Which board will you support at the AGM? (As of Sep 2007)

ausfatcat · Post: # 455797Post **ausfatcat** » Fri 14 Sep 2007 12:28am

I voted as a undecided, but am firm in the burkie camp now.

Sam23 · Post: # 455803Post **Sam23** » Fri 14 Sep 2007 12:38am

imo take another poll now...

After around a week of developments, most would've decided one way or the other?

ausfatcat · Post: # 455806Post **ausfatcat** » Fri 14 Sep 2007 12:41am

in anther week I reckon

The Fireman · Fri 14 Sep 2007 9:39am

Sam23 wrote:imo take another poll now...

After around a week of developments, most would've decided one way or the other?

I agree... another poll.

SENsei · Post: # 455923Post **SENsei** » Fri 14 Sep 2007 10:27am

This poll is quoted today in the Herald Sun, Pulse page, FYI.

saintspremiers · Fri 14 Sep 2007 11:50am

This poll is somewhat meaningful....if RB and his cronies wanted their case to look better, why haven't they got all their mates/rellies to sign up to Saintsational and boost their 11 votes up a bit??

saintlee · Post: # 456124Post **saintlee** » Fri 14 Sep 2007 1:42pm

Can't happen quick enough and hope that the club can finially move forward as a united force

Agree, its about the only thing I am sure of in this board challenge saga

riccardo · Post: # 456125Post **riccardo** » Fri 14 Sep 2007 1:53pm

As Owen Hart once said: Enough is enough, and its time for a change!

Oh When the Saints · Fri 14 Sep 2007 6:32pm

I will start a second poll at the end of next week - we'll make it the 21st September.

After that, we'll have one every 3 weeks until the EGM.

MCG-Unit · Post: # 456496Post **MCG-Unit** » Fri 14 Sep 2007 10:58pm

I voted undecided, for now

aussierules0k · Tue 18 Sep 2007 12:28pm

Otiman · Post: # 458760Post **Otiman** » Tue 18 Sep 2007 12:42pm

129 votes (so far) vs 30,000 members. Not sure it's an accurate representation of Saints supporters.

Remember most of the information people will be receiving on this is through the media, and not going through lengthy discussions like the readers of SS.

ausfatcat · Post: # 459185Post **ausfatcat** » Tue 18 Sep 2007 7:10pm

Otiman wrote:129 votes (so far) vs 30,000 members. Not sure it's an accurate representation of Saints supporters.

Remember most of the information people will be receiving on this is through the media, and not going through lengthy discussions like the readers of SS.

of those 30000 members about 29000 are spam bot sign ups.

Otiman · Post: # 459374Post **Otiman** » Wed 19 Sep 2007 2:52am

Saints members, i mean.

luckysaint · Post: # 459591Post **luckysaint** » Wed 19 Sep 2007 2:15pm

LOL i can see the banter going on in 4-5 years time when the shoe is on the other foot. We'll see gifs of Westaway as a transformer "Deceptorcon", morphing from his usual human form into a truck with the name "Destructor". Oh how i can't wait for evolution of this club's petty political propaganda, within the framework of this forum, in the future!!!

bungiton · Post: # 459794Post **bungiton** » Wed 19 Sep 2007 6:00pm

poor Rod, undecided is polling better than him, mind you thats only a messianic stromtroopers rant

Garibaldi · Post: # 460319Post **Garibaldi** » Thu 20 Sep 2007 1:12pm

Im waiting for the "more information", I'll make my mind up very soon.
While change can be good it needs to be a good change.

hammers · Post: # 462151Post **hammers** » Sun 23 Sep 2007 9:33pm

What does everyone see in this FF conspiracy?
i don't think they have gone about it the right way..

Sam23 · Post: # 462575Post **Sam23** » Mon 24 Sep 2007 2:21pm

Oh When the Saints wrote:I will start a second poll at the end of next week - we'll make it the 21st September.

After that, we'll have one every 3 weeks until the EGM.

???

Now the 24th

Juggernaut · Post: # 465556Post **Juggernaut** » Fri 28 Sep 2007 3:17pm

After much thought I've just posted in my proxy form to SFF. I had been sitting on the fence unsure of who I would support but in the end I figured that in the best interests of the STKFC that there is a change of the board.
Even if RB and Co were to remain as the board it will still remain fractured and unstable. This is not condusive to attracting new sponsors, new members or even retaining members or sponsors that we have left

we the members have had had no communications from the RB camp at all. He seems to want to fight this on legal technicalities but it is the members decision as to who should run the club. In my eyes he has gone from what is in the best interests of the STKFC to what is in the best interests of the RBFC

What is hurting this club at the moment above all else is the instability that has engulfed it. The sooner the board battle is resolved the better for the club.

Saintlyone · Sun 30 Sep 2007 10:42pm

RB lost me when he ran to the AFL for support.

Nathan Burke said in response..."we are more interested in serving the rights and interests of the St.KFC ahead of the AFL".

Enough said !!!!

Ps. Also listening to some of the anti Saints First rants. Arent they the same people who carried on about getting a new coach and gauranteeing a top 4 finish. Time to push the Barks and Joffaboys of this site aside and let some sanity prevail !

Post: # 468022Post **n1ck** » Tue 02 Oct 2007 3:51pm

No need for this to be a sticky anymore.

Which board will you support at the AGM? (As of Sep 2007)

Who will you support at the AGM?