will we or won't we....do we have balls

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
stinger
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 38126
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:06pm
Location: Australia.

will we or won't we....do we have balls

Post: # 675411Post stinger »

are we prepared to separate from the herd.....i flowering hope so....


"
Saints having second thoughts as Ben Cousins confronts coalition of unwilling



Stephen Rielly | November 22, 2008
Article from: The Australian

THE AFL opened its door to Ben Cousins this week, which is not to say it extended a warm invitation to him on Tuesday.

In fact, as the week passed it became more obvious that a sense of obligation - legal and medical - rather than any sincere desire or goodwill brought the nine AFL commissioners to their decision.

That Cousins has, in their view, shamed the game and not only refused to acknowledge as much but demanded a return, offering in exchange little more than a smirk and a begrudging confession to an addiction to illicit drugs, rankles. Is contrition not a necessary step to recovery, they ask.

It galls them, too, that for all of the indications of substance abuse apparent in his increasingly erratic behaviour in 2006 and 2007, the competition's illicit drug testing program was unable to catch him out. Or, perhaps more accurately, out of it.

It is that much harder for the league to defend its reputation and the enlightened principles underpinning its recreational drug policy when all anyone has to do, even the most ignorant critic, is utter the name Cousins.

There are many reasons why Collingwood, having spent a number of months sorting through the pros and cons of recruiting the 2005 Brownlow medallist and former West Coast captain, decided in September to leave him be.

A concern that, at 30 years of age, he might not be physically capable of rising again to his extraordinary standards was one. The memory of the hamstring complaint that dogged his last season with the Eagles in 2007 and troubled him again this year, as he trained for his comeback, was another.

After being suspended for the first half of the season by the Eagles, Cousins played only seven games in 2007 before being deregistered by the league for bringing the game into disrepute.

There was the idea, too, that Cousins can only be a short-term proposition and therefore of limited value to a side that is being rebuilt to contend in the mid-term. Would he enable the Magpies to surpass or even close on Hawthorn or Geelong in 2009? The answer, as it was at Carlton and a number of other possible destinations, was no.

There was intelligence gathered for the club by a private detective that was taken into account, as was a private discussion with the chief of Victoria Police, Christine Nixon.

This cost-benefit analysis alone was enough to discourage the Magpies, but they certainly found it difficult, too, to ignore a strong suspicion the AFL would rather Cousins stay out in the cold. They are not alone in believing this, either. Cousins certainly holds to it and the only club still giving thought to recruiting him, St Kilda, is aware of the sentiment, of the distrust.

Well before he was informed this week that to play again next year he will have to submit to as many as three urine tests a week and regular hair testing that, to an extent, will dictate even how long or short his mop must be, Cousins felt the league did not want him back.

The AFL Players Association appeared to think along this line, too, when it asked on Wednesday for an explanation of the strict and unique terms of his return, wanting a sound medical rationale to dismiss the thought that the true motive must lie elsewhere. The AFLPA says it is still sifting through the evidence. Not that Cousins helped his cause at all by closely cropping the hair on his head and waxing his body this month.

It may simply have been an expression of appreciation for metrosexual fashion, and Cousins did pass yet another urine test at the time, but it was not a look that pleased AFL medical officials who were unable to complete their testing for the lack of a strand of hair at least three centimetres long. Such a sample can provide a history of drug use going back months.

Cousins says he wants foremost to return for the sake of his health, which made the threat to walk away from the game that was aired by his manager, Ricky Nixon, on Tuesday such a foolish position to adopt. By Wednesday, Cousins was committed to playing. He must nominate for next Saturday's national draft by Wednesday or the pre-season draft by December 9.

But he is also motivated by a powerful determination to prove wrong his detractors - a coalition, as he sees it, that includes the AFL and would condemn him to retirement as a disgraced figure.

In any event, St Kilda must gird itself if, at a board meeting on Tuesday, it decides to recruit Cousins. It is much easier to run with the herd than break from it. The club will truly be out on its own if it agrees to take him, and every sceptic, on."


.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will

"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"

However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
joffaboy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 20200
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:57pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Post: # 675413Post joffaboy »

How effing much more can these hacks wring out of this story.

This crap and this from Smith

Importantly, coach Ross Lyon is said not to be in favour of the club drafting Cousins. But the coach has been over-ruled before. It is believed Lyon was not at all keen in Fraser Gehrig coming back to the club last year after the full-forward had previously announced his retirement. As it was, Gehrig played just five games and kicked nine goals. He was a liability as opponents ran off him at will, much as Lyon had feared.

