We are a middle of the road team...

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
fugazi
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4243
Joined: Thu 25 Mar 2004 2:47pm
Location: incarnate
Has thanked: 286 times
Been thanked: 694 times

We are a middle of the road team...

Post: # 547714Post fugazi »

We have been very overrated, talked up as top 4 and some having us to top the ladder...we are nowhere near. We are somewhere between 6-12 on the ladder.

I actually thought we were OK yesterday, we lost by 7 goals but thought we played better then our 7 goal win against Carlton. But the difference was enormous between the two sides. Too many passengers and so many players who are just below AFL standard.

Upside:

S.King - excellent, great to have a ruckman at last, some great taps to advantage.

L.Hayes - back to near his best

Goddard - will be in the top 5 again soon.

Roo - apart from finishing, was very good today.

Passengers:
Fiora - too weak, did you see Ling stand up and effortlessly shrug him off his back?

Gehrig - his full back was BOG, his liabilities outweigh his assets.

Dempster - first week back I suppose, but awful.

Maguire - will hopefully improve, but was badly out of it today.

Blake - can be useful but not when there are too many other unskilled players out there too.

Depth:

We have Baker back in a couple of weeks, both Gardiners to come in

Armitage and Birss the next best midfielders and Schneider up forward.

No more soft players:

B: ...L.Fisher..........Max........S.Fisher
HB:..Goddard.......Goose........Gilbert
C: ..Monty...........Hayes...........Gram
HF:...Ball..............Roo..........C.Gardiner
F:...Schneider.......Kosi...........X-man
R:..King, Dal Santo, Baker
I/C: M.Gardiner, Harvey, Armitage, Birss
EMG: Blake, Allen, McEvoy

Fiora, Raph, Dempster to prove their worth in the VFL

Gehrig to drop out unless injuries create room for him at FF.
Last year for Harvs, so we really need game time into Armitage, he should be played as much as possible this year. Same with Gilbert keep [playing him...will be taking over from Max. Allen is the next tall to get a guernsey if it opens up for him.


Nee!
User avatar
Eastern
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14357
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
Location: 3132
Been thanked: 1 time

Post: # 547717Post Eastern »

The next 2 weeks could determine where we finish this year.

Win both and we are back on track to finish top 6

Win one and we are in the middle of the pack 7-10

Lose both and we are in real trouble !!


fugazi
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4243
Joined: Thu 25 Mar 2004 2:47pm
Location: incarnate
Has thanked: 286 times
Been thanked: 694 times

Post: # 547724Post fugazi »

Exactly. And thats about where we deserve to be. We are still being rated on the 2005 names. But we have gone backwards since then in most areas (Ball, Dal Santo, Harvey, Max, Gehrig, Maguire...all worse then their 2005 form)....S.Fisher, Goddard, Monty have improved admittedly, and we now have a ruck division......but improvement from your second stringers is not enough to offset the decline of your first stringers.


Nee!
Hawkesbury Saint
Club Player
Posts: 353
Joined: Wed 07 Apr 2004 10:28pm
Location: Faulconbridge
Been thanked: 17 times

Post: # 547732Post Hawkesbury Saint »

I'm not so sure we are a middle of the road team atm. I think we may need to climb a few spots on the ladder before we can legitinately claim that. :cry:


Saints Footy - Let all others follow.
User avatar
SaintBot
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5368
Joined: Thu 27 Oct 2005 7:06am
Location: RUCK-ROVER

Post: # 547733Post SaintBot »

Eastern wrote:The next 2 weeks could determine where we finish this year.

Win both and we are back on track to finish top 6

Win one and we are in the middle of the pack 7-10

Lose both and we are in real trouble !!
very true this friday against essendon is the biggest test of the season yet

So far, as far as predicting goes, only the bulldogs game has been a disappointment - a loss to geelong was to be expected.

We could (and should) win the next three games - essendon dome, port aami and tigers dome

Collingwood at dome should sit in our favour. Followed by Brisbane at the Gabba, win-able but as far as predicting goes this can go down as a loss (one of our expected losses will have to be turned into a win now we have put down the doggies game).

Then we get a % boost with melbourne at td - id be surprised if we lost to bulldogs again in round 11.

From there we have a few tough games (syd scg, haw td, col mcg, wc freo subi) win at least three of those and that's a pass.


