tool of the weekBernard Shakey wrote:For the sake of 8 one armed bandits, we are probably going to Tassie.
FRANKSTON DEAL NOT DONE YET
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
FQF
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
- GeorgeYoung27
- Club Player
- Posts: 660
- Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 2:54pm
- Location: on a tight angle at the South Rd end
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005 1:40am
- Location: Hampton/Gold Coast
- Been thanked: 7 times
"Saints-Frankston deal in doubt" says the Frankston Leader on-line news.
http://frankston-leader.whereilive.com. ... -in-doubt/
And Kingston's door is always open says its Mayor.
Come on Archie & Greg - go for it. There's one last opportunity to save the situation.
http://frankston-leader.whereilive.com. ... -in-doubt/
And Kingston's door is always open says its Mayor.
Come on Archie & Greg - go for it. There's one last opportunity to save the situation.
I second that suggestion. It would be best for Kingston and for the Saints to redevelop the site and settle there. For a group of supposedly successful businessmen, it is plainly obvious that due diligence was not performed on any aspect of the Frankston proposal. It was undue haste IMO to stick one up Kingston Council that drove the whole process, and that has bitten us firmly on the bum.casey scorp wrote:"Saints-Frankston deal in doubt" says the Frankston Leader on-line news.
http://frankston-leader.whereilive.com. ... -in-doubt/
And Kingston's door is always open says its Mayor.
Come on Archie & Greg - go for it. There's one last opportunity to save the situation.
If we have to sack Archie to do it, then it must be done. He has been a good CEO in all other respects, but if he remains a hurdle to negotiations resuming with Kingston, its bye-bye Archie.
I am new to this whole subject matter, and have been reading through the posts.
Looking around the ground today, it was quite depressing
Don't get me wrong, I am not turning my nose up at the outdated facilities. It's more that the place is tired and run down, with no-one able to give it the respect it deserves.
Here's hoping that we pursue the option of staying put, and try again!
Looking around the ground today, it was quite depressing
Don't get me wrong, I am not turning my nose up at the outdated facilities. It's more that the place is tired and run down, with no-one able to give it the respect it deserves.
Here's hoping that we pursue the option of staying put, and try again!
report in the Hsun this morning.... you had best have that apology readycasey scorp wrote:"Saints-Frankston deal in doubt" says the Frankston Leader on-line news.
http://frankston-leader.whereilive.com. ... -in-doubt/
And Kingston's door is always open says its Mayor.
Come on Archie & Greg - go for it. There's one last opportunity to save the situation.
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sport/ ... 42,00.html
they are saying that the deal has been done and agreed with everyone to build at Frankston on that new site $11m building and in by 2010...
So can I have that open apology from you you did say you would give all of us........good bye Casey forever
Our best is yet
to come......
to come......
- Ghost Like
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6562
- Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
- Has thanked: 5786 times
- Been thanked: 1909 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5412
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 10:29am
- Has thanked: 33 times
- Been thanked: 47 times
the vote nearly came through to move the the money.bigmicka wrote:Melbourne is going to be really loved at Casey after the council decided to give that $1.25 million to Melbourne instead of fixing the Methane problem.
mic
4 to 5 infavour of giving it to a football club instead of fixing the methane problem.
if i was a melbourne supporter, it doesn't sound good!
I take it you are referring to Casey Scorps...RBnW wrote:Casey.....Casey....Casey where are you....public apology for all the bull you have put us through for the past year.......
the deal is done at Frankston that you said would never take place.....
Casey.....where are you
We are all waiting.....
No need for an apology IMO. The deal did not go through as presented. We ended up with a compromise backdoor screwing dressed up as the romance of the century.
you are hard to keep happy.....but then your name says it allGrumpyOne wrote:I take it you are referring to Casey Scorps...RBnW wrote:Casey.....Casey....Casey where are you....public apology for all the bull you have put us through for the past year.......
the deal is done at Frankston that you said would never take place.....
Casey.....where are you
We are all waiting.....
No need for an apology IMO. The deal did not go through as presented. We ended up with a compromise backdoor screwing dressed up as the romance of the century.
Our best is yet
to come......
to come......
