Please get him a chair or better yet he should have a bench with his name onzebraman wrote:
BTW..Jack Barker stands on the beach side of TBO near the coaches box..
....
FRANKSTON DEAL NOT DONE YET
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- saintbrat
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 44575
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:11pm
- Location: saints zone
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 188 times
StReNgTh ThRoUgH LoYaLtY
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
looking forward to it...zebraman wrote:slightly off the subject...last Sunday at Sandy there were quite a feww Saints supporters there...I do the scoreboard at TBO and very pleasing to see the St Kilda supporters there wearing their scarves...no doubt happy after beating Carlton the night before...I asked a couple of them how come they were watching Sandy and they said they were happy with the decision to align with Sandy and just wanted to see what they were in for starting next year...hope they enjoyed the day even though Sandy got beaten by Williamstown
We get quite a few Melbourne supporters at Sandy which will obviously stop come next year
Welcome aboard. Saints fans....hope to see lots of you at the TBO next year...you get a damn good hot dog at a reasonable price here...plus a beer with the best view in Melbourne from the Social Club...
BTW..Jack Barker stands on the beach side of TBO near the coaches box..
St Kilda at Frankston or somewhere else???...my gut feel feel is the Frankston thing will not go ahead and the Saints will head elsewhere....destination????...not Belveedere Park..
Maybe a bit further up the Nepean Highway....
just a question, do melbourne have a similar set up to us with free entry for the aligned footy members for home games?
FQF
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005 1:40am
- Location: Hampton/Gold Coast
- Been thanked: 7 times
MFC standard membership includes:Solar wrote:just a question, do melbourne have a similar set up to us with free entry for the aligned footy members for home games?
Sandringham Football Club membership, incorporating free admission to VFL home games at Trevor Barker Oval.
http://cms.melbournefc.com.au/Default.aspx?tabid=10517
- bobmurray
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7935
- Joined: Mon 03 Oct 2005 11:08pm
- Location: In the stand at RSEA Park.
- Has thanked: 549 times
- Been thanked: 253 times
I had a look at the Sandringham ground yesterday,the only way it beats Casey is with it's name,"Trevor Barker Oval"...........
terrible location,IMO,and where the F*** do you park on matchday.....
How close to the ground is Sandringham station.....
terrible location,IMO,and where the F*** do you park on matchday.....
How close to the ground is Sandringham station.....
How many defenders will The Saints pick in the 2024 draft ?
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005 1:40am
- Location: Hampton/Gold Coast
- Been thanked: 7 times
At Sandy:
* the ground is about 800m from the station.
* parking is hopeless.
At Casey:
* the ground is about 1km from the bus service (that is the train extension service)
* parking for VFL crowds will be a maximum of 200m from the ground entry
* unfortunately St Kilda players won't be there (the Saints have missed the boat)!
* the ground is about 800m from the station.
* parking is hopeless.
At Casey:
* the ground is about 1km from the bus service (that is the train extension service)
* parking for VFL crowds will be a maximum of 200m from the ground entry
* unfortunately St Kilda players won't be there (the Saints have missed the boat)!
- Eastern
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14357
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
- Location: 3132
- Been thanked: 1 time
Nowhere to develop/expand.. Yacht clubs and boat harbour wouldnt allow itbobmurray wrote:I had a look at the Sandringham ground yesterday,the only way it beats Casey is with it's name,"Trevor Barker Oval"...........
terrible location,IMO,and where the F*** do you park on matchday.....
How close to the ground is Sandringham station.....
Nowhere to park unless you want to get booked
Train station is about 800m away
Frankston marginally better
Casey too far away
Moorabbin- Nah
St Kilda- won't hapen
Lets hope that AF and his team come through with a deal at Frankston that is the absolute best for the club !!
Last edited by Eastern on Sat 19 Jul 2008 4:50pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005 1:40am
- Location: Hampton/Gold Coast
- Been thanked: 7 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005 1:40am
- Location: Hampton/Gold Coast
- Been thanked: 7 times
- St Fidelius
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10492
- Joined: Sun 01 Aug 2004 10:30am
Still waiting for a comment from you b4e....St Fidelius wrote:Care to answer b4e???
to state thatjust makes a mockery of your total stance on your previous posts.."we are not called St.kilda for nothing."
For the second time it's ST KILDA NOT ST. KILDA...
Get a clue
also your PM about that you were quite happy to relocate to Frankston appears to, either be a sham or that you love shyte stiring this site for the sake of it
Why do you feel the need to turn this site to crapola ???barks4eva wrote: I actually am quite happy with the Frankston relocation, truth be known
but where would the fun be in that
best regards
Andrew
I feel this has been your agenda for a couple of years...
