OLB wrote:Ross Lyon and co must be coaching better too. Lyon has already attributed our forward-pressure to the acquisition of Leigh Tudor, but I'm not so sure.
yes good point.
OLB wrote:It must be due to the fact that Robert Harvey is no longer looking over the shoulders of everyone at the club.
Whose shoulder was RH looking over? Harvs was the consumate club man.
OLB wrote:Such a wave of relief has swept through Moorabbin since Harvey packed his bags. The whole place is buzzing now without the shackles that Robert Harvey had us in for far too long.
I dont understand your derision and sarcasm. Nobody said it was Harveys fault or he was a hinderance to the club. he did everthing in his power and
MORE to get the Saints a flag.
mabye if some of his teammates tried a little harder and didn't leave him to do so much heavy lifting for so long he may well have got the flag he so richly deserved.
OLB wrote:We're 2-0. Yes, that's right, 2 and zip.
Yes thats correct. A fairly good start - long way to go. Every thinking person acknowledges that.
OLB wrote: But it's not just the fact that this is undoubtably the greatest 2-0 start in VFL/AFL history,
who said that???
OLB wrote:not just the fact we're playing footy from another planet, it's the manner in which our players have suddenly lived up to their potential in the space of only two weeks.
Nobody has stated that. We are playing pretty good hard iat it football but as St.Mart has stated our disposal and footskills still leave a lot to be desired.
i would say a good start but not extraordinary.
OLB wrote: So much so that we need to look for reasons for this AMAZING turnaround in fortunes. And the answer is obvious - we're structurally and psychologically better off now without the burden that was Robert Harvey.
There has been no AMAZING turnaround. It is just that the team is playing a much better brand of
TEAM football where the second tier players are not leaving it to the few as has always been the case with the Saints.
Anyway my Op was a question not a statement. Mabye you should re-read the OP and stop being silly.
OLB wrote:Luke Ball kicked 50 metres from a set-shot on Friday night too. Maybe because Robert Harvey struggled to kick 50 during his final years that Luke Ball thought it wasn't effective to do so either, such is the high esteem Ball held Harvey in.
Why would this be the case? Luke Ball has had OP for years and may finally be shaking it off. Harv's had hammy problems and so tailored his kicking to that limitation.
I really dont understand how you could get any similarity.
OLB wrote:Wow. This is all making sense.
No you are not making much sense at all I'm afraid.
OLB wrote:How we managed to finish top four last season DESPITE Robert Harvey playing for us is a miracle. Credit to the coaching staff and the players for battling through such crippling circumstances.
We made the top four BECAUSE of Banger. If you wish to want to totally misrepresent my OP - go ahead - however you are making a fool of yourself in the process.
the majority of posters who replied on this thread did not think that Harv's retirement had much to do with what the club is doing now on the field - but at least have the good sense and decency not to totally take the OP and totally misrepresent the sentiment involved in it.
OLB wrote:Good riddance Banger, don't let the door smack your ass on the way out.
One of the worst things I have read from a poster on here about Robert Harvey.
Harvey was one of our greatest players and should be honoured. Posters like you should not make such terrible statements about Robert Harvey - he played his guts out for the club.
You should hang your head in shame for posting that about Harvey
OLB wrote:RIP Saintsational.
Rip any sensible discussion when you are involved apparently.