I’m not so sure this battle acquisition is such a good deal for the hawks. We know he’s a good player but $850k-$900k a season over 6 years? Seems a bit overs and will probably put them into cap trouble in a few years time as their list matures (Same goes with barass).They have several big names coming out of contract for the first time in 2027-2028. These will be prime targets for Tassie as they enter the competition.saintkid wrote: ↑Thu 29 Aug 2024 5:21pm Regardless of the offer, this is why we are a dumb club. Battle is a hard-bodied, strong defender, in his prime with no past serious injury history. They have targetted well and have a player that is likely to give several excellent years to them. He is a better player than Howard and they have made a wise decision, further improving a damn good list.
On the other hand, we paid a premium for Hill, who is not the type of player we desperately needed and absolutely stuffed up embarrassingly, without any common sense, on a cooked Hannebery.
Very, very disappointing. Wish it was Howard going but what 'smart' club would have wanted him?
Battle
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 687
- Joined: Mon 15 May 2017 7:18pm
- Has thanked: 50 times
- Been thanked: 91 times
Re: Battle
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Tue 22 Aug 2023 11:26pm
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 59 times
Re: Battle
Although not like-for-like I believe Houston is a better footballer than Battle, and I'd be content if we can land him (Houston) for Battle's compensation pick.
Adding Houston to the list would give us the best attacking half-back line in the competition with Sinclair, Wagnaneen, Hill and Dan Houston.
We'll just need to find a solid key defender.
Adding Houston to the list would give us the best attacking half-back line in the competition with Sinclair, Wagnaneen, Hill and Dan Houston.
We'll just need to find a solid key defender.
Re: Battle
Perhaps Saint Kid should put his alliance with the Kennet’s - including thru their upcoming Court case they have tried to bury
Battle does not wish to remain with St Kilda
St Kilda is therefore better off without him
We want committed players who stand on support of the Club and their teammates
Which distinguishes Hill from Battle
Battle does not wish to remain with St Kilda
St Kilda is therefore better off without him
We want committed players who stand on support of the Club and their teammates
Which distinguishes Hill from Battle
- saintkid
- Club Player
- Posts: 1804
- Joined: Tue 16 Sep 2008 12:30am
- Has thanked: 143 times
- Been thanked: 312 times
Re: Battle
Of course him choosing to leave is a slap in the face and it's easy to say good riddance to a player who doesn't want to stay and be loyal to the club who developed him.Killa wrote: ↑Thu 29 Aug 2024 6:25pm Perhaps Saint Kid should put his alliance with the Kennet’s - including thru their upcoming Court case they have tried to bury
Battle does not wish to remain with St Kilda
St Kilda is therefore better off without him
We want committed players who stand on support of the Club and their teammates
Which distinguishes Hill from Battle
Truth of the matter is though, he's going to be a big loss, we've been screwed here and the Hawks, who I have no feeling for whatsoever, are the big winners here, building on an already impressive playing list.
I also stand by the fact that Battle is a better player than Howard and it's very disappointing to lose him and seeing him turn his back on the club that made him the player he is.
- bobmurray
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7933
- Joined: Mon 03 Oct 2005 11:08pm
- Location: In the stand at RSEA Park.
- Has thanked: 548 times
- Been thanked: 252 times
Re: Battle
During these dates i would say...
2024 AFL Trade Period calendar
Oct 4 - AFL Free Agency opens
Oct 7 - AFL Trade Period opens
Oct 11 - AFL Free Agency closes
Oct 16 - AFL Trade Period closes
How many defenders will The Saints pick in the 2024 draft ?
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3385
- Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
- Has thanked: 172 times
- Been thanked: 519 times
Re: Battle
Throw enough darts with your eyes closed eventually one will hit the target and everyone forgets about all the others. If good at your job means less than a 50% strike rate then yes - Marshall wanted out remember...Moods wrote: ↑Thu 29 Aug 2024 5:39pmThe same bloke who weeks ago reported that Petracca wanted out? Waay before anyone else had cottoned on? He may be a knob, but he’s good at his jobolder saint wrote: ↑Thu 29 Aug 2024 5:05pmThe way you know Tom Morris is talking rubbish is when sound comes from his mouth. Got chip on his shoulder after RL called him out at the press conference.silverhalo wrote: ↑Thu 29 Aug 2024 4:57pm Nine’s Tom Morris reported the Hawks’ offer accepted by Battle was less lucrative than the Saints’ bid which virtually rules out that Band 1 compo it seems.
So disappointing....
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19154
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1609 times
- Been thanked: 2030 times
Re: Battle
Can Hooston play wing?Big Max wrote: ↑Thu 29 Aug 2024 6:17pm Although not like-for-like I believe Houston is a better footballer than Battle, and I'd be content if we can land him (Houston) for Battle's compensation pick.
