Windhager
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 747
- Joined: Thu 06 Dec 2007 3:14pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 118 times
Windhager
Windhager has been OK this year but not as good as last year. Others have dropped off far more than he has therefore has probably run a bit under the radar. He has been OK and deserved his spot. But not a standout.
Last year he was doing tagging roles and run with roles. This year not so much.
Today was a great example.
Q1 - 1 handball 1 tackle
Q2. - 5 disposals no tackles
At half time Windhager given the tagging role of Harley Reid
Q3 5 disposals 4 tackles 4 clearances.
Q4 7 disposals 3 tackles 2 clearances
Harley down had 3 possessions). No clearances after being completely dominant in the first half.
Well done Windhager. I hope that you have more tagging roles.
The game needs to be learnt. One way is to shut out great players.
Last year he was doing tagging roles and run with roles. This year not so much.
Today was a great example.
Q1 - 1 handball 1 tackle
Q2. - 5 disposals no tackles
At half time Windhager given the tagging role of Harley Reid
Q3 5 disposals 4 tackles 4 clearances.
Q4 7 disposals 3 tackles 2 clearances
Harley down had 3 possessions). No clearances after being completely dominant in the first half.
Well done Windhager. I hope that you have more tagging roles.
The game needs to be learnt. One way is to shut out great players.
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14060
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1315 times
- Been thanked: 2093 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23164
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9113 times
- Been thanked: 3951 times
Re: Windhager
And at quarter time Steele had not touched the ball
Plus Ross only touched it 6 times all game - and Webster who I assume was on Cripps, had it 7 times all game
These players being among our most experienced
Windhager stood up in the second half
So, as a run with player, has he done Ross and Steele out of their jobs?
And the “small defender” remains a problem
Plus Ross only touched it 6 times all game - and Webster who I assume was on Cripps, had it 7 times all game
These players being among our most experienced
Windhager stood up in the second half
So, as a run with player, has he done Ross and Steele out of their jobs?
And the “small defender” remains a problem
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12768
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2721 times
Re: Windhager
First half he was across HB - has no idea how to play there
Is an inside mid/tagger
We had an AA hb playing as an inside mid and Windhager playing hb
They had 1 bull mid capable of being damaging - we put our smallest, most offensive mid to him.
All week to plan - and come up with that?!
Are you fkn serious
Is an inside mid/tagger
We had an AA hb playing as an inside mid and Windhager playing hb
They had 1 bull mid capable of being damaging - we put our smallest, most offensive mid to him.
All week to plan - and come up with that?!
Are you fkn serious
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23164
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9113 times
- Been thanked: 3951 times
Re: Windhager
Hmmm. Interesting. Food for thought.Killa wrote: ↑Sat 01 Jun 2024 11:38pm And at quarter time Steele had not touched the ball
Plus Ross only touched it 6 times all game - and Webster who I assume was on Cripps, had it 7 times all game
These players being among our most experienced
Windhager stood up in the second half
So, as a run with player, has he done Ross and Steele out of their jobs?
And the “small defender” remains a problem
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12768
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2721 times
Re: Windhager
Webster was on Ryan - kept falling over
Ross was on a wing - as you would put an inside mid with average disposal in that role!
Ross was on a wing - as you would put an inside mid with average disposal in that role!
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2787
- Joined: Sun 25 Apr 2021 9:43pm
- Has thanked: 707 times
- Been thanked: 784 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23164
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9113 times
- Been thanked: 3951 times
Re: Windhager
Maybe. Not as far fetched as it sounds.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18655
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1994 times
- Been thanked: 873 times
Re: Windhager
Tagging seems to bring out the best in him where he not only beats his opponent, but wins a lot of his own ball as well.
Who was it he did a job on against Pies? De Goey?
Who was it he did a job on against Pies? De Goey?
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12768
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2721 times
Re: Windhager
It was Daicos
Ross had DeGoey
Surprise- we put our inside mids inside with roles - we perform well
Ross had DeGoey
Surprise- we put our inside mids inside with roles - we perform well
- mbogo
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2499
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:40pm
- Location: Hogwarts
- Been thanked: 32 times
Re: Windhager
Nick Daicos .. beat him clearly all day
This is a team game and there is no room for individuals who think they are above walking through the fire.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1304
- Joined: Thu 22 Jun 2006 4:03pm
- Location: StKilda East
- Has thanked: 50 times
- Been thanked: 233 times
- Contact:
Re: Windhager
It has been obvious to me for at least 3 seasons now, that Windhager plays his best when given a tagger/run-with role.