Touche.RBnW wrote:you are hard to keep happy.....but then your name says it allGrumpyOne wrote:I take it you are referring to Casey Scorps...RBnW wrote:Casey.....Casey....Casey where are you....public apology for all the bull you have put us through for the past year.......
the deal is done at Frankston that you said would never take place.....
Casey.....where are you
We are all waiting.....
No need for an apology IMO. The deal did not go through as presented. We ended up with a compromise backdoor screwing dressed up as the romance of the century.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005 1:40am
- Location: Hampton/Gold Coast
- Been thanked: 7 times
I'm here, and I'm not sure what you're expecting an apology for.RBnW wrote:Casey.....Casey....Casey where are you....public apology for all the bull you have put us through for the past year.......
the deal is done at Frankston that you said would never take place.....
Casey.....where are you
We are all waiting.....
I told you months ago that the Frankston deal would fall over, and now it officially has! Many derided me for bucking the company line, but the ultimate outcome was obvious.
Now we have the Seaford Deal, or Belvedere Park. Don't kid yourself that this is really Frankston, but then again swallow the company line. Some people will believe anything.
Will Belvedere Park work? It certainly doesn't have the same constraints as Frankston, but I'm not sure the proponents can add up. From the media release titled:
SAINTS MOVE TO FRANKSTON CITY CONFIRMED
we have the following:
The $11m plus training and administration facility will include an AFL MCG sized oval, gymnasium, rehabilitation pool, meeting rooms, lecture theatre and an indoor sports hall for basketball, netball and other sports that will be made available to local schools, health providers and sporting associations.
The project will be funded by four parties including the Victorian State Government ($3.45m), Frankston City Council ($3m), AFL ($2.55m) and the St Kilda Football Club ($1.43m, plus all additional costs).
When I went to school that added up to $9 million of other party's contributions, which is exactly as was proposed earlier. The Saints are now to pick up $1.43 million (plus all additional costs).
That is an interesting way of saying $2 million plus (ie $11 million - $9 million).
If you think the Saints have a lazy $2 million plus you're nuts.
And it's a lot more than the $1.25 million proposed to be contributed by the club at Frankston Park when "the deal" was announced in November last year.
And building construction costs have escalated since last year's announcement, and will escalate a lot more before the project is underway, further eroding the value of the total contributions.
I'd be very surprised if the project can be constructed for $11 million (although $11 million plus is rather unlimited, so it can obviously be built for an unlimited figure).
Of course the heading is instructive as well......reference to Frankston City is a poorly attempted smokescreen. Somer people will just swallow anything.
I've just watched The Hollowmen on ABC, and you can just hear the spin doctors "if we say Frankston City, it's consistent with our original announcement because Frankston Park is in Frankston City as well, and it's the same Council so we can just say it's a minor relocation". Please.....I think the supporters should be treated with a bit more respect. But then, some don't really even ask for it.
As for being completed during the 2010 season, it's now a maximum of two years. Without doing a bit of research on the site, I don't know if there are planning requirements that need to be satisfied. I do know that, if a permit is required, you could well get resident opposition given the residential street which must be traversed in order to get to the site. But that may not be a problem. A 12-15 month construction period gives the club about 9 months to get all the design completed, approvals obtained, and tendering undertaken. The gun has just been fired......and the club had better get it's collective skates on.
I've got a feeling that the club and the Council will make this development happen because a failure of another announcement would be fatal. However, we will get a third rate outcome.
The Frankston deal is dead. I'm the one awaiting the apologies.
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11241
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 126 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005 1:40am
- Location: Hampton/Gold Coast
- Been thanked: 7 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23247
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 741 times
- Been thanked: 1800 times
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11241
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 126 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
Which is just what Moorabbin oval was.casey scorp wrote:Hopefully not, but the surface at Belvedere Park is uneven and vegetation struggles to grow.Bernard Shakey wrote:Shouldn't be any problems with methane, no tips nearby.
When you walk the site, it has the feeling of an old....
Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
Are you that obsessed you went and walked on the site. And do you sit there and watch the grass grow. I would suggest you use your life for better things like the Saints winning the prelim and next year both Sandy and Saints being in the finals.casey scorp wrote:Hopefully not, but the surface at Belvedere Park is uneven and vegetation struggles to grow.Bernard Shakey wrote:Shouldn't be any problems with methane, no tips nearby.
When you walk the site, it has the feeling of an old....
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005 1:40am
- Location: Hampton/Gold Coast
- Been thanked: 7 times
I find that doing some research puts you in a better position to make comments.plugger66 wrote:Are you that obsessed you went and walked on the site. And do you sit there and watch the grass grow. I would suggest you use your life for better things like the Saints winning the prelim and next year both Sandy and Saints being in the finals.
I visited the Frankston Park site after the announcement last November and, blow me down, it was obvious that the proposed development wouldn't work.
I visited the Belvedere Park site as well. My initial observations were that the site was:
* difficult to access (the intersection of Ti-Tree Cres and Seaford Road is left in-left out only)
* accessible only through residential streets
* isolated
* barren
* already occupied by some sports clubs.
It seems like the site is the pits, and hardly worthy of an AFL club's home.
And I'll also put energy into cheering the Saints over the line on Saturday.
- bobmurray
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7935
- Joined: Mon 03 Oct 2005 11:08pm
- Location: In the stand at RSEA Park.
- Has thanked: 549 times
- Been thanked: 254 times
The Saints should have gone to Casey,the project would have started long before the methane started door knocking.....casey scorp wrote:I find that doing some research puts you in a better position to make comments.plugger66 wrote:Are you that obsessed you went and walked on the site. And do you sit there and watch the grass grow. I would suggest you use your life for better things like the Saints winning the prelim and next year both Sandy and Saints being in the finals.
I visited the Frankston Park site after the announcement last November and, blow me down, it was obvious that the proposed development wouldn't work.
I visited the Belvedere Park site as well. My initial observations were that the site was:
* difficult to access (the intersection of Ti-Tree Cres and Seaford Road is left in-left out only)
* accessible only through residential streets
* isolated
* barren
* already occupied by some sports clubs.
It seems like the site is the pits, and hardly worthy of an AFL club's home.
And I'll also put energy into cheering the Saints over the line on Saturday.
Based on what's happened so far,who's to say Belvedere's actually going to progress beyond spin....
How many defenders will The Saints pick in the 2024 draft ?
Sounds very similar to casey but closer to where current players live. Remember it is a training facility not a VFL ground. Good move compared to Casey even though Moorabbin would have been better but wasnt an option.casey scorp wrote:I find that doing some research puts you in a better position to make comments.plugger66 wrote:Are you that obsessed you went and walked on the site. And do you sit there and watch the grass grow. I would suggest you use your life for better things like the Saints winning the prelim and next year both Sandy and Saints being in the finals.
I visited the Frankston Park site after the announcement last November and, blow me down, it was obvious that the proposed development wouldn't work.
I visited the Belvedere Park site as well. My initial observations were that the site was:
* difficult to access (the intersection of Ti-Tree Cres and Seaford Road is left in-left out only)
* accessible only through residential streets
* isolated
* barren
* already occupied by some sports clubs.
It seems like the site is the pits, and hardly worthy of an AFL club's home.
And I'll also put energy into cheering the Saints over the line on Saturday.
i spoke to brian mase at the dolphins,
and there was a concern that f/ston park was not big enough
(which it truthfully isn't).
so much space at seaford - room to swing a cat.
and sure the land itself is largely old swampland if you do a geological survey,
however they will make it work.
speaking of work,
it has been said that it will start soon.
great stuff from the club!
next to eastlink.
will secure the saints in the top four long term.
great stuff!
casey/cranbourne is putrid.
and there was a concern that f/ston park was not big enough
(which it truthfully isn't).
so much space at seaford - room to swing a cat.
and sure the land itself is largely old swampland if you do a geological survey,
however they will make it work.
speaking of work,
it has been said that it will start soon.
great stuff from the club!
next to eastlink.
will secure the saints in the top four long term.
great stuff!
casey/cranbourne is putrid.
- RedWhiteBlack
- Club Player
- Posts: 234
- Joined: Thu 03 Jul 2008 4:27pm
- Location: Melbourne