Trade Week (Updated - Mattner to Swans 4:40pm Tues)
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- SaintDippa
- Club Player
- Posts: 875
- Joined: Sun 20 Aug 2006 10:28pm
- Location: Mean Streets of Ringwood North
- Has thanked: 187 times
- Been thanked: 116 times
- Scoop
- Club Player
- Posts: 807
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 10:29pm
- Location: On a New Street Corner
- Has thanked: 519 times
- Been thanked: 43 times
My mail is that pick 9 won't be traded.evertonfc wrote:Hard to believe they'd offer up Schneider, my mail says it's very unlikely, but if he is up for grabs, I'd hope we're all over it.
My offer would be Pick 9 for Schneider straight out...
Extra! Extra! Read all about it......no I don't want to read about it anymore!!!
- SaintDippa
- Club Player
- Posts: 875
- Joined: Sun 20 Aug 2006 10:28pm
- Location: Mean Streets of Ringwood North
- Has thanked: 187 times
- Been thanked: 116 times
- BelfastSaint
- Club Player
- Posts: 1335
- Joined: Wed 14 Apr 2004 9:53pm
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23247
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 741 times
- Been thanked: 1800 times
- Animal Enclosure
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2364
- Joined: Mon 04 Apr 2005 2:37pm
- Location: Saints Footy Central
And rightfully so...Scoop wrote:My mail is that pick 9 won't be traded.evertonfc wrote:Hard to believe they'd offer up Schneider, my mail says it's very unlikely, but if he is up for grabs, I'd hope we're all over it.
My offer would be Pick 9 for Schneider straight out...
Get David Myers, Rioli or one of the top 5 mids that will inevitably drop down a few picks.
Grab one of the athletic key defenders with pick 26 (Tayte Pears, etc), trade the 3rd rounder for Ben McKinley and draft the best remaining ruckman with the 4th rounder.
- borderbarry
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6676
- Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
- Location: Wodonga
- mad saint guy
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7087
- Joined: Tue 26 Jul 2005 9:44pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 52 times
- Been thanked: 367 times
- Scoop
- Club Player
- Posts: 807
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 10:29pm
- Location: On a New Street Corner
- Has thanked: 519 times
- Been thanked: 43 times
mad saint guy wrote:Unless Justin Sherman requests a trade I don't think we should give pick 9 away.
Would trade pick 26 for
Schneider
Buchanan
McMahon
Wood
Judd
Johnstone
Pettifer
Would trade a late draft pick for
King
Miller
McDonald
Extra! Extra! Read all about it......no I don't want to read about it anymore!!!
- sax
- Club Player
- Posts: 976
- Joined: Tue 29 Nov 2005 10:19pm
- Location: Barossa Valley
- Been thanked: 1 time
Schneider 17 FF, 21 FA
Buchanan 14 FF, 21 FA.
Compared to Riewoldt 45 FF, 10 FA!
Yeh.... Heaps of free kicks!
Our own skips a protected species!!! (As he should be)
Buchanan 14 FF, 21 FA.
Compared to Riewoldt 45 FF, 10 FA!
Yeh.... Heaps of free kicks!
Our own skips a protected species!!! (As he should be)
Last edited by sax on Mon 08 Oct 2007 10:52pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Animal Enclosure
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2364
- Joined: Mon 04 Apr 2005 2:37pm
- Location: Saints Footy Central
Probably helps that Roo is a leading forward who spends most games out in front of his opponent. Get's his arms chopped at practically every contest. It is hard to give frees away when you're in front of your man!sax wrote:Schneider 17 FF, 21 FA
Buchanan 14 FF, 21 FA.
Compared to Riewoldt 45 FF, 10 FA!
Yeh.... Heaps of free kicks!
Our own skips a protected species!!! (As he should be)
- Oh When the Saints
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5621
- Joined: Wed 29 Mar 2006 4:25pm
- Location: QLD
- Contact:
Schenider is 23, and has played 98 games.
In 2007, he averaged 15 disposals, 5 marks and 1.3 goals per game. He polled 0 Brownlow votes.
Buchanan is 25 and has played 88 games.
