Dean Cox a Saint in 2008

[insidesource]

That's right. And full credit should go to the new board for arranging this, and keeping it under wraps. Well done Greg Westaway. A very good deal too in my opinion!

[Teflon]

I'll have what bens having thanks.

[dascman]

Spam alert.

http://carltonfc.com.au/Season2007/News ... wsId=52332

[Dal_Santos_Gal]

Ok before anyone shots the new poster for posting this.
lets run with this ....so you say we are getting Dean Cox?

What are we giving up in return?

[insidesource]

wow it didn't take long for the ferals to post it up. i know being involved with the judd trade is sleeping with the enemy, but hey, we get to enjoy a big cox!

[insidesource]

http://carltonfc.com.au/Season2007/News ... wsId=52332

It's all there as Dascman pointed out.

But that has errors. we gave up gwilt and our first round pick.

[Dal_Santos_Gal]

Spam alert.

http://carltonfc.com.au/Season2007/News ... wsId=52332

LMAO ... for Gwilt.... thats the funnist page I have ever seen ...

[insidesource]

Spam alert.

http://carltonfc.com.au/Season2007/News ... wsId=52332

LMAO ... for Gwilt.... thats the funnist page I have ever seen ...

It's no joke. Cox will be confirmed tomorrow. It is for Gwilt and our first rounder.

[Teflon]

thats gotta be cr@p surely.

[mad saint guy]

But that has errors. we gave up gwilt and our first round pick.

And Montagna and Gilbert and Watts and Armitage and pick 26?

Yeah, I'd believe that.

[insidesource]

well unless the AFL are playing a hoax or someone has cracked what would probably be a multi million dollar telstra security system, I'm pretty sure it's real.

But as I said, it has an error. we obviously didn't give up gwilt for cox, it was gwilt and our first rounder for cox with an exchange of some late picks. but in such a weak draft it's essentially gwilt and 9 for Cox

[Dal_Santos_Gal]

Spam alert.

http://carltonfc.com.au/Season2007/News ... wsId=52332

LMAO ... for Gwilt.... thats the funnist page I have ever seen ...

It's no joke. Cox will be confirmed tomorrow. It is for Gwilt and our first rounder.

As much as I would love to have a big fat Cox in my side LOL
lets just come back and chat about this in 24 hours time alright.
I am finding it VERY hard to believe at the moment.

[Teflon]

well unless the AFL are playing a hoax or someone has cracked what would probably be a multi million dollar telstra security system, I'm pretty sure it's real.

But as I said, it has an error. we obviously didn't give up gwilt for cox, it was gwilt and our first rounder for cox with an exchange of some late picks. but in such a weak draft it's essentially gwilt and 9 for Cox

is that ure only sauce? trade tracker???

[insidesource]

well unless the AFL are playing a hoax or someone has cracked what would probably be a multi million dollar telstra security system, I'm pretty sure it's real.

But as I said, it has an error. we obviously didn't give up gwilt for cox, it was gwilt and our first rounder for cox with an exchange of some late picks. but in such a weak draft it's essentially gwilt and 9 for Cox

is that ure only sauce? trade tracker???

no. not at all. i didn't post the link initially as you will see from the thread. it wasn't meant to even be up till tomorrow, it was meant to be confirmed at a press conference.

[Teflon]

well unless the AFL are playing a hoax or someone has cracked what would probably be a multi million dollar telstra security system, I'm pretty sure it's real.

But as I said, it has an error. we obviously didn't give up gwilt for cox, it was gwilt and our first rounder for cox with an exchange of some late picks. but in such a weak draft it's essentially gwilt and 9 for Cox

is that ure only sauce? trade tracker???

no. not at all. i didn't post the link initially as you will see from the thread. it wasn't meant to even be up till tomorrow, it was meant to be confirmed at a press conference.

cmon mate seriously reckon Eagles would look at 9 and Gwilt for Cox?

youve had your spam fun now give us break....we'll be flat out landing Blake.

[Iratedebate]

no. not at all. i didn't post the link initially as you will see from the thread. it wasn't meant to even be up till tomorrow, it was meant to be confirmed at a press conference.

[insidesource]

well unless the AFL are playing a hoax or someone has cracked what would probably be a multi million dollar telstra security system, I'm pretty sure it's real.

But as I said, it has an error. we obviously didn't give up gwilt for cox, it was gwilt and our first rounder for cox with an exchange of some late picks. but in such a weak draft it's essentially gwilt and 9 for Cox

is that ure only sauce? trade tracker???

no. not at all. i didn't post the link initially as you will see from the thread. it wasn't meant to even be up till tomorrow, it was meant to be confirmed at a press conference.

cmon mate seriously reckon Eagles would look at 9 and Gwilt for Cox?

youve had your spam fun now give us break....we'll be flat out landing Blake.

it's part of the judd deal. we exchanged later picks.

at the end of the day,

West Coast have ended up with three first round picks (including 3 and 9), Fevola, and another player for Judd and Cox. The Cox desire to move hasn't been given much coverage as yet.

[barks4eva]

But do we really need him?

afterall we already have Rix and Blake

gotta be having a lend

[Dal_Santos_Gal]

I am still laughing at that carlton page... Cox for Gwilty....

I am with Teffers on this one... we are flat out going for blake
If we were getting Cox we wouldn't be offering Blake in excess of 800,000 over 3 years.


Yes but Carlton said today that the trade for Judd was not involving a 3rd party..

[Saints Premiers 2008]

I am still laughing at that carlton page... Cox for Gwilty....

I am with Teffers on this one... we are flat out going for blake
If we were getting Cox we wouldn't be offering Blake in excess of 800,000 over 3 years.


Yes but Carlton said today that the trade for Judd was not involving a 3rd party..

yes but then again this is carlton

i am find it very very hard to believe but if i happens i will laugh...

does anyone know who teflon really is??? has anyone met him/her???

[n1ck]

Dont think anyones met him SP2006, wonder why?

Anyway, im shattered about Gwilty. This kid will be a superstar, cant believe we're letting him go for an over the hill rookie listed ruckman.

[Teflon]

and the first with the scoop is trade tracker????

righto mate...

[OneEyedSainter77]

Blake? Really, do you think he'd want to come here? That's one I haven't heard of. Honestly, I didn't thikn we'd be figuring in trade week at all.

[Saints Premiers 2008]

Dont think anyones met him SP2006, wonder why?

Anyway, im shattered about Gwilty. This kid will be a superstar, cant believe we're letting him go for an over the hill rookie listed ruckman.

i agree...i wonder why...

it could be interesting if it was found out who teflon was...

[Sam23]

Apparently Blake has signed on for the Cats today. Was a snippet about it on SEN and I think channel 9 news.

Cats trying to land a late second/early third round DP for King.