Riewoldt to CHB? Poor Coaching Display
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Riewoldt to CHB? Poor Coaching Display
I was extremely disappointed with some key decisions made from the box tonight after such a great display against Collingwood last week.
* Blake on Hodge from the opening bounce was a negative tactic
* Dal Santo clearly should have played forward to drag Bateman away from the play
* Rooey should have been in the action in the first half (not getting the ball forward and with the great form his in) why not try a CHB role.
* Sam Gilbert is not a key position back and they exposed him very well 1 on 1.
We had to win the game not save it, clearly we were too safe e,g. with Blake going into the ruck, the contest was already gone. We played the game on their terms which was very disappointing.
* Blake on Hodge from the opening bounce was a negative tactic
* Dal Santo clearly should have played forward to drag Bateman away from the play
* Rooey should have been in the action in the first half (not getting the ball forward and with the great form his in) why not try a CHB role.
* Sam Gilbert is not a key position back and they exposed him very well 1 on 1.
We had to win the game not save it, clearly we were too safe e,g. with Blake going into the ruck, the contest was already gone. We played the game on their terms which was very disappointing.
Last edited by LennyBoy on Sun 21 Sep 2008 2:10am, edited 1 time in total.
Poochy 1 2 3 4 and 5 should be reinstated!
Re: Riewoldt to CHB? Poor Coaching Display
Havent been a huge fan of RL but wouldnt blame him at all tonight except picking Fizz over Birss. Made no difference at all though.LennyBoy wrote:I was extremely disappointed with some key decisions made from the box tonight after such a great display against Collingwood last week.
* Blake on Hodge from the opening bounce was a negative tactic
* Dal Santo cleared should have played forward to drag Bateman away from the play
* Rooey should have been in the action in the first half (not getting the ball forward and with the great form his in) why not try a CHB role.
* Sam Gilbert is not a key position back and they exposed him very well 1 on 1.
We had to win the game not save it, clearly we were too safe e,g. with Blake going into the ruck, the contest was already gone. We played the game on their terms which was very disappointing.
Re: Riewoldt to CHB? Poor Coaching Display
Surely plugger though you would have to agree that our best player needed to be in the action when the game was on the line - especially in the 2nd term.plugger66 wrote:Havent been a huge fan of RL but wouldnt blame him at all tonight except picking Fizz over Birss. Made no difference at all though.LennyBoy wrote:I was extremely disappointed with some key decisions made from the box tonight after such a great display against Collingwood last week.
* Blake on Hodge from the opening bounce was a negative tactic
* Dal Santo cleared should have played forward to drag Bateman away from the play
* Rooey should have been in the action in the first half (not getting the ball forward and with the great form his in) why not try a CHB role.
* Sam Gilbert is not a key position back and they exposed him very well 1 on 1.
We had to win the game not save it, clearly we were too safe e,g. with Blake going into the ruck, the contest was already gone. We played the game on their terms which was very disappointing.
Poochy 1 2 3 4 and 5 should be reinstated!
- mad saint guy
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7088
- Joined: Tue 26 Jul 2005 9:44pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 52 times
- Been thanked: 367 times
Re: Riewoldt to CHB? Poor Coaching Display
Not fussed over that. We needed someone to stop Hodge from dominating at half back (though Birss would have been ideal).LennyBoy wrote:I was extremely disappointed with some key decisions made from the box tonight after such a great display against Collingwood last week.
* Blake on Hodge from the opening bounce was a negative tactic
That is an absolute no-brainer and I am amazed that it never happened. Bateman was slaughtering us and Dal gave us nothing. Either Bateman would follow him forward and be taken out of the game, or Dal would finally be able to get away from Bateman and try to create something for us.* Dal Santo clearly should have played forward to drag Bateman away from the play
.* Rooey should have been in the action in the first half (not getting the ball forward and with the great form his in) why not try a CHB role
Roo needs to play forward every week. We do not have any other reliable marking option and he is our only consistent avanue to goal.
I think the problem was that they weren't playing him as a key position back. He was on the quick midget Williams and just couldn't keep up on the lead. Sam has been very good recently when played on talls and should continue in that role.* Sam Gilbert is not a key position back and they exposed him very well 1 on 1.
At the end of the day we just didn't have the cattle and no coaching moves could have won us the game.
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30098
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1235 times
Clearly you have Kerr on your mind.saintsRrising wrote:Roo to CHB????
Was Duddy and Roughead running riot?????
I do not think the problem tonight was in our backline.
Midfield
Midfield
Midfield
Porr Disposal
Porr Disposal
Porr Disposal
Then we get onto other issues...but the above were the biggies.
Poochy 1 2 3 4 and 5 should be reinstated!
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sun 31 Aug 2008 1:51am