Our season is far from over. Bulldogs could very realistically get to 6 - 0 but then they have 6 or 7 tough games in a row.


This season is well and truly alive.


Behind Play
Club Player
Posts: 763
Joined: Tue 19 Jun 2007 7:18pm

Post: # 547742Post Behind Play »

I believe it was this time last season Geelong lost their game, Bomber behind closed doors gave them what for.......since then they have lost one game. Can we turn it around, is RL able to turn it around or is this another saints typical season?
I just cannot believe we have got that far behind Geelong.


cwrcyn
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4344
Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
Location: earth
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1467 times

Post: # 547804Post cwrcyn »

We are better than a MOR team. Behind Geelong, we sit equal with the next four or five teams.

Unfortunately, we have a gama plan that concerns itself far too much with what the opposition is doing. Our players, who are a talented bunch, have become hesitant and unwilling to take risks.

They do a ridiculous amount of unnecessary defensive running, which means by half time in each game they are physically spent. Our negative style is affcting the performances of players such as Gram and S.Fisher.

As a proactive team, we can play with fluency and we worry our opposition. As a reactive team, which we now are, we fail tp play to our strengths and fail to threaten the big sticks enough to post winning scores.

I see some worrying similarities with the Tim Watson era in where our tactical focus is.


cwrcyn
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4344
Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
Location: earth
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1467 times

Post: # 547812Post cwrcyn »

Oh, and we need to replace Fiora with Geary. Geary can do anything Fiora can, and doesn't shirk any contests.

Jason Blake is a man without a position at the moment, and his form hasn't been up to par. He needs to be replaced with someone like Ferguson, who is quicker and better in marking contests.


With Harvey probably out through injury, the time has arrived for Armitage. He's got plenty of mongrel, and we really need some at the moment.


yltnias
Club Player
Posts: 44
Joined: Thu 23 Jun 2005 11:16pm
Location: Up North

Post: # 547839Post yltnias »

Thank God cw..... finally a poster that talks more sense than crap!!!


User avatar
mad saint guy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7087
Joined: Tue 26 Jul 2005 9:44pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 52 times
Been thanked: 367 times

Post: # 547880Post mad saint guy »

cwrcyn wrote:We are better than a MOR team. Behind Geelong, we sit equal with the next four or five teams.

Unfortunately, we have a gama plan that concerns itself far too much with what the opposition is doing. Our players, who are a talented bunch, have become hesitant and unwilling to take risks.

They do a ridiculous amount of unnecessary defensive running, which means by half time in each game they are physically spent. Our negative style is affcting the performances of players such as Gram and S.Fisher.

As a proactive team, we can play with fluency and we worry our opposition. As a reactive team, which we now are, we fail tp play to our strengths and fail to threaten the big sticks enough to post winning scores.

I see some worrying similarities with the Tim Watson era in where our tactical focus is.
Great post. Sums up where we are at the moment and where we could be with a decent game style.


User avatar
st_Trav_ofWA
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8886
Joined: Wed 13 Sep 2006 7:10pm
Location: Perth
Contact:

Post: # 548119Post st_Trav_ofWA »

Eastern wrote:The next 2 weeks could determine where we finish this year.

Win both and we are back on track to finish top 6

Win one and we are in the middle of the pack 7-10

Lose both and we are in real trouble !!
if we loose the next 2 games we may as well do a carlton and go for broke to get a kid by the name of Rich playing in the WAFL !!


"The team that wins in the most positions and makes the least amount of mistakes, usually wins the game." -- Allan Jeans

http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
User avatar
Buckets
SS Life Member
Posts: 2501
Joined: Wed 25 Aug 2004 5:35pm
Location: Wodonga

Post: # 548140Post Buckets »

st_Trav_ofWA wrote:
Eastern wrote:The next 2 weeks could determine where we finish this year.

Win both and we are back on track to finish top 6

Win one and we are in the middle of the pack 7-10

Lose both and we are in real trouble !!
if we loose the next 2 games we may as well do a carlton and go for broke to get a kid by the name of Rich playing in the WAFL !!

HELL NO!!!!!!! I could not stand by and watch that happen we are above the scum i would never want to sink to their disgusting level!


