Didak case thrown out...

[chook23]

Not even looked at, so it has nothing to do with Kosi having carry over points.


Plugger - explain this one too me.


Kosi gets a week, Didaks case gets thrown out.


Just a joke.

You said not even looked at..............wrong......was but deemed more of a pushing action and force below required that to warrant a charge.....

it was a punch to the jaw ...with a fist...holding a handful of jumper ffs.....

Not my opinion it was the MRP
my reference to wrong was in relation to the claim ....not even looked at!!

[Batnoe]

it is not a guess and i do not have faith in the system

Round 16 last year Kosi was reported on the same night on the same ground in the same round but half an hour later which means that his carry over of 1 year and 70 points added to this game

if you take off 70 points from that time he would have been under 100 points that would have gotten him off

i dont know what didak had or has.. he got off unfortunately but if he hadn't had any points to his name in the last year, he will for next time

[lennyhayes77]

its the same old story isn't it? the tribunal is massively inconsistent, and who gets the brunt of the bad decisions? im not claiming there is a conspiracy against us, but it is really a joke that i can name 4-5 instances where the tribunal has stuffed us over.

Gehrig's 'love tap'
McGuire getting smacked behind play by Hall
Kossie jumper punch (which is obviously an ok action if you play for collingwood)
baker's suspension, without ANY vision
xavier clarke getting hit BEHIND PLAY, HEAD HIGH by trent west this year

its a complete joke!

[Liam_G]

It sounds like you are guessing Batnoe.

Kosi was given the following:

"The AFL match review panel assessed the match-day report of Koschitzke as reckless conduct, low impact and high contact, drawing 125 points and a one-match ban."

Yes, he has carry over points, which are explained here:

"But the tally was increased by 10 percent for last season's indiscretion.And the carry-over points pushed the total to 206.25 and a two-games penalty."

Kosi was suspended for 1 match by the MRP for the jumper punch. Simple as that. His prior indiscretion last year cost him further weighting and meant he could not be given a reprimand.

This is different to Didak in which it was considered "to be a pushing motion, and not a strike". Didak was let off with ZERO points, no reprimand, nothing. Off free. Kosi, on the other hand, was given 125 points for what they considered a strike which encompassed "reckless conduct, low impact and high contact".

Big difference.

Yet the video didn't seem to show much difference at all....

[plugger66]

When will people wake up and realize, that Collingwood RUN the AFL, and dimwit is eddies puppet...

- No clash jumper,

- Minimum interstate games

- Anzac day

Very lucky IMO but i dont go along with that. The pies have had some pretty ordinary decisions at the tribunal as well. Didak for one about 3 years ago and both Rocca and Cloke were ver unlucky is pretty important games. The grand final.

[BallBanger]

When will people wake up and realize, that Collingwood RUN the AFL, and dimwit is eddies puppet...

- No clash jumper,

- Minimum interstate games

- Anzac day

Very lucky IMO but i dont go along with that. The pies have had some pretty ordinary decisions at the tribunal as well. Didak for one about 3 years ago and both Rocca and Cloke were ver unlucky is pretty important games. The grand final.

Bullshttt. When rocca was reported collingwood thought it was a conspiracy and thats when I knew they had never experienced the rough end before, but rocca should have gone.

Look at baker when he received 3 wks for attmptd striking a few wks earlier collingwood played footscray - buckley and didak were jumper punching (if thats what u call it (they were flat out punching)) I/we thought beauty no way known are they playing against us next week. Not only were they not cited but baker goes for attempted striking (holding his jumper tooo/as well) a few wks later...

This is not paranoia

Why don't c'wood travel interstate - because all vic clubs want to play them? bulls***. If they don't go interstate it means they have to play the interstate teams here.....I'll spell it out for you IF COLLINGWOOD DON'T PLAY INTERSTATE IT MEANS THAT THEY HAVE TO PLAY THE INTERSTATE TEAMS HERE IN VICTORIA
so theory has it they actually should travel intersate more and only play interstate teams once (interstate) so other vic teams play them here....but hey its an excuse that does not weigh up and who cares so long as the strong get looked after they will keep the guardians in power.