So he is "said" to not be in favour??? By whom? More Smith mythical sources???

As for Gehrig - that is a blatant mistruth by Smith. A lie. A bit fat porky. (Sorry just slipped into Phatpryck style for a second there). It was Lyon who spoke to Gehrig and Lyon who decided to take him in the draft.

The Australian is a crappy rag at the best of times and their coverage of AFL is worse than the rest of their reporting.

The rag would love to drag out the story so they dont have to do any real work and actually find a new story.

Pitiful.


Lance or James??

There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
fonz_#15
SS Life Member
Posts: 3804
Joined: Tue 30 May 2006 7:34pm
Location: the new home of the saints :)

Post: # 675431Post fonz_#15 »

with no quotes from people at the club i find it hard to believe


Robert Harvey- Simply the best
saint66au
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 17003
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:03pm
Contact:

Post: # 675462Post saint66au »

Still looking through that article for any evidence that the Saints are having second thoughts...nope..cant even see it MENTIONED in the body of the article anywhere!!!

Loo Paper >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Australian


Image

THE BUBBLE HAS BURST

2011 player sponsor
User avatar
ausfatcat
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6536
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:36pm
Has thanked: 19 times
Been thanked: 101 times

Re: will we or won't we....do we have balls

Post: # 675469Post ausfatcat »

stinger wrote:are we prepared to separate from the herd.....i flowering hope so....

Theres a reason the heard heads in one direction together


User avatar
saint75
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2101
Joined: Sun 28 Sep 2008 2:05pm
Location: Melbourne

Post: # 675479Post saint75 »

Has anyone stopped to think that maybe the others clubs have pulled out because they know it is a done deal already? Remember, the draft has to been seen as fair and *cough* equitable. Maybe it is more of a 'saving face' by saying they don't want him instead of it being more of a situation that Ben doesn't want them? Food for thought anyway.


User avatar
stinger
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 38126
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:06pm
Location: Australia.

Re: will we or won't we....do we have balls

Post: # 675501Post stinger »

ausfatcat wrote:
stinger wrote:are we prepared to separate from the herd.....i flowering hope so....

Theres a reason the heard heads in one direction together

lemmings????? :roll: :wink: :lol:


.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will

"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"

However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
User avatar
WayneJudson42
SS Life Member
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon 07 Jul 2008 9:53pm
Location: I'm a victim of circumstance

Post: # 675506Post WayneJudson42 »

An interesting point in the paper about why some clubs aren't interested... and the fact that we're probably one of 4 genuine contenders for a flag.

If the filth or the scum believed they were a genuine chance, they'd be after him... make no mistake.

Port are happy to get Carr back, so having both probably won't work.

As for the reast, by the time they are in contention, BC will be too old.

Makse sense to me.


The lid is off after Round 2! Enjoy the journey, coz you just don't know where we'll end up. Live for today and seize the moment.
User avatar
stinger
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 38126
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:06pm
Location: Australia.

Post: # 675507Post stinger »

saint75 wrote:Has anyone stopped to think that maybe the others clubs have pulled out because they know it is a done deal already? Remember, the draft has to been seen as fair and *cough* equitable. Maybe it is more of a 'saving face' by saying they don't want him instead of it being more of a situation that Ben doesn't want them? Food for thought anyway.
nail..... hammer ....head....i was told months ago that benny was a done deal........came from benny's own mouth......the filth were just saving face...they lost out to us over fraser and couldn't face the fact that even a hop head....abet reformed ...would walk over them to play for the saints.......


.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will

"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"

However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
User avatar
WayneJudson42
SS Life Member
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon 07 Jul 2008 9:53pm
Location: I'm a victim of circumstance

Post: # 675510Post WayneJudson42 »

stinger wrote:
saint75 wrote:Has anyone stopped to think that maybe the others clubs have pulled out because they know it is a done deal already? Remember, the draft has to been seen as fair and *cough* equitable. Maybe it is more of a 'saving face' by saying they don't want him instead of it being more of a situation that Ben doesn't want them? Food for thought anyway.
nail..... hammer ....head....i was told months ago that benny was a done deal........came from benny's own mouth......the filth were just saving face...they lost out to us over fraser and couldn't face the fact that even a hop head....abet reformed ...would walk over them to play for the saints.......
If that's the case, then I hope your'e right. Coz it means he's decided to prove a point and is committed.


