So is this rebuild mark 4 now?
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- SydneySainter
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2428
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2007 6:59pm
- Has thanked: 54 times
- Been thanked: 160 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12738
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2716 times
- SydneySainter
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2428
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2007 6:59pm
- Has thanked: 54 times
- Been thanked: 160 times
Re: So is this rebuild mark 4 now?
I honestly can’t think of a first round pick that has delivered since Goddard.
Gresh was close, but no longer on our books?
Anyone?
Gresh was close, but no longer on our books?
Anyone?
Bad management is bad management
- bobmurray
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7933
- Joined: Mon 03 Oct 2005 11:08pm
- Location: In the stand at RSEA Park.
- Has thanked: 548 times
- Been thanked: 252 times
Re: So is this rebuild mark 4 now?
It's year 58 of the rebuild, and continuing. Can't believe this inept mob are supposedly offering 1.5 Mil for a KPD. Let failure continue i say.
How many defenders will The Saints pick in the 2024 draft ?
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 418
- Joined: Wed 01 May 2024 11:58pm
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 108 times
Re: So is this rebuild mark 4 now?
Might be a bit of a hot take, but what would we take in terms of draft picks for Marshall? Appreciate we don't really have a replacement, but while he gets alot of positions and clearances, I think they might actually make us a worse team. Too many disposals are snatched out of the ruck hack kicks to no-one when our midfielders would probably use it better running in to space (or at least facing the goals), as evidenced by his score involvements being below average and direct assists are poor.
- samoht
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5878
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:45am
- Location: https://www.amazon.com.au/Fugitive-Sold ... B00EO1GCNK
- Has thanked: 615 times
- Been thanked: 460 times
- Contact:
Re: So is this rebuild mark 4 now?
St Kilda must have a chronic aversion to drafting/recruiting quality midfielders. It is the only conclusion, bobmurray.
We will continue to look for other types to draft or splurge on, outside of what our team really needs and has needed for years ... that's the message.
Go figure.
And we support this outfit ... we should be in charge of it (we're probably the right people to do the rebuild, jays)!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 538
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2018 9:49pm
- Has thanked: 110 times
- Been thanked: 128 times
Re: So is this rebuild mark 4 now?
If we spent as much time concentrating on drafting and development as we do on every social cause (wank), then we’d be undefeated the last 15 years.samoht wrote: ↑Sun 19 May 2024 9:46amSt Kilda must have a chronic aversion to drafting/recruiting quality midfielders. It is the only conclusion.
We will continue to look for other types to draft or splurge on, outside of what our team really needs and has needed for years ... that's the message.
Go figure.
And we support this outfit ... we should be in charge of it!
Seriously, changing the name of the club to a ridiculous name. This isn’t for ‘one’ round either.
Wasn’t long ago we were promoting men being allowed into womens toilets at Marvel.
We are a turd of a club. Get exactly what we deserve. The normal people of the world get frustrated with this nonsense. A higher proportion of St Kilda supporters cheer it on, so you cannot get upset when these are the results.
When St Kilda is on the brink of folding in a few years (another North in waiting on-field), the dogooders still won’t get it.