Confirmed Farren Ray & pick 48 to the Saints for pick 31
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
Seaford_Saint
- Club Player
- Posts: 452
- Joined: Sat 16 Jun 2007 1:05am
Ok people... listen up......
To all you in-grates on here who are already bagging young Farren.... Jesus Christ!!.. Fair Dinkum!!!... give the kid a go for God sake!... he has been a Saint for a handful of hours and is already the new whipping boy to some....
Welcome aboard Farren... the slate is clean... work hard.... earn the respect of your teammates... and realise your undoubted potential.
Over & out.
To all you in-grates on here who are already bagging young Farren.... Jesus Christ!!.. Fair Dinkum!!!... give the kid a go for God sake!... he has been a Saint for a handful of hours and is already the new whipping boy to some....
Welcome aboard Farren... the slate is clean... work hard.... earn the respect of your teammates... and realise your undoubted potential.
Over & out.
Failure cannot succeed in the face of persistence......
the kids played 75 games as a midfielder at age 22 in a team known for a strong midfield. How many games have our 22 year olds played??
Give him a chance, i don't think we are losing much pick wise if reports are correct of a deep draft (I'm not one to know if it is or isn't). the difference between picks 30-60 in many cases can depend or development after they were drafted not before.
Give him a chance, i don't think we are losing much pick wise if reports are correct of a deep draft (I'm not one to know if it is or isn't). the difference between picks 30-60 in many cases can depend or development after they were drafted not before.
I was surprised he's played that many...and he reckons he hasn't had much of a chance at the Doggies.iceman wrote:the kids played 75 games as a midfielder at age 22 in a team known for a strong midfield. How many games have our 22 year olds played??
Give him a chance, i don't think we are losing much pick wise if reports are correct of a deep draft (I'm not one to know if it is or isn't). the difference between picks 30-60 in many cases can depend or development after they were drafted not before.
Well, I for one am stoked. Though I haven't seen a lot of the Doggies, when I have I have noticed Ray..... looks like a player.
In many games this year we have been beaten because of the lack of impact of our "bottom six". Farren will improve on that - he averages over 19 possessions a game! He currently would get into the team in front of Jones, Eddy, Gwilt, Allen, Gardiner, Armitage.
And we give up what..... 16 places in the draft.... no biggie........ great trade, well done Saints.
In many games this year we have been beaten because of the lack of impact of our "bottom six". Farren will improve on that - he averages over 19 possessions a game! He currently would get into the team in front of Jones, Eddy, Gwilt, Allen, Gardiner, Armitage.
And we give up what..... 16 places in the draft.... no biggie........ great trade, well done Saints.
Hird... The unflushable one is now... just a turd...
-
BAM! (shhhh)
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2134
- Joined: Thu 24 May 2007 5:23pm
- Location: The little voice inside your head
I've never been that high on Farren Ray, but we should keep in mind that the Dogs (who have a stronger midfield) let him go because he wanted to, not because they didn't have a place for him.
Without suggesting that he's a replacement for the great man, that's the spot in the 22 that he steps into.
If nothing else, it sends a message to those who couldn't crack the regular lienup this year that they don't move up the depth chart purely on loss of depth.
Without suggesting that he's a replacement for the great man, that's the spot in the 22 that he steps into.
If nothing else, it sends a message to those who couldn't crack the regular lienup this year that they don't move up the depth chart purely on loss of depth.
"Everything comes to he who hustles while he waits"
- Henry Ford
- Henry Ford
could have phreased that better ross ol' buddy......
farren's girlfriend mightn't like the competition...
"
Lyon happy, still eyes Cousins
ST KILDA coach Ross Lyon says the addition of Bulldog midfielder Farren Ray does not mean the club has lost interest in former Eagle Ben Cousins.
The Saints landed Ray and the Bulldogs’ third-round pick (no. 48 overall) on the final day of trade week in exchange for its second-round pick.
Lyon said the addition of Ray would bring pace and endurance to the St Kilda midfield.
“We saw the opportunity/cost was reasonable. He’s got a massive tank and we deferred a bit to (general manager football operations) Matthew Drain’s experience as well,â€
farren's girlfriend mightn't like the competition...
"
Lyon happy, still eyes Cousins
ST KILDA coach Ross Lyon says the addition of Bulldog midfielder Farren Ray does not mean the club has lost interest in former Eagle Ben Cousins.
The Saints landed Ray and the Bulldogs’ third-round pick (no. 48 overall) on the final day of trade week in exchange for its second-round pick.
Lyon said the addition of Ray would bring pace and endurance to the St Kilda midfield.
