What a nice graphic

saintbrat · Post: # 632441Post **saintbrat** » Mon 01 Sep 2008 12:12am

Round 22 AFL Ladder
teams p w l d % pts
Geelong 22 21 1 0 161.8 84
Hawthorn 22 17 5 0 131.9 68
Western Bulldogs 22 15 6 1 118.7 62
St. Kilda 22 13 9 0 110.6 52

Adelaide 22 13 9 0 109.7 52
Sydney 22 12 9 1 112.4 50
North Melbourne 22 12 9 1 97.0 50
Collingwood 22 12 10 0 111.2 48
-------------------------
Richmond 22 11 10 1 97.4 46
Brisbane 22 10 12 0 98.0 40
Carlton 22 10 12 0 94.2 40
Essendon 22 8 14 0 81.7 32
Port Adelaide 22 7 15 0 95.9 28
Fremantle 22 6 16 0 93.7 24
West Coast 22 4 18 0 65.9 16
Melbourne 22 3 19 0 62.6 12

I liked the one Footy classified used to
they took the last 8-10 games of the season and created a ladder and the Saints were second to geelong

i_luv_nick_riewoldt · Mon 01 Sep 2008 12:15am

I cant believe we have won 8 of the last 11 games only second to geelong!! It's been an amazing run home!

Goose is king · Mon 01 Sep 2008 12:15am

And Richmond were 3rd. Maybe they wont finish 9th next year

The Saintsational Man · Mon 01 Sep 2008 12:20am

i_luv_nick_riewoldt wrote:I cant believe we have won 8 of the last 11 games only second to geelong!! It's been an amazing run home!

8 of our last 10 sounds better.....

Which we did.....

saint66au · Post: # 632453Post **saint66au** » Mon 01 Sep 2008 12:20am

Loved how the scoreboard had the nous to put the live ladder after every score in the last 20 mins..was truly the only interest in the game

esaint66 · Post: # 633212Post **esaint66** » Mon 01 Sep 2008 6:11pm

i_luv_nick_riewoldt wrote:I cant believe we have won 8 of the last 11 games only second to geelong!! It's been an amazing run home!

Jeez that's brilliant !!!

Griggsy · Post: # 633217Post **Griggsy** » Mon 01 Sep 2008 6:14pm

saint66au wrote:Loved how the scoreboard had the nous to put the live ladder after every score in the last 20 mins..was truly the only interest in the game

silly commentators were saying the players didnt know and that they should/will keep attacking until a runner is out.

Mr Magic · Post: # 633221Post **Mr Magic** » Mon 01 Sep 2008 6:15pm

I heard a guy ring up SEN this morning claiming that in the last 10 games we have, n average, only allowed the opposition to kick 4.47 goals in the second half of our games.

I would think that would be the best effort defensively of all teams?

plugger66 · Post: # 633224Post **plugger66** » Mon 01 Sep 2008 6:17pm

Mr Magic wrote:I heard a guy ring up SEN this morning claiming that in the last 10 games we have, n average, only allowed the opposition to kick 4.47 goals in the second half of our games.

I would think that would be the best effort defensively of all teams?

Yes it would be close or if not better than the cats and it certainly would be better than the Jackers. What happened yesterday? Thought they were our only danger.

Mr Magic · Post: # 633227Post **Mr Magic** » Mon 01 Sep 2008 6:18pm

plugger66 wrote:
Mr Magic wrote:I heard a guy ring up SEN this morning claiming that in the last 10 games we have, n average, only allowed the opposition to kick 4.47 goals in the second half of our games.

I would think that would be the best effort defensively of all teams?
Yes it would be close or if not better than the cats and it certainly would be better than the Jackers. What happened yesterday? Thought they were our only danger.

Didn't turn up to play!
Unfortunately Oakleigh did.
Good luck in B-Grade - who's going to play on Harves?

plugger66 · Post: # 633235Post **plugger66** » Mon 01 Sep 2008 6:21pm

Mr Magic wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Mr Magic wrote:I heard a guy ring up SEN this morning claiming that in the last 10 games we have, n average, only allowed the opposition to kick 4.47 goals in the second half of our games.

I would think that would be the best effort defensively of all teams?
Yes it would be close or if not better than the cats and it certainly would be better than the Jackers. What happened yesterday? Thought they were our only danger.
Didn't turn up to play!
Unfortunately Oakleigh did.
Good luck in B-Grade - who's going to play on Harves?

We may do what North did with GA and let him run free. Not sure we have match ups for Browny, Voss or Loewe either. Then again we are after some good names next season.

Mr Magic · Post: # 633245Post **Mr Magic** » Mon 01 Sep 2008 6:24pm

plugger66 wrote:
Mr Magic wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Mr Magic wrote:I heard a guy ring up SEN this morning claiming that in the last 10 games we have, n average, only allowed the opposition to kick 4.47 goals in the second half of our games.