Here's a clue...
Post something you are passionate about and don't post to gain some sort of fun for yourself that in a way has a negative effect on this site.
You maybe lonely or may not have that much to do in your life, but please refrain from going on and on about an issue that you have previously stated that you are happy the with
Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005 1:40am
- Location: Hampton/Gold Coast
- Been thanked: 7 times
8 month anniversary.
8 months today since the Frankston announcement on 21 November last year. That’s 2/3 of a year. Nothing has happened on the ground, but a heck of a lot has happened off the ground. Most of it adverse to our interests.
In fact I’d say we are well behind where we were on 20 November last year prior to the announcement. On 20 November last year we were:
• in dispute with Kingston Council
• looking for an alternative home, with a number of alternatives available.
Now we are:
• in dispute with Kingston Council
• looking for an alternative home, with less alternatives available
• trying to develop a facility with less money in real terms than we had originally
• needing to regain credibility with the AFL and our supporters as a strategic organisation.
The fact is we didn’t diligently research the Frankston Park project, and rushed into a decision to demonstrate that the new Board was going to make things happen.
Frankston is still attractive to the club because the Council is now committed to giving us the Plowman Place block of land. But it is false economy. Although it was nominally worth $1 million, and is probably worth more, we should just let it go.
Let it go because the extra cost of development at Frankston is greater than the value of the land.
Let it go, make up with Kingston Council and redevelop where the costs can be established and contained far more easily. It now makes sense to stay at Moorabbin for so many reasons. Plus we get the benefit of the $500,000 grandstand demolition funds from the State Government.
PS - I wouldn’t be advocating Moorabbin, except that Casey Fields is now gone as an option for the Saints.
8 months today since the Frankston announcement on 21 November last year. That’s 2/3 of a year. Nothing has happened on the ground, but a heck of a lot has happened off the ground. Most of it adverse to our interests.
In fact I’d say we are well behind where we were on 20 November last year prior to the announcement. On 20 November last year we were:
• in dispute with Kingston Council
• looking for an alternative home, with a number of alternatives available.
Now we are:
• in dispute with Kingston Council
• looking for an alternative home, with less alternatives available
• trying to develop a facility with less money in real terms than we had originally
• needing to regain credibility with the AFL and our supporters as a strategic organisation.
The fact is we didn’t diligently research the Frankston Park project, and rushed into a decision to demonstrate that the new Board was going to make things happen.
Frankston is still attractive to the club because the Council is now committed to giving us the Plowman Place block of land. But it is false economy. Although it was nominally worth $1 million, and is probably worth more, we should just let it go.
Let it go because the extra cost of development at Frankston is greater than the value of the land.
Let it go, make up with Kingston Council and redevelop where the costs can be established and contained far more easily. It now makes sense to stay at Moorabbin for so many reasons. Plus we get the benefit of the $500,000 grandstand demolition funds from the State Government.
PS - I wouldn’t be advocating Moorabbin, except that Casey Fields is now gone as an option for the Saints.
When are the next local council elections?
Why don't Saints members who live in Kingston stand for each council ward with the platform of Keeping The Saints in Moorabbin?
We might not get a councillor up, but I'm sure that there will be current and potential councillors who would be prepared to do a deal for our preferences.
That way we can keep our club in its 40 year home, redevelop the facilities with Government money, and keep all our pokies in the new location on the corner of South Road.
We can also bail out of the rapidly less attractive Frankston deal with dignity.
C'mon guys.... How about it?
Why don't Saints members who live in Kingston stand for each council ward with the platform of Keeping The Saints in Moorabbin?
We might not get a councillor up, but I'm sure that there will be current and potential councillors who would be prepared to do a deal for our preferences.
That way we can keep our club in its 40 year home, redevelop the facilities with Government money, and keep all our pokies in the new location on the corner of South Road.
We can also bail out of the rapidly less attractive Frankston deal with dignity.
C'mon guys.... How about it?
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11240
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 126 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
- RedWhiteBlack
- Club Player
- Posts: 234
- Joined: Thu 03 Jul 2008 4:27pm
- Location: Melbourne
casey scorp wrote:8 month anniversary.
8 months today since the Frankston announcement on 21 November last year. That’s 2/3 of a year. Nothing has happened on the ground, but a heck of a lot has happened off the ground. Most of it adverse to our interests.
In fact I’d say we are well behind where we were on 20 November last year prior to the announcement. On 20 November last year we were:
• in dispute with Kingston Council
• looking for an alternative home, with a number of alternatives available.
