Llane Spandermann?

woooosaints · Tue 06 Nov 2007 5:42pm

worth looking at? known attitude problems but great ruckman

rd 1 - 12 possies 22 hitouts (backing up beeck! they had 50 hitouts between the 2!) opposition ruck 15 hitouts 3 possies
rd 2 - 13 possies 14 hitouts (2nd ruck to beeck) opposition ruck had 6 & 7 hitouts
rd 3 - 12 possies 15 hitouts 1 goal (looks like beeck and he shared ruck duties) opposition had 14 & 7 hitouts
rd 4 - 19 possies 6 hitouts 1 goal 2 (2nd ruck to beeck who had 28 hitouts) opposition had 16 & 9 hitouts
rd 5 - 21 possies 24 hitouts 1 goal - opposition had 12 & 6 hitouts
rd 6 - 19 possies 8 hitouts (2nd ruck to beeck) - opposition had 22 & 7 hitouts
rd 8 - 28 possies 22 hitouts - opposition (Griffiths) had 12 possies & 22 hitouts
rd 9 - 19 possies 11 hitouts 2 goals (2nd ruck to beeck) - Newick caned beeck at this one, looks like Newick rucked alone virtually!
rd 10 - 19 possies 18 hitouts 1 goal - beeck had 13 hitouts, opposition rucks had 12 & 5 hitouts
rd 11 - 27 possies 24 hitouts - opposition had 9 & 3 hitouts
rd 12 - 16 possies 27 hitouts - opposition had 21 & 4 hitouts
rd 14 - 17 possies 16 hitouts (played back up ruck man to Lyster who had 19 hitouts 3 possies) - opposition had 18 & 4 hitouts
got injured at this point, played 2 games in this time with limited game time and average returns.
rd 23 - 21 disposals, 18 hit outs 3 goals 1 (lyster 2nd ruck with 11 HO - opposition ruck had 10 & 13 hitouts

those were his stats last year in the WAFL

Batnoe · Post: # 487268Post **Batnoe** » Tue 06 Nov 2007 5:48pm

A back up in the WAFL wont make the AFL rucking. Already been at 2 teams, Would have stayed at the Lions if they thought he had any chance of coming through. I dont think they had Leunberger at that stage

Armoooo · Post: # 487272Post **Armoooo** » Tue 06 Nov 2007 5:58pm

No chance, hack.

ifonlybarkswashere · Tue 06 Nov 2007 6:44pm

Besides, we can't have a Schneiderman and a Spandermann.

Oh When the Saints · Tue 06 Nov 2007 6:47pm

Was convicted and lucky to escape a jail sentence earlier in the year for acting as an accomplice in an aggravated assault.

Too short for a first ruck and not mobile enough for a permanent forward.

We'd have been better off keeping Nick Stone.

nabby7 · Post: # 487348Post **nabby7** » Tue 06 Nov 2007 8:40pm

heeeeeeeeeeck! no

mad saint guy · Tue 06 Nov 2007 9:04pm

Nutcase and too short. No thanks.

LTN16 · Post: # 487362Post **LTN16** » Tue 06 Nov 2007 9:05pm

mad saint guy wrote:Nutcase and too short. No thanks.

Agree 100%

Otiman · Post: # 487453Post **Otiman** » Wed 07 Nov 2007 3:50am

Not a chance, but who is this Beeck fellow?

cwrcyn · Post: # 487460Post **cwrcyn** » Wed 07 Nov 2007 7:57am

Why not Spaanderman and Angwin as your ruck combination?

.

GrumpyOne · Post: # 487485Post **GrumpyOne** » Wed 07 Nov 2007 10:20am

cwrcyn wrote:Why not Spaanderman and Angwin as your ruck combination?

.

We'd have to recruit both their parole officers as well

Lynch Beast · Wed 07 Nov 2007 11:09am

Otiman wrote:Not a chance, but who is this Beeck fellow?

Former West Coast rookie

I always thought he was a dud though

http://westcoasteagles.com.au/TheClub/P ... fault.aspx

Dan Warna · Post: # 487507Post **Dan Warna** » Wed 07 Nov 2007 11:29am

cwrcyn wrote:Why not Spaanderman and Angwin as your ruck combination?

.

yep go well with cousins.

the supply looks solid.

bindeez bindeez bindeez.

Brian Collis · Wed 07 Nov 2007 2:22pm

Another for the rookie list

PLUGGER14 · Post: # 487820Post **PLUGGER14** » Wed 07 Nov 2007 8:17pm

Too much baggage.

His father would be tough to handle as well.

fonz_#15 · Post: # 487822Post **fonz_#15** » Wed 07 Nov 2007 8:18pm

Brian Collis wrote:Another for the rookie list

taking our rookie list to 142,337 for next year according to some