I would think that would be the best effort defensively of all teams?
Yes it would be close or if not better than the cats and it certainly would be better than the Jackers. What happened yesterday? Thought they were our only danger.
Didn't turn up to play!
Unfortunately Oakleigh did.
Good luck in B-Grade - who's going to play on Harves?
We may do what North did with GA and let him run free. Not sure we have match ups for Browny, Voss or Loewe either. Then again we are after some good names next season.

You'll have to offer scholarships to Ormond Primary to get anybody good.

Surely Matty Robbins woiuld have to have a 'crack' at him?

plugger66 · Post: # 633254Post **plugger66** » Mon 01 Sep 2008 6:26pm

Mr Magic wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Mr Magic wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Mr Magic wrote:I heard a guy ring up SEN this morning claiming that in the last 10 games we have, n average, only allowed the opposition to kick 4.47 goals in the second half of our games.

I would think that would be the best effort defensively of all teams?
Yes it would be close or if not better than the cats and it certainly would be better than the Jackers. What happened yesterday? Thought they were our only danger.
Didn't turn up to play!
Unfortunately Oakleigh did.
Good luck in B-Grade - who's going to play on Harves?
We may do what North did with GA and let him run free. Not sure we have match ups for Browny, Voss or Loewe either. Then again we are after some good names next season.
You'll have to offer scholarships to Ormond Primary to get anybody good.

Surely Matty Robbins woiuld have to have a 'crack' at him?

We do but doesnt seem to have the pulling power of Hailebury. Robbo is a forward now. Doesnt like moving to far from goals. If we could just have Ritterman for a season that would be good.

Mr Magic · Post: # 633257Post **Mr Magic** » Mon 01 Sep 2008 6:30pm

plugger66 wrote:
Mr Magic wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Mr Magic wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Mr Magic wrote:I heard a guy ring up SEN this morning claiming that in the last 10 games we have, n average, only allowed the opposition to kick 4.47 goals in the second half of our games.

I would think that would be the best effort defensively of all teams?
Yes it would be close or if not better than the cats and it certainly would be better than the Jackers. What happened yesterday? Thought they were our only danger.
Didn't turn up to play!
Unfortunately Oakleigh did.
Good luck in B-Grade - who's going to play on Harves?
We may do what North did with GA and let him run free. Not sure we have match ups for Browny, Voss or Loewe either. Then again we are after some good names next season.
You'll have to offer scholarships to Ormond Primary to get anybody good.

Surely Matty Robbins woiuld have to have a 'crack' at him?
We do but doesnt seem to have the pulling power of Hailebury. Robbo is a forward now. Doesnt like moving to far from goals. If we could just have Ritterman for a season that would be good.

We could send you the Father if you like?
How far back do you go with teh monders? Do you go back to Robbins' junior days? If so, whatever happened to an Italina kid named Luigi? he was a fantastic player as a kid, and I never heard of him again after he finished playing juniors?

plugger66 · Post: # 633264Post **plugger66** » Mon 01 Sep 2008 6:32pm

Mr Magic wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Mr Magic wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Mr Magic wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Mr Magic wrote:I heard a guy ring up SEN this morning claiming that in the last 10 games we have, n average, only allowed the opposition to kick 4.47 goals in the second half of our games.

I would think that would be the best effort defensively of all teams?
Yes it would be close or if not better than the cats and it certainly would be better than the Jackers. What happened yesterday? Thought they were our only danger.
Didn't turn up to play!
Unfortunately Oakleigh did.
Good luck in B-Grade - who's going to play on Harves?
We may do what North did with GA and let him run free. Not sure we have match ups for Browny, Voss or Loewe either. Then again we are after some good names next season.
You'll have to offer scholarships to Ormond Primary to get anybody good.

Surely Matty Robbins woiuld have to have a 'crack' at him?
We do but doesnt seem to have the pulling power of Hailebury. Robbo is a forward now. Doesnt like moving to far from goals. If we could just have Ritterman for a season that would be good.
We could send you the Father if you like?
How far back do you go with teh monders? Do you go back to Robbins' junior days? If so, whatever happened to an Italina kid named Luigi? he was a fantastic player as a kid, and I never heard of him again after he finished playing juniors?

Dont know him. Havent had any really involvement with the juniors except watching my mates kids. I did coach the under 15s about 20 years ago. Is his father Henry or Michael.

Mr Magic · Post: # 633272Post **Mr Magic** » Mon 01 Sep 2008 6:36pm

Michael is his father. Henry's boy doesn't play footy - just golf!

20 years ago is when I first got involved with the Juniors. We had many wonderful games against Ormond Blues, especially in Robbins' age group.

G-Unit · Post: # 633283Post **G-Unit** » Mon 01 Sep 2008 6:44pm

wow, this thread changed direction.
was at the ajax game before heading to the dome and no, they didnt turn up to play. jeremy dukes showing up late due to a wedding didn't help them.

back to the topic.. our second half of the year has been fantastic. first grinding out wins we needed, now winding up and finishing off teams with ease.
look out cats!!! (we can have hope)