Who's this 'Thomas' you speak of?barks4eva wrote:There must be some questions about Matthew Drain, because super coach Thomas was totally opposed to us appointing him previouslysaintsRrising wrote:also chatted on Matthew Drain,
said Sheedy wasa big wrap for him.
Has broad experience from cricket to Football.
Archie said they aggressively went after him.
back on topic
what was that again?
Archie Says Gardi is fit/ New Physio and Team Doctor!!!...
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- rodgerfox
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:10am
- Has thanked: 425 times
- Been thanked: 327 times
- barks4eva
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:39pm
- Has thanked: 190 times
- Been thanked: 92 times
The one who was previously opposed to having Drain appointed, after the board had chased him previously, which eventually meant that Drain was not appointedrodgerfox wrote:Who's this 'Thomas' you speak of?
Given super coach Thomas's strong opposition to Drain's possible appointment previously, should we be concerned now?
DO THE MATHS AND THE SQUARES ARE ALL ROOTED.
Drain had the job offered by Waldron and GT spat it, it was the start of the GT & RB fallout I remember the articles at the time, only question is when will he get his second premiership, my mail is he is a good operator and the Dogs were not happy to loose him, on top of the others we have added to the football area he is a good get for us, if GT didnt want him he is most probabaly a good operator that would have challenged GT....we know he didnt like that....this looks to be a great addition for usbarks4eva wrote:There must be some questions about Matthew Drain, because super coach Thomas was totally opposed to us appointing him previouslysaintsRrising wrote:also chatted on Matthew Drain,
said Sheedy wasa big wrap for him.
Has broad experience from cricket to Football.
Archie said they aggressively went after him.
back on topic
what was that again?
Our best is yet
to come......
to come......
- rodgerfox
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:10am
- Has thanked: 425 times
- Been thanked: 327 times
You should be concerned about lots of things - this being the least of them.barks4eva wrote:The one who was previously opposed to having Drain appointed, after the board had chased him previously, which eventually meant that Drain was not appointedrodgerfox wrote:Who's this 'Thomas' you speak of?
Given super coach Thomas's strong opposition to Drain's possible appointment previously, should we be concerned now?
As for Drain not being appointed because Thomas didn't want him there, I'd say that explains in a sentence why that Board is no longer at the club.
- riccardo
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6952
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:44am
- Location: Jason Gram - Michael Tuck Medalist 2008
The only reason Thomas was opposed to Drain was he wanted to be Football manager, if I understand it correctly.barks4eva wrote:The one who was previously opposed to having Drain appointed, after the board had chased him previously, which eventually meant that Drain was not appointedrodgerfox wrote:Who's this 'Thomas' you speak of?
Given super coach Thomas's strong opposition to Drain's possible appointment previously, should we be concerned now?
Thomas was opposed to anyone other than him being in control, apparently it is part of the reason he was sacked.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5413
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 10:29am
- Has thanked: 33 times
- Been thanked: 47 times
yep quite right riccardo. it was stated at the time about trying to get Drain, and GT's oppositionriccardo wrote:The only reason Thomas was opposed to Drain was he wanted to be Football manager, if I understand it correctly.barks4eva wrote:The one who was previously opposed to having Drain appointed, after the board had chased him previously, which eventually meant that Drain was not appointedrodgerfox wrote:Who's this 'Thomas' you speak of?
Given super coach Thomas's strong opposition to Drain's possible appointment previously, should we be concerned now?
Thomas was opposed to anyone other than him being in control, apparently it is part of the reason he was sacked.
- barks4eva
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:39pm
- Has thanked: 190 times
- Been thanked: 92 times
barks4eva wrote: Given super coach Thomas's strong opposition to Drain's possible appointment previously, should we be concerned now?
Very good point and I agree wholeheartedlyrodgerfox wrote: You should be concerned about lots of things - this being the least of them.
Agree againAs for Drain not being appointed because Thomas didn't want him there, I'd say that explains in a sentence why that Board is no longer at the club.
and also explains why Thomas himself is not there either and why that is a very, very good thing
Off field things are now finally taking shape
If only we'd have had a professionally run football department like we have now, five years ago, we might have won a premiership by now
DO THE MATHS AND THE SQUARES ARE ALL ROOTED.
Here is the article....rodgerfox wrote:No it wasn't.RBnW wrote:it was the start of the GT & RB fallout
It wasn't at all.
Yes it was
August 2005
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Top Saints mates no longer
Stephen Riellly
The friction of their professional roles has brought Grant Thomas and Rod Butterss undone as friends.