The lid is off after Round 2! Enjoy the journey, coz you just don't know where we'll end up. Live for today and seize the moment.
saint66au
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 17003
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:03pm
Contact:

Post: # 675541Post saint66au »

I'm convinced that the Pies pulled out from sponsor pressure, given that some of their sponsors might be hanging by a thread as it is given the events of last year

St Kilda dont have that problem :-)


Image

THE BUBBLE HAS BURST

2011 player sponsor
saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Post: # 675553Post saintspremiers »

saint66au wrote:I'm convinced that the Pies pulled out from sponsor pressure, given that some of their sponsors might be hanging by a thread as it is given the events of last year

St Kilda dont have that problem :-)
Me too.

And would you blame them, given the Pies recent history?

I mean, they've even dumped Joffa from their latest advertising campaign!!!

As for Benny, we need him as much as he needs us.


i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Post: # 675576Post SainterK »

stinger wrote:
saint75 wrote:Has anyone stopped to think that maybe the others clubs have pulled out because they know it is a done deal already? Remember, the draft has to been seen as fair and *cough* equitable. Maybe it is more of a 'saving face' by saying they don't want him instead of it being more of a situation that Ben doesn't want them? Food for thought anyway.
nail..... hammer ....head....i was told months ago that benny was a done deal........came from benny's own mouth......the filth were just saving face...they lost out to us over fraser and couldn't face the fact that even a hop head....abet reformed ...would walk over them to play for the saints.......
So why didn't he name us as a preferred club like everyone anticipated, because he is actually handling this in house? (which I realise is the opposite to what the media would have us believe)


Langi
Club Player
Posts: 136
Joined: Wed 31 May 2006 2:43pm

Post: # 675647Post Langi »

I was just surfing the net and came acrooss a picture of cuz chatting with friends at the opening of some clothes shop in perth, this is after he landed back in perth after meeting the saints directors ( thats what the paper said ) anyway ben looks happy in this picture, typical cuz smugness if you like which suggests to me he didn't exactly get bad news while he was in melbourne.

I know i'm probably clutching at straws a little bit but if he was told we were not going to pick him up i wouldn't think he would look as happy and relaxed as he seemed in that picture.

u can view that picture on the west australian website if u like.

Anyway thats my take on it and really hope we give ben a go.


User avatar
stinger
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 38126
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:06pm
Location: Australia.

Post: # 675662Post stinger »

saint66au wrote:I'm convinced that the Pies pulled out from sponsor pressure, given that some of their sponsors might be hanging by a thread as it is given the events of last year

St Kilda dont have that problem :-)

no....they were never going to get him.......he wants to play footy with his mate.....


.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will

"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"

However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
User avatar
stinger
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 38126
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:06pm
Location: Australia.

Post: # 675663Post stinger »

ohwhenthesaints! wrote:
stinger wrote:
saint75 wrote:Has anyone stopped to think that maybe the others clubs have pulled out because they know it is a done deal already? Remember, the draft has to been seen as fair and *cough* equitable. Maybe it is more of a 'saving face' by saying they don't want him instead of it being more of a situation that Ben doesn't want them? Food for thought anyway.
nail..... hammer ....head....i was told months ago that benny was a done deal........came from benny's own mouth......the filth were just saving face...they lost out to us over fraser and couldn't face the fact that even a hop head....abet reformed ...would walk over them to play for the saints.......
So why didn't he name us as a preferred club like everyone anticipated, because he is actually handling this in house? (which I realise is the opposite to what the media would have us believe)

never had to......


.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will

"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"

However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
undecided
Club Player
Posts: 504
Joined: Wed 08 Oct 2008 7:50pm
Contact:

Post: # 675989Post undecided »

voss flew to Perth to meet with Cousins over to weekend so Brisbane still might not be out of the race


User avatar
rodgerfox
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9059
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:10am
Has thanked: 425 times
Been thanked: 327 times

Re: will we or won't we....do we have balls

Post: # 676002Post rodgerfox »

ausfatcat wrote:
stinger wrote:are we prepared to separate from the herd.....i flowering hope so....

Theres a reason the heard heads in one direction together
There is.

And that's to remain 'average'. To not stand out.

If you take the tact to do everything the same as everyone else - just hopefully better than them, that's fine. Good luck.

Or you can try to do things in certain areas that set you apart from the herd, in order to get an advantage.


User avatar
Saints Premiers 2008
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4335
Joined: Thu 27 Oct 2005 11:21pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: will we or won't we....do we have balls

Post: # 676007Post Saints Premiers 2008 »

rodgerfox wrote:
ausfatcat wrote:
stinger wrote:are we prepared to separate from the herd.....i flowering hope so....

