FRANKSTON DEAL NOT DONE YET

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Post: # 589591Post plugger66 »

Bernard Shakey wrote:There is plenty of room at Trevor Barker Oval.

I had a look yesterday.

It's just a matter of whether or not Bayside Council would approve the development.
There is no room in the ground for a devolopment size that the Saints want. Where is the room. No wings and either end of the ground isnt big enough.


User avatar
Bernard Shakey
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11240
Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
Has thanked: 126 times
Been thanked: 137 times

Post: # 589595Post Bernard Shakey »

Ton of room on beach side wing to build a state of the art training facility.


Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Post: # 589598Post plugger66 »

Bernard Shakey wrote:Ton of room on beach side wing to build a state of the art training facility.
That isnt in the ground. Do you really think the council will let us purchase that land. Not a hope in hell.


saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Post: # 589621Post saintspremiers »

Bernard Shakey wrote:There is plenty of room at Trevor Barker Oval.

I had a look yesterday.

It's just a matter of whether or not Bayside Council would approve the development.
Check out Sandy Yacht club down the road towards the beach from TB Oval, have a look at the two storey clubhouse building, the size of the carpark and tell me what you think of my left-field idea???


i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
casey scorp
Club Player
Posts: 1617
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005 1:40am
Location: Hampton/Gold Coast
Been thanked: 7 times

Post: # 589630Post casey scorp »

And here's the real deal:

http://www.frankstonleader.com.au/artic ... _news.html
Paul Amy writes wrote: ST KILDA boss Archie Fraser today revealed the club was reconsidering its move to Frankston Park.
The sensational development comes as the club revealed a massive $5 million blow-out in costs in redeveloping the football ground.
The financial crunch led Fraser to admit today that the Saints might look to other sites in Frankston if costs could not be reined in.
It’s believed Belvedere Park, which has been earmarked as a potential training venue for TAC Cup team the Dandenong Stingrays, is one alternative.
St Kilda’s contribution to the $10.25m elite training facility and administration centre at Frankston Park was put at $1.5 million when the project was announced amid great fanfare last November.
But it has got as high as $5 million, due largely to rising steel prices and building restrictions on the site.
``In terms of the price, yes, it has come in higher than we’d all like, but we’re working through that at the moment,’’ Fraser said on Thursday morning.
``The whole thing pushed out to $16.25 million. We’ve been able to knock it back to about $14.25 million. We’ve had two or three meetings where we’ve been trying to cut things out that might have been niceties, as opposed to cutting back on the actual size of the building.’’
While Frankston Council, the State Government and the AFL are all contributing to the development, Fraser said the Saints would have to pay for the extra costs.
Although the club was debt-free, ``we’re not jumping in at $14 million’’, he said.
``What we’re really doing now is having a good look at it, to see if it can be `engineered down’ a little bit, while at the same time being an elite facility that meets all our requirements,’’ Fraser said.
``The more we can close the gap, the less money we have to find. We don’t want to be putting in $5 million when we thought we’d be putting in $1.25 million.
``We thought $1.25 million would tun into $2 million, maybe $2.5 million, but nowhere near $5 million.’’
Fraser said St Kilda was still intent on moving to Frankston.
``That’s 100 per cent. What we might have to do is start looking at other sites within the city council area,’’ he said.
``The key thing from the Saints’ point of view is that we’re going to be in Frankston and hopefully we’re going to be at Frankston Park. We want to make this work.’’
Belvedere Park - Melways Map 100 A4

• not too close to the heart of Frankston, where the players and fans can go for a coffee
• not in a location right in a vibrant activity centre
• not in sight of the beach, where the players could walk to for recovery
• no romance of a seaside location
• no Frankston VFL team that we'll share our home with
• those drawings of our new facility looked fantastic – but we couldn’t afford them.

Reality starts to bite, and hard.
Last edited by casey scorp on Thu 19 Jun 2008 1:02pm, edited 1 time in total.


spert
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9151
Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
Location: A distant beach
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 438 times

Post: # 589632Post spert »

mm..maybe the Junction Oval is worth another go?


saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Post: # 589633Post saintspremiers »

I wonder if Moorabbin can now go back on the agenda again if those Kingston Councillors perhaps see the light?


i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
User avatar
SENsei
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7129
Joined: Mon 05 Jun 2006 8:25pm
Been thanked: 2 times

Post: # 589635Post SENsei »

saintspremiers wrote:I wonder if Moorabbin can now go back on the agenda again if those Kingston Councillors perhaps see the light?
Kingston were happy to see us go. No chance they'd welcome us back.

Particularly after the public drubbing given by AF in the media last year.