He has been found wanting when tried in other positions, especially half-back. Why do they persist in trying him there?
He has been found wanting when tried in other positions, especially half-back. Why do they persist in trying him there?
Re: Windhager
And there is the knock I have always had on Webster
He loses his feet in a game where you need to stay on your feet
Plus, being left footed, his disposal has the grace left footers seem to have - except where do they finish up?
From TV coverage (and the rubbish which is commentary) who our back 6/7 were was unknown as was who they were responsible for
We know Howard, Willie and Battle were back there
Plus Webster, Wanganeen-Milera and Bonner
So that is 6, allowing for any interchanges
And it was their “smalls” who got shots on goal
He loses his feet in a game where you need to stay on your feet
Plus, being left footed, his disposal has the grace left footers seem to have - except where do they finish up?
From TV coverage (and the rubbish which is commentary) who our back 6/7 were was unknown as was who they were responsible for
We know Howard, Willie and Battle were back there
Plus Webster, Wanganeen-Milera and Bonner
So that is 6, allowing for any interchanges
And it was their “smalls” who got shots on goal
- perfectionist
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9054
- Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
- Has thanked: 60 times
- Been thanked: 353 times
Re: Windhager
Jack Steele was on Reid in the first quarter and kept him quiet. Steele was released in the second quarter and Dow went to Reid. Worked alright most of the time until WC had a dominant period at the centre bounce and Reid, being untagged and alone on the defensive side of the ball up, capitalised. Windhager had been poor until then. Whilst he can get to the fall of the ball, he is not strong enough to break free and his handball skills not good enough from a pack to set others running. He is a lot better when he doesn't actually get the ball but prevents someone who could hurt us getting it as well. That's what he did in the third quarter. He was helped by the fact that Reid lost concentration after the sling of Wilson. You could see it on his face. Windhager capitalised and got kicks himself. One thing about tagging a good player is that they take you to the ball. The other winning "move" in the last quarter was the injury to King. We kicked 5 goals in the last having kicked 7 in the first three.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12768
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2721 times
Re: Windhager
Steele was getting tagged by Dom Sheed from the first bounce
Simpson said so in his presser
Kept Steele to 18 touches (zero in the First) which Simpson was happy with.
In true Steel style, getting tagged - still got his hands dirty with game high 15 tackles
Simpson said so in his presser
Kept Steele to 18 touches (zero in the First) which Simpson was happy with.
In true Steel style, getting tagged - still got his hands dirty with game high 15 tackles
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4673
- Joined: Tue 22 Jan 2008 5:41pm
- Has thanked: 425 times
- Been thanked: 518 times
Re: Windhager
Windhager was mainly playing extra man (7 backs) across back half during first half. He only picked up an actual player when either Bonner or Nasiah left their player to advance the ball through the centre or were having a rest on the pine. Plus he went onto Ryan briefly when Webster was off the ground for a period (Jimmy went down the race to get some attention). So Windhager was more a loose player in defense, not permanently positioned as a half back flanker.
I was at the game - you don’t pick up such nuances off TV. Obviously the commentators didn’t pick it up also.
I assume he was played in the back half to try and have a harder bodied player to pick up smalls - missing Stocker there folks!!
I was at the game - you don’t pick up such nuances off TV. Obviously the commentators didn’t pick it up also.
I assume he was played in the back half to try and have a harder bodied player to pick up smalls - missing Stocker there folks!!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12768
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2721 times
Re: Windhager
Just a thought?!
Wouldn’t Sinclair be a bit better in that role?
Given he is an AA half back!
And Windy be a bit more suited to the midfield- as he has played his best footy there!
Wouldn’t Sinclair be a bit better in that role?
Given he is an AA half back!