Adding Houston to the list would give us the best attacking half-back line in the competition with Sinclair, Wagnaneen, Hill and Dan Houston.
We'll just need to find a solid key defender.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 547
- Joined: Sun 07 Jan 2007 4:18pm
- Location: Derby, West Kimberley WA
- Has thanked: 827 times
- Been thanked: 160 times
Re: Battle
I don't know how you can come to that particular conclusion, Hill walked away from a WA team.Killa wrote: ↑Thu 29 Aug 2024 6:25pm Perhaps Saint Kid should put his alliance with the Kennet’s - including thru their upcoming Court case they have tried to bury
Battle does not wish to remain with St Kilda
St Kilda is therefore better off without him
We want committed players who stand on support of the Club and their teammates
Which distinguishes Hill from Battle
Anyway I am very dissapointed with his decision but that's the way of things.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1049
- Joined: Tue 20 Oct 2015 5:52pm
- Has thanked: 170 times
- Been thanked: 239 times
Re: Battle
Good on you Roughead - basically ended Ben Paton's career by smashing his leg and has now been very instrumental in poaching Battle away from the Saints - his salary has a commission component for bringing in players - job well done, not
I suddenly have an intense hatred of Sam Mitchell and the Hawthorn Football Club - I sense the start of a bitter rivalry here, especially if we don't get the Band 1 compo!
I suddenly have an intense hatred of Sam Mitchell and the Hawthorn Football Club - I sense the start of a bitter rivalry here, especially if we don't get the Band 1 compo!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10505
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 148 times
- Been thanked: 1344 times
Re: Battle
Did I post that clown.The_Dud wrote: ↑Thu 29 Aug 2024 6:03pmYeah no you're right, Howard is better than Wilkie, everyone knows that...
Curly knows football!
Howard more often than not takes the best opposition tall forward.
The Dud The Negative
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19154
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1609 times
- Been thanked: 2030 times
Re: Battle
Howard’s best can be very good.
He just needs to know his limitations.
What pisses me off about this:
Our backline was a strength
It takes years to develop players and for supporters to see the benefits
Our list isn’t great and we can’t afford to lose good players and Battle will not be easy to replace
Hawks get Battle for free notwithstanding the salary take up
It makes Hawthorn instantly better which annoys me
Our compensation is unclear with the strong possibility that we will not get band 1
He just needs to know his limitations.
What pisses me off about this:
Our backline was a strength
It takes years to develop players and for supporters to see the benefits
Our list isn’t great and we can’t afford to lose good players and Battle will not be easy to replace
Hawks get Battle for free notwithstanding the salary take up
It makes Hawthorn instantly better which annoys me
Our compensation is unclear with the strong possibility that we will not get band 1
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- meher baba
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7223
- Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
- Location: Tasmania
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 516 times
Re: Battle
If Battle has truly left us for less money, then all I can say is "F--- you Josh Battle!"
And, as the Irish say, "May the road rise up to meet you...and smash you in the face!"
And, as for Hawthorn, I hope you lose every game of football for the next decade.
Apart from all that, I'm feeling pretty cool about it all.
And, as the Irish say, "May the road rise up to meet you...and smash you in the face!"
And, as for Hawthorn, I hope you lose every game of football for the next decade.
Apart from all that, I'm feeling pretty cool about it all.
"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
- Jonathan Swift
- Mr Magic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12798
- Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
- Has thanked: 811 times
- Been thanked: 433 times
Re: Battle
Something smells here.
Battle has said he’s looking after the future of his family.
If it’s true we offered more than the apparent deal he’s accepting from Hawthorn then how does that ‘look after the future of his family’?
There can only be 2 reasons why you would accept less to leave:-
1. You don’t want to stay
2. The reported deal you’re accepting is actually not the deal - there’s a side-deal component not being made public
Battle has said he’s looking after the future of his family.
If it’s true we offered more than the apparent deal he’s accepting from Hawthorn then how does that ‘look after the future of his family’?
There can only be 2 reasons why you would accept less to leave:-
1. You don’t want to stay
2. The reported deal you’re accepting is actually not the deal - there’s a side-deal component not being made public
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 791
- Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2022 3:22pm
- Has thanked: 87 times
- Been thanked: 145 times
Re: Battle
The AFL will have a s*** storm on its hands if we don't get Band 1. The Club should go thermonuclear if we don't and make its expectations clear to the AFL now.samuraisaint wrote: ↑Thu 29 Aug 2024 5:41pmNot just that - age comes into it, length of contract Hawthorn give him, and his performances - i.e. Top 5 in the B&F.WellardSaint wrote: ↑Thu 29 Aug 2024 4:09pm Saints want to try to get a 1st round compo pick, according to SaintsTV podcast.