Frankston will still happen. All AF is trying to do is play the media game, like he did with Kingston, to get more money into the project or they will threaten to back out.

It worked a treat last time he played this game, so go for it Arch.


Poster formerly known as SENsaintsational. More wisdom. More knowledge. Less name.
bergsone
SS Life Member
Posts: 2929
Joined: Mon 28 Apr 2008 4:56pm
Location: victoria
Has thanked: 265 times
Been thanked: 121 times

Post: # 589674Post bergsone »

spert wrote:mm..maybe the Junction Oval is worth another go?
That though just crossed my mind too,sure to be a lot of pro and cons,butworth some though?


User avatar
Animal Enclosure
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2364
Joined: Mon 04 Apr 2005 2:37pm
Location: Saints Footy Central

Post: # 589680Post Animal Enclosure »

bergsone wrote:
spert wrote:mm..maybe the Junction Oval is worth another go?
That though just crossed my mind too,sure to be a lot of pro and cons,butworth some though?
Too much of a conflict with cricket as far as I know. The VCA have a contract to play the district final there every year & that's why the Dees couldn't train there over summer. Melbourne left there due to not being able to do anything with the ground & that probably means we'll be no chance either.


User avatar
Bernard Shakey
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11240
Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
Has thanked: 126 times
Been thanked: 137 times

Post: # 589685Post Bernard Shakey »

We left the Junction Oval in 1965 because of cricket.

Nothing has changed since then.


Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
User avatar
WinnersOnly
SS Life Member
Posts: 3059
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 10:24pm
Location: Canberra

Just another administrative cluster!

Post: # 589691Post WinnersOnly »

Just another administrative cluster by the St Kilda FC. Surely before your President & CEO go spruking off to the media and fans about an exciting move they would have done their research and costings on the project...
Just another group of incompetent fools we have running our club!


SAINTS another day older another day closer to the Holy Grail!
bergsone
SS Life Member
Posts: 2929
Joined: Mon 28 Apr 2008 4:56pm
Location: victoria
Has thanked: 265 times
Been thanked: 121 times

Post: # 589695Post bergsone »

Animal Enclosure wrote:
bergsone wrote:
spert wrote:mm..maybe the Junction Oval is worth another go?
That though just crossed my mind too,sure to be a lot of pro and cons,butworth some though?
Too much of a conflict with cricket as far as I know. The VCA have a contract to play the district final there every year & that's why the Dees couldn't train there over summer. Melbourne left there due to not being able to do anything with the ground & that probably means we'll be no chance either.
Yes your right mate ,just me reminising


spert
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9151
Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
Location: A distant beach
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 438 times

Post: # 589696Post spert »

Archie suggested that price of steel and other building costs have blown things out..we'll Im sure steel prices haven't risen that dramatically and building costs should have been investigated and costed to a close approximation by the time of the announcement of the relocation..sounds like a load of crap.


User avatar
perfectionist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9054
Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
Has thanked: 60 times
Been thanked: 353 times

Post: # 589702Post perfectionist »

Bernard Shakey wrote:We left the Junction Oval in 1965 because of cricket.
We played our last game at the Junction Oval (as our home ground) in 1964 and defeated Geelong by three goals and our first home game at Moorabbin in 1965, and defeated Collingwood by one goal.

Ah, the good old days!

No doubt, the St Kilda Cricket Club was the major reason.

Why doesn't someone suggest a training oval at Docklands somewhere - it could do with a bit of green amidst the concrete jungle.
Last edited by perfectionist on Thu 19 Jun 2008 2:25pm, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
degruch
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8948
Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
Location: Croydonia
Has thanked: 146 times
Been thanked: 237 times

Post: # 589705Post degruch »

spert wrote:Archie suggested that price of steel and other building costs have blown things out..we'll Im sure steel prices haven't risen that dramatically and building costs should have been investigated and costed to a close approximation by the time of the announcement of the relocation..sounds like a load of crap.
Price of steel's gone up by about 10% over the last few weeks...from my experience. Still, could be crap, as you say.


Strength_Through_Loyalty
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon 07 Apr 2008 10:46am
Location: The Basin

Post: # 589725Post Strength_Through_Loyalty »

perfectionist wrote: Why doesn't someone suggest a training oval at Docklands somewhere - it could do with a bit of green amidst the concrete jungle.
The Roof of Southern Cross perhaps?


User avatar
ausfatcat
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6536
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:36pm
Has thanked: 19 times
Been thanked: 101 times

Post: # 589728Post ausfatcat »

Strength_Through_Loyalty wrote:The Roof of Southern Cross perhaps?

haha



it's China same with cement


User avatar
St. Luke
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5268
Joined: Wed 17 Mar 2004 12:34pm
Location: Hiding at Telstra Dome!