And Windy be a bit more suited to the midfield- as he has played his best footy there!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18655
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1994 times
- Been thanked: 873 times
Re: Windhager
Ross will be furious that his tanking plans have come unstuck.saynta wrote: ↑Sat 01 Jun 2024 11:55pmMaybe. Not as far fetched as it sounds.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12109
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3711 times
- Been thanked: 2580 times
Re: Windhager
Good observationsperfectionist wrote: ↑Sun 02 Jun 2024 9:34am Jack Steele was on Reid in the first quarter and kept him quiet. Steele was released in the second quarter and Dow went to Reid. Worked alright most of the time until WC had a dominant period at the centre bounce and Reid, being untagged and alone on the defensive side of the ball up, capitalised. Windhager had been poor until then. Whilst he can get to the fall of the ball, he is not strong enough to break free and his handball skills not good enough from a pack to set others running. He is a lot better when he doesn't actually get the ball but prevents someone who could hurt us getting it as well. That's what he did in the third quarter. He was helped by the fact that Reid lost concentration after the sling of Wilson. You could see it on his face. Windhager capitalised and got kicks himself. One thing about tagging a good player is that they take you to the ball. The other winning "move" in the last quarter was the injury to King. We kicked 5 goals in the last having kicked 7 in the first three.
David King said in the closing minute or just after the final siren...that "Windhager was the difference. He won them the match"
The sheople listened and voted accordingly
It's interesting how many times people take their cues (look up the word if you don't understand what I mean) from commentators. Obviously...it's easier than thinking for yourself
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23164
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9113 times
- Been thanked: 3951 times
Re: Windhager
.. Yep, took his eyes off the ball and let his assistants have a free run for once.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1078
- Joined: Mon 20 Jan 2020 7:38am
- Has thanked: 64 times
- Been thanked: 318 times
Re: Windhager
Interesting take.Scollop wrote: ↑Sun 02 Jun 2024 6:45pmGood observationsperfectionist wrote: ↑Sun 02 Jun 2024 9:34am Jack Steele was on Reid in the first quarter and kept him quiet. Steele was released in the second quarter and Dow went to Reid. Worked alright most of the time until WC had a dominant period at the centre bounce and Reid, being untagged and alone on the defensive side of the ball up, capitalised. Windhager had been poor until then. Whilst he can get to the fall of the ball, he is not strong enough to break free and his handball skills not good enough from a pack to set others running. He is a lot better when he doesn't actually get the ball but prevents someone who could hurt us getting it as well. That's what he did in the third quarter. He was helped by the fact that Reid lost concentration after the sling of Wilson. You could see it on his face. Windhager capitalised and got kicks himself. One thing about tagging a good player is that they take you to the ball. The other winning "move" in the last quarter was the injury to King. We kicked 5 goals in the last having kicked 7 in the first three.
David King said in the closing minute or just after the final siren...that "Windhager was the difference. He won them the match"
The sheople listened and voted accordingly
It's interesting how many times people take their cues (look up the word if you don't understand what I mean) from commentators. Obviously...it's easier than thinking for yourself
Mine.
The sign tackle occurred because he was frustrated and had lost concentration already due to the close checking he was receiving.
Disclaimer: posts are my views and shouldn't be taken as fact, even if I am in fact right.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12109
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3711 times
- Been thanked: 2580 times
Re: Windhager
The tackle occurred before half-time. Windhager wasn't on him at that stagenostalgicsaint wrote: ↑Sun 02 Jun 2024 6:50pmInteresting take.Scollop wrote: ↑Sun 02 Jun 2024 6:45pmGood observationsperfectionist wrote: ↑Sun 02 Jun 2024 9:34am Jack Steele was on Reid in the first quarter and kept him quiet. Steele was released in the second quarter and Dow went to Reid. Worked alright most of the time until WC had a dominant period at the centre bounce and Reid, being untagged and alone on the defensive side of the ball up, capitalised. Windhager had been poor until then. Whilst he can get to the fall of the ball, he is not strong enough to break free and his handball skills not good enough from a pack to set others running. He is a lot better when he doesn't actually get the ball but prevents someone who could hurt us getting it as well. That's what he did in the third quarter. He was helped by the fact that Reid lost concentration after the sling of Wilson. You could see it on his face. Windhager capitalised and got kicks himself. One thing about tagging a good player is that they take you to the ball. The other winning "move" in the last quarter was the injury to King. We kicked 5 goals in the last having kicked 7 in the first three.