In 2007, her averaged 18 disposals, 5 marks and 0.4 goals per game. He polled 5 Brownlow votes.
Both are good players ... Buchanan is better though.
I would straight away give up #26 for either, and possibly #9.
In 2007, he averaged 15 disposals, 5 marks and 1.3 goals per game. He polled 0 Brownlow votes.
Buchanan is 25 and has played 88 games.
In 2007, her averaged 18 disposals, 5 marks and 0.4 goals per game. He polled 5 Brownlow votes.
Both are good players ... Buchanan is better though.
I would straight away give up #26 for either, and possibly #9.
They should only play AFL games now when it's raining. Slow games of footy are so much better to watch.
- Armoooo
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7281
- Joined: Sun 26 Nov 2006 2:28pm
- Location: The Great South East
- Contact:
I think we would be VERY happy with that dealsax wrote:I think we should keep pick 9.
But what if Sydney would take 9 & 26 for Buchanan AND Schneider.
Would we be happy with that deal.
(It'd probably never happen)
ROBERT HARVEY A.K.A The Great Man, Banger, Harves, Ol' Man River...
384 games, 4 B&F's, 3 EJ Whitten Medals, St.Kilda Captain, 2 Time Brownlow Medalist, 8 Time All Australian, 2nd Highest Brownlow votes poller.... The greatest of ALL TIME!!
384 games, 4 B&F's, 3 EJ Whitten Medals, St.Kilda Captain, 2 Time Brownlow Medalist, 8 Time All Australian, 2nd Highest Brownlow votes poller.... The greatest of ALL TIME!!
- evertonfc
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7262
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 9:11pm
- Location: 'Quietly Confident' County
- Has thanked: 115 times
- Been thanked: 267 times
- Contact:
Disagree - Schenider is a match-winner already, Buchanan isn't quite there yet...Oh When the Saints wrote:Schenider is 23, and has played 98 games.
In 2007, he averaged 15 disposals, 5 marks and 1.3 goals per game. He polled 0 Brownlow votes.
Buchanan is 25 and has played 88 games.
In 2007, her averaged 18 disposals, 5 marks and 0.4 goals per game. He polled 5 Brownlow votes.
Both are good players ... Buchanan is better though.
would straight away give up #26 for either, and possibly #9.
Schneider averages over a goal a game; Buchanan averages a goal every second game. I reckon the goals both of them kick are almost worth two goals - they're always on the run, and they kick team and crowd lifting goals, Schneider in particular.
Schneider's 23; Buchanan is 25. I'd say their age also reflects that Schneider can probably improve as a footballer, regardless of whether he stays or goes.
I feel Buchanan, to reach his potential, will need a change of scenery.
In spite of all that, if we can get either for a second round pick, it would be sensational...
And yes, I'd do 9 & 26 for both of them. They'd give our running power the biggest boost you could imagine. Dare I say it, but if we could get either Gardiner fit or bring in a decent ruckman....I'd be very quickly re-assessing our chances of success in 2008.
And I'm sure we could pick up a few late gems in the draft and rookie draft, too.
*Giddy at the thought of seeing goal-kicking midfielders in St Kilda jumpers*
Clueless and mediocre petty tyrant.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1928
- Joined: Sun 22 May 2005 11:42pm
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 90 times
Thank the Lord RL is coach and not some posters on this forum...
We would be barney bananas to trade either of our first two picks for anything other than an outstanding (read ridiculous) deal.
In the 95-97 period we kept our picks and ended up with Jones, Smith, Brown, Lappin et al.
In Timmy's reign we opted for recycled players and subsequently have a dearth of players around the age of 27.
Trade away your picks, trade away your future...
Take a look at the list Hawthorn are putting together and you'll get an indication of why giving away high picks for the likes of recycled hacks is mindless...
We would be barney bananas to trade either of our first two picks for anything other than an outstanding (read ridiculous) deal.
In the 95-97 period we kept our picks and ended up with Jones, Smith, Brown, Lappin et al.
In Timmy's reign we opted for recycled players and subsequently have a dearth of players around the age of 27.
Trade away your picks, trade away your future...