What can we do complain?

U are a fool plugger turning a blind eye.....

Apparently eddie was not happy (radio) sat night...free kick (DIDAK JUMPER PUNCH) cost them a goal and they had a run on....
This would have been enough to scare the powers of b to not be consistant and bring didak to justice

[stinger]

If Westaway had balls he would DEMAND that the AFL explain the difference betwen Didak's and Kosi's.

He can use the appropriate channell's of course...but I am getting throughly pissed off that we kept getting right royally done over up our channel.

While we played poorly no doubt, if Kosi had played I am sure that we would have 4 more points than we do now.

even sheahan. walls and healy said that kossi should be really pissed off.....

[saint patrick]

If Westaway had balls he would DEMAND that the AFL explain the difference betwen Didak's and Kosi's.

He can use the appropriate channell's of course...but I am getting throughly pissed off that we kept getting right royally done over up our channel.

While we played poorly no doubt, if Kosi had played I am sure that we would have 4 more points than we do now.

even sheahan. walls and healy said that kossi should be really pissed off.....

I'm pissed off.. f@#king ropable on his behalf

[saintly_safes]

This decision does not suprise me(ater all it is Collingwood )but you really have to wonder what St.kilda have done to the afl to get such a raw deal from the mrp & the tribunal. If that had of been Bakes he'd be sitting in the stand for a month

[osama milne laden]

>>>Why don't c'wood travel interstate - because all vic clubs want to play them? bulls***

that theory's always got me too ... funny how when we were struggling for cash between 2000-2003 and down the bottom we only played them once at home in 4 years

[terry smith rules]

only just saw the didak one

agree with all... disgraceful

the afl do themselves no favours with complete inconsistency with the tribunal

on the other hand kosi was stupid and should not have put himself in the position in the first place

[BAM! (shhhh)]

It sounds like you are guessing Batnoe.

Kosi was given the following:

"The AFL match review panel assessed the match-day report of Koschitzke as reckless conduct, low impact and high contact, drawing 125 points and a one-match ban."

Yes, he has carry over points, which are explained here:

"But the tally was increased by 10 percent for last season's indiscretion.And the carry-over points pushed the total to 206.25 and a two-games penalty."

Kosi was suspended for 1 match by the MRP for the jumper punch. Simple as that. His prior indiscretion last year cost him further weighting and meant he could not be given a reprimand.

This is different to Didak in which it was considered "to be a pushing motion, and not a strike". Didak was let off with ZERO points, no reprimand, nothing. Off free. Kosi, on the other hand, was given 125 points for what they considered a strike which encompassed "reckless conduct, low impact and high contact".

Big difference.

Yet the video didn't seem to show much difference at all....

For all the talk of Kosi being suspended for the jumper punch, near the end of the incident his arm swings wildly without a hold of the jumper and makes high contact.

I assumed that's what the suspension was for.

Has the tribunal actually said otherwise?

[Ralphy]

It sounds like you are guessing Batnoe.

Kosi was given the following:

"The AFL match review panel assessed the match-day report of Koschitzke as reckless conduct, low impact and high contact, drawing 125 points and a one-match ban."

Yes, he has carry over points, which are explained here:

"But the tally was increased by 10 percent for last season's indiscretion.And the carry-over points pushed the total to 206.25 and a two-games penalty."

Kosi was suspended for 1 match by the MRP for the jumper punch. Simple as that. His prior indiscretion last year cost him further weighting and meant he could not be given a reprimand.

This is different to Didak in which it was considered "to be a pushing motion, and not a strike". Didak was let off with ZERO points, no reprimand, nothing. Off free. Kosi, on the other hand, was given 125 points for what they considered a strike which encompassed "reckless conduct, low impact and high contact".

Big difference.

Yet the video didn't seem to show much difference at all....

For all the talk of Kosi being suspended for the jumper punch, near the end of the incident his arm swings wildly without a hold of the jumper and makes high contact.

I assumed that's what the suspension was for.

Has the tribunal actually said otherwise?

he was suspended for the jumper Punch