where's he at?
wherever the ball aint
where is jarryd Allen at?
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23247
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 741 times
- Been thanked: 1800 times
Re: where is jarryd Allen at?
Good point......whats his disposal like under pressure? He competes well and IMO Gwilt needs a chop out..RBnW wrote:Good post, I think he is important to our stucture up forward we have looked better since he has been in, he doesnt get rebounded on and takes the 3rd tall defended....he has learn to find the footy at this level yet, I would like to see him in the team for an exstended run of games if we start to kick it to him that would help too, but he is contributing.....he could also play back and has to be a better option than Gwilt....he may end up as a CHBfonz_#15 wrote:last night Allen had 80% game time for only four possessions and only 2 effective, he contributed nothing by the way of scoreboard pressure despite playiong deep at times.
i am not being critical (and don't like to be with young players) i am just stating the facts. The question is do we play him for the rest of the season despite doing very little, or do we send him back to the 2's to teach him how to beat an opponent and kick some goals?
the way i see it, despite statistics i would keep him in the side as he takes a tall defender and frees up kosi to play as a second ruck and gives him a little more freedom to push forward when playing in the ruck.
from this moment on i would only play 1 of king and gardiner, keep Allen and let kosi roam as it is proving to be the way he plays his best footy. Kosi seems to have a very strong fitness base (something he may have lacked in the past due to injuries) and i feel he contributes most with brief spurts in the ruck and then pushing forward.
This makes Allen an important piece of the puzzle because he frees up kosi because he is big and strong enoough to warrant a competent defender regardless of his output, however a potential negative of playing the kid when he is seeing very little of the ball is that he may lose confidence and doubt his ability if he is not getting near it.
I think Ross should back ther kid and highlight his importance to our structure and hopefully he can step up and be a strong contributor on our run home.
what are your thoughts?
“Yeah….nah””
- bobmurray
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7938
- Joined: Mon 03 Oct 2005 11:08pm
- Location: In the stand at RSEA Park.
- Has thanked: 549 times
- Been thanked: 254 times
I'm not convinced he'll make it,it's not like he dominates at Casey,i've seen him struggle at that level as well,who knows where he'll end up fitting into the St Kilda story........
Good key Forwards are hard to find............not sure we've found another one yet.......
Good key Forwards are hard to find............not sure we've found another one yet.......
How many defenders will The Saints pick in the 2024 draft ?
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Wed 11 Jun 2008 10:39am
structure
Its a good observation saying Allen is good for structure. Its like having a 3rd point post out there.
To say that his impact was minimal is paying him a compliment. He wandered around looking completely lost and out of his depth.
He may very well be good in the future, hes just not good enough to be there now. I'm not particularly a fan of Charlie, but he does do more.
To say that his impact was minimal is paying him a compliment. He wandered around looking completely lost and out of his depth.
He may very well be good in the future, hes just not good enough to be there now. I'm not particularly a fan of Charlie, but he does do more.
- borderbarry
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6676
- Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
- Location: Wodonga