2008.


What needs to happen to beat the Saints – An in depth look at their side?

Firstly, the balance of St.Kilda is very good at the moment. They have 2 genuine tall forwards in good form, with 2 crumbers and a few options to play as mid-sized forwards. In the midfield they have 2 genuine star in and unders, 2 classy players with pace, 2 taggers and a few outsiders. Down back they seem undermanned, but the structure is good and all their defenders attack off their man. They also have a few guys who offer dash out of defence.


Nick Dal Santo and Leigh Montagna are the 2 classy midfielders. Both would have been slightly underwhelmed with their 2008 season…Dal Santo in particular. However both have stepped up and are in career best form. They are now dealing with tags and doing a fair job of it.

The other 2 genuine star players in the St.Kilda midfield are Lenny Hayes and Luke Ball who I have classed as the 2 in and unders. Lenny Hayes had a modified start to the season but is now playing more gametime and is getting a stack of the footy. Luke Ball seems to have recovered from his groin troubles and is moving better and disposing of the footy better.


But you have to also look outside these 4 guys. There are a number of players who have probably been classed as ‘2nd-tier’ guys for a while now but are really establishing themselves in the AFL.

The first would be Brendon Goddard. He was good last year as a loose defender, but was probably unable to push into the midfield after coming off a knee reconstruction in 2007. This year, he has played forward, back and midfield and his footskills are hurting sides. Remarkably, the Western Bulldogs paid him no respect last week and he won a lot of the footy and was very damaging. In the matchup’s section below, I’ll discuss the strategy Collingwood should employ to cover him, but for the time being it is fair to say Collingwood cannot allow him to play loose across half back or through the middle.

Farren Ray has come across from the Western Bulldogs and is fast establishing himself as a top-tier player. Many were quick to write this guy off, but I never did. I think when he first came into the AFL, he was always going to be a 3 year prospect simply because he was so skinny. In that 3 years, the Doggies uncovered a wealth of midfield talent, and Ray was pushed to the back of the pecking order. Like Adam Cooney who was the pick 1 in his draft, Ray is now in his peak, but was never given the opportunity at the Bulldogs. Since converting over to the Saints, he has a role and has put on significant bulk in his upper body.

Sam Gilbert has been fantastic in the absence of Hudghton and Maguire. He also has put on significant size over pre-season. I think he is playing in the Sam Fisher mould in that he has responsibility for an opponent, but looks to play very offensively. He is winning 20+ possessions a game and setting up a lot of attack. Last week he played on Brad Johnson and did a great job.

Clinton Jones was classed by many as a dud. However, in the absence of Dempster, he has now been given tagging duties and has beaten every opponent so far, which includes Daniel Kerr, Griffen, Pearce and Hasleby. Going the other way, he is winning a stack of footy and kicking goals. You only have to look at his Dream Team and Super Coach points to see how much of the pill he is getting. He along with McQualter have established themselves as the taggers in the side.

The Michael Gardiner risk is starting to pay dividends for the Saints. He is a hard worker and his size intimidates most. He has also shown an ability to push forward and kick goals. The Saints have been without a dominant ruckman for a long time, and this year have 2 genuine 1st rate rucks in Gardiner and King. King may miss again with his hamstring problem, but both rucks have genuinely given the Saints first use of the ball.


The St.Kilda gameplan

Ross Lyon has basically admitted he was too defensive in his first years of coaching. However, it may have been an acceptable price to pay to develop this new found discipline and pressure they are exhibiting in 2009. This year, Lyon has also permitted a more attacking style of game, whilst still maintaining a suffocating defence.

At times, and this was the case against the Bulldogs, the Saints go back to shut down mode and maintain possession. But what is different in 2009 is that the Saints now have the ability to open the game right up and kick more goals.

Ross Lyon has adapted the game-plan over pre-season. It is now a combination of his old Sydney style, but also encompasses a lot of the Hawthorn style as well.

What is very noticeable is the zone the Saints are employing. In the past, the Saints have flooded a lot. This year, they press up on their opponents. The defence comes right up to the centre-line with guys like Gilbert, Goddard, Dawson and Blake forming the outer perimeter. Last week, the Bulldogs were starved of all run. This is because they were not allowed any free possession in the backline. The Saints were right up on them, pressuring every disposal. Whereas in the past the Saints may have held back. When the Doggies were able to get the ball out of defence, it was ugly and laboured. Collingwood will face the same challenges on Monday.