THE close friendship between Rod Butterss and Grant Thomas that has been at the heart of St Kilda's renaissance has crumbled, with the president and coach keeping only what both describe as an "acceptable working relationship".
The pair, Brighton neighbours, confidants and one-time golfing partners, who were brought together as directors in 1999 before assuming control of the club the following year, have fallen out over a series of decisions taken in the off-season, the second such summer of discontent.
Butterss said yesterday that the "realities of football life" had strained their friendship.
"There's no doubt that the relationship Thommo and I have is not what it used to be," the president explained. "What it used to be was 'bosom buddies'. We'd meet for coffee daily and talk on the telephone for an hour. We were the closest of mates.
"But in the pressure-packed environment of footy, when two mates end up as senior coach and the other as president of the one club, there are going to be times when your opinion differs; there are going to be times when there is an element of strain.
"I'm philosophical about my relationship with Thommo. My responsibility is club-wide - it's to the institution that is St Kilda, not just the team but the business, the members, the people who work for us, what we stand for as a club. I take that responsibility very seriously."
The fragmentation of what was the most influential relationship within the club - a freeze of sorts that is understood to exist between at least two other directors and the coach - began in the off-season as negotiations over a string of decisions gained an edge.
Thomas negotiated a new three-year contract, opted to take the team to South Africa for a training camp in November at a cost of $250,000 and appointed former Fremantle fitness coach Adam Larcom - a hiring not fully endorsed by the board first.
The manner in which Thomas and the football department handled the controversy that engulfed full-forward Fraser Gehrig in late October, after he drunkenly urinated on a woman in a hotel, is believed to have sat uncomfortably with some on the board, although Butterss denied that this was the case last night.
These events followed a dispute the previous summer over the appointment of a football manager who, ultimately, was never appointed. The administration had decided to hire former Essendon football manager Matthew Drain but changed its plans in the face of opposition from Thomas and instead added responsibilities to assistant coach Matt Rendell.
Thomas was tight-lipped yesterday but said the state of his relationship with Butterss was a private matter.
"It's a personal issue and personal issues should remain personal. We have a working relationship and that's all that the St Kilda football club requires," said the coach, who disputed that their falling-out was a clash of wills.
"We don't clash or hit head-on or butt heads because we don't really discuss anything. I report to the chief executive and the chief executive reports to the board. I'm happy with that."
Butterss admitted that the off-season had involved confrontation.
"He (Thomas) might want to go to South Africa, and I'm thinking, 'Hang on, that's going to cost us $250,000 and we've still got debts of $2 million.' That, for instance, was a contentious issue we struggled with," Butterss conceded.
"Thommo is firmly of the view that Raphael Clarke and Nick Dal Santo and players like that benefited enormously from visiting Soweto and seeing the poverty and witnessing life as we don't know it here. As he would describe it, the whole international travelling thing was a priceless opportunity for growth.
"But the poor old administrator has a juggling act. We want to do as much as we can for our footy department, but on the other hand we want to try to be prudent and build a club that will be strong in every way. There was a difference of opinion on that issue, among others, and it was vigorous. I'm not going to deny that."
Butterss and Thomas spent time together in a club sponsor's marquee during the Melbourne grand prix and according to Butterss the mood was "comfortable". He was adamant that the problems between them would not be allowed to seep into the workings of the club and said new chief executive and director Jim Watts had a strong relationship with the coach.
"We sat and talked footy. I would still say we've got a rapport. We're not throwing darts at one another, put it that way," Butterss said.
"I think that when I'm no longer president and Thommo is no longer coach, whenever that might be, we'll be playing golf together again and having the family dinners.
"I strongly challenge the suggestion that what has occurred between us is in any way endangering or harming the workings of the club. Neither of us would allow that to occur."
A FRIENDSHIP STRAINED
THAT WAS THEN
Thomas on Butterss last year:
"We became very close very quickly. We liked each other's company and we started spending most of our time together. We'd catch up at lunchtimes, find time for a coffee in our days and often get together at nights as well. We'd see each other every day, always discussing St Kilda."
. . . THIS IS NOW
Butterss on Thomas this week:
"There's no doubt that the relationship 'Thommo' and I have is not what it used to be. What it used to be was 'bosom buddies' . . . There was a difference of opinion on that (South Africa) issue, among others, and it was vigorous."
Thomas on Butterss this week:
"We don't clash or hit head-on or butt heads because we don't really discuss anything.
