Believe what you want mate.............. where still moving to SeafordLoyal wrote:i reckon the vibe is that we are stayin' at Moorabbin.
Moorabbin
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2154
- Joined: Mon 06 Aug 2007 1:53pm
- Location: SE Queensland
- Has thanked: 30 times
- Been thanked: 16 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 641
- Joined: Fri 19 Sep 2008 2:19pm
- Been thanked: 8 times
- ausfatcat
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6536
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:36pm
- Has thanked: 19 times
- Been thanked: 101 times
Loyal wrote:the closer the demolition is to completed the further away frankston is.
Yep sure is, tenders have gone out plan's approved for seaford. At this stage it's not changing and very unlikely to due kingston council ect ect.
Like it or not it's gone too far now seaford is it get over it and movve on it's not changing.
Spellcheck is no substitute for paying attention during EnglishGo Sainters Go wrote:Loyal, why don't you get onto Kingston Council and sought them out, instill some commonsense into them. All the experts couldn't get those idiots to do something for the benefit of the community. This matter, incidently has been flogged to death, but Loyal, you might be smarter than all the experts.
THE BUBBLE HAS BURST
2011 player sponsor
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11242
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 126 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005 1:40am
- Location: Hampton/Gold Coast
- Been thanked: 7 times
Well well well.
I couldn't believe it when I stumbled across this little thread.
Lots of support for staying at Moorabbin, and very little crap from the pro-Seaforders. But eventually they woke up too, and they've gone for the good old assassinations rather than deal on merit (which isn't surprising as Seaford has no merit).
I posted and posted, and got belted and belted. Welcome, pro-Moorabbin redevelopment supporters.
I hope that the sentiment being expressed in favour of Moorabbin has some solid backing.
It is by far the best option available for the Saints.
Possible……if they took the gamble and raced on ahead of knowing whether there would be appeals and what the VCAT outcome would be. I doubt they would be so foolish as to invest in working drawings needed for tendering, prior to the certainty that the project had jumped all hurdles.
BTW, is the lease signed off yet at Belvedere Park (which is sort of essential to have in order to be able to award a tender to a builder isn't it)?
I couldn't believe it when I stumbled across this little thread.
Lots of support for staying at Moorabbin, and very little crap from the pro-Seaforders. But eventually they woke up too, and they've gone for the good old assassinations rather than deal on merit (which isn't surprising as Seaford has no merit).
I posted and posted, and got belted and belted. Welcome, pro-Moorabbin redevelopment supporters.
I hope that the sentiment being expressed in favour of Moorabbin has some solid backing.
It is by far the best option available for the Saints.
I don’t recall the celebratory media release saying it’s all signed off with the Frankston Council. Lots of spin, but no real substance so far.Stephen Theodore wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but hasnt the deal been signed, sealed and delivered. (Sainter)
All the working drawings have been completed, and tenders called only about a month after the planning permit was finalised?ausfatcat wrote:……tenders have gone out plan's approved for seaford. At this stage it's not changing and very unlikely to due kingston council ect ect.
Like it or not it's gone too far now seaford is it get over it and movve on it's not changing.
Possible……if they took the gamble and raced on ahead of knowing whether there would be appeals and what the VCAT outcome would be. I doubt they would be so foolish as to invest in working drawings needed for tendering, prior to the certainty that the project had jumped all hurdles.
BTW, is the lease signed off yet at Belvedere Park (which is sort of essential to have in order to be able to award a tender to a builder isn't it)?
looking at it from all angles one would be very surprised if we now moved away from moorabbin.
a moorabbin re-development represents the most potential for growth of our club.
with a re-development of the site at linton street we get an elite facility in an elite location.
moorabbin needs to be re-developed into a waverley-style arrangement.
there is a groundswell of support for linton street to be re-developed into an elite facility.
i live in frankston and believe that the project was handled poorly by frankston council. we should have been given frankston park regardless of cost.
i believe there was a conspiracy from frankston council regarding the general manager of the frankston dolphins that stopped the move to frankston park.
the only available realistic opportunity for growth of our club rests with re-developing linton street.
a moorabbin re-development represents the most potential for growth of our club.
with a re-development of the site at linton street we get an elite facility in an elite location.
moorabbin needs to be re-developed into a waverley-style arrangement.
there is a groundswell of support for linton street to be re-developed into an elite facility.
i live in frankston and believe that the project was handled poorly by frankston council. we should have been given frankston park regardless of cost.
i believe there was a conspiracy from frankston council regarding the general manager of the frankston dolphins that stopped the move to frankston park.
the only available realistic opportunity for growth of our club rests with re-developing linton street.