Like, Hawthorn, the Saints have a good forward line. Riewoldt and Kosi are tough match-ups. Riewoldt usually takes 3-5 rounds to warm up, but this year only took the 1. This is despite an interrupted pre-season. I thought Riewoldt was best on ground against the Bulldogs. His work-rate is just astonishing to watch live. Milne and Schneider are also benefitting from the good form of their talls and are kicking many crumbing goals.


The Options for Collingwood

There are a few options for the Magpies. Plan A has to be quick ball movement. If you work your way through the zone, I still feel that the St.Kilda defence can be exploited 1 on 1. We might see the re-match of Rocca and Zac Dawson, and you would still back big Anthony in a marking contest. But you wouldn’t if the Saints are given time to get numbers back and crowd him.

We’ll also perhaps see the re-match of Blake and Cloke. Blake probably has had the better of these matchups…but Cloke still remains the more talented and versatile player.

So I would back in the Collingwood forwards. However, I would only back them in if the ball movement is quick and sharp. This is far easier said than done, because the Saints will make it near impossible to create run off the backline. If the Western Bulldogs could not do it, then Collingwood are going to really struggle considering the Dogs are renowned for their run and quick ball movement.


So that makes centre clearances very important. The Saints pride themselves on their tough onball division, but Collingwood has been fantastic in the clearances this year. If there is one area Collingwood has improved in this year, it has been clearances.

Collingwood has 4 players in the top 25 for clearances (Pendlebury, O’Bree, Fraser, Swan). The leading St.Kilda clearance player is Lenny Hayes who ranks 12th and Luke Ball who ranks 18th. So Collingwood may actually back themselves to win the clearances. This will be essential because the Pies do not want to be caught across half back, and if the Saints are winning the clearances, this is where the ball will be.


Over-handballing did not work against St.Kilda last week. The pressure St.Kilda applied was too good. Western Bulldogs only played into the Saints hand by over-possessing the football. So Collingwood may try to move the ball on quick…but over-possessing is not the answer either.

Therefore, if Collingwood’s strength lies in the clearances, then I think we’ll see the team revert to the wide game-plan and we’ll see a lot of boundary throw ins and ball ups. If the Pies are unable to move the ball out of defence, a 55 metre punt out wide to the boundary is a better option than trying to pinpoint a 15 metre pass to a contested situation.

We may therefore see a very messy game. Collingwood will not mind that. But this will only work if Collingwood applies the same sort of pressure they did against Geelong last year, and Brisbane up at the Gabba 2 weeks ago. The tackling pressure is going to be the key to this game. St.Kilda are the benchmark at the moment, but Collingwood at its best has been the benchmark in the last 2 years. I’m looking forward to seeing some ferocious contests.


Recent History

I don’t think recent history counts for a lot between these 2 sides. Although Collingwood has won 3 of the last 4 games against the Saints, they are a different prospect this year. The best benchmark to compare against is the Semi-Final last year where the Saints outmuscled a young Collingwood outfit.

In Round 19 last year, Collingwood was coming off a horrible week following the Heath Shaw and Alan Didak incident. They went in very undermanned into the match and defied the odds to win.

But in the Semi-Final last year, it was Dal Santo and Montagna who took the Pies to the cleaners with 32 and 29 respectively. Sam Fisher was also dominant down back with 17 marks and Blake took 18 marks.

It demonstrates incredible unaccountability by Collingwood. I don’t think allowing these guys so much of the ball is a smart move. Riewoldt, Koschitzke and Milne also kicked 11 goals between them.

Collingwood’s highest possession winner was Pendlebury with 23. The Saints dominated possession and were harder in at it.


The Teams

As I write this preview, it is Tuesday morning and I have limited information about Collingwood’s injury list and whether John Anthony will accept his 1 week ban.

Both sides have had relatively good run with injuries, atleast up until this week. The Saints will still be without Hudghton for atleast 1 more week. Xavier Clarke has ruptured his ACL and will be out for the season, whilst King faces a fitness test this week. With a 9 day break, he may come into consideration.


