Maguire to Hawthorn?

[StNoodles]

It's looking more and more likely from the whispers I hear, unfortunately. He had lunch with a senior Hawk today, who has been confident of getting him there for some time apparently.

What would we expect in return, realistically? They'd probably offer up something like Beau Dowler (potential FF) or Beau Muston (tough mid), though most here would expect more...

Disappointing if it eventuates, given it will be largely because of what we put on the table in terms of salary.

[Teflon]

Theyd wanna do a lot better than that or see ya at Richmond.

Roughead?

[Batnoe]

Franklin or nothing!!!

[saint66au]

Speculation...and any chance you can amend your thread title to give people a bit less heart trouble??? Ta

[SaintWodonga]

Surley he will stay?

I'd like their 1st round plus a player... But I don't want him to leave.

[brown-coat]

VANDENBURG!

[ausfatcat]

how many threads do we need on maguire being traded..


Also Hawthorn wont deal fairly (if true) they never do.

[satchmo]

Also Hawthorn wont deal fairly (if true) they never do.

Dealing is their speciality.

[StNoodles]

how many threads do we need on maguire being traded..


Also Hawthorn wont deal fairly (if true) they never do.

looked at 2 most recent pages and didn't see one. bound to be plenty of speculation until we know one way or the other.

true re the deal they'll offer though.

[Saints Premiers 2008]

pelchen is a tosser is if he does go to the hawks we are in a bit of a bother

if goose is going well simple...stuff you boy...

[ausfatcat]

how many threads do we need on maguire being traded..


Also Hawthorn wont deal fairly (if true) they never do.

looked at 2 most recent pages and didn't see one. bound to be plenty of speculation until we know one way or the other.

true re the deal they'll offer though.

http://www.saintsational.com/forum/view ... hp?t=35704


sticky up the top.

[battye]

Franklin or nothing!!!

Maguire + 2nd rounder -> Franklin would be fine.

[Dan Warna]

Franklin or nothing!!!

Maguire + 2nd rounder -> Franklin would be fine.

franklin may not be around next year according to some...

[vacuous space]

I'd love to have Mitch Thorp.

[maverick]

I'd love to have Mitch Thorp.

Me too

[plugger66]

I'd love to have Mitch Thorp.

Me too

As I have previously we cannot get him next year. @ years for newly drafted players.

[Saints Premiers 2008]

who could we realistically get???

noone really stands out

realistically here...not in some fancy dream world that some posters believe

we arent going to get any of franklin, roughhead, hodge, cant get thorp cause he is into his second year...who else is there

what i would trade for is first rounder plus player....maybe sewell???

chb's don't exactly grow on trees

[vacuous space]

As I have previously we cannot get him next year. @ years for newly drafted players.

So you can delist them, but you can't trade them? That's stupid if it's true. And why are they bringing this rule in after we blow two good picks on Barry Brooks?

[plugger66]

As I have previously we cannot get him next year. @ years for newly drafted players.

So you can delist them, but you can't trade them? That's stupid if it's true. And why are they bringing this rule in after we blow two good picks on Barry Brooks?

You cannot delist either and yes you are right the rule is only 3 years old. I think it is an excellent rule myself.

[fisher_fan]

Williams + pick 2 for Milne & Goose

Opens up room for another player, gets rid of Milne's contract, gives us the extra forward we need to now cover Hamill and Gehrig.

Kosi isn't required as much in the forward line and then watch him and Gardiner rotate.

Pick 9 avalible for choosing a young ruckman, or a CHB (although I believe my man Sam Fisher could do a good job) and our 2 second round picks to either trade away for a Haselby (with even more room in our cap) or pick up some more young kids.

And then more good news, Carlton don't get pick 9, Fevola has to stay or go to Richmond (who probably aren't interested) so Carlton get a disgruntled Fev.....

All dreaming and hypotheticals, this Hawthorn official is probably his Dad's friend who he met in town for a coffee...but I can see how it add's fuel to the fire.

And another Q what pick was Bartel in the National Draft????

[SaintWodonga]

[quote="plugger66"][/quote]

So plugger what is really going on with Goose then?

[plugger66]

Williams + pick 2 for Milne & Goose

Opens up room for another player, gets rid of Milne's contract, gives us the extra forward we need to now cover Hamill and Gehrig.

Kosi isn't required as much in the forward line and then watch him and Gardiner rotate.

Pick 9 avalible for choosing a young ruckman, or a CHB (although I believe my man Sam Fisher could do a good job) and our 2 second round picks to either trade away for a Haselby (with even more room in our cap) or pick up some more young kids.

And then more good news, Carlton don't get pick 9, Fevola has to stay or go to Richmond (who probably aren't interested) so Carlton get a disgruntled Fev.....

All dreaming and hypotheticals, this Hawthorn official is probably his Dad's friend who he met in town for a coffee...but I can see how it add's fuel to the fire.

And another Q what pick was Bartel in the National Draft????

So get rid of player that was third in the goalkicking and also with G gone that is about 100 goals and why would Hawthorn take Milne. Have they asked for him.

[sasaint]

And another Q what pick was Bartel in the National Draft????

Bartel was pick 8 in the 2002 super draft. We picked Ball at 2 and X Clarke at pick 5.

[vacuous space]

You cannot delist either and yes you are right the rule is only 3 years old. I think it is an excellent rule myself.

Tim Hutchison (Kangaroos) and Austin Lucy (Essendon) were both delisted after one year last year.

[plugger66]

So plugger what is really going on with Goose then?

Can honestly say I have no idea but I certainly hope he stays because we have lost a lot of experience as it is.