Cousins - we couldn't cope with him, even at half fitness

mullet · Post: # 442170Post **mullet** » Sat 25 Aug 2007 12:15am

plugger66 wrote:
JeffDunne wrote:Wasn't just the stat's that raised my eyebrows.

He looked pale and ill in the first qtr. Cold turkey might explain it.

After half time he was beaming. Not only that, but for a bloke that's missed so much football, there was no drop off in performance the longer the game went.

Interesting indeed.
crap

There will always be doubt though now wont there whether we like it or not

plugger66 · Post: # 442172Post **plugger66** » Sat 25 Aug 2007 12:15am

stinger wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
JeffDunne wrote:Wasn't just the stat's that raised my eyebrows.

He looked pale and ill in the first qtr. Cold turkey might explain it.

After half time he was beaming. Not only that, but for a bloke that's missed so much football, there was no drop off in performance the longer the game went.

Interesting indeed.
crap
fine he took drugs at half time. Makes sense. What rubbish

why is it crap....their coach is a flowering chemist ffs......

stinger · Post: # 442176Post **stinger** » Sat 25 Aug 2007 12:20am

JeffDunne wrote:What's crap plugger?

That he didn't look ill in the first half? Hardly sighted.

That he didn't look a million dollars after half time?

That he didn't look like the fitest bloke on the ground at the end of the game?

Please help me out here, I'm struggling with your insightful post.

as i said........interesting..........

i'm sure that there is a suspicion in some circles that he has taken drugs at half-time in the past.....

plugger66 · Post: # 442180Post **plugger66** » Sat 25 Aug 2007 12:22am

JeffDunne wrote:What's crap plugger?

That he didn't look ill in the first half? Hardly sighted.

That he didn't look a million dollars after half time?

That he didn't look like the fitest bloke on the ground at the end of the game?

Please help me out here, I'm struggling with your insightful post.

Well my post might not be insightful but yours is utter crap.

JeffDunne · Post: # 442185Post **JeffDunne** » Sat 25 Aug 2007 12:24am

You're really going out all there plugger.

Crap! Crap! Crap!

Insightful.

plugger66 · Post: # 442190Post **plugger66** » Sat 25 Aug 2007 12:25am

JeffDunne wrote:You're really going out all there plugger.

Crap! Crap! Crap!

Insightful.

What drugs are you on at the moment your posts have really improved since this morning.

stinger · Post: # 442191Post **stinger** » Sat 25 Aug 2007 12:25am

plugger66...the guy was taken off the ground in thje first half because he was either ill..or playing shithouse...which he was....he threw up three times.......the guys on the radio made a comment about it.......then he came back on and starred.............after being injured and out for one week with a strained hammie...?????????..give me a break......

snippa · Post: # 442194Post **snippa** » Sat 25 Aug 2007 12:27am

It's easy to look good when you virtually have no opponent.

Even I would have looked like a star tonight if Blake was my opponent

JeffDunne · Post: # 442195Post **JeffDunne** » Sat 25 Aug 2007 12:28am

plugger, I think you better get an early night.

You're really struggling.

plugger66 · Post: # 442196Post **plugger66** » Sat 25 Aug 2007 12:28am

stinger wrote:plugger66...the guy was taken off the ground in thje first half because he was either ill..or playing shithouse...which he was....he threw up three times.......the guys on the radio made a comment about it.......then he came back on and starred.............after being injured and out for one week with a strained hammie...?????????..give me a break......

Must be on drugs because he was sick 3 times. i have seen bakes throw up 5 times and still keep running. Do you realise how stupid it sounds when you say a player is on drugs because he got better.

JeffDunne · Post: # 442198Post **JeffDunne** » Sat 25 Aug 2007 12:28am

snippa wrote:It's easy to look good when you virtually have no opponent.

Even I would have looked like a star tonight if Blake was my opponent

JeffDunne · Post: # 442211Post **JeffDunne** » Sat 25 Aug 2007 12:31am

plugger66 wrote:Must be on drugs because he was sick 3 times. i have seen bakes throw up 5 times and still keep running. Do you realise how stupid it sounds when you say a player is on drugs because he got better.

It's not the throwing up I question. Hell that's pretty normal for a lot of blokes.

It was how he looked. He was pale, was running on the spot.

Something changed after half time. Maybe it was the oranges?

I'm not suggesting anything other than I hope he was tested.

Why does that bother you so much?

plugger66 · Post: # 442216Post **plugger66** » Sat 25 Aug 2007 12:33am

JeffDunne wrote:
plugger66 wrote:Must be on drugs because he was sick 3 times. i have seen bakes throw up 5 times and still keep running. Do you realise how stupid it sounds when you say a player is on drugs because he got better.
It's not the throwing up I question. Hell that's pretty normal for a lot of blokes.