Now we are:
• in dispute with Kingston Council
• looking for an alternative home, with less alternatives available
• trying to develop a facility with less money in real terms than we had originally
• needing to regain credibility with the AFL and our supporters as a strategic organisation.
The fact is we didn’t diligently research the Frankston Park project, and rushed into a decision to demonstrate that the new Board was going to make things happen.
Frankston is still attractive to the club because the Council is now committed to giving us the Plowman Place block of land. But it is false economy. Although it was nominally worth $1 million, and is probably worth more, we should just let it go.
Let it go because the extra cost of development at Frankston is greater than the value of the land.
Let it go, make up with Kingston Council and redevelop where the costs can be established and contained far more easily. It now makes sense to stay at Moorabbin for so many reasons. Plus we get the benefit of the $500,000 grandstand demolition funds from the State Government.
PS - I wouldn’t be advocating Moorabbin, except that Casey Fields is now gone as an option for the Saints.
From what I gather, the dispute with Kingston Council was started (and is being drawn out) by the council rather than the club. We won the preliminary Supreme Court hearing last week which IMO shows they don't have a leg to stand on, so I think it's unfair to say we haven't progressed when it's the council carrying on with the petty bickering.
Secondly, we ARE still looking for an alternative home but wouldn't you rather the club spends time carefully and meticulously reviewing options now rather than running gung-ho into an agreement that might suit us now but could be detrimental in the future? I thought it showed good leadership from Archie and the Board to explore other options once the Frankston Park costs blew out. They have a duty of care toward members/stakeholders. While it's frustrating to not have a new home locked down as yet, I'm happy with the status quo in the knowledge that our money is being spent responsibly.
As far as the whole Frankston concept goes, it would be a HUGE backward step if the club was to pull the pin now. I respectfully disagree with your comments about the finances as well. Recent reports from Frankston said the St Kilda move would generate $40m of economic onflow benefits to the community EVERY YEAR. I don't know how that figure was attained, but if that rings true, I'm sure the Frankston City Council will be keen to keep kicking in to our coffers (in addition to the $3m they have already committed to the move).
I don't know whether our relationship with Kingston can be healed after their frivolous claims in court last week. They clearly don't want us there and IMO there's not much point dragging us both through the mud any longer. Let's stay committed to Frankston and work with a council that actually wants us and is prepared to help us with the transition!
Have faith fellow Sainters! It's not been as smooth as we could have hoped, but I believe the CEO and Board are acting in the best interests of the club and the members.
- RedWhiteBlack
- Club Player
- Posts: 234
- Joined: Thu 03 Jul 2008 4:27pm
- Location: Melbourne
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005 1:40am
- Location: Hampton/Gold Coast
- Been thanked: 7 times
No progress in relation to Frankston was what I was saying.RedWhiteBlack wrote:From what I gather, the dispute with Kingston Council was started (and is being drawn out) by the council rather than the club. We won the preliminary Supreme Court hearing last week which IMO shows they don't have a leg to stand on, so I think it's unfair to say we haven't progressed when it's the council carrying on with the petty bickering.
Now no other alternative to looking elsewhere than Frankston Park (unless the Council tips in more money – see next point). I would expect it to be done diligently (although Frankston Park was a balls up), but that doesn’t mean it should take many months more. There are experts in these fields who provide advice.RedWhiteBlack wrote:Secondly, we ARE still looking for an alternative home but wouldn't you rather the club spends time carefully and meticulously reviewing options now rather than running gung-ho into an agreement that might suit us now but could be detrimental in the future? I thought it showed good leadership from Archie and the Board to explore other options once the Frankston Park costs blew out. They have a duty of care toward members/stakeholders.
It was Frankston Council itself that came up with the $40 million/year financial benefit to the local economy of St Kilda’s presence. One would think it a tad optimistic, but there would be no doubt that there would be a financial spin-off for local businesses.RedWhiteBlack wrote: As far as the whole Frankston concept goes, it would be a HUGE backward step if the club was to pull the pin now. I respectfully disagree with your comments about the finances as well. Recent reports from Frankston said the St Kilda move would generate $40m of economic onflow benefits to the community EVERY YEAR. I don't know how that figure was attained, but if that rings true, I'm sure the Frankston City Council will be keen to keep kicking in to our coffers (in addition to the $3m they have already committed to the move).
As it is the Council’s own figure, you would think the club would be using it as leverage to seek an increased Council contribution. And they probably are trying to.
However, the Mayor has said $3 million already committed is the max from Council:
http://www.frankstonleader.com.au/artic ... _news.html
“$3m limit for Saints, says Frankston mayorâ€
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11240
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 126 times
- Been thanked: 137 times