Collingwood has a few injury concerns. Medhurst will struggle to be fit after rolling his ankle on Friday night. The 10 day break should allow him to pull up. You can guarantee he’ll be named in the squad anyway given teams will be released 4 days prior to the game.

Dayne Beams also suffered a slight adductor injury on Friday night and may miss a game. Apparently it is not overly serious, but given he is a first year player he may be nursed.

Nathan Brown should be ok to play after he missed portions of the Friday night game.

Alan Didak will miss at least another 2 games after tearing his hamstring.

John Anthony will also most likely miss 1 game after been sighted by the MRP. At this stage, I am unsure as to whether Collingwood will appeal, but I feel they will accept the sentence…especially after Mick’s spray at Jack on Friday.

The interesting selections surround Heath Shaw and Anthony Rocca who were late changes against the Kangaroos. I have no doubt both will be fit to play, however both are out of form and perhaps not deserving of a spot. Given the other injuries and suspensions, I think we’ll see both return.

I think the ultimate changes for Collingwood will be:

In: Shaw, Rocca
Out: Anthony, Beams


I’d preferably like to see a ruckman come into the side to help Josh. Perhaps Bryan. That would be at the expense of Leigh Brown who I thought was ordinary on Friday night.

I’d also love to see Stanley come into the side after his 4 goal and 30 possession game in the VFL, or Sidebottom who has had a month of consistent VFL football, named in the best again last week. But given Collingwood won by 50+ points on the weekend, I doubt we’ll see more than 2 changes which may both be forced.

If Medhurst misses, then perhaps we’ll see Sidebottom or Stanley play with extra responsibility placed on Macaffer. Otherwise, to date Macaffer has not had a major role in the forward line and may be dropped for another midfielder. Brent has however been effective in terms of goal-assists.


I think the Saints will go in unchanged.



The Matchups

St.Kilda forward line:

Riewoldt v Presti – I don’t love the sound of the matchup, but Presti is in great form and has to get the job on the St.Kilda champion. If Presti has a weakness, it is playing against giants, so I doubt he is suited to Koshitzke. The cover of Maxwell will be important.

Koschitzke v Nathan Brown – Brown is back into some better form. Kosi was eased back in last week from his hamstring complaint.

Milne v Harry O’Brien – Harry did the job in round 19 last year and I think Collingwood will use Harry again for this matchup. Milne is playing fantastic football in 2009 and I think is underrated. He requires close checking, and Harry is as close checking as they come and should match him for speed. He seems to enjoy playing on smaller opponents.

Toovey v Schneider – Schneiderman was fantastic last week kicking 3 goals. Toovey has been effective shutting down small forwards, so will most likely get the job here.


Midfield:

Collingwood’s only hope of winning this game is in the midfield. If St.Kilda dominate disposal, they will simply shut Collingwood down across half back or maintain possession themselves.

O’Bree v Hayes – The 2 clearance experts at their respective clubs. O’bree becomes vital this week.

Swan v Ball – Saints may elect to tag Swan, but I think they’ll concentrate on the better ball users. This could be a head to head clash. Would be a fantastic and tough matchup.

McQualter v Pendlebury – I think the Saints will use McQualter to tag Pendlebury. Pendles has been our leading disposal and clearance player in 2009, and has good disposal efficiency. The Saints won’t ignore this. Pendlebury will have to start learning to deal with tags so this will be a great test.

Davis v Clint Jones – Jones is the St.Kilda designated tagger and he has been doing jobs on the pacier game-breakers. He has also been running off his opponents. Leon Davis is Collingwood’s best player at the moment, but he will have to show good defensive awareness because Jones will run off him. I think we’ll see this matchup eventuate.


Barham v Montagna – I think Collingwood should run young Jaxson on Montagna. Leigh is quick and damaging by foot, so it would be a big mistake to allow him to run free. Barham is a fantastic tackler and is lightning quick, and may also be able to exploit a lack of accountability by Montagna.

Wellingham v Dal Santo – St.Kilda’s best player at the moment, and must be tagged. Wellingham made a name for himself tagging Ablett Jnr last year. He is a tough tackler and damaging himself…and lightning quick. Wellingham will have a big responsibility to create some dash in the midfield and take the game on…but defensively I’d like him to check Dal Santo very closely. Otherwise Toovey may be used more in the midfield in this role.