Publish date: Tuesday, March 17, 2005
Our best is yet
to come......
to come......
- Saints Premiers 2008
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4335
- Joined: Thu 27 Oct 2005 11:21pm
- Location: Brisbane
- super dooper
- Club Player
- Posts: 858
- Joined: Sat 20 Mar 2004 12:24am
Re: Archie Says Gardi is fit/ New Physio and Team Doctor!!!.
ill believe it when i see it with my eyes, we've been told too many lies re injuries over the past few seasons, hopefully NAB cup rd 1 he is there, that to me says he would be fit, after all he hasnt played for nearly 2 years, so he would need all the practise games he can getsaintsRrising wrote:Archie Fraser just said on SEN that Gardiner was shaping up well and that the medical reports are good.
Expects him to play from start of the season.
Great News!!!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1636
- Joined: Wed 29 Mar 2006 5:24pm
- Location: Sunshine, Vic
Gardi being right now will mean nothing if he has broken down again during the pre season. Hope he will stay right, but u cant deny question marks still hang over him.
Trust the Midas Touch
"My heart is at St.Kilda, I've been here seven years, I only wanted to play for them." (Fraser Gehrig, 27/11/2007)
"My heart is at St.Kilda, I've been here seven years, I only wanted to play for them." (Fraser Gehrig, 27/11/2007)
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6656
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:24pm
- Location: Hotel Bastardos
- Has thanked: 198 times
- Been thanked: 166 times
- Contact:
There are several good breakfast beers on the market. I recommend a Carlsburg Elephant.rexy wrote:Wouldnt have thought Gardiner had a bed time off season, would have thought he could stay up all night if he wanted too.
When I am on annual leave sometimes I have a beer at 10 in the morning
*Allegedly.
Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.
You can't un-fry things.
Last Post
Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.
You can't un-fry things.
Last Post
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Sun 26 Mar 2006 1:03am
- Location: Eagles Nest
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: Fri 29 Oct 2004 1:01pm
- Has thanked: 91 times
- Been thanked: 162 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
well what sort of crap would we be in if RB was still uncontrolling our club?spert wrote:Anyway, lets hope we get some quality game time out of Gardi and also I'm still waiting for the new sponsors that Westaway had lined up, the sponsors who wouldn't come near the old board..we're waiting.
My guess we'd down to about zero admin staff.
...or Haywards 5000 (7%+). Excellent with bacon and eggs. I have a beer first thing in the morning everyday I'm not working.satchmo wrote:There are several good breakfast beers on the market. I recommend a Carlsburg Elephant.rexy wrote:Wouldnt have thought Gardiner had a bed time off season, would have thought he could stay up all night if he wanted too.
When I am on annual leave sometimes I have a beer at 10 in the morning
Just hope Gardi doesn't!!!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6656
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:24pm
- Location: Hotel Bastardos
- Has thanked: 198 times
- Been thanked: 166 times
- Contact:
Is that you Mummy ???nicola69 wrote:...or Haywards 5000 (7%+). Excellent with bacon and eggs. I have a beer first thing in the morning everyday I'm not working.satchmo wrote:There are several good breakfast beers on the market. I recommend a Carlsburg Elephant.rexy wrote:Wouldnt have thought Gardiner had a bed time off season, would have thought he could stay up all night if he wanted too.
When I am on annual leave sometimes I have a beer at 10 in the morning
Just hope Gardi doesn't!!!
*Allegedly.
Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.
You can't un-fry things.
Last Post
Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.
You can't un-fry things.
Last Post
- Saints Premiers 2008
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4335
- Joined: Thu 27 Oct 2005 11:21pm
- Location: Brisbane
i dont expect him to be however he should be good foil for steven kingvacuous space wrote:Even if he does play, he's had a long layoff and is coming back from multiple foot surgeries on the back of multiple knee surgeries. He's unlikely to be anywhere near the dominant force he used to be.
i have always been admirer of his arrogance on the field...bring it to the saints...yes please!!
"It's a work in progress," Lyon said.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10598
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
- Location: North
- Has thanked: 1011 times
- Been thanked: 1055 times
Ben Cousins NO games for the next fifty years, so farking what???Lynch Beast wrote:Michael S. Gardiner
18 games in the past 4 seasons
I wouldn't get your hopes up saints fans, I would love to see him get through a full year but so many times he failed to do it.
I'm sorry, you've gone through all the trouble to find out what this actually says and it really is quite insignificant.