I’m not writing this off like a lot of others are.
I can recall two occasions where the club used our first round picks to prioritise the “types” of players we apparently needed against the best players available.
First, picks 7 and 8 on Clark and Coffield.
Second and perhaps the worst use of a number 1 pick yet - McCartin over Petracca.
We’ve tried horses for courses, it hasn’t worked, so I have no issue with taking the best player available.
Taking players you need vs. the best players available
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
SydneySainter
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2428
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2007 6:59pm
- Has thanked: 54 times
- Been thanked: 160 times
-
B.M
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12763
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2719 times
Re: Taking players you need vs. the best players available
Best available
But don’t glut some positions
But don’t glut some positions
-
The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14060
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1315 times
- Been thanked: 2093 times
Re: Taking players you need vs. the best players available
Trade up / back / out, get the ‘best available’ and what you need, don’t just settle for one.
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.