My Key Matchup - ***Maxwell v Goddard – This is my solution for Goddard. Maxwell played this role against Scott Thompson to great success. The advantage here is that Maxwell can play on Goddard in any position and matches him in the air.

I may be criticised for saying this, but I feel Goddard is suspect under pressure. I’ve seen him make some terrible errors when he is forced to make a split second decision. When left with space and time, he is one of the most damaging players in the AFL. The Doggies gave him this space, and he answered devastatingly.

I also think at times Goddard can be unaccountable. To watch him at a game, he is constantly pointing and barking out orders. But at times I feel he is quick to lay blame. Last week I observed a passage of play where he was so busy telling everyone who to man up, that he ignored a loose Bulldog defender who was his responsibility. That player kicked a goal and was left unchecked in the forward line.

Put the pressure on Goddard. Make him accountable and work off him.




Lockyer v Ray – Tarks is coming off a 4 goal game against the Roo’s, whilst Ray had a fantastic 31 possession game against his former club. Considering Lockyer has a knack of popping forward for a goal, this may force Ray to play accountable. Ray is good overhead and is showing greater signs of toughness…but I think to this stage Lockyer has always shown a greater willingness to put his head over it.


Collingwood forward line:
Rocca v Dawson – many would be hoping for this matchup again. We all remember Rocca’s humiliation of a young Zac Dawson whilst he was playing for Hawthorn. I think Zac has come a long way since, but you would still fancy Rocca in a marking contest. I think Lyon would have no hesitation to throw the challenge down to Dawson who has been very good this year. He has held up with the big 2 defenders for the Saints down with injury.

Cloke v Blake – Blake usually takes Cloke, and I don’t think it will be different this year…although without John Anthony the Saints may chose to run Fisher on him. Cloke is not in good form, but his work-rate was good against the Kangaroos, and hopefully his best is not far away.

Fisher v Medhurst – Fisher will work off him and probably cover him in the air. However, Medhurst must ensure Fisher is held accountable and not allowed to run off. Medhurst is an incredibly dangerous player and is very creative himself…so a few early goals would ensure Fisher does not zone off for another 18 lazy marks.

Gilbert v Macaffer – Gilbert did a good job on Brad Johnson last week. He is another who enjoys zoning off and creating a bit of play.

Thomas v Gram – This may be a good opportunity to use Thomas defensively again. Thomas was very good playing on Drummond a few weeks back, so may be used in this defensive forward role again. Dale is another whose form has been underwhelming, but his work-rate has also been very good. Gram is the St.Kilda playmarker out of defence, so attention has to be put into him.

The Saints don’t have a lot of run off half back in terms of pace…but they are full of attacking tall defenders. If Collingwood can shut down Gram, then it will stop a lot of attacking play from the Saints. Thomas has to make Gram accountable.

Corrie v Baker – Bakes has been playing as a small defender this year and is doing a good job of it. Corrie had a really good debut game for Collingwood last week, and will play as a small forward, which in turn allows Leon Davis more gametime in the middle.



The Wrap Up

This is 1st vs 5th and is what I consider Match of the Round. St.Kilda are rightly favourites, which is a position I feel more comfortable in been a Collingwood supporter.

Could this be a repeat of the round 9 clash against Geelong where Collingwood stunned the competition?

Can St.Kilda maintain this level of intensity for the 7th week running?

Does Collingwood have the grunt in the middle to shut down the Saints?


All will be answered on Monday night. The 10 day break will ensure both sides are fresh are ready to go.


The Saints will win this game comfortably if Collingwood does not bring its best tackling game to the table. I think the Pies will look to make this a tough in and under contest. Both sides pride themselves in this area, but if Collingwood is any chance then it has to take out the class factor and make it a scrap.

The Saints are disciplined and well structured. On paper, and looking at things logically, the Pies will struggle to break through the zone. But it is about time Collingwood learn to counter this tactic and earn back the respect of the AFL.


Every time I’ve tipped against Collingwood this year, they’ve won….so St.Kilda by 30.

See you guys on Monday.


