Lenny Reported?

Mr Magic · Post: # 637864Post **Mr Magic** » Sun 07 Sep 2008 7:52pm

Was listening to ABC on teh way home and their reporter in the Saints rooms stated taht Lenny has been reported for striking by the Emenrgency Umpire.
Neither lenny nor teh Saints knew anything about it untill teh 'umpires report card' was handed in.

Anybody hear anything about this?

Batnoe · Post: # 637870Post **Batnoe** » Sun 07 Sep 2008 7:53pm

Should be alright if he doesnt know anything about it

If Bartel gets off and Lenny doesnt then i will really hurt someone!

bobmurray · Post: # 637914Post **bobmurray** » Sun 07 Sep 2008 8:13pm

I saw the yellow shirted dude wait for Lenny to turn around and he checked Lenny's number but when he didn't write it down i thought there musn't be anything in it....

dascman · Post: # 637924Post **dascman** » Sun 07 Sep 2008 8:20pm

My Geelong supporting mate (who is very level-headed, believe it or not) reckons that he's gone. Hit Selwood unnecessarily.

That said, he reminded me that Hayes will, like everybody else, spin the wheel and hopefully come up with "reprimand" or "thrown out".

Does he have carryover points?

Fidelis · Post: # 637956Post **Fidelis** » Sun 07 Sep 2008 8:37pm

Thought he may be in trouble. Happened in the third quarter on the members wing. Didn't see the incident but the aftermath was a spiteful wrestle behind play that was broken up by the emergency umpire. He spoke only to Lenny and appeared to take his number. I was surprised I'd heard nothing until now.

SJONES · Post: # 638015Post **SJONES** » Sun 07 Sep 2008 8:58pm

dascman wrote:My Geelong supporting mate (who is very level-headed, believe it or not) reckons that he's gone. Hit Selwood unnecessarily.

That said, he reminded me that Hayes will, like everybody else, spin the wheel and hopefully come up with "reprimand" or "thrown out".

Does he have carryover points?

Don't think Hayes has carryover points! When will we know whether he is gone?

saintspremiers · Sun 07 Sep 2008 9:56pm

SJONES wrote:
dascman wrote:My Geelong supporting mate (who is very level-headed, believe it or not) reckons that he's gone. Hit Selwood unnecessarily.

That said, he reminded me that Hayes will, like everybody else, spin the wheel and hopefully come up with "reprimand" or "thrown out".

Does he have carryover points?
Don't think Hayes has carryover points! When will we know whether he is gone?

The MRP release there "findings" normally at about 5pm on Monday.

So no doubt Lenny will get offered 2 weeks!

bethb7 · Post: # 638333Post **bethb7** » Sun 07 Sep 2008 11:04pm

I didn't know anything about it? But it is seriously not what we needed he was one of our better players today

Furphy · Post: # 638468Post **Furphy** » Mon 08 Sep 2008 12:48am

Yep, Lenny has been reported for striking Selwood during the 3rd Qtr. What else can go wrong?

degruch · Post: # 638470Post **degruch** » Mon 08 Sep 2008 12:50am

Furphy wrote:Yep, Lenny has been reported for striking Selwood during the 3rd Qtr. What else can go wrong?

There'll be no evidence and he'll get 7 weeks!

Teflon · Post: # 638471Post **Teflon** » Mon 08 Sep 2008 12:51am

Anyone see the incident? was there much in it?

Sainternist · Mon 08 Sep 2008 1:10am

emergency umpires are blight on the game.

little prick wanted to get his 15 seconds

St. Luke · Post: # 638695Post **St. Luke** » Mon 08 Sep 2008 11:45am

Ahh found the thread.

Any more word on this so-called incident?

Moccha · Post: # 638696Post **Moccha** » Mon 08 Sep 2008 11:47am

St. Luke wrote:Ahh found the thread.

Any more word on this so-called incident?

Lenny said in the Age that was nothing in it. How the F*** the emergency umpire saw it from where he sat when no one else at the ground did is an amazing freak of nature.

matrix · Post: # 638700Post **matrix** » Mon 08 Sep 2008 11:52am

Batnoe wrote:Should be alright if he doesnt know anything about it

If Bartel gets off and Lenny doesnt then i will really hurt someone!

read something about it in the herald sun on the plane back....
im sure they said that lenny said he thought there was nothing in it.

if jude bolton can get off for jumping off the ground, hitting a guy in the smoosh....late (and i must admit, it was a doozie), then we should be right...

according to afl standards.

Selhurst Saint · Mon 08 Sep 2008 11:53am

[/quote]Lenny said in the Age that was nothing in it. How the F*** the emergency umpire saw it from where he sat when no one else at the ground did is an amazing freak of nature.[/quote]

Thats what Baker told Ross Lyon last year.

Moccha · Post: # 638707Post **Moccha** » Mon 08 Sep 2008 11:59am

Selhurst Saint wrote:

Lenny said in the Age that was nothing in it. How the F*** the emergency umpire saw it from where he sat when no one else at the ground did is an amazing freak of nature.[/quote]

Thats what Baker told Ross Lyon last year.

[/quote]

Lets see if the tribunal are fair dinkum. Bolton and Buchanan from the Swans should have been rubbed out, but were saved. Maybe Dimwit was sticking his fat ugly head in?

matrix · Post: # 638711Post **matrix** » Mon 08 Sep 2008 12:02pm

maybe its got somwthing to do with them needing serious interest in another team in NSW huh?

i mean rub those two players out and their chances drop of getting a flag

go out early from the finals race, and interest drops in non member types in sydney.

get to the big day, and all non member swan types might latch on to a new team.

i mean how many turned up at the swans roos game?

just a thought