Post: # 589730Post St. Luke »

casey scorp wrote:
St. Luke wrote:We've just been given the go ahead for getting the plan submissions drawn up for the Frankston project. I can't say anything more....sorry 8-)
St Luke, how is the design work going for the new project?


Very badly now I think :lol: :lol:

What on earth are we doing????? Arrrrgh!!


When they created LENNY HAYES (in the shadow of Harvs) they forgot to break the mold (again)- hence the Supremely Incredible Jack Steven!!
Sainterman
Club Player
Posts: 1497
Joined: Wed 24 Mar 2004 11:45am

Post: # 589829Post Sainterman »

What a great piece of management this is...Archie Fraser at the helm and its looking pretty messy! Surely we should have had things a little more locked in before we made an announcement. It really makes me wonder about the current admin! :evil: :evil:


casey scorp
Club Player
Posts: 1617
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005 1:40am
Location: Hampton/Gold Coast
Been thanked: 7 times

Post: # 590309Post casey scorp »

St. Luke wrote:
casey scorp wrote:
St. Luke wrote:We've just been given the go ahead for getting the plan submissions drawn up for the Frankston project. I can't say anything more....sorry 8-)
St Luke, how is the design work going for the new project?


Very badly now I think :lol: :lol:

What on earth are we doing????? Arrrrgh!!
Why didn't you blow the whistle when it started going off the rails?


casey scorp
Club Player
Posts: 1617
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005 1:40am
Location: Hampton/Gold Coast
Been thanked: 7 times

Post: # 592228Post casey scorp »

8 June 2006
$16.5 MILLION UPGRADE FOR MOORABBIN RESERVE
http://www.dpc.vic.gov.au/domino/Web_No ... enDocument


21 November 2007
Saints Relocate to Frankston
http://www.saints.com.au/Season2007/New ... wsId=53412

What and when will be the official 2008 announcement?

If its going to be Belvedere Park, then the people who said Casey Fields is in the boonies might need to steel themselves for a shock.


SAINTLY73
Club Player
Posts: 59
Joined: Tue 05 Jun 2007 6:27pm

Post: # 592514Post SAINTLY73 »

Agree with you Casey Scorp. Frankston seemed a strange choice considering what Casey had to offer.

Just spent 15 min trying to find Belvedere Oval on the net . No offence to those that live out there but it not quite the real estate (wow factor) that you would have thought an AFL team would be seeking.
I would think the consultants should have their heads on the chopping block. Go check out Stratcorp's website and what there involvement was in this process. They were paid to give advice and get it right. The checks and balances weren't there. Ultimately its Archie's responsibility and he knows it.

We'll wait and see where the next site will be. One thing is for sure it won't be at Moorabbin (bridges are too far burnt) or Casey (Melbourne saw the opportunity).


RBnW
Club Player
Posts: 325
Joined: Tue 16 Oct 2007 7:43pm
Location: Port Melbourne
Contact:

Post: # 592535Post RBnW »

SAINTLY73 wrote:Agree with you Casey Scorp. Frankston seemed a strange choice considering what Casey had to offer.

Just spent 15 min trying to find Belvedere Oval on the net . No offence to those that live out there but it not quite the real estate (wow factor) that you would have thought an AFL team would be seeking.
I would think the consultants should have their heads on the chopping block. Go check out Stratcorp's website and what there involvement was in this process. They were paid to give advice and get it right. The checks and balances weren't there. Ultimately its Archie's responsibility and he knows it.

We'll wait and see where the next site will be. One thing is for sure it won't be at Moorabbin (bridges are too far burnt) or Casey (Melbourne saw the opportunity).
great to see both of you council boys back talking again, Saintly 63 good to see you back in another name.....well disguised....you are good :oops:
while you two chat away to each other from your respective council chambers, can you just accept it....you lost. :P :P The Saints are gone :lol: :lol:
The club will be building at Frankston and you both missed out....sorry :? :?
Move on Casey, you will get Melbourne, we only have to go to Sandy to watch the 2's instead of that wind swept hollow and Saintly 63 or 73 whatever...you know that the Saints are gone from Moorabbin and Kingston and you also know that its not the right thing for your rate payers but you still allowed it to happen.... :roll: :roll:


Our best is yet
to come......
SAINTLY73
Club Player
Posts: 59
Joined: Tue 05 Jun 2007 6:27pm

Post: # 592576Post SAINTLY73 »

Huh!!! :? :? :? :? :? :?


Post Reply