Theres a reason the heard heads in one direction together
There is.

And that's to remain 'average'. To not stand out.

If you take the tact to do everything the same as everyone else - just hopefully better than them, that's fine. Good luck.

Or you can try to do things in certain areas that set you apart from the herd, in order to get an advantage.
its nothing to do with having balls or going with herds, the fact is that most clubs should not draft cousins due to it being pointless

especially in such an age whereby its imperitive to use every possible place on your list wisely and effectively, i.e. a team rebuilding from the ground up do not need cousins...he is a waste of space


"It's a work in progress," Lyon said.
User avatar
rodgerfox
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9059
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:10am
Has thanked: 425 times
Been thanked: 327 times

Re: will we or won't we....do we have balls

Post: # 676011Post rodgerfox »

Saints Premiers 2008 wrote:
rodgerfox wrote:
ausfatcat wrote:
stinger wrote:are we prepared to separate from the herd.....i flowering hope so....

Theres a reason the heard heads in one direction together
There is.

And that's to remain 'average'. To not stand out.

If you take the tact to do everything the same as everyone else - just hopefully better than them, that's fine. Good luck.

Or you can try to do things in certain areas that set you apart from the herd, in order to get an advantage.
its nothing to do with having balls or going with herds, the fact is that most clubs should not draft cousins due to it being pointless

especially in such an age whereby its imperitive to use every possible place on your list wisely and effectively, i.e. a team rebuilding from the ground up do not need cousins...he is a waste of space
To quite a wise man - "well derrrrrr".


Pilgram
Club Player
Posts: 819
Joined: Sun 20 Jul 2008 10:25am

Re: will we or won't we....do we have balls

Post: # 676013Post Pilgram »

Saints Premiers 2008 wrote:its nothing to do with having balls or going with herds, the fact is that most clubs should not draft cousins due to it being pointless

especially in such an age whereby its imperitive to use every possible place on your list wisely and effectively, i.e. a team rebuilding from the ground up do not need cousins...he is a waste of space
i find that comment slightly ignorant when you consider the need for another quality midfielder.


SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Re: will we or won't we....do we have balls

Post: # 676014Post SainterK »

Pilgram wrote:
Saints Premiers 2008 wrote:its nothing to do with having balls or going with herds, the fact is that most clubs should not draft cousins due to it being pointless

especially in such an age whereby its imperitive to use every possible place on your list wisely and effectively, i.e. a team rebuilding from the ground up do not need cousins...he is a waste of space
i find that comment slightly ignorant when you consider the need for another quality midfielder.
I think you will find that he is not referring to St Kilda...


Pilgram
Club Player
Posts: 819
Joined: Sun 20 Jul 2008 10:25am

Post: # 676015Post Pilgram »

saying that cousins is a waste of space to any team rebuilding from the ground up may be correct, however st. kilda are in the business of playing finals football and i fail to see what relevance the remark has.


User avatar
Ice Wolf
Club Player
Posts: 744
Joined: Tue 12 Feb 2008 12:55pm

Re: will we or won't we....do we have balls

Post: # 676017Post Ice Wolf »

Pilgram wrote:
Saints Premiers 2008 wrote:its nothing to do with having balls or going with herds, the fact is that most clubs should not draft cousins due to it being pointless

especially in such an age whereby its imperitive to use every possible place on your list wisely and effectively, i.e. a team rebuilding from the ground up do not need cousins...he is a waste of space
i find that comment slightly ignorant when you consider the need for another quality midfielder.
Most teams aren't close enough for 1 quality midfielder to make a difference.
The bottom 12 would be wasting a pick if they were to pick him up, the bulldogs are covered on midfielders they need talls, Hawthorn and Geelong are covered on midfielders, Geelong might need a forward but thats it, Hawthorn could use tall defenders.
The only team that could be seen as to not wasting a pick is us.


User avatar
stinger
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 38126
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:06pm
Location: Australia.

Re: will we or won't we....do we have balls

Post: # 676020Post stinger »

Saints Premiers 2008 wrote:
its nothing to do with having balls or going with herds, the fact is that most clubs should not draft cousins due to it being pointless

especially in such an age whereby its imperitive to use every possible place on your list wisely and effectively, i.e. a team rebuilding from the ground up do not need cousins...he is a waste of space

of course it does........collingwood and brisbane both wanted him...but didn't have the balls to pursue him when the heat in the kitchen got to hot.....


.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will

"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"

However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
Post Reply