Depends on how much $$ Hawks offer him.
The deal will be done on Oct 4 when trade window opens...
I think we should be eligible for first round compo. a 25 year old key defender is worth a high draft pick. The club should fight if this isn't forthcoming.
North got Band 1 (Pick 3) for McKay who is a very average key defender and clearly an inferior player than Battle.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 418
- Joined: Wed 01 May 2024 11:58pm
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 108 times
Re: Battle
I'm not exactly a Ross the Boss fan, but his key strength and focus as a coach is using his defensive structure to get the most out of players who aren't necessarily stars (only Sincs made the AA squad and he isn't exactly the most defensive defender). We conceded the 5th least points across the season and wheeloratings rated us as the second best defence overall.SaintPav wrote: ↑Thu 29 Aug 2024 7:13pm Howard’s best can be very good.
He just needs to know his limitations.
What pisses me off about this:
Our backline was a strength
It takes years to develop players and for supporters to see the benefits
Our list isn’t great and we can’t afford to lose good players and Battle will not be easy to replace
Hawks get Battle for free notwithstanding the salary take up
It makes Hawthorn instantly better which annoys me
Our compensation is unclear with the strong possibility that we will not get band 1
Losing Battle is a blow to that of course, but I am reasonably confident that players who are trained in that structure will step up and we won't be impacted as much as people might think.
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19154
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1609 times
- Been thanked: 2030 times
Re: Battle
Wilkie is 191cms.
Battle is 193cms.
Howard is 199cms and is deployed accordingly versus Wilkie and Battle.
Do not underestimate Howard and his importance (including his loss thru the front half of the season).
In regards the opinion that Hawthorn are a top Club, look at this:-
Essendon LOSS
Melbourne LOSS
Geelong LOSS
Carlton LOSS
GCS LOSS
North Melbourne WIN
Sydney LOSS
WB WIN (by 7 points)
StK WIN (by 9 points)
PA LOSS
Brisbane WIN
Adelaide WIN
GWS WIN (by 6 points)
Richmond WIN
WCE WIN
Geelong LOSS
Fremantle WIN (here)
Collingwood WIN
Adelaide WIN
GWS LOSS
Carlton WIN
Richmond WIN
North Melbourne WIN
Impressive, hey?
The credible wins were v Brisbane when Brisbane were not traveling well, GWS when they were not traveling well plus a couple of close wins v WB and St Kilda (in Tasmania in ordinary conditions).
We will see how long they last from here, with Battle in the Stands cheering them on.
5 of their wins were against serial AFL stragglers, NM, Richmond and WCE.
Battle is 193cms.
Howard is 199cms and is deployed accordingly versus Wilkie and Battle.
Do not underestimate Howard and his importance (including his loss thru the front half of the season).
In regards the opinion that Hawthorn are a top Club, look at this:-
Essendon LOSS
Melbourne LOSS
Geelong LOSS
Carlton LOSS
GCS LOSS
North Melbourne WIN
Sydney LOSS
WB WIN (by 7 points)
StK WIN (by 9 points)
PA LOSS
Brisbane WIN
Adelaide WIN
GWS WIN (by 6 points)
Richmond WIN
WCE WIN
Geelong LOSS
Fremantle WIN (here)
Collingwood WIN
Adelaide WIN
GWS LOSS
Carlton WIN
Richmond WIN
North Melbourne WIN
Impressive, hey?
The credible wins were v Brisbane when Brisbane were not traveling well, GWS when they were not traveling well plus a couple of close wins v WB and St Kilda (in Tasmania in ordinary conditions).
We will see how long they last from here, with Battle in the Stands cheering them on.
5 of their wins were against serial AFL stragglers, NM, Richmond and WCE.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9151
- Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
- Location: A distant beach
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 438 times
Re: Battle
Not everyone is on the same page as Lyon, and apparently there was a sour taste in some mouths at Ratten being sacked in that mannerMr Magic wrote: ↑Thu 29 Aug 2024 7:27pm Something smells here.
Battle has said he’s looking after the future of his family.
If it’s true we offered more than the apparent deal he’s accepting from Hawthorn then how does that ‘look after the future of his family’?
There can only be 2 reasons why you would accept less to leave:-
1. You don’t want to stay
2. The reported deal you’re accepting is actually not the deal - there’s a side-deal component not being made public
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19154
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1609 times
- Been thanked: 2030 times
Re: Battle
If it was up to some people Watters would still be coach.
Battle has publicly stated that Ross has been a big influence on his life.
Battle has publicly stated that Ross has been a big influence on his life.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23247
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 741 times
- Been thanked: 1800 times