David King said in the closing minute or just after the final siren...that "Windhager was the difference. He won them the match"
The sheople listened and voted accordingly
It's interesting how many times people take their cues (look up the word if you don't understand what I mean) from commentators. Obviously...it's easier than thinking for yourself
Mine.
The sign tackle occurred because he was frustrated and had lost concentration already due to the close checking he was receiving.
The changing of the magnets was after that
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18655
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1994 times
- Been thanked: 873 times
Re: Windhager
You sure? I don’t think that’s rightScollop wrote: ↑Sun 02 Jun 2024 6:57pmThe tackle occurred before half-time. Windhager wasn't on him at that stagenostalgicsaint wrote: ↑Sun 02 Jun 2024 6:50pmInteresting take.Scollop wrote: ↑Sun 02 Jun 2024 6:45pmGood observationsperfectionist wrote: ↑Sun 02 Jun 2024 9:34am Jack Steele was on Reid in the first quarter and kept him quiet. Steele was released in the second quarter and Dow went to Reid. Worked alright most of the time until WC had a dominant period at the centre bounce and Reid, being untagged and alone on the defensive side of the ball up, capitalised. Windhager had been poor until then. Whilst he can get to the fall of the ball, he is not strong enough to break free and his handball skills not good enough from a pack to set others running. He is a lot better when he doesn't actually get the ball but prevents someone who could hurt us getting it as well. That's what he did in the third quarter. He was helped by the fact that Reid lost concentration after the sling of Wilson. You could see it on his face. Windhager capitalised and got kicks himself. One thing about tagging a good player is that they take you to the ball. The other winning "move" in the last quarter was the injury to King. We kicked 5 goals in the last having kicked 7 in the first three.
David King said in the closing minute or just after the final siren...that "Windhager was the difference. He won them the match"
The sheople listened and voted accordingly
It's interesting how many times people take their cues (look up the word if you don't understand what I mean) from commentators. Obviously...it's easier than thinking for yourself
Mine.
The sign tackle occurred because he was frustrated and had lost concentration already due to the close checking he was receiving.
The changing of the magnets was after that
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12109
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3711 times
- Been thanked: 2580 times
Re: Windhager
I'm surebigcarl wrote: ↑Sun 02 Jun 2024 7:02pmYou sure? I don’t think that’s rightScollop wrote: ↑Sun 02 Jun 2024 6:57pmThe tackle occurred before half-time. Windhager wasn't on him at that stagenostalgicsaint wrote: ↑Sun 02 Jun 2024 6:50pmInteresting take.Scollop wrote: ↑Sun 02 Jun 2024 6:45pmGood observationsperfectionist wrote: ↑Sun 02 Jun 2024 9:34am Jack Steele was on Reid in the first quarter and kept him quiet. Steele was released in the second quarter and Dow went to Reid. Worked alright most of the time until WC had a dominant period at the centre bounce and Reid, being untagged and alone on the defensive side of the ball up, capitalised. Windhager had been poor until then. Whilst he can get to the fall of the ball, he is not strong enough to break free and his handball skills not good enough from a pack to set others running. He is a lot better when he doesn't actually get the ball but prevents someone who could hurt us getting it as well. That's what he did in the third quarter. He was helped by the fact that Reid lost concentration after the sling of Wilson. You could see it on his face. Windhager capitalised and got kicks himself. One thing about tagging a good player is that they take you to the ball. The other winning "move" in the last quarter was the injury to King. We kicked 5 goals in the last having kicked 7 in the first three.
David King said in the closing minute or just after the final siren...that "Windhager was the difference. He won them the match"
The sheople listened and voted accordingly
It's interesting how many times people take their cues (look up the word if you don't understand what I mean) from commentators. Obviously...it's easier than thinking for yourself
Mine.
The sign tackle occurred because he was frustrated and had lost concentration already due to the close checking he was receiving.
The changing of the magnets was after that
You can watch the replay. It happened just before half time. Also Simpson made mention of 'what he said to Harley' during the long break.