John (Jack) Anthony-1 week !!

perfectionist · Tue 05 May 2009 7:13pm

He only seems to get five possessions, but kicks three goals. Very accurate kick.

Winmarvellous · Tue 05 May 2009 10:43pm

So that means Didak, Anthony and possibly Medhurts all missing from the forward line. Against this seasons version of our backline, they are severely lacking firepower. If we don't take this game out, we truly are pretenders. Should win by at least 5 goals.

Eastern · Post: # 734727Post **Eastern** » Tue 05 May 2009 10:54pm

Winmarvellous wrote: Should win by at least 5 goals.

5 goals, 3 behinds to be precise

!!

The darkness · Tue 05 May 2009 11:24pm

Will be sad not to be able to make fun of John Anthony and his mongy tweety bird head....looks a bit better with hair but only makes his mongy tweety bird head look bigger.
Lets smash these pretenders and remind them that they are still pretenders just as they were last finals when we met.....We are a ten goal better side and they have been on the slide trying to plug holes in a sinking stinking ship .

Sainter_Dad · Wed 06 May 2009 9:40am

I have the feeling that Collingwood did the wrong thing in not challenging - the tribunal have a excessive amount of wet lettuce to slap wrists with this year - lol!

SainterK · Post: # 734823Post **SainterK** » Wed 06 May 2009 10:42am

Bonus he is not playing, great kick that kid. Then again they have plenty of other options that can kick goals, so lets not underestimate them.

InkerSaint · Wed 06 May 2009 11:03am

Anyone who has to ask who he is obviously hasn't watched many Collingwood games in the last year. His problem is getting the pill, but once he has it - look out. I think he will probably challenge for a Coleman or two as he matures. If I had to pick a guy to miss he's probably fourth on the list behind Medhurst, Swan and Lockyer.

And headbutting an opponent's crotch - what can you say? The guy's a perfect fit for the black and white.

samoht · Post: # 734965Post **samoht** » Wed 06 May 2009 6:20pm

InkerSaint wrote: And headbutting an opponent's crotch - what can you say? The guy's a perfect fit for the black and white.

on both counts (headbutting an opponent's groin and wearing the collingwood jumper) the guy is a d..khead

lazy · Post: # 734972Post **lazy** » Wed 06 May 2009 6:40pm

So with Anthony out, and possibly Rocca and Medhurst, does this again mean that if we win we have only played against an 'out of form' side?

Iceman234 · Post: # 734978Post **Iceman234** » Wed 06 May 2009 6:46pm

lazy wrote:So with Anthony out, and possibly Rocca and Medhurst, does this again mean that if we win we have only played against an 'out of form' side?

"Underdone", "youngsters" and "decimated by injury" will be the comments...

stinger · Post: # 734990Post **stinger** » Wed 06 May 2009 7:20pm

Iceman234 wrote:
lazy wrote:So with Anthony out, and possibly Rocca and Medhurst, does this again mean that if we win we have only played against an 'out of form' side?
"Underdone", "youngsters" and "decimated by injury" will be the comments...

yeah well...an out of form young filth side jumped us lastvyear for an upset win.....

SinCitySaint · Thu 07 May 2009 12:39pm

He should have got more than one week. With a head as disturbingly large as his he could have broken the other players pelvis and ruined his career. In fact it should be against the rules of the game to carry such an offensive head onto the field with you. Rules panel sort it out.

Sobraz · Post: # 735259Post **Sobraz** » Thu 07 May 2009 5:04pm

Im more weary of an unknown, young and inexperienced Collingwood side than a full strength one.... Its the magpie no name teams that often spring up and win a surprise game, while when they are full strength they often let winnable games slip....

That being the case, Im praying Rocca is right to play...