By David Natoli
aka DaVe86
you are a muppet


User avatar
InkerSaint
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2132
Joined: Wed 07 Jan 2009 3:06pm

Post: # 735198Post InkerSaint »

DaVe86 wrote:I have never said we will win....i have said i think we CAN win. And I have done that with a 6000 word analysis of the game which goes into all your strengths.

I tipped st.kilda ultimately in the preview, and I am not expecting to walk away monday night with teh 4 points. But the point of my preview is not to say we will win....it is to analyse the game. The tip is just for fun at the end...it bears no consequence to what i have written
Dave, I didn't ignore your points or put words in your mouth. You raised what you describe as our "cockiness" and that is what I, and others such as saintsRrising, have attempted to address.

I appreciate the amount of work you have put into this game analysis but you seem reluctant to debate the finer points.

I also notice you charge us with "arrogance" at the Saints' 6-0 start so I'm a little annoyed that you don't make the effort to understand my attitude or that of many others on here. If you have jumped to the conclusion that we are wallowing in hubris then you have done so prematurely in my opinion.

We have our share of hard-core supporters who slag the opposition at any chance, just like you do. But there are plenty more of us who are happy to hold an intelligent and informed discussion.

And finally, if you can have the temerity to state that the Saints will lose a game this year, then I can have the temerity to say yes, but it won't be to Collingwood.


OneEyedSainter77
SS Life Member
Posts: 3792
Joined: Tue 02 Aug 2005 10:24pm

Post: # 735200Post OneEyedSainter77 »

Dave, first of all welcome to the forum and thank you for proving that not all Collingwood supporters are prisoners with limited capacity..... Some are prisoners who are quite bright. :wink: :lol:

Please excuse stinger - he is under the impression that EVERY single non St Kilda supporter is a troll.

I actually thought your arguments were well constructed and thought out. It seems that most posters here are so friggen one-eyed they can't understand the constructive criticism you've provided here.

With respect to your comments, I heartily disagree with what you wrote about Brendan Goddard. I don't thikn he is suspect under pressure - I think the whole TEAM is suspect under pressure. Let's face it, how well did we react to the pressure applied by the other three members in the top four last year? geelong smacked us twice, the bulldogs overran us twice and Hawthorn only lost to us when WE put the pressure on THEM.

Our problem has been for a while now that when teams pour the pressure on and force us to kick to contests or anything, we more often than not cough it up.

But if you think about it, wouldn't anyone be susceptible to this if they are under pressure while kicking. People are too harsh. If you only watch what you see in front of you on TV, of course that's what you see, but more often than not we've been grabbing the ball and just blindly kicking it.

If you watch the little things they do off the ball and what they do to try and make themselves accountable, you learn a bit more.

I think that's why you're reception here has been a little frosty, because these people are only watching the ball and where that's going.

I still think we do the kicks under pressure sometimes but at least now, we're a little smarter and more likely to get out of the pressure situation byt taking a bit more time to dispose of the ball. (So I'm sure these supporters are the same that keep screaming "kick it! Kick ittt!" and then when it goes to the opposition they say "Oh why did you kick it there you idiot???!!!" We're a fickle bunch here)

Anyway, once again, I apologise if people here don't take your comments seriously or think you are a troll but like I said, some of us are just too one-eyed and passionate to accept the views of an opposition supporter.


d roit
Club Player
Posts: 140
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008 7:35pm
Location: Melbourne

Post: # 735232Post d roit »

keep it up dave86, it quite obviously took you sometime to write that and its not often we have an opposition poster who doesnt just launch into a tirade so thank you for a fresh approach.

but a bit off the topic boys, wanted to ask if our team is going to be published today at 5, considering we're playing on Monday night?
Last edited by d roit on Thu 07 May 2009 4:18pm, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
Armoooo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7281
Joined: Sun 26 Nov 2006 2:28pm
Location: The Great South East
Contact:

Post: # 735237Post Armoooo »

Chin up Dave, it's pretty hard to come up with anything here that would get a unanimously positive reaction.