Thats Mr. Smartarse to you
User avatar
matrix
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21475
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Post: # 548145Post matrix »

cwrcyn wrote:We are better than a MOR team. Behind Geelong, we sit equal with the next four or five teams.
equal with the hawks?
sorry, but no way are we rated equal with hawthorn.

all we have to do is finish in the 8 for a sniff at GF action.
everyone loses, and GF day can be a funny old day and give everyone a chance.
but at the moment (and come on, its only round 4) we havent a chance at beating the cats or the hawks.
hopefully we start to see a bit of a turn around in the next 2 or so months.


User avatar
evertonfc
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7262
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 9:11pm
Location: 'Quietly Confident' County
Has thanked: 115 times
Been thanked: 267 times
Contact:

Post: # 548250Post evertonfc »

mad saint guy wrote:
cwrcyn wrote:We are better than a MOR team. Behind Geelong, we sit equal with the next four or five teams.

Unfortunately, we have a gama plan that concerns itself far too much with what the opposition is doing. Our players, who are a talented bunch, have become hesitant and unwilling to take risks.

They do a ridiculous amount of unnecessary defensive running, which means by half time in each game they are physically spent. Our negative style is affcting the performances of players such as Gram and S.Fisher.

As a proactive team, we can play with fluency and we worry our opposition. As a reactive team, which we now are, we fail tp play to our strengths and fail to threaten the big sticks enough to post winning scores.

I see some worrying similarities with the Tim Watson era in where our tactical focus is.
Great post. Sums up where we are at the moment and where we could be with a decent game style.
Seconded. Individual players are all performing at different levels, but the fact is that collectively, their output is exactly as you have described.


Clueless and mediocre petty tyrant.

Image
User avatar
Eastern
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14357
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
Location: 3132
Been thanked: 1 time

Post: # 548253Post Eastern »

st_Trav_ofWA wrote:
Eastern wrote:The next 2 weeks could determine where we finish this year.

Win both and we are back on track to finish top 6

Win one and we are in the middle of the pack 7-10

Lose both and we are in real trouble !!
if we loose the next 2 games we may as well do a carlton and go for broke to get a kid by the name of Rich playing in the WAFL !!
I heard shifter Sheehan say on radio the other day that Rich could go ahead of Natnui in this yrs draft. He must be bl**dy good. I don't like our chances of getting either because we ain't that bad, but have to prove that !!


User avatar
st_Trav_ofWA
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8886
Joined: Wed 13 Sep 2006 7:10pm
Location: Perth
Contact:

Post: # 548386Post st_Trav_ofWA »

Eastern wrote:
st_Trav_ofWA wrote:
Eastern wrote:The next 2 weeks could determine where we finish this year.

Win both and we are back on track to finish top 6

Win one and we are in the middle of the pack 7-10

Lose both and we are in real trouble !!
if we loose the next 2 games we may as well do a carlton and go for broke to get a kid by the name of Rich playing in the WAFL !!
I heard shifter Sheehan say on radio the other day that Rich could go ahead of Natnui in this yrs draft. He must be bl**dy good. I don't like our chances of getting either because we ain't that bad, but have to prove that !!
in my opinion getting Natnui is a bit like picking up Kosi huge potential and a lot of upside but still that little bit of a querrie on if it can be harnessed consistantly where as Rich would be like picking a ready made player with silky skils and a fair amount of grunt mark my words Natnui may go no.1 but Rich will be the one that will make the instant impact !


"The team that wins in the most positions and makes the least amount of mistakes, usually wins the game." -- Allan Jeans

http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
brown-coat
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2034
Joined: Wed 03 May 2006 11:18pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Post: # 548388Post brown-coat »

cwrcyn wrote:We are better than a MOR team. Behind Geelong, we sit equal with the next four or five teams.

Unfortunately, we have a gama plan that concerns itself far too much with what the opposition is doing. Our players, who are a talented bunch, have become hesitant and unwilling to take risks.

They do a ridiculous amount of unnecessary defensive running, which means by half time in each game they are physically spent. Our negative style is affcting the performances of players such as Gram and S.Fisher.

As a proactive team, we can play with fluency and we worry our opposition. As a reactive team, which we now are, we fail tp play to our strengths and fail to threaten the big sticks enough to post winning scores.

I see some worrying similarities with the Tim Watson era in where our tactical focus is.
Brilliantly said.

We're a reactive team, it's boring to watch and is founded on fear.


Post Reply