Once a club selects a player, it is their responsibility to help the in any way it can. Why shouldn't we help in his rehabilitation if it is mutally beneficial?Dan Warna wrote: I don't see it as st kilda's responsiblity to rehabilitate him, or invest in his potential rehabilitation.
It isn't all take at a football club anymore.
Risks to whom? Other players, the clubs reputation, your feelings of self worth? As i said if the club deem it advantageous to have Cousins well, I would take their knowledge over yours anyday. You have a right to your opinion, although it is based on intolerance and ignorance. Oh thas my opinion BTW.Dan Warna wrote:I see him as a potential risk and the benifits do not outweigh the risks.
Fair points. But I totally and utterly disagree. He would not cost much, Harvs would be gone and he would be great in our midfield.Dan Warna wrote:As I've said over the past few years, I see the current core list of players as more than capable of winning a premiership with a bit of luck, I don't think cousins adds that much to the mix, nor do I believe the potential, given his age, his attitude, outweight the costs of investing $$ in him.
If we selected him it would be. Of course it would be. Just as we have been responsible and have helped Michael Gardiner back to senior level.Dan Warna wrote:Good on him if he can turn his life around and be a success or at least a law abiding citizen, I don't see it as my responsibility nor as the responsibility of the st kilda football club to contribute to that.
this is a complete cop out I'm afraid. You reckon kids will copy Cousins? Dear me, it is up to parents to give their kids some moral direction, not relying on some fictitious role model, based on the myth of celebretey and then attempt to lay the blame at the so called role models feet when all goes wrongDan Warna wrote:and to some degree, st kilda football club and football does reflect society's issues.
you'd be surprised at how kids copy their football stars, and you'd be suprised how teenagers mimic their idols.
Your argument is confused. First you question why we do anything for Cousins outside of football, now you are lourding the fact that we do invest resources in our players outside of football.Dan Warna wrote:St Kilda over the past decade has invested a lot of resources in developing the footballers we have OUTSIDE football, public speaking, financial management, diet, secondary and tertiary education, health promotion, family days, auskick etc etc.
Why wouldn't you afford Cousin that same opportunity all other saints players have or have had if he became a Saint? Still seem like you want to punish Cousins for some reson.
only the occasional rape accusation, peeing on womens legs, assualt at pubs etc, what family are you referring to/ The Manson family?Dan Warna wrote:i believe the management under Rod Butters has made st kilda a far more family oriented team than say 20 odd years ago.
Anyway just subjective motherhood statements - means nothing.
Umm Rod Butters didn't introduce open training sessions and autographs Dan Warna.Dan Warna wrote:my kids look forward to auskick at moorabin and going down to training when I have a day off and the like.
My son was very excited to have a photo taken with xavier clarke, robert harvey and others.
I take it that you would confiscate the phot of X fo example if came out he made a mistake (humans do you know) and he was no longer your sons role model? Or would you try to explain that all people make mistakes, and that you become a better, more tolerant person by learning from mistakes and moving on?
You choice Dan.