Votes v Tigers

[avid]

Marshall
Sinclair
Wilkie
Battle
Membrey

[StPeter]

Marshall
Battle
Clark
Dow
Skunk

Scollop are you sure you recovered from your earlier post about having a couple (and I suggest more than a couple)?

The only person to omit Sinclair including both coaches who gave him votes.
His performance and stats and influence on the game I think put him well ahead of at least 3 of your selected players.
29 possessions, 9 marks, 8 score assists, 93.1% disposal efficiency, 396 metres gained, 116 fantasy points.

[Scollop]

Marshall
Battle
Clark
Dow
Skunk

Scollop are you sure you recovered from your earlier post about having a couple (and I suggest more than a couple)?

The only person to omit Sinclair including both coaches who gave him votes.
His performance and stats and influence on the game I think put him well ahead of at least 3 of your selected players.
29 possessions, 9 marks, 8 score assists, 93.1% disposal efficiency, 396 metres gained, 116 fantasy points.

I have a particular system I used this time around

It's called biased voting

[StPeter]

Marshall
Battle
Clark
Dow
Skunk

Scollop are you sure you recovered from your earlier post about having a couple (and I suggest more than a couple)?

The only person to omit Sinclair including both coaches who gave him votes.
His performance and stats and influence on the game I think put him well ahead of at least 3 of your selected players.
29 possessions, 9 marks, 8 score assists, 93.1% disposal efficiency, 396 metres gained, 116 fantasy points.

I have a particular system I used this time around

It's called biased voting

So you are admitting a bias against Sinclair?
Hardly seems fair.

[saintbob]

5 Marshall
4 Battle
3 Clark
2 Membrey
1 Sinclair

[Scollop]

So you are admitting a bias against Sinclair?
Hardly seems fair.

This week I wanted to acknowledge Clark, Dow and Membrey.

I do admit that I value contested possessions a lot more than uncontested. Brad Hill had 4 contested possessions. Sinclair had only 3. Sincs had zero clearances. He wasn't involved in stoppages and wasn't in at centre bounce this week.

It's not like Sincs didn't deserve votes. It's just my mood perhaps

I usually mark him down when he's getting a handful of easy touches from kicking out after a behind is scored. I'm the same with Nas. I mark him down if he's getting half a dozen touches simply from the kick outs.

I thought Clark was very important in that first half and he made a huge difference to our overall midfield compared to last week.

Clark got 10 touches in the second quarter. In one quarter alone he got 4 clearances including a ctre clearance; 4 contested possessions and 2 intercept possessions plus 4 score involvements. That's what stood out

The other thing that happens subconsciously, is that I expect Sincs to play well and mark him against some pretty high standards he's set the last 3 years.

[Sainter_Dad]

Almost there for the week!

[Sainter_Dad]

Down to a race of two