ROBERT HARVEY A.K.A The Great Man, Banger, Harves, Ol' Man River...
384 games, 4 B&F's, 3 EJ Whitten Medals, St.Kilda Captain, 2 Time Brownlow Medalist, 8 Time All Australian, 2nd Highest Brownlow votes poller.... The greatest of ALL TIME!!
DaVe86
Club Player
Posts: 53
Joined: Tue 05 May 2009 1:15pm

Post: # 735251Post DaVe86 »

thanks guys.

Not after everyone agreeing with me. I've got no problems with those who have disagreed with what I've said...that's the point and i always say a few controversial things to drum up debate. My problem is with guys who pretty much disregard all the points i have made simply because i straight up front admit i'm an outsider.



Have been to 3 saints games this year and watched all others on TV, so im not talking blind.



Will respond to a few criticisms with my rebuttables....thanks for the criticisms, i enjoy the fact you have taken the time to read and respond.




On Goddard- It is my personal opinion that he can make wrong decisions if there is pressure on him. This is no different to any other player in the AFL granted. But the point is that if we do what the Doggies did and let him run loose across half back, then we may as well not turn up because you'll smash us.

Pre 2007, Goddard i felt was very suspect in a pressure situation. He has improved out of sight since and now he is over the knee reco. But I haven't seen him under too much pressure this year. Collingwood (apart from Sydney) is perhaps the best tackling side you guys have faced this year (granted only on our day). I feel we have to really put Goddard under pressure and try to minimise the damage he can cause.

I think Hayes, Ball and Dal Santo are far more effective in the trenches. They constantly are at the bottom of packs or have tags on them and there decisions under this kind of heat are fantastic. Goddard obviously has a different role, but the point is don't give hm freedom.




On Montagna - Defensive pressure he is good...but will he look after a dangerous opponent or can you win the footy against him?? We don't have any taggers, so my best option i could think of was put a quicker player on him and try and work off him. Wellingham and Barham are quick and good tacklers. Yes they are young and you guys would be licking your lips at the matchup...but find a better alternative and I'll take it on board. Congrats to Montagna for becoming a far more aggressive player.



On Cloke v Blake - I feel Blake is versatile in the sense that he can play multiple positions. I never thought he would be able to make himself as effective a footballer as he has become. On raw talent and speed, Cloke is more versatile on a 1 on 1 matchup and that is where I'm coming from. But Blake is perhaps smarter and more consistent and has done the job on him before.



Back to the cockiness/arrogance debate. At 6-0 of course you would be cocky. I just remember in 2001 we were 5-0 and we lost every game there after.

Every supporter is different. The majority of you seem like top guys and I've enjoyed the discussion. Then there are the few who think this game is a walk up win and ignore a lot of other factors. There is good arrogance and bad arrogance, and I've seen both on this forum and other saints discussion boards.

I'd be doing cartwheels if the Pies were playing as good as your mob. But ultimately there is still Geelong who still rightfully hold favouritism...and Hawthorn are warming up. So its a bit early to be arrogant...but you have every right to be confident.


And i think a lot of what i say about your 'cockiness' is a bit tongue in cheek as well. There has barely been 1 person who has raised the possibility of losing on Monday. I doubt it will happen, but its a 2 horse race and whether you rate Collingwood or not, we are always a dangerous team to face. Go to Round 19 last year for the evidence.






I'll be there with my dad on Monday night...so it may be a little rocky in my household this week. Thanks again, you guys have proven to me you are decent blokes and willing to look at all arguments.


User avatar
Loyal
Club Player
Posts: 853
Joined: Thu 12 Mar 2009 10:31am

Post: # 735258Post Loyal »

what sort of an idiot spends his time writing a six-thousand word summary on why it's okay that his team will get thumped.
seriously dave - get a life!


BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Post: # 735262Post BigMart »

Goddard finished 5th in the B&F in 2006 and in 2007 before his reco would have been around top 3........not sure he has 'improved out of sight' since coming back.....it possibly delayed his progress for a year....

His composure under pressure is what sets him apart and allows him to choose the right options.....

a good match-up would be Goddard vs Pendlebury.....but it will not happen because we will sit on Pendlebury with Jones

Currently he would be sitting 4th in the B&F
Dal Santo, Gilbert, Montagna - in front of him.....

You did not comment about the fact that Joey provides no defensive pressure......yet is in the top echelon for tackles this season and leads at STK by 7.......averaging 7 a game...


Post Reply