Take a look at the list Hawthorn are putting together and you'll get an indication of why giving away high picks for the likes of recycled hacks is mindless...
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 513
- Joined: Fri 22 Jun 2007 2:34pm
- n1ck
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9871
- Joined: Sun 08 Aug 2004 2:28am
- Location: Clarinda
- Has thanked: 78 times
- Been thanked: 91 times
ST KILDA
General manager football development Tony Elshaug:
"It's a day to get a bit of an understanding about the requirements of each club. I think it's basically a lot of housekeeping and just making sure everyone is up to speed with who's on the list and who's off the list at this stage, what rookies have been promoted and what clubs are looking for."
On Lions ruckman Cameron Wood: "No [we won't be chasing him]. I think all the clubs are looking for ruckmen. I think if you've got one or two strong ruckmen at your club, you've got a better chance of being successful. That's been proven with [Brad] Ottens, [Brendon] Lade, [Steven] King and [Dean] Brogan. You need two strong ruckmen to win a premiership, so if you aren't looking down that road, you've got to have something else special going in your team. I think everyone is looking for that sort of player if they can, but they might not be there."
On Steven King: "If someone mentions his name and talks to us about him, we'll take it on board and go back and have a talk about it. [We're not worried about King's age as] we took Matthew Clarke last year at 34 years old."
General manager football development Tony Elshaug:
"It's a day to get a bit of an understanding about the requirements of each club. I think it's basically a lot of housekeeping and just making sure everyone is up to speed with who's on the list and who's off the list at this stage, what rookies have been promoted and what clubs are looking for."
On Lions ruckman Cameron Wood: "No [we won't be chasing him]. I think all the clubs are looking for ruckmen. I think if you've got one or two strong ruckmen at your club, you've got a better chance of being successful. That's been proven with [Brad] Ottens, [Brendon] Lade, [Steven] King and [Dean] Brogan. You need two strong ruckmen to win a premiership, so if you aren't looking down that road, you've got to have something else special going in your team. I think everyone is looking for that sort of player if they can, but they might not be there."
On Steven King: "If someone mentions his name and talks to us about him, we'll take it on board and go back and have a talk about it. [We're not worried about King's age as] we took Matthew Clarke last year at 34 years old."
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1928
- Joined: Sun 22 May 2005 11:42pm
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 90 times
It's fair enough if you give up sod all to get him. I don't mind a risk (e.g. down trading pick 40 to pick 45) but not at the expense of a kid.On Steven King: "If someone mentions his name and talks to us about him, we'll take it on board and go back and have a talk about it. [We're not worried about King's age as] we took Matthew Clarke last year at 34 years old."
- evertonfc
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7262
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 9:11pm
- Location: 'Quietly Confident' County
- Has thanked: 115 times
- Been thanked: 267 times
- Contact:
Incorrect.suss wrote:Trade away your picks, trade away your future...
It's about balance.
McQualter, R Clarke, Ferguson, Howard and Armitage are some recent top 30 picks of ours.
Trading, if done correctly, isn't the scary beast people it is, and drafting isn't an exact science.
In fact, our recent recruiting has been highly questionable.
There's no hard and fast rule, unless you're rebuilding. My attitude is to be a frenzied hawk at trade week and investigate everything to see what the prices are. If you can cut an excellent deal, cut it. If you can't get at least 55-45 out of a deal, don't do it (unless being held to ransom by want-away player).
And if you can't cut the deal, so be it, you go to the draft.
I'm confident we can get him in a swap of picks.suss wrote:It's fair enough if you give up sod all to get him. I don't mind a risk (e.g. down trading pick 40 to pick 45) but not at the expense of a kid.On Steven King: "If someone mentions his name and talks to us about him, we'll take it on board and go back and have a talk about it. [We're not worried about King's age as] we took Matthew Clarke last year at 34 years old."
King and 51 for 42 would go close.
End result = we lose some ground with our third round pick, but pick up a ruckman who's proven at AFL level, is desperate for another go, and has just had a really impressive VFL and AFL grand finals (couldn't have hoped for more from him, really). Age and injuries are against him, but it now seems clear that he's getting his body back on track.
Clueless and mediocre petty tyrant.