Saintsational Fan Forum - A passionate community of St Kilda Football Club fans discussing news, history, players, trade rumours, results, AFL stats and more.
takeaway wrote: ↑Tue 04 Jun 2024 8:50am
As illustrated by Super Duper
Have a look at Duggan's stats versus Wilkie and Sinclair. Are you really saying that Duggan deserves votes ahead of Wilkie and Sinclair?
That's the only way those 'illustrated' numbers work
Also...dingbat...antogoniser...what you're trying to argue is that the WCE Eagles coach is observant and rational by giving Wilkie best on ground...but the Saints coach doesn't rate Wilkie's game at all.
Dingbat!
Its the coaches' votes, not mine.
You lost me at the word "stats". You really do go overboard on "stats". Stats enough. Watch the game, man, that's what the coaches do.
The coaches' votes are now official and go into the record, who cares how the coaches actually voted, unless you want to try to find an angle to bag one of the coaches. It's only a guess anyway. Childish stuff.
I know I lost you... I know why your salty too and I know why you questioned me after The_Dud posted his initial post in this thread...
You get confused with numbers... don't you?
I enjoyed it when 'perfectionist' would post coaches votes. I thought I'd continue the tradition. He was one of the few who liked to work out the combinations. Never saw you do it ...dingbat!!
Once I explained it to you simply that there's no way the Saints coach gave Duggan 3... you were still trying to point out to saynta that my original thinking was wrong
takeaway wrote: ↑Tue 04 Jun 2024 8:50am
As illustrated by Super Duper
Have a look at Duggan's stats versus Wilkie and Sinclair. Are you really saying that Duggan deserves votes ahead of Wilkie and Sinclair?
That's the only way those 'illustrated' numbers work
Also...dingbat...antogoniser...what you're trying to argue is that the WCE Eagles coach is observant and rational by giving Wilkie best on ground...but the Saints coach doesn't rate Wilkie's game at all.
Dingbat!
Its the coaches' votes, not mine.
You lost me at the word "stats". You really do go overboard on "stats". Stats enough. Watch the game, man, that's what the coaches do.
The coaches' votes are now official and go into the record, who cares how the coaches actually voted, unless you want to try to find an angle to bag one of the coaches. It's only a guess anyway. Childish stuff.
I know I lost you... I know why your salty too and I know why you questioned me after The_Dud posted his initial post in this thread...
You get confused with numbers... don't you?
I enjoyed it when 'perfectionist' would post coaches votes. I thought I'd continue the tradition. He was one of the few who liked to work out the combinations. Never saw you do it ...dingbat!!
Once I explained it to you simply that there's no way the Saints coach gave Duggan 3... you were still trying to point out to saynta that my original thinking was wrong
Not "salty" at all. "Dingbat", antagonist, etc points to the fact that you are salty one!
Glad you admitted that there are several combinations possible - that's all I was pointing out, not just your "interpretation". Try to remember that, the next time you get your abacus out after coaches' votes.
bigcarl wrote: ↑Mon 03 Jun 2024 9:07pm
Surprised with no love for Windy since his move on to Reid essentially won us the match.
Not sure how many other players in the comp can do a job on a rampaging Reid … or a Nick Daicos. Windhager has stitched the both of them up this season. That’s a handy card to have up our sleeves.
Usually I much prefer the attacking, ball-winning type of game-changer, but there’s more than one way to skin a cat.
Windy probably deserved a vote (I gave him one), but I wouldn't say he won us the game. Reid has torn every game he's played apart in the first half and always fades after the big break. He needs to develop a tank. Watch out when he does!
takeaway wrote: ↑Tue 04 Jun 2024 8:50am
As illustrated by Super Duper
Have a look at Duggan's stats versus Wilkie and Sinclair. Are you really saying that Duggan deserves votes ahead of Wilkie and Sinclair?
That's the only way those 'illustrated' numbers work
Also...dingbat...antogoniser...what you're trying to argue is that the WCE Eagles coach is observant and rational by giving Wilkie best on ground...but the Saints coach doesn't rate Wilkie's game at all.
Dingbat!
Its the coaches' votes, not mine.
You lost me at the word "stats". You really do go overboard on "stats". Stats enough. Watch the game, man, that's what the coaches do.
The coaches' votes are now official and go into the record, who cares how the coaches actually voted, unless you want to try to find an angle to bag one of the coaches. It's only a guess anyway. Childish stuff.
I know I lost you... I know why your salty too and I know why you questioned me after The_Dud posted his initial post in this thread...
You get confused with numbers... don't you?
I enjoyed it when 'perfectionist' would post coaches votes. I thought I'd continue the tradition. He was one of the few who liked to work out the combinations. Never saw you do it ...dingbat!!
Once I explained it to you simply that there's no way the Saints coach gave Duggan 3... you were still trying to point out to saynta that my original thinking was wrong
Not "salty" at all. "Dingbat", antagonist, etc points to the fact that you are salty one!
Glad you admitted that there are several combinations possible - that's all I was pointing out, not just your "interpretation". Try to remember that, the next time you get your abacus out after coaches' votes.
"abacus"... that's good
Stick to the humour and try not to post when numbers are involved
Scollop wrote: ↑Tue 04 Jun 2024 12:39pm
"abacus"... that's good
Stick to the humour and try not to post when numbers are involved
Oh...and combinations need justification
Problem is there is no way to prove your "justification", it is just your view, others may think otherwise, and it doesn't really matter anyway.
Bit of a waste of time really.
Scollop wrote: ↑Tue 04 Jun 2024 12:39pm
"abacus"... that's good
Stick to the humour and try not to post when numbers are involved
Oh...and combinations need justification
Problem is there is no way to prove your "justification", it is just your view, others may think otherwise, and it doesn't really matter anyway.
Bit of a waste of time really.
Have a look at my very first post. I said "I think" this is how they voted
Why didn't you just post your configuration with your specific reasoning... instead of wasting everyone's time
bigcarl wrote: ↑Mon 03 Jun 2024 9:07pm
Surprised with no love for Windy since his move on to Reid essentially won us the match.
Not sure how many other players in the comp can do a job on a rampaging Reid … or a Nick Daicos. Windhager has stitched the both of them up this season. That’s a handy card to have up our sleeves.
Usually I much prefer the attacking, ball-winning type of game-changer, but there’s more than one way to skin a cat.
Windy probably deserved a vote (I gave him one), but I wouldn't say he won us the game. Reid has torn every game he's played apart in the first half and always fades after the big break. He needs to develop a tank. Watch out when he does!
Well we all see it differently and that’s ok. For mine, once he stopped Reid the result was never in doubt, so I gave him BOG.
While I’ve got you, and knowing you are an avid watcher of Sandi, how far off would you think Arie Schoenmaker is and what sort of a role would you envisage as his best.
While I’ve got you, and knowing you are an avid watcher of Sandi, how far off would you think Arie Schoenmaker is and what sort of a role would you envisage as his best.
Arie is probably likely to get a game soon if he presents himself into the game more, as he is doing now.
Early on he just looked for space and picked up easy possessions.
He'll probably get a game down back, where he can use his booming boot.
