Anti-Saints tribunal decisions

[Brewer]

Thought it might be interesting to collect together some of those obviously farked up tribunal decisions where we have copped it, perhaps along with some examples of how it seems to work when it is the other way round?

Maybe give the media a nice shortlist to consider.

I'll kick us off with a couple of obvious ones:

Barry Hall v Matthew Maguire (2005)
Brad Scott v Lenny Hayes (2002)
Matt Scarlett v Nick Riewoldt (2004)
Matt Whelan v Luke Ball (2007)

[Krikkett]

Thought it might be interesting to collect together some of those obviously farked up tribunal decisions where we have copped it, perhaps along with some examples of how it seems to work when it is the other way round?

Maybe give the media a nice shortlist to consider.

I'll kick us off with a couple of obvious ones:

Barry Hall v Matthew Maguire (2005)
Brad Scott v Lenny Hayes (2002)
Matt Scarlett v Nick Riewoldt (2004)
Matt Whelan v Luke Ball (2007)

You should name this thread "Conspiracy Theorists of the world Unite!"

...this is getting a bit silly don't you think?

[milney044]

the other way round..hmm..how about the tummy taps to frase and bakes for a start..

[1989 saint]

Jonothan Brown v Jason Blake (2004)
Fraser Gherig V collingwood scum - love tap (2005)

[Iceman234]

Thought it might be interesting to collect together some of those obviously farked up tribunal decisions where we have copped it, perhaps along with some examples of how it seems to work when it is the other way round?

Maybe give the media a nice shortlist to consider.

I'll kick us off with a couple of obvious ones:

Barry Hall v Matthew Maguire (2005)
Brad Scott v Lenny Hayes (2002)
Matt Scarlett v Nick Riewoldt (2004)
Matt Whelan v Luke Ball (2007)

You should name this thread "Conspiracy Theorists of the world Unite!"

...this is getting a bit silly don't you think?

Ummm no actually.

FOFF Kirkett

[cowboy18]

the other way round..hmm..how about the tummy taps to frase and bakes for a start..

That's an attempted tummy tap for Bakes young fella.


2 weeks.

[Gilbert The Great]

murphy and cant member other person V baker 2007

a love tap and a chest high bump

obviously the new rule is Baker isnt allowed to touch anyone

[Saints-06-Premiers]

Baker for the kicking and attempting to strike
I'm sure theres more bullshti calls as well

[BakesFan]

"Dyslexics of the world; UNTIE!!"
Seeing as the tribunal is joke, I thought I'd join in.

[Krikkett]

Thought it might be interesting to collect together some of those obviously farked up tribunal decisions where we have copped it, perhaps along with some examples of how it seems to work when it is the other way round?

Maybe give the media a nice shortlist to consider.

I'll kick us off with a couple of obvious ones:

Barry Hall v Matthew Maguire (2005)
Brad Scott v Lenny Hayes (2002)
Matt Scarlett v Nick Riewoldt (2004)
Matt Whelan v Luke Ball (2007)

You should name this thread "Conspiracy Theorists of the world Unite!"

...this is getting a bit silly don't you think?

Ummm no actually.

FOFF Kirkett

AWWWW...did I disagree with you sweetie?

Deal with it, there is no conspiracy...which is going against the strange theme of this forum.

[Dis Believer]

J Brown (Bris) v's Jason Blake (around 2004)
Scott and Johnson vs Riewoldt's shoulder (2005)
Lloyd vs Thomson (or was it Hayes?)(I was trying to handball like robert harvey)
Alessio v's Bakes ankle
Bakes "attempted" striking
Fraser's "tummy tap"

The list is like my Johnson - long and distinguished and all are within about the last 5 or 6 years. It is beyond a joke and this is the final straw. If the admin don't pursue avery avenue available to have this rubbish overturned, I will sign a petition for a spill of the board.

[Iceman234]

Thought it might be interesting to collect together some of those obviously farked up tribunal decisions where we have copped it, perhaps along with some examples of how it seems to work when it is the other way round?

Maybe give the media a nice shortlist to consider.

I'll kick us off with a couple of obvious ones:

Barry Hall v Matthew Maguire (2005)
Brad Scott v Lenny Hayes (2002)
Matt Scarlett v Nick Riewoldt (2004)
Matt Whelan v Luke Ball (2007)

You should name this thread "Conspiracy Theorists of the world Unite!"

...this is getting a bit silly don't you think?

Ummm no actually.

FOFF Kirkett

AWWWW...did I disagree with you sweetie?

Deal with it, there is no conspiracy...which is going against the strange theme of this forum.

Oops sorry bout the name bytch.

Thought u were Kirky's waterboy.

FOFF anyway precious.

[midas_touch]

Stafford on Blake in 2004 also comes to mind. Practically broke Blake's back.

To do with Freo, Des Headland's 5 match ban getting overturned early this season.

[Verdun66]

The Hayes into the fence one took the biscuit. This has got beyond a joke. I was at the Gabba when they got into Roo. Rough? Surely not.

Just shows they make it up as they go along. No precedent, no credibility.

[fugazi]

GIANSIRACUSA vs KOSI

[Life Long Saint]

Stafford on Blake in 2004 also comes to mind. Practically broke Blake's back.

To be fair...Stafford copped weeks for that!

[Behind Play]

The Giansiracusa incident may have been within the 5 meter perameter, and i am certain that Giansiracusa did not deliberately mean to fracture Kosi's skull.....just as Bakes did not mean to break Farmer's nose, but why wasn't Gian. charged with a reckless act. His block caused Kosi and sever injury.

St. Kilda Football club do something about this or the back lash will be to your detriment.

[Liam_G]

Behind Play, I believe they only brought in the "If you make head high contact, even accidentally, the onus is now on you" stuff this year due to incidents like the Kosi/Gian clash. Unfortunately for us, The AFL screwed themselves by not acting upon their own new rules in Round 1, when Whelan laid what was arguably a fair bump in play on Luke Ball, but still caused a head injury to his opponent. This is the exact type of incident their new rules were designed for, yet they set an early season precedent by doing jack all. 20 rounds later, they decide to invoke it.....