Are all your previous 256 posts as hopeless as this one?Loyal wrote:looking at it from all angles one would be very surprised if we now moved away from moorabbin.
a moorabbin re-development represents the most potential for growth of our club.
with a re-development of the site at linton street we get an elite facility in an elite location.
moorabbin needs to be re-developed into a waverley-style arrangement.
there is a groundswell of support for linton street to be re-developed into an elite facility.
i live in frankston and believe that the project was handled poorly by frankston council. we should have been given frankston park regardless of cost.
i believe there was a conspiracy from frankston council regarding the general manager of the frankston dolphins that stopped the move to frankston park.
the only available realistic opportunity for growth of our club rests with re-developing linton street.
- ausfatcat
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6536
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:36pm
- Has thanked: 19 times
- Been thanked: 101 times
It's not that loyal wants it to stay at Moorrabbin it's that he thinks it will.
There is no chance that the saints will redevelop linen house it done no chance for a revival
Seaford is pretty much locked in (not 100% thou) but even if that deal falls through the saints will go else. Moorabbin is not a option wether or like it not it's not happening.
There is no chance that the saints will redevelop linen house it done no chance for a revival
Seaford is pretty much locked in (not 100% thou) but even if that deal falls through the saints will go else. Moorabbin is not a option wether or like it not it's not happening.
- ausfatcat
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6536
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:36pm
- Has thanked: 19 times
- Been thanked: 101 times
Duggie1 wrote:The great Robert Harvey leaves no doubt in his book where his heart lay (lies) and many others too.
So wont change the fact's kingston council doesn't want the saints and we can't afford to stay there, I am sure the players felt that way also in 65 when they moved there from junction oval.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Thu 25 Sep 2008 11:19pm
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11242
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 126 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
Players were very happy to move in '65. Don't here any support from the playing group this time.ausfatcat wrote:Duggie1 wrote:The great Robert Harvey leaves no doubt in his book where his heart lay (lies) and many others too. :lol:
So wont change the fact's kingston council doesn't want the saints and we can't afford to stay there, I am sure the players felt that way also in 65 when they moved there from junction oval.
Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
are you being genuinely sarcastic?GrumpyOne wrote:Are all your previous 256 posts as hopeless as this one?Loyal wrote:looking at it from all angles one would be very surprised if we now moved away from moorabbin.
a moorabbin re-development represents the most potential for growth of our club.
with a re-development of the site at linton street we get an elite facility in an elite location.
moorabbin needs to be re-developed into a waverley-style arrangement.
there is a groundswell of support for linton street to be re-developed into an elite facility.
i live in frankston and believe that the project was handled poorly by frankston council. we should have been given frankston park regardless of cost.
i believe there was a conspiracy from frankston council regarding the general manager of the frankston dolphins that stopped the move to frankston park.
the only available realistic opportunity for growth of our club rests with re-developing linton street.
- Saints94
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3443
- Joined: Wed 31 Jan 2007 10:47am
- Location: NSW
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Contact:
No he is seriousLoyal wrote:are you being genuinely sarcastic?GrumpyOne wrote:Are all your previous 256 posts as hopeless as this one?Loyal wrote:looking at it from all angles one would be very surprised if we now moved away from moorabbin.
a moorabbin re-development represents the most potential for growth of our club.
with a re-development of the site at linton street we get an elite facility in an elite location.
moorabbin needs to be re-developed into a waverley-style arrangement.
there is a groundswell of support for linton street to be re-developed into an elite facility.
i live in frankston and believe that the project was handled poorly by frankston council. we should have been given frankston park regardless of cost.
i believe there was a conspiracy from frankston council regarding the general manager of the frankston dolphins that stopped the move to frankston park.
the only available realistic opportunity for growth of our club rests with re-developing linton street.
been a while since i was on saints central now that i have an excuse.saint66au wrote:Hey Loyal...why dont you pose the question to Michael Nettlefold on SaintsCentral?
He can give you the definative answer and perhaps put all your conspiracy theories to rest eh?
i understand that there was a political collision between frankston council and the GM of the dolphins, brian mase. by conspiracy i simply meant that to have been an agenda-setting breakdown.
brian had said to me that "as a stand-alone VFL club they all want to put s**t on you". meaning: he was very much against the saints moving to frankston park and forcing him out. he stood firm and the council suggested an alternative. the alternative being belvedere park. the cost blowout was a line.