Best & Fairest OFFICIAL Update Thread
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
hellorocky
- Club Player
- Posts: 401
- Joined: Tue 20 Apr 2004 12:04am
- Location: Wodonga
- Contact:
-
hellorocky
- Club Player
- Posts: 401
- Joined: Tue 20 Apr 2004 12:04am
- Location: Wodonga
- Contact:
Sam fisher won
Max 4th
Harvey 5th
Max 4th
Harvey 5th
Last edited by hellorocky on Sat 04 Oct 2008 11:42pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
St Michele
- Club Player
- Posts: 931
- Joined: Sun 26 Aug 2007 10:06pm
- Location: Perth WA
-
Saints Premiers 2008
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4335
- Joined: Thu 27 Oct 2005 11:21pm
- Location: Brisbane
-
Saints Premiers 2008
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4335
- Joined: Thu 27 Oct 2005 11:21pm
- Location: Brisbane
-
Batnoe
-
bigcarl
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18653
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1994 times
- Been thanked: 872 times
-
saint24601
- Club Player
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Fri 12 May 2006 3:34pm
thats great for Sam Fisher, rack up another success story for John Beveridge picking him out of the draft in the 40's. From his efforts in the finals he may even me a handy forward - he seems to kick pretty straight.
BUT (and isn't there always a but!) nobody could suggest that we would have even made the finals without the herculean efforts of the guy who wears no.12, particularly but not exclusively in the second half of the season. Can the same be said of Fisher? Maybe, maybe not. 4 best and fairest underlines his brilliance, and its good to see them share it around a bit but I thought this year was easily his best year and considering how down some of our better players were (some through injury others not) it seems a bit of a strange one.
I suppose its not the "most valuable", if it was it wouldn't even be worth counting!
BUT (and isn't there always a but!) nobody could suggest that we would have even made the finals without the herculean efforts of the guy who wears no.12, particularly but not exclusively in the second half of the season. Can the same be said of Fisher? Maybe, maybe not. 4 best and fairest underlines his brilliance, and its good to see them share it around a bit but I thought this year was easily his best year and considering how down some of our better players were (some through injury others not) it seems a bit of a strange one.
I suppose its not the "most valuable", if it was it wouldn't even be worth counting!
-
Saints Premiers 2008
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4335
- Joined: Thu 27 Oct 2005 11:21pm
- Location: Brisbane
did we over-rate rooey's second half of the year??? or was his first half of the season that average???
the brownlow showed it and now the b and f when at the end of the home and away season we were going nuts and orgasming about how good his second half of the year was
the brownlow showed it and now the b and f when at the end of the home and away season we were going nuts and orgasming about how good his second half of the year was
"It's a work in progress," Lyon said.
-
maverick
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5026
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:42am
- Location: Bayside
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 93 times
Why is it so much about Roo.Saints Premiers 2008 wrote:did we over-rate rooey's second half of the year??? or was his first half of the season that average???
the brownlow showed it and now the b and f when at the end of the home and away season we were going nuts and orgasming about how good his second half of the year was
Chips had an excellent year, all year, if we are ever to win everything there needs to be a few more up there IMO.
-
Saints Premiers 2008
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4335
- Joined: Thu 27 Oct 2005 11:21pm
- Location: Brisbane
thats my point though (actually my previous post was about it)maverick wrote:Why is it so much about Roo.Saints Premiers 2008 wrote:did we over-rate rooey's second half of the year??? or was his first half of the season that average???
the brownlow showed it and now the b and f when at the end of the home and away season we were going nuts and orgasming about how good his second half of the year was
Chips had an excellent year, all year, if we are ever to win everything there needs to be a few more up there IMO.
its great to see someone else get it
"It's a work in progress," Lyon said.
Very true, no-one questions that fact that Roo has very broad shoulders, but it's great to see other people step up and completely understand and fufill their role for the club....well done!Saints Premiers 2008 wrote:thats my point though (actually my previous post was about it)maverick wrote:Why is it so much about Roo.Saints Premiers 2008 wrote:did we over-rate rooey's second half of the year??? or was his first half of the season that average???
the brownlow showed it and now the b and f when at the end of the home and away season we were going nuts and orgasming about how good his second half of the year was
Chips had an excellent year, all year, if we are ever to win everything there needs to be a few more up there IMO.
its great to see someone else get it
-
saint24601
- Club Player
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Fri 12 May 2006 3:34pm
the best and fairest is not a fact, its an opinion. True its an eductaed opinion since the match committee know what is expected of the players so they judge them against that. They produced a result that is popular, but in the end somewhat unjust in my opinion. Nick R is streets ahead of the rest of the players in talent, application, willingness to work hard, willingness to promote the club, willingness to put his body on the line, willingness to take responsibility for what happens on the field and off.(Robert Harvey excluded)
Does Sam Fisher "completely understand and fufill (his) role for the club" simply because he wins the best and fairest???
I'm only puttig it out there, but is there any chance Nick R was up for a big bonus if he won the B&F? Its wouldnt be the first time such events have transpired. Talk about tanking!!!
Does Sam Fisher "completely understand and fufill (his) role for the club" simply because he wins the best and fairest???
I'm only puttig it out there, but is there any chance Nick R was up for a big bonus if he won the B&F? Its wouldnt be the first time such events have transpired. Talk about tanking!!!
Last edited by saint24601 on Sun 05 Oct 2008 12:14am, edited 1 time in total.
He consistently fufills his role for the club, there is no because....saint24601 wrote:the best and fairest is not a fact, its an opinion. True its an eductaed opinion since the match committee know what is expected of the players so they judge them against that. They produced a result that is popular, but in the end somewhat unjust in my opinion. Nick R is streets ahead of the rest of the players in talent, application, willingness to work hard, willingness to promote the club, willingness to put his body on the line, willingness to take responsibility for what happens on the field and off.(Robert Harvey excluded)
Does Sam Fisher "completely understand and fufill (his) role for the club" simply becuase he wins the best and fairest???
I'm only puttig it out there, but is there any chance Nick R was up for a big bonus if he won the B&F. Its wouldnt be the first time such events have transpired. Talk about tanking!!!