“We saw the opportunity/cost was reasonable. He’s got a massive tank and we deferred a bit to (general manager football operations) Matthew Drain’s experience as well,â€
.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
Joke to critisise Ray.
What did people expect for #31? Cooney? Griffen? Kerr? Okeefe?
Wake up people.
Lots of upside to the trade - but I suppose unless we get one of the above and a first round draft pick for our pick #31 some people will be unhappy.
Good luck and welcome Farren.
What did people expect for #31? Cooney? Griffen? Kerr? Okeefe?
Wake up people.
Lots of upside to the trade - but I suppose unless we get one of the above and a first round draft pick for our pick #31 some people will be unhappy.
Good luck and welcome Farren.
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
pick 31 versus pick 48:
2007: Daniel Boyle vs Michael Shields
2006: Clayton Collard vs David Mackay
2005: Trent West vs Alan Obst
2004: Jarred Moore vs Nathan Ablett (fs)
2003: Josh Krueger vs Heath Shaw (fs)
2002: Joel Perry vs Greg Edgcumbe
2001: Joel Reynolds vs Simon Cox
2000: Blake Campbell vs Matthew Smith
1999: Paul Chapman vs Chance Bateman
1998: Gary Dhurrkay vs Lucas Herbert
1997: Simon Black vs Ben Thompson (st kilda)
1996: Jess Sinclair vs Marty Warry
1995: Andrew Ukovic vs Darren Milburn
1994: Allen Nash vs Austinn Jones
1993: Mark Stevens vs Matthew Hopkins
What does that mean?
In the last eight years, neither pick has given anything - ignoring Ablett and Shaw who would have gone higher if not for father son. (Jury probably still out on Collard and Moore.)
In the seven years before that it was Champan, Black, Sinclair, Stevens vs Bateman, Milburn, Jones. That's a win to the earlier pick but not unarguably so.
I'm not unhappy with the trade. Picks after about 30 are a lottery and just depend on how much homework you've done and how good your recruiting instincts are.
Whether Fazza is the next Fiora or the next Montagna, I don't know. Let's hope the latter.
2007: Daniel Boyle vs Michael Shields
2006: Clayton Collard vs David Mackay
2005: Trent West vs Alan Obst
2004: Jarred Moore vs Nathan Ablett (fs)
2003: Josh Krueger vs Heath Shaw (fs)
2002: Joel Perry vs Greg Edgcumbe
2001: Joel Reynolds vs Simon Cox
2000: Blake Campbell vs Matthew Smith
1999: Paul Chapman vs Chance Bateman
1998: Gary Dhurrkay vs Lucas Herbert
1997: Simon Black vs Ben Thompson (st kilda)
1996: Jess Sinclair vs Marty Warry
1995: Andrew Ukovic vs Darren Milburn
1994: Allen Nash vs Austinn Jones
1993: Mark Stevens vs Matthew Hopkins
What does that mean?
In the last eight years, neither pick has given anything - ignoring Ablett and Shaw who would have gone higher if not for father son. (Jury probably still out on Collard and Moore.)
In the seven years before that it was Champan, Black, Sinclair, Stevens vs Bateman, Milburn, Jones. That's a win to the earlier pick but not unarguably so.
I'm not unhappy with the trade. Picks after about 30 are a lottery and just depend on how much homework you've done and how good your recruiting instincts are.
Whether Fazza is the next Fiora or the next Montagna, I don't know. Let's hope the latter.
-
fisher_fan
- Club Player
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Mon 03 Sep 2007 12:59am
with a full list is it likely ray will be in our best 18??? would he start midfield? forward? half back? from what i know of the guy he would fit into the gram/fisher/montagna type group of our team. should be a good pick up and to go back 11 picks can go either way so its worth the risk....i think one thing the saints do well (forgetting barry brooks) is trade well imo...i know everyone might not agree but they do a good job of picking up the half decent players for very little on a friday afternoon of trade week.
such is life
-
Mr Magic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12798
- Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
- Has thanked: 811 times
- Been thanked: 433 times
fisher_fan, you might want to change the spelling of Schneider's name in your sig?fisher_fan wrote:with a full list is it likely ray will be in our best 18??? would he start midfield? forward? half back? from what i know of the guy he would fit into the gram/fisher/montagna type group of our team. should be a good pick up and to go back 11 picks can go either way so its worth the risk....i think one thing the saints do well (forgetting barry brooks) is trade well imo...i know everyone might not agree but they do a good job of picking up the half decent players for very little on a friday afternoon of trade week.
But then again, you may want to be belligerent, stubborn and obtuse like MisKa and leave the miss-spelling there?
-
borderbarry
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6676
- Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
- Location: Wodonga