GrumpyOne wrote:
I would be good to compare the current clash jumper with a mock-up of B4's suggestion. I think we are committed to two years with the current jumper anyway.
If the club pinched the idea off SS, then it was a good design idea on SS.
I like it anyway. I might like B4s suggestion more, but I haven't seen it in action.
You should lay off Amanda B4..... she speaks very highly of you.
What's there to mock up?
We've all seen the home jumper, just make the back white, it doesn't take much imagination, way too much imagination for the current board, but that's hardly surprising!
Besides as it is, with the white panel being so much bigger than the red and black panels, surely this is not only implied racism but political discrimination as well!
This harks back to white Australia policies and the old reds under the bed, the blacks and reds being treated like oppressed minorities with the whites taking a bigger slice than they richly deserve, at the expense of the blacks and reds!
Quite frankly, I'm appalled our club would stoop so low and if it is an innocent mistake and they are by some chance completely unaware of the implied racism that the new clash jumper evokes, then with this now having been brought to their attention, I expect the appropriate modifications to be done and our new clash jumper to be nothing more, nothing less than our home jumper with a white back, which has all three panels on the front of the jumper exactly the same size!
Surely you would agree with this?
DO THE MATHS AND THE SQUARES ARE ALL ROOTED.