It was how he looked. He was pale, was running on the spot.

Something changed after half time. Maybe it was the oranges?

I'm not suggesting anything other than I hope he was tested.

Why does that bother you so much?

Because I think it is an excuse that IMO is rubbish. Blake jut wasnt good enough to go with a champion. He was beaten fair and square.

stinger · Post: # 442218Post **stinger** » Sat 25 Aug 2007 12:33am

plugger66 wrote:. Do you realise how stupid it sounds when you say a player is on drugs because he got better.

do you know just how stupid your comment is.......

stinger · Post: # 442219Post **stinger** » Sat 25 Aug 2007 12:34am

and just where the f*** have i said that the little dipstick was on drugs.....

plugger66 · Post: # 442221Post **plugger66** » Sat 25 Aug 2007 12:35am

stinger wrote:
plugger66 wrote:. Do you realise how stupid it sounds when you say a player is on drugs because he got better.
do you know just how stupid your comment is.......

No.

mad saint guy · Sat 25 Aug 2007 12:35am

Cousins absolutely tore us apart and leaving Blake on him all day was just moronic. Blake was never within 5m of him, so if we're going to have an unaccountable opponent on Cousins then at least make it someone who can hurt West Coast going the other way.

stinger · Post: # 442224Post **stinger** » Sat 25 Aug 2007 12:35am

plugger66 wrote:
stinger wrote:
plugger66 wrote:. Do you realise how stupid it sounds when you say a player is on drugs because he got better.
do you know just how stupid your comment is.......

No.

why am i not surprised......

plugger66 · Post: # 442235Post **plugger66** » Sat 25 Aug 2007 12:37am

stinger wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
stinger wrote:
plugger66 wrote:. Do you realise how stupid it sounds when you say a player is on drugs because he got better.
do you know just how stupid your comment is.......

No.

why am i not surprised......

My comment is stupid but you basically say a person had performance enhancing drugs a half time when he is the most tested player in the AFL. Are you serious.

JeffDunne · Post: # 442241Post **JeffDunne** » Sat 25 Aug 2007 12:39am

mad saint guy wrote:Cousins absolutely tore us apart and leaving Blake on him all day was just moronic.

Maybe we should be drug testing Ross?

Teflon · Post: # 442243Post **Teflon** » Sat 25 Aug 2007 12:39am

Thread started well and was spot on.
Dragged into the most inane and stupid innuendo Ive heard in a long long time by the usual suspects....f@rk me it was Liegh Harvey Oswald administered Cousins cocktail at half time...what next....

stinger · Post: # 442244Post **stinger** » Sat 25 Aug 2007 12:39am

plugger66 wrote:
stinger wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
stinger wrote:
plugger66 wrote:. Do you realise how stupid it sounds when you say a player is on drugs because he got better.
do you know just how stupid your comment is.......

No.

why am i not surprised......
My comment is stupid but you basically say a person had performance enhancing drugs a half time when he is the most tested player in the AFL. Are you serious.

where have i said that....and yes...your comment is stupid......

plugger66 · Post: # 442246Post **plugger66** » Sat 25 Aug 2007 12:39am

Teflon wrote:Thread started well and was spot on.
Dragged into the most inane and stupid innuendo Ive heard in a long long time by the usual suspects....f@rk me it was Liegh Harvey Oswald administered Cousins cocktail at half time...what next....

Teffers we agree. I have marked down the date and time.

stinger · Post: # 442247Post **stinger** » Sat 25 Aug 2007 12:40am

Teflon wrote:Thread started well and was spot on.
Dragged into the most inane and stupid innuendo Ive heard in a long long time by the usual suspects....f@rk me it was Liegh Harvey Oswald administered Cousins cocktail at half time...what next....

your the only usual suspect on here

QueenC · Post: # 442248Post **QueenC** » Sat 25 Aug 2007 12:40am

Teflon wrote:Thread started well and was spot on.
Dragged into the most inane and stupid innuendo Ive heard in a long long time by the usual suspects....f@rk me it was Liegh Harvey Oswald administered Cousins cocktail at half time...what next....

I agree with Teflon.......

If you want to think the absolute worst of him or anyone else for that matter then you are always going to, and no matter what he does good, bad or indifferent, you will never change your mind. That is your right.

But to through accusations around, even with or because of the reputation Cousins has, because of innuendo and your own personal suspicion rather than fact can be very dangerous in this world.

Or maybe some people just want it to be that he has slipped. It might make them feel better or something. Personally for his own sake I actually hope that he is able to stay clean.