Official thread St Kilda v. Brisbane NAB Cup Round 1

henno · Post: # 700535Post **henno** » Sat 14 Feb 2009 10:50pm

eljay connors!!

Ralphy · Post: # 700536Post **Ralphy** » Sat 14 Feb 2009 10:51pm

MILNEEEEEEEEEEEEEY!

Moorabbin Saints · Sat 14 Feb 2009 10:51pm

MIIILLLNNNEEYYY!

henno · Post: # 700539Post **henno** » Sat 14 Feb 2009 10:52pm

tip rat strikes again!!

clarky449 · Post: # 700540Post **clarky449** » Sat 14 Feb 2009 10:52pm

Milne is bringing us back in the game

Mr Magic · Post: # 700542Post **Mr Magic** » Sat 14 Feb 2009 10:53pm

Eljay has had some nice touches in this last quarter. Prepared to attack the footy or the man with the footy.

Teflon · Post: # 700544Post **Teflon** » Sat 14 Feb 2009 10:54pm

Mr Magic wrote:Eljay has had some nice touches in this last quarter. Prepared to attack the footy or the man with the footy.

yep he moved ok...great to see.

clarky449 · Post: # 700545Post **clarky449** » Sat 14 Feb 2009 11:00pm

You cant be serious

henno · Post: # 700546Post **henno** » Sat 14 Feb 2009 11:00pm

how the hell can jack steven see that the brisbane guy he tackled has 'let go' of the ball if he's tackling him??!!

Moorabbin Saints · Sat 14 Feb 2009 11:00pm

Come on the SUPERGOAL!

plugger66 · Post: # 700548Post **plugger66** » Sat 14 Feb 2009 11:01pm

henno wrote:how the hell can jack steven see that the brisbane guy he tackled has 'let go' of the ball if he's tackling him??!!

That was the right decision but the one against Dawson was wrong.

Moorabbin Saints · Sat 14 Feb 2009 11:02pm

Get outside 50, not inside!

Thats it. Go down by 9. Happy enough with the fightback.

Sam23 · Post: # 700550Post **Sam23** » Sat 14 Feb 2009 11:03pm

and the 2 holding the balls that were called holding the man and in the back were funny

lol that free against eljay in the forward line was so funny

maverick · Post: # 700551Post **maverick** » Sat 14 Feb 2009 11:05pm

plugger66 wrote:
henno wrote:how the hell can jack steven see that the brisbane guy he tackled has 'let go' of the ball if he's tackling him??!!
That was the right decision but the one against Dawson was wrong.

Actually the other way round IMO, but you keep reporting them as fact, as always

mick13 · Post: # 700552Post **mick13** » Sat 14 Feb 2009 11:05pm

Haha those last 3 frees inside 50 were complete jokes.

Lovin Jack getting into Johnstone about that run down.

He's my man, move over Armo.

Devilhead · Post: # 700553Post **Devilhead** » Sat 14 Feb 2009 11:06pm

Yep good to see us fight back - 5 more minutes and we probably would have won it

BallBanger · Sat 14 Feb 2009 11:06pm

Plugger if you can't see those frees going lions way at the end then thats why your an ump....cheetin' cuniii

Your like a woman with caroline wilson//cant see past her...

Ralphy · Post: # 700556Post **Ralphy** » Sat 14 Feb 2009 11:06pm

im liking the look of
steven
goose was good for his first game
BJ!
eljay wasnt bad
heyne was good
raph was ok

plugger66 · Post: # 700557Post **plugger66** » Sat 14 Feb 2009 11:07pm

maverick wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
henno wrote:how the hell can jack steven see that the brisbane guy he tackled has 'let go' of the ball if he's tackling him??!!
That was the right decision but the one against Dawson was wrong.
Actually the other way round IMO, but you keep reporting them as fact, as always

Thats probably because I know the rules and you dont.

maverick · Post: # 700559Post **maverick** » Sat 14 Feb 2009 11:09pm

plugger66 wrote:
maverick wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
henno wrote:how the hell can jack steven see that the brisbane guy he tackled has 'let go' of the ball if he's tackling him??!!
That was the right decision but the one against Dawson was wrong.
Actually the other way round IMO, but you keep reporting them as fact, as always
Thats probably because I know the rules and you dont.

Course you do, Dawson jumped on his back, its a free, they always pay it, we can all read the rules, its the interpreting that's the hard bit, well for you anyway.......

pickle_weasel · Sat 14 Feb 2009 11:09pm

meh time to see st kilda in the bottom 4, useless bunch we have this year once again. 1 less membership for this joke of a club with 1 premiership.

skeptic · Post: # 700561Post **skeptic** » Sat 14 Feb 2009 11:09pm

see this is what i can't stand.

The games there to be won, its a contest situation inside the forward 50 and brisbane get a cheap free kick and the game is over

clarky449 · Post: # 700563Post **clarky449** » Sat 14 Feb 2009 11:10pm

The 'in the back free kick' was right
The Steven one was not a free kick

clarky449 · Post: # 700564Post **clarky449** » Sat 14 Feb 2009 11:11pm

Pickle=Troll???

plugger66 · Post: # 700565Post **plugger66** » Sat 14 Feb 2009 11:11pm

maverick wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
maverick wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
henno wrote:how the hell can jack steven see that the brisbane guy he tackled has 'let go' of the ball if he's tackling him??!!
That was the right decision but the one against Dawson was wrong.
Actually the other way round IMO, but you keep reporting them as fact, as always
Thats probably because I know the rules and you dont.
Course you do, Dawson jumped on his back, its a free, they always pay it, we can all read the rules, its the interpreting that's the hard bit, well for you anyway.......

The problem with what you say is it was holding the ball before he went into his back. Just look at the Lions player reaction when the decision was paid. He thought it was against him. Give me your address I will send you a rule book.