Grant Thomas wrote:Having had the advantage to sit on the "other side of the fence" for a year or so I have watched with a keen eye the performance of the umpires department. I have also had the benefit of watching my sons play football – one in the TAC and one in local Under 11's.
The state of play in relation to umpires is comprehensively poor.
Unfortunately the same theatre is starting to evolve in the junior ranks with umpires perfecting the "holding the ball" theatrics to a tee. There seems to be more focus on how you look than how you adjudicate. Interestingly the action imitates "dropping the ball" which is no longer a rule. I vividly remember asking Jeff Gieschen why the "dropping the ball" action was to be retained by the umpires I was astounded to hear that: the crowds really enjoy it, the umpires like it and it provided some great anticipation and theatre to the game.
FAIR DINKUM, this sums up what is wrong with our game and why I also am losing interest in going to the football.
It is being overtaken by these rodger rubbers and todger tuggerss, theatre, perleeeeeze, what a fair dinkum ass clown.
Grecian 2000 should be dipped in syrup and tied to a bullant's nest or covered in honey araldited to a bee hive.
The game is now catering to the small dick in need of a string and a brick victims of school bullying giving these geeks, gimps, gumps and goofballs a stage whereby they can finally exact their revenge.
I fricken hate the umpiring theatrics and it encapsulates everything that is wrong with our game, not vica versa.
Umpires should not be bouncing the fricken ball either, why should teams be advantaged or disadvantaged based on a scrotum strokers skill level.
FAIR DINKUM