Apologies to Terry Wallace
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2540
- Joined: Mon 27 Jun 2005 1:27pm
- Location: Abiding
- Has thanked: 173 times
- Been thanked: 385 times
Apologies to Terry Wallace
If Tim Membrey goes to Collingwood I’ll fair dinkum spew up
" A few will never give up on you. When you go back out on the field, those are the people I want in your minds. Those are the people I want in your hearts."
— Coach Eric Taylor - Friday Night Lights
— Coach Eric Taylor - Friday Night Lights
- bobmurray
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7935
- Joined: Mon 03 Oct 2005 11:08pm
- Location: In the stand at RSEA Park.
- Has thanked: 549 times
- Been thanked: 253 times
Re: Apologies to Terry Wallace
What if Collingwood get both Hayes and Membrey.
McCrae has said, i don't want draft picks, i want players !
McCrae has said, i don't want draft picks, i want players !
How many defenders will The Saints pick in the 2024 draft ?
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 998
- Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 10:39am
- Has thanked: 62 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
Re: Apologies to Terry Wallace
McCrae is committed to having one last roll of the dice before he goes into full rebuild mode.
It looks like he has decided that he won't be mired in the middle of the pack and that brining in Membrey may give his forward line a lift.
It is good for Collingwood that they seem to have committed to a strategy.
We don't seem to have committed to a single strategy at this stage it looks like we are running with this pointless dual narrative which will lead us nowhere in my opinion.
If we don't bring in any more over the hill players, like Macrae, and don't do anything silly with the picks we have I may change my opinion on what our strategy is.
It looks like he has decided that he won't be mired in the middle of the pack and that brining in Membrey may give his forward line a lift.
It is good for Collingwood that they seem to have committed to a strategy.
We don't seem to have committed to a single strategy at this stage it looks like we are running with this pointless dual narrative which will lead us nowhere in my opinion.
If we don't bring in any more over the hill players, like Macrae, and don't do anything silly with the picks we have I may change my opinion on what our strategy is.
- Otiman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8781
- Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005 11:09pm
- Location: Elsewhere
- Has thanked: 203 times
- Been thanked: 660 times
Re: Apologies to Terry Wallace
Our drafting and trading strategy are pretty clear over the last few years, it's clearly focused on youth. The 'dual narrative' is just about not bottoming out and losing members. The last few premierships have shown you don't need to get multiple top 3 picks to win a flag.
We just need to not get greedy and pay overs for established players. Market value for McRae should be the equivalent of picks 30-45.
We just need to not get greedy and pay overs for established players. Market value for McRae should be the equivalent of picks 30-45.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 998
- Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 10:39am
- Has thanked: 62 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
Re: Apologies to Terry Wallace
I understand what the dual narrative is however I don't understand how it will be successful for St Kilda.
We are not Geelong, Carlton, Collingwood or one of the other desirable destinations who can target the players they want and get them to support that approach.
We are also not Sydney or Brisbane who can bring in a handful of NGAs and FSs for drastically under their true value.
Guess what we are also neither GWS or GC who had so many FRDPs that they can simply keep trading some out to keep adding more high-end picks.
We have two ways to improve our list, one we overpay dramatically to get players in see Brad Hill or two we go to the draft and draft well.
Unfortunately, if you float around mid-table the probability of bringing in elite talent is diminished compared to the teams that have the 3 or 4 picks.
We are not Geelong, Carlton, Collingwood or one of the other desirable destinations who can target the players they want and get them to support that approach.
We are also not Sydney or Brisbane who can bring in a handful of NGAs and FSs for drastically under their true value.
Guess what we are also neither GWS or GC who had so many FRDPs that they can simply keep trading some out to keep adding more high-end picks.
We have two ways to improve our list, one we overpay dramatically to get players in see Brad Hill or two we go to the draft and draft well.
Unfortunately, if you float around mid-table the probability of bringing in elite talent is diminished compared to the teams that have the 3 or 4 picks.
- magnifisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8187
- Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
- Has thanked: 231 times
- Been thanked: 629 times
Re: Apologies to Terry Wallace
I thought his name was Terry Wallet. He got badly burnt by coaching.
In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in, they're eating the cats. They’re eating – they are eating the pets of the people that live there.
- Otiman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8781
- Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005 11:09pm
- Location: Elsewhere
- Has thanked: 203 times
- Been thanked: 660 times
Re: Apologies to Terry Wallace
Agreed, which is why we are raising hell around draft inequality.SinCitySainter wrote: ↑Wed 16 Oct 2024 11:40am Unfortunately, if you float around mid-table the probability of bringing in elite talent is diminished compared to the teams that have the 3 or 4 picks.
It's also obvious to me that unless it's a planned 'bottoming out' (ie Tanking), the gains do not outweigh the losses. Not just around supporters and memberships, but player